Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSA_179_Chamber_Peirce.2Requested, by and when re d mail to: 131.1171; LOCAL AGENCY FORMATiON COMMISSION 2770 Clive Highway, Suite C, Oroville, CA 95966-6117 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION �Illlllllllillllllillllllill 111111 2002-0053065 Recorded i REC FEE see Official Records # CONFORM : o@ Count�r��� Of i BUTTE CAN ACE I GRUBBS 1 Recorder i ROSEMARY D I CKSON I Assistant 1 Cheryl f 2: l 74PM 109 -Oct -2002 I Page I of 7 I, PAULA LEASURE, the Executive Officer of the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission. herehy certify ihat the Cotiiily has completed a change of organization ptirsuant to the Cortese -Knox -Hertzberg Local Governmcnt Reorganization Act of 2000, as follows: The name of the County is: Butte County The name of the County or Counties in which the entire County is located is: Butte County The change of organization completed is: _ Reorganization Inhabited X Formation X Uninhabited The short title, if any, of the above-mentioned proceeding is: 02-35 - Formation of CSA No. 179 (Chambers & Speedway Subdivisions) The legal description of the territory for which this Certificate is being written is set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". The map of the territory for which this Certificate is being written is set forth in the attached Exhibit B" The change of organization was: Ordered without an election and the Resolution ordering the change of organization was X adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission on September 5. 2002. Confirmed by the voters and the Resolution confirming the change of organization after confirmation by the voters was adopted by the governing Board of the District/City on Local Agency Formation Commission Datcd: October 9, 2002 13y Jnmiarv,• 1994 Paula Leasure, Executive Officer 7 eP RESOLUTION N0.09 2002/03 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTEMAKING DETERNIINATIONS AND APPROVING THE ESTABLISHME NT OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS 02-35 FORMATION OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO.179 CHAMBERS/SPEEDWAY SUBDIVISIONS RESOLVED, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte, State of California, that WHEREAS, a resolution of application for the proposed formation ' . P P of a county service area in the County of Butte was heretofore filed* by the Butte CountyB • Board of Supervisors and was accepted for filing on July 30, 2002, by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 61 Division 1, commencingwith Section on 56404 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer, pursuant to Government Cod ' 5e � � � _ e Section X6658, set September.5, as the hearing date and gave the required notice of ' q public hearing; and W$EREAS, the Executive Officer, pursuant to Government Code • Section 56665, has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including her recommendations ndatlons thereon, and has fi.irnished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy; and WHEREAS, this Commission called for and held aublic hearing g on September 5, 2002 and at the hearing this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons present were given an opportunity un• ty to hear and be heard with respect to thisro osal and the report P P P of the Executive Officer; and WHEREAS, this Commission considered the factors determined' by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to factor ' s specified in Government Code Section 56668; and NOW THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte DOES NOW RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER, as follows: Section 1. Environmental Findings: A. The County Commission finds that the formation of the Service Area for the operation and maintenance of existing storm drain facilities firep rotection facilities and street lighting is consistent with thea roved County subdivision pp ty subdivision plans and associated environmental documents and is consideredCategori' cally Exempt from the California Environmental QualityAct(CEQA)u pursuant to Section 153011) Existing Facilities, which exempts the operation, P p n, m alntenance and repair of existing public or private facilities involving negligible r n . g gligi o 0 expansion of use beyond that what is exists. RESOLUTION No. 09 2002/03 Section 2. General Findings and/or Conditions: A. The Commission has considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including, but not limited to Sphere of Influence , � p uence and General Plan consistency, and other factors specified in Government C . P ode Section 56841 and as described in the staff report dated August 19 2002 P gu for the meeting of September 5, 2002. B. The Commission recognizes that the conversion of agricultural land for gn this proposal has been considered by the County of Butte General Plan Land Use Element, the subsequent approval of the residential(SR-1) zoningand the subsequent approved subdivision of the parcel. The CSA formation is consistent with the approved development plans and conforms to the County of Butte General Plan. C. The formation of County Service Area No. 179 is for the operation and maintenance of storm drainage facilities, fire protection facilities and street lighting services for the 17 lot residential subdivisions. D. The subject territory includes approximately 17 acres of private property - p P perty identified as APN's 040-640-001 through 009 and 040-040-075 through 082 and is assigned the following distinctive short term designation: 02-3 5 - Formation of County Service Area No. 179(Chambers/Speedway Subdivisions). E. The Sphere of Influence shall be coterminous with the boundary of the county senice area. F. As this formation has been initiated by the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 02-122 and has been supported by the affected landowners through the Ballot Proceeding identified in Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 02-119 pursuant to Government Code Section 56663, the Commission waives theublic hearing g and notice requirements and approves the formation of County Service Area No. 179 (Chambers/Speedway Subdivisions). Section 3. Conditions adopted by LAFCo: A. All Butte County and State of California fees must be paid in full prior to filing the Certificate of Completion. B. The map and legal description shall comply with the Department of Public P Works and State Board of Equalization requirements. Page 2 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 09 2002/03 C. The legal description and map, if rejected by the State Board of Equalization or amended by action of the Commission, will be revised at the expense of the . applicant Section 4. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this Resolution in the manner and as provided in Section 56882 of the Government Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte, on the 5 day of September 2002, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Dolan, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: None ABSTAINS: None ABSENT: None Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 179 ANNEXATION SPEEDWAY SUBDIVISION AND CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE COUN'Iy OF BU1TE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCR7BID AS FOLLOWS: THE SPEEDWAY SUBDrV SION RECORD mEv�Eco oF8TI]F-d4s STATE of CALIFORNIA.,ON S ER 252 1997, IN BOOK 142 of MAPS PAGES 53, 54, & 55, AND TSE ERS SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN TBE COUNTY of B STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MAY 3, 1994, IN BOOK 13 Q OF MAPS, PAGES 94, 95 & 96, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT A BUTTE COUNTY MONUMENT AT -THE IlVTE'�E�QNS OF THE CENTERLINESOF SPEEDWAY LANE AND NEW FOSTER PLACE; THENCE NORTH 67° 19'00" EAST ALONG THE EEDSP C IrtE OF S AIQ WAY LADE, A DISTANCE OF 263.82 FEET; TH]ENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE SO " SOUTH 28 1 d 00 EAST TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNEROF CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 30.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEG G• s THENCE SOUTH 28010700" EAST ALONG THE NORTBEASTERLy BOUNDARY LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CO OF SAID CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 727.87 FEET; ' 'THENCE SOUTH 62007'00" WEST ALONG TIS SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION AND SPEEDWAY SUBDIVISIONA DISTANCE OF 978.06 FFE"I' TO THE MOST SOUTE�RL, y CORNER OF SAID SPEEDWAY SUBDIVISION; CE NORTH 2V10"00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE, TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SPEEDWAY SUBDMSION, A DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET; CE NORTH 67° 19'00" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARYL INE OF SAID SPEEDWAY SUBDIVISION AND ERS SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 982.54 FEET TO THE TRUE pO]NT OF BEG Cr CONTAINING 17.342 ACRES, MORE OR LESSEF r Q"S� PAGE 1 OF I o. 12 f f CAV, suoiswpgng AempeedS +g siagwey� 6L 6# VSO joJ deVy e3!S L jo L a ed `Z I!q!qx3 oo.-nn 005Z• L 38ed ooz 006 0 0 L aodu. /:,god xr"- �N vi-os' U0040 0"s 1801 Z8'E9Z ISU uOO.6LeL9 WON speou /A\ / I Aiepun% 61 W VSO s1a0Jed s91111!3e=1 uoiPaIoad aJiA saa��i3e1 a6euieJQ pueBeal THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL FILE AN OF RECORD IN THIS OFFICE. ATTEST: 20 Paula Leasure Executive Officer of the Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission. SAW— "FWAX«A�� i i11 BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Minutes of September 5, 2002 A. Call to Order Chair Leverenz called the meeting to order at 9:02 a.m., September 5, 2002, in the Butte County Board of Supervisor's Chambers, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Dolan, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz Absent: None Others Present: Paula Leasure, Executive Officer Stephen Lucas, Senior Planner Barbra Duncan, Administrative Analyst Alternate Commissioner Hunter Clif Sellers, City of Chico Ruben Duran, City of Oroville Jo Sherman, City of Oroville B. Business Items: CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of the Minutes of August 1, 2002 2. 02-14 - Annexation of Buckland Subdivision to CSA No. 23 It was moved by Commissioner Keene, seconded by Commissioner Beck, and carried to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Dolan, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None ITEMS WITH PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. 02-33 - City of Chico - Connors Court Annexation No. 1 Continued from August 1, 2002 Chair Leverenz said he has been informed that the City of Chico has requested this item either be continued or dropped from the Commission's calendar. In orderfor the City to bring the same annexation before the Commission again within a year, the Commission must specify that their action is taken "without prejudice." It was moved by Commissioner Beeler, seconded by Commissioner Keene, and unanimously carried to drop Connors Court Annexation No. 1 from the Commissioner's calendar without prejudice. 4. 02-28 - City of Chico - Holly Avenue Annexation No. 4 Steve Lucas, LAFCo Senior Planner, said the annexation was initiated by the City of Chico for a single parcel (APN 043-620-005 - Burton). LAFCo staff contacted the surrounding property owners to ask if they were interested in being included in the annexation. No responses to the solicitation were received. Therefore, staff has recommended the inclusion of the additional parcels in the annexation area. He said the Butte County Elections Office, Sheriffs Office and CDF/Butte County Fire have expressed support for the inclusion of the additional parcels to keep the parcels under one jurisdiction. Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the public. Dennis Strubb, 2330 Holly Avenue, said the area proposed for annexation is a rural area where property owners raise gardens and bum their own garden refuse. He said annexation to the City would create a financial hardship on the property owners as they would be disallowed to burn their own green waste. He added that he has no desire to be a part of the City of Chico. Commissioner Keene explained that the City of Chico does have a utility user's tax that is slightly higher than the County's, but, upon annexation, existing taxes to service areas are no longer paid by parcel owners. As far as agricultural burning is concerned, parcels annexed to the City are allowed to be "grand fathered" in and agricultural burning is allowed to continue. Chair Leverenz further explained that one of LAFCo's main responsibilities from the State legislature is to provide for orderly growth and to discourage "pockets" or "islands" of mixed jurisdictions for fire and police protection, and administration of streets, etc. Commissioner Dolan advised that a majority of the property owners could stop the annexation. In this proposal, if seven (7) or more of the registered voters signed a protest, the annexation would be terminated. She said this information should be provided to property owners and registered voters within annexation areas. Paula Leasure, Executive Officer, said the Commission could make a determination of whether to include the additional parcels as recommended by staff, or to allow the single parcel to annex. If the Commission chooses to recommend the approval of all .the parcels, then staff will provide a public notice ad in the newspaper as well as notify all of the residents and registered voters in the area of the time and date of a protest hearing. In approximately forty-five (45) days, the Executive Officer would then hold the protest hearing where official protests can be registered or the residents may mail their official written protests to the LAFCo office. Commissioner Keene recommended that the City of Chico schedule a neighborhood meeting to further discuss the impacts of annexation. Mr. Lucas said if there was a successful protest of the annexation, the parcel owner (Burton) who requested to be annexed originally would also be rejected. Ms. Leasure said in the past when similar situations occurred, the Commission determined that if there were a protest, the single parcel would be allowed to annex. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ Minutes of September 5, 2002 ■ Page 2 ■ Commissioner Dolan said she believes there are many benefits to annexation, but the Commission does take the residents views into consideration and if the majority of residents oppose it, there is a legal way to stop it. Friedel Reber, 626 W. 12th Avenue, said she had questions concerning the costs of annexation and hooking up to the city sewer system. Clif Sellers, City of Chico Assistant Community Development Director, said the capacity and hook up fees are calculated by the City Public Works Department. He recalled a recent sewer hook up to a parcel on W. 121h Avenue that cost approximately $4,500 in connection fees. Chair Leverenz closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Lucas said the Commission may choose to single out the Burton parcel for annexation at this time or go forward with the protest hearing. The Commission can specify that if the annexation fails due to a successful protest, the Commission would authorize the single parcel to annex. It was moved by Commissioner Hall, seconded by Commissioner Keene, to adopt Resolution No. 6 2002/03 approving the Holly Avenue Annexation No. 4 with the findings and conditions as stated in the Executive Officer's Report and Recommendation dated August 23,2002; and to direct the Executive Officer to set the proposal for a protest hearing, with the provision that if there is a successful protest for the entire eight (8) parcel annexation, the single Burton parcel would be annexed. Commissioner Keene invited the Holly Avenue property owners to call Clif Sellers, Assistant Community Development Director of the City of Chico, for answers to their annexation questions. Jo Sherman, City of Oroville Planning Manager, said the City of Oroville is beginning to look at several possible annexation areas and whether or not to include additional properties. She asked if an applicants processing fees would increase if additional parcels were added to an annexation area. She wanted to know If the annexation failed at the protest hearing level and the original applicant's parcel was the only parcel annexed would the applicant and/or the City incur Increased costs? Ms. Leasure said it would depend on how the application was submitted to LAFCo. There are different fees for different types of annexations. For instance, if a 100% annexation is submitted, the fee is a flat fee of $600. However, if an application is submitted for land that will be developed, the initial deposit is $1,500 with probable additional processing costs. Chair Leverenz used the Holly Avenue Annexation as an example, and said the application was submitted for a single parcel annexation. Staff recommended annexing additional parcels, but the applicant of the single parcel nor the City would not be charged for any Increased processing fees. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: Commissioner Dolan ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ Minutes of September 5, 2002 ■ Page 3 • 5. 02-30 - City of Chico - West 12th Avenue Annexation No.1 Chair Leverenz summarized the staff s report and opened the hearing to the public Clif Sellers, City of Chico Assistant Community Development Director, commented that all protests must be submitted in writing to be legally valid. Anyone wishing to protest must sign and complete the required form and submit it by mail or in person by the close of the LAFCo protest hearing. There were no further public comments and the hearing was closed to the public. It was moved by Commissioner Beck, seconded by Commissioner Keene, to adopt Resolution No. 7 2002/03 approving the West 12th Avenue Annexation No.1 with the findings and conditions as stated in the Executive Officer's Report and Recommendation dated August 23, 2002, finding also that there were no written protests submitted to the Commission prior to the close of the public hearing, and the protest hearing requirement pursuant to Government Code Section 57000 is waived and the annexation is ordered complete. The motion was carved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: Commissioner Dolan ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None 6. 02-34 - Formation of CSA No. 178 (Twin Palms Subdivision) Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the public. There were no public comments and the hearing was closed to the public. Commissioner Beck said the Initial Study indicates that there is an active agricultural operation (orchard) to the west of the Twin Palms Subdivision and there is no stated requirement for a 250' buffer. The reason appears to be that the buffer would wipe out approximately one half of the subdivision. He said one section of the Initial Study states a detention pond is needed and another section says there are no storm drain facilities necessary. He said there is a county policy currently in effect regarding the 250' agricultural buffer. The Commission has upheld the 250' buffer requirement for the Boeger project and he does not see how they can apply the requirement to one project but not another. Commissioner Keene said the projects are qualitatively different. The Boeger project is on the edge of a true sustainable agricultural area. The Twin Palms Subdivision project is locked in by residential uses. Chair Leverenz said the Twin Palms project has already been approved by the County of Butte and, therefore, all county policies have been applied. Commissioner Beck said the Commission is being asked to certify that they have reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and it is full of inaccuracies and he has a problem doing that. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ Minutes of September 5, 2002 ■ Page 4 ■ It was moved by Commissioner Keene, seconded by Commissioner Hall, to adopt Resolution No. 8 2002/03 approving the Formation of County Service Area No. 178 (Twin Palms Subdivision) with the findings and conditions as stated in the Executive Officer's Report and Recommendation dated August 15, 2002. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: signers Beeler, Hall, Keene Chair Leverenz NQ.E —" Commissione-Dolan ,,, -ABS PST: None ABSTAINS: Commissioners Beck and Cook 7. 02-35 -Formation of CSA No. 179 (Chamberspeedway Sub.) Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the pqo the hearing was closed to the public. It was moved by Commissioner Beck, seconded by Commissioner Beeler, to adopt Resolution No. 9 2002/03 approving the Formation of County Service Area No. 179 (Chambers/Speedway Subdivision) with the findings and conditions as stated in the Executive Officer's Report and Recommendation dated August 19, 2002. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Dolan, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. Review, consideration and first reading of amended Policies and Procedures - Chapter 3, inclusion of policy for the definition of "surrounded" and "substantially surrounded" island areas in support of Government Code Section 56375. Mr. Lucas said in order to use the island annexation provisions of the code, there needs to be a definition for the terms "surrounded" and "substantially surrounded" areas. Staff has tried to come up with definitions that will provide direction to the Commission and to the cities when they are coming up with annexation plans that their councils could adopt using the island provisions which would shorten certain processes. Commissioner Keene said the Chico City Council is requesting that LAFCo continue this item for 30 days in order for them to comment on staffs proposal. Commissioner Dolan agreed with the proposed continuance. She said the Commission needs to be very clear in saying that the island annexation law allows people to be annexed even if they protest. Chair Leverenz said the Executive Officer informed him that as there is only one hearing scheduled for the October meeting which can be deferred, it may be beneficial to continue this item until the November meeting. ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ Minutes of September 5, 2002 ■ Page 5 ■ Mr. Lucas said today's hearing is for the purpose of holding a first reading of the policy. Staff is then required to notify the cities, special dlstncts and the County of the policy change which then gives them the opportunity to comment. Staff would then bring the item back with those comments for a second reading of the amended policy. Commissioner Dolan suggested that the policy change be circulated for comments before holding a first reading of the policy with the intent of adopting it at the second reading. It was moved by Commission Dolan, seconded by Commissioner Keene, to circulate the proposed Policy Amendment regarding the definition of "Surrounded and Substantially Surrounded" areas to the cities, special districts and the County for their comments and to bring the proposal back before the Commission in November for the first reading. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Beck, Beeler, Cook, Dolan, Hall, Keene and Chair Leverenz NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINS: None co Public Comment on items not on the agenda Jo Sherman explained the maps she prepared for the Commission showing possible future "Island" annexation areas the City of Oroville is considering. Commissioner Keene commented that the law has been modified by the legislature to make cities more aggressive at eliminating county islands. He said it is very hard to administer a city with such mixed jurisdictional areas. D. Correspondence E. Administration. The Commission will discuss and provide direction to the Executive Officer on administrative matters relating to the operation of the Commission. F. Executive officer's Report There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 a.m. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION By: Paula Leasure, Executive Officer Minutes prepared by Barbra Duncan, Administrative Analyst ■ Butte Local Agency Formation Commission ■ Minutes of September 5, 2002 ■ Page 6 a ii6lojl;i P.O.AM 0064 Box 60 2313Durham'Dayton Highway ****** INVOICE ****** PAGE: 1 Du/ham. California 95938 ' INVOICE NUMBER: 0087521 -IN 530-891-4821 tel INVOICE DATE: 01/16/06 5300911613 fax `JLD TU: OUTTE COUN}f FlRL DLPT MAIN 176 NELSON AVE OROVILLE CA 95965 ^ ORDER NUMBER: 0017824 ORDER DATE: 10/18/05 � - SALESPERSON: KEVIN O'SHEA CUSTOMER NO: 09-0005315 ' SHIP TO: � BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPT - MAIN 176 NELSON AVE OROVILLE CA 95965 ^ JOB NAME: CONFIRM TO: DARREN READ CSA #179 CHAMBERS PEIRCE ` lMER P.O. SHIP VIA TERMS NET 10TH ------------------------------------------------- ___________________________ �/O ORD SHIP IlEM NO. PRICE AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12-29-05-PUMP SYSlLM SLRVlCE-PERFORM BI -ANNUAL FIRE PUMP SYS[EM SERVICE CHECKS AND MAINTENANCE ON ONE FIRE PUMP SYSTEM. REPORTS ENCLOSED. ' / ' FIRE PUMP SYSTEM CHECK 10N.~ 0 /PMAINT ~ ' � � ~ ^~^ NET INVOICE: TAXABLE: NON-TAXABLE: .000% DISCOUNT: TAXABLE FRGHT: SALES TAX: ShANATURE PRINTED NAME INVOICE TOTAL: ACCT SWIMENT COPY "•:EM'�"IIR�fw:tVrpw �Cl��(� _ .1• j i( yyy. y. �}+� �'�j} }•{� �ryy� �. �1 i/� - -� �,J1' A' if �" � ..7 \.i ��.i�'�}_,>F' :i'T'. }� ic��' �?' �J,A�I,���I� {p,y,�•��}�p/� qatd 94 13t, 7 r" 1N :BI \0i.' s3T FlaQqQ QUO 1'. q_fkl 0J.. y IKE, 1+4Xt _.... ! . -313I i 7 i' E3.� :ad"-1"� 01Fw. q30 301-li 1YTHuot) 1.01TWO I oflo �I r..1s mAwc) tom` ACJ Cia =iR Ui AAA4 l .. �. T.. .1 HTO t 31►i s. :.n"(UI3CrIA ; 3TF� .t?VI 1+1 i aIH tINCi 7 Iytr+iL.Jl�.'A-4 hidra*f8 C4I,4Ck r 3 TIM I AM GAA n)-{ � 4H� .� i',�Ft %' 1 ill 1� ..3f! !A 4 r `rRogjf >PUTaYe qMtjq 3ql -4 3b1C1 M 11312 Ye qi4U,-1 =7 .r T14I Fiiq `-. r ,. V!/� _ •x.�_R it • �J.��Y.T/�a 1 _7Y1'-.:i _ .ref.wiM i,M. _Wii: M.��F.. _.. i �' ••�ryj{ }�"� - I]7..}�u :.: i 1' �;[Lj1AJ,.J13.3 i1 �arl�r�� • •. I �.•l1 y,� IYCV- . ora I _.{mss i T 3 I 0 VM 1 �hi%t U3TV11Rfi F, 34 T €1rp ., '. P 1 TR03TAT2 TOO P.O. Box 60 2313 Durham -Dayton ... .... . INVOICE PACE 4 1 Highway Durham, California 95938 INVOICE NUMBER: 0091501 -'IN 530-891-4821 tel I H V O•I CE DATE: 07 l � 1 /0 6 530-891-0613 fax ORDER NUMBER: 0019163 ORDER DATE: es5/ ~1:+ ; SOLD TO n BUTTE COUNTY E I RE C=E.r'T rel—A I t%j I' E5 ��•IE1.. SON AVE SALESPERSON: KEVIN O s 1SHEA CUSTOMER NO: 09--0005315 H I P -�- �-; a BUTTE COUIBJT'`► FIRE SEPT 11AIIN 1. ;' IIEILSON AYE M PISPEC NET INVOICE: T! f ." i-)P.LE .3 A T A � GNATURE PRINTED NAME ACCT STATEMENT COPY 1 _6 30 iti s i }414.y 00 a� 00 L »:I— ., JOB OB NAME i GIN 1'•' I f + ;--! i4 ►� E i`' i• E ,�=� },� �..� '1 .r. i«•1 A 1�j B r E L RCE .._ � •-.� }K �• .� ! � 1 l" . �. i k.« % � n ­.0__i.1v__i•=-'Ur1rt YSTEr --�'ERFOR; BI--AN1~.1L1AL PUMP Epi 3E �VA.'-C' a .Ht.�..: ?.•::� AND t7�i�.�.i`�Tt:.:.i��'At`3(...� f...�i"� F1 1L«. 1 I'�RE i"'UI}SP 3���S f E1'1a fi'•«.Pi �RT3 E3`ICL0 �E.i..�r 1 •� .r L.. 3 E � < <.« `�' ;-' C ! ''r i.'-'2 }`" T E r i D T •j' _ . � f r � 1 �. 7 }� , ',21 a� 0. 'L� �.�! i +. , i�"`i t�;! �, . 00 .� 01A S T E R + 0 C. K ~� s f `.. ►� +�... Y E D A Lr I KE .... 1 � 1. i � : �.. PISPEC NET INVOICE: T! f ." i-)P.LE .3 A T A � GNATURE PRINTED NAME ACCT STATEMENT COPY 1 _6 30 iti s i }414.y 00 a� 00 L »:I— ., 891-4821 telPO Box 60 891-0613 fax 2313 Durham Dayton Hwy. Durham CA 95938 NAME: ADDRESS: DATE OF INSPECTION: Durham PUMP PUMP SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORT ` CHAMBERS PEIRCE # 179 CHICO, CA. 06-30-06 INSPECTED BY: PHIL GUFFY PUMP TYPE: X SUBMERSIBLE JET CONDITION: GOOD TURBINE CENTRIFUGAL MAKE: MODEL: HP: 1/2 HP. METER #: 5199R7 CONTROL BOX CONDITION: GOOD DATE CODE: VOLTS: 230 1 PHASES: SINGLE PRESSURE SWITCH SET: NON -RUNNING CHECKS: ✓ ELEC. LEADS & CONNECTIONS - TIGHTEN/REPAIR AS NECESSARY ✓ INCOMING IDLE VOLTAGE: X WITHIN LIMITS UNACCEPTABLE ✓ FUSES, REPLACE AS NECESSARY SIZE: 20 AMP ✓ GENERAL CLEAN-UP OF ELECTRICAL PANEL AND MOTOR RUNNING CHECKS: (CAN ONLY BE PERFORMED DURING OPERATION) ✓ CHECK FOR EXCESSIVE NOISE OR VIBRATION ✓ CONTROL DEVICES: HOA START SWITCH TIME CLOCK ✓ AMP CHECK: RED .5 YELLOW 5.2 BLACK 5.5 RATED: AMPS 6.0 PRESSURE TANK: SIZE: 119 GAL. TYPE: C/A CONDITION: GOOD WELL X TROL COMMENTS: THE TESTING COMPLETED DOES NOT IMPLY OR WARRANT THAT RESULTS WILL REMAIN AS TESTED. THIS REPORT ONLY REFLECTS TESTING AND SITE CONDITIONS ON THE INSPECTION DATE AS NOTED ABOVE. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT DURHAM PUMP, INC. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REPORT. (531) 891-4821 tel PO Box 60 -0613 fax 2313 Durham Dayton Hwy. 5301) 891 Durham CA 95938 PUMP CHECK REPORT CUSTOMER: BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPT. CSA #179 CHAMBERS PEIRCE DATE: 06-30-06 MOTOR: MANUFACTURER TM 80 YES X HP METER # RPM 25 5199R7 3450 NO SERIAL # - 7 11 , Durham PUMP VOLTS PHASE RATED AMPS 230 3 67 PANEL: MANUFACTURER NEMASZ DISCHARGE HEAD: MANUFACTURER SIZE FURNAS ESP 6" TYPE: X X/L P/W OTHER NON -RUNNING CHECKS: LUBRICANT LEVELS — SERVICE AND CHANGE IF NECESSARY OILER UNIT AND/OR PACKING X ELEC. LEADS & CONNECTIONS — REPAIR OR TIGHTEN AS NECESSARY X INCOMING IDLE VOLTAGE: X W/I ACCEPTABLE LIMITS UNACCEPTABLE X FUSES, REPLACE IF NECESSARY SIZE: 100 AMP X PERFORM GENERAL CLEAN-UP OF ELECTRICAL PANEL AND MOTOR RUNNING CHECKS: (CAN ONLY BE PERFORMED UNDER OPERATING CONDITIONS) X EXCESSIVE OR UNUSUAL NOISE X EXCESSIVE OR UNUSUAL VIBRATION X CONTROL DEVICES: X H -O -A X START SWITCH TIME CLOCK FROST START TIME DELAY OTHER: PRESSURE SWITCH AMPERAGE: EXPECTED AMPS: 67 ACTUAL: L1: 64 L2: 58 L3:61 Overload % Underload % Evenload Avg Amps: 61.0 ADJUSTMENT: YES X NO COMMENTS: IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ABOVE INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT KEVIN O'SHEA AT (XT. 123). Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Stu Edell. Land Development From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: Chambers/Pierce Subdivision, AP#040-040-66 thru 74, CSA 162 Date: October 14, 1999 According to my conversation last week with Mr. Tom Edgars, the CSA process is being held up with your approval in hopes of coming up with a better method of long term maintenance of systems such as fire protection. The lack of a CSA has caused some delays in repairs to the fire hydrant system at this development but has now been taken care of. I believe that the CSA should be completed as soon as possible unless you have found a better way. CC: Bill Orthel George Morris Ted Crawford From: BTU - DURHAM STN 45 (A5) Sent: Sunday, September 19, 1999 4:41 PM ro: Ted Crawford Cc: Bill Redding; BILL ORTHEL; BTU - SOUTH CHICO STN 44 (A4); BTU - DURHAM STN 45 (A5); BTU REL B3 S1 Subject: HYDRANTS O/S CAPT. CRAWFORD, THERE ARE TWO HYDRANTS THAT HAVE BEEN OUT OF SERVICE FOR AT LEAST 6 MONTHS OFF OF SPEEDWAY IN CHICO. THE HYDRANTS ARE LOCATED AT 21 RANCHWOOD AND THE CORRESPONDING HYDRANT ON NEW FOSTER PLACE. BELIEVE THEY WERE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIER MAINTENANCE (DURHAM PUMP?) LAST WINTER BY YOURSELF OR CAPT. KNUTSEN. WHEN THE HYDRANT IS INITIALLY OPENED IT DELIVERS 100-150 GALLONS OF WATER THEN THE PRESSURE DROPS DRASTICALLY AND ONLY A TRICKLE COMES OUT. HAVE YOU DEALT WITH PROBLEMS AT THIS LOCATION IN THE PAST? AND WHO SHOULD WE CONTACT TO HAVE THEM SERVICED NOW? PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT I CAN DO TO CORRECT THIS PROBLEM. SHANNON GARRETT BATT 3 HYDRANT MAINTENANCE ed Crawford From: Ted Crawford Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 1:55 PM To: BILL ORTHEL-BTU - DURHAM STN 45 {A5} Subject: Speedway F��Protection System The pump is now working for the fire hydra Ats on Old Foster Place, off Speedway. Northstate Electric checked it yesterday and all he had to do was to hit t,�e reset button. The system still belongs to the original owners as the CSA has not been finalized. I have advised for owl to finish the required paper work so that the system can become a part of the CSA system. Durham station iorized to go by periodically and open the hydrants and flow the system. It is probably better for it to work once a� while. The problem with it not working could be either a brown out or interruption of the power to the system. It is ma##.." shut down rather than cause damage to the pump. TED 1 ed Crawford rom: Ted Crawford ent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 2:55 PM o: BILL ORTHEL; BTU - DURHAM STN 45 (A5); George Morris Ubject: Chambers -Pierce Subdivision, Speedway ill I have arranged for the contractor who installed the water system in the above subdivision to look at the system morrow, 9-29 and advise me of the problem with the system. I have also talked to the lawyer of the owners of the jbdivision and they g has agreed to pay for any expenses incurred or necessary to keep the system in working order. Te '1✓ 4 May 1998 Thomas Edgar, Esq. 682 East 7th Avenue Chico, CA 95926 7 ffAuttle Count LAND 4F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE 9 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 RE: Formation of County Service Area No -162 (Speedway and Chambers Subdivision), LAFCo File No. 98-06. Dear Mr. Edgar: Our files indicate that the above referenced County Service Area Formation application originally submitted September 9, 1997, was an incomplete application. The reasons for the incompleteness determination was outlined to you in our letter of November 26, 1997 (attached). The procedural requirements are unchanged from the content of the November letter. It is our desire to move your application through the formation process and this will require your cooperation in meeting the application requirements. Please indicate what your current intentions are concerning this project. If we do not receive the required items or an explanation for delay by June 15, 1998, we will return the application. If you have any questions please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Stephen Lucas Associate Planner, LAFCo k:Aafco/stfrpts/98-06.1t e r � November 26, 1997 rte .1• 46JI(ttle Count am L A K r-, LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Thomas E. Edgar, Esq. 682 East Seventh Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Re: Formation of County Service Area No. 162 (Speedway and Chambers Subdivision), File No. 98-06. Dear,Mr. Edgar: In response to our telephone conversation of November 25, 19979 I have prepared the following list if issues regarding your application for the formation of a county service area (CSA). As we discussed, the application continues to be incomplete at this time subject to the rectification of these matters. 1. The LAFCo Operations Manual guidelines for the formation of a county service area require that an application be initiated by a resolution of the affected agency (Butte County) or, if a resolution is not submitted, then by petition of property owners. LAFCo shall only accept a petition based application where the applicant provides satisfactory evidence that diligent effort has been made to obtain the consent of the affected public agency to initiate the application and that such consent has been denied by the legislative body (Board of Supervisors) of that agency. LAFCo shall require an explanation of any specific reasons the agency failed to - adopt a, resolution. This process may be accomplished by working with the Department of Public Works as a conduit to obtain the Resolution of Application or by making the request directly to the Clerk of the Board. Please find a sample Resolution of Application attached to this letter. 98 -os Page 2 2. As it was indicated toY ou previously, the Department of Public Works requires a valid legal description of the property to be served by the proposed CSA. Specifically, the map does not disclose the location of drainage facilities to be maintained nor future street lights to determine whether or not Speedway should be included. In addition, an annual operation budget and maintenance budget, with per parcel charges needs to be prepared by the project engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works, Auditor, Butte County Fire Department prior to a LAFCo evaluation. Ultimately, the CSA must receive a majority vote of the property owners to formed. Additionally, it should be known that the Butte County Administrative Office has established a committee to address the issue of the use of CSA's for the provision of services in the unincorporated area due to the passage of Proposition 218. It is the preliminary position of this committee that alternatives to CSA's be implemented such as a Community Services District (CSD) or a homeowners association. While no final policy direction has been offered by the Board of Supervisors, it is necessary to evaluate this project with the expectation that CSA's may not be a practical mechanism for your purpose. It may be prudent to consider an alternative mechanism to achieve the stated purpose of this CSA. If you have any questions, please call Monday through Thursday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Stephen Lucas Deputy Executive Officer Attachments CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE COUNTY OF BUTTE JOHN S. BLACKLOCK CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER September 17, 1997 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVI LLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 Telephone: (916) 538-7631 Fax: (916) 538-7120 Barbara Duncan, LAFCO Secretary Development Services Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: LAFCO File Numbers: 98-052 98-06 Dear Ms. Duncan: The Butte County Administrative Office has no objections application #98-05. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD R. J. BEELER JANE DOLAN MARY ANNE ROUX CURT JOSIASSEN FRED C. DAVIS However, 98-05 is located within Service Area (CSA) 114. The properties located within this application should not be removed from the CSA if: 1. The property is unsevered, or, 2. The property has no permanent storm drainage facilities which deliver the storm drainage to a natural drainage channel. If either of the above are true, then we request that language be included in any approval to ensure that the properties continue to remain within CSA 114 as required by the language of the Nitrate Action Plan adopted October, 1988, by the County of Butte, City of Chico, and State of California. A'0000 -40o -n.#9406 - proposes to establish a CSA for fire protection services and drainage services. The County has established a committee to address the issue of use of CSA's for the provision of services in the unincorporated area and particularly due to the passage of Proposition 218. Although the committee's efforts to formulate a recommendation to the Board 'of Supervisors has been hampered by the need to deal with the immediate need to implement Proposition 218, a recommendation and discussion before the Board is expected in the near future. As of now, staff has preliminarily identified other alternatives to the formation of a CSA for the provision of services. These alternatives include the formation of a Community Services District (CSD) or a homeowners association. Given the critical importance of such services as fire protection, it is of concern to see a CSA brought forward for the provision of fire protection services and drainage services given the recent poor performance at the election polls by several of the existing CSAs. Planning Division SEP 2 2 1991 oroville, California m2m The Board of Supervisors has not yet heard or decided upon this issue and therefore there is no final policy guidance. I thought it important to point out that the discussion is currently ongoing and there has been initial significant concern expressed by the Proposition 218 Committee regarding the continued use of CSAs to provide services given the laws currently in effect. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1 Starlyn SilveBrown Assistant Chief Administrative Officer SSB/lk cc: Paula Leasure Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Paula Leasure, LAFCO From: Ted Crawford, Fire Department Subject: County Service Area Numbering System Date: February 17, 1999 It has come to my attention that CSA numbers which have been assigned to projects and then if the project does not go through, the number is reassigned to the next project that comes in. This creates problems for me and others who set up files using these numbers and have the same number show up again on some other project. Is it possible to keep the number assigned to a project even though the project does not ever get completed? The project in question is CSA 171, which has been re -numbered to CSA 162 because CSA 162 was changed into a PUD (Humboldt Woodlands). I still have a file on CSA 162 for tracking purposes. Thanks for your consideration in this matter. CC; G. Ross G. Morris S. Edell Chrono BCF VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANIES B NGOR B GGS B JTTE CREEK CANYON B JTTE MEADOWS C-IEROKEE IRSEATER PER MILLS HASS ET ABLA HAM THER FALLS EST RANCH DEN FEATHER GRIDLEY LY RIDGE ALIA TH CHICO ERMO NTZ VALLEY ONEER ICHVALE OBINSON MILL STIRLING CITY ERMALITO BCJD FU LL -TIM E FIR STATIONS ANGOR URHAM RIDLEY ELLY RIDGE ORD ORTH CHICO 1ROVILLE ALEFMO ICHVALE OUTH CHICO PPER RIDGE CDq FIRE STATIONS UTTE MEADOWS OHASSET EATHER FALLS OREST RANCH ARTS MILL ARBO GAP ROVILLE HO ARADISE OBINSON MILL TIRLING CITY BUE FIRE CENTER tAGALIA REFORESTATION NU ISERY AVIS GALIA AIF ATTACK BASE RICO FIRE LOOKOUTS ALD MOUNTAIN LOOMER HILL LATTE MOUNTAIN AWMILL PEAK UNSET HILL AL O PROUDLY SERVING ITY OF BIGGS ITY OF GR{DEFY Beverly J. Chambers C/o Thomas E. Edgar, Esq. 682 East Seventh Avenue Chico, CA 95926 ,butte Count LAND QF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION "Sixty-seven Years of Cooperative Emergency Services" 176 NELSON AVENUE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3495 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7111 FAX: (530) 538-7401 February 17, 1999 Subject: Chambers -Pierce Subdivision, AP## 040-440-66 thru -74 Dear Mr. Edgars: The formation of County Service Area (CSA) No. 171 has not been completed through the LAFCO process as of this date but the fire protection system has been completed. The maintenance of this fire protection system remains the responsibility of the developer until such time as the CSA is formed and assessments are established for the collection of funds to pay for the necessary cost of routine and emergency needs. Attached is a copy of a bill from Durham Pump for the repairs of the pump, which occurred on December 22, 1998, and was necessary f0 Kgep the system in working order. If there are any questions please contact Kevin O'Shea at Durham Pump at 891-4821. Thank you for taking care of this matter. CC: G. Morris T. Crawford Durham Pump Chrono Sincerely, Gary Ross County Fire Warden By: Ted Crawford Fire Protection Planning Officer ul m TZ' iTI T., -iUt > G. x I.J) CC.4) rr' 1 > G. x I.J) CC.4) rr' 1 CA) C..) 0 OD > c co CA) -0 OT 0 000T rr cja Cie -0 0 o> x 31 33 OD NZ -lo L43 0 L c� z cA) T_ CO3 Ln co CA) N OD i7_: r*a 6-4 M Z rp T, m Aq C-) 15 r rn 44 rrl 4% D Z 0 t A. all • C71 "T ff C I To. IITJ IT1 2 9Mll all ri; M T' 7r, Irl Ui T.i L�-j IT, Jwl i jTJ rT CIO Ji r fit Ij. i Gj IC I > G. x I.J) CC.4) CA) C..) > x I.J) CC.4) CA) C..) 0 OD > c co CA) -0 OT 0 000T rr cja Cie -0 0 o> x 31 33 OD NZ -lo L43 0 L c� z cA) T_ CO3 Ln co CA) N OD i7_: r*a Aq 15 !T% all T :lilt n! C - . A -i To. IITJ IT1 2 9Mll all ri; M T' Irl Ui T.i L�-j BC D VOLUNTEER FIR COMPANIES ANGOR IGGS UTTE CREEK CANYON UTTE MEADOWS HEROKEE LIPPER MILLS OHASSET eSABLA URHAM EATHER FALLS OREST RANCH OLDEN FEATHER REATER GRIDLEY LLY RIDGE GALIA ORTH CHICO ALERMO E NTZ VALLEY IONEER ICHVALE OBINSON MILL TIRLING CITY HERMAUTO BC D FULL-TIME FI E STATIONS ANGOR IGGS URHAM RIDLEY ELLY RIDGE oRD ORTH CHICO ROVILLE ALERMO ICHVALE OUTH CHICO PPER RIDGE CD FIRE STATIONS UTTE MEADOWS OHASS ET EATHER FALLS OREST RANCH ARTS MILL ARBO GAP ROVILLE HCS ARADISE OBINSON MILL TIRLING CITY BU 17TE FIRE CENTER AGALIA RE ORESTATION NU SERY AVIS AGALIA AIF ATTACK BASE RICO FIF E LOOKOUTS ALD MOUNTAIN BLOOMER HILL LATTE MOUNTAIN AWMILL PEAK UNSET HILL ALO PROUDLY SERVING ITY OF BIGGS tiTY OF GRIDLEY 146 • «+ me�qq,, -�� ffi������• //� u LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION "Sixty-seven Years of Cooperative Emergency Services" 176 NELSON AVENUE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3495 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7111 FAX: (530) 538-7401 February 17, 1999 Beverly J. Chambers C/o Thomas E. Edgar, Esq. 682 East Seventh Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Subject: Chambers -Pierce Subdivision, AP# 040-040-66 thru -74 Dear Mr. Edgars: The formation of County Service Area (CSA) No. 171 has not been completed through the LAFCO process as of this date but the fire protection system has been completed. The maintenance of this fire protection system remains the responsibility of the developer until such time as the CSA is formed and assessments are established for the collection of funds to pay for the necessary cost of routine and emergency needs. Attached is a copy of a bill from Durham Pump for the repairs of the pump, which occurred on December 22, 1998, and was necessary tQ Kipep the system in working order. If there are any questions please contact Kevin O'Shea at Durham Pump at 891-4821. Thank you for taking care of this matter. CC: G. Morris T. Crawford Durham Pump Chrono Sincerely, Gary Ross County Fire Warden By: Ted Crawford Fire Protection Planning Officer IMP W. P.O. BOX 60 4 -L.3 .4 2313 DURHAM/DAYTON HWY. DURHAM, CALIFORNIA 95938 (530) 891-4821 FAX: (530) 891-0613 ORM30) 342-3217 D 11-4TE a GNATURE ACC. STATEIME NT COPY . - - 1- :":4 9. -'; E In L c. L -t -JEi F I D E P C) L" IV 41— C 5 Cl C -I '17 D t I c E G L' F, ILI RE PiD, 17 R"ty q C. R' -pl c-` i P• L V PT, L VE • 1:0, V E 5 5d 5 'Spsc- I LANGSE P V 4 S. 4 - -0- iA 0, 101 PPE PIV CI4 5 I,-% S40-13 0 L71 GASKET R I N G 00 1 NS Lit j--jTl UN 1-:-k 41 4J S P E C I E R GNATURE ACC. STATEIME NT COPY . - - 1- :":4 9. -'; E In • V T re • InternDepart emorandum * 10 UK o: oir Ron McElroy, Public Works ROM: Ted Crawford, Fire Department U BJ ECT: CSA Budgets for 1997/98 AT E: December 11, 1997 Attached please find revised Fire Department budgets for the upcoming elections. These budgets have been trimmed down to better reflect the actual costs as we know them now. Be advised that these amounts only reflect the Fire Department portion of the costs and so not include any other department charges. It is also understood that the amount of money for contingencies and reserves will now be keep in one account for use as needed for emergencies and long term facilities replacement and will continue to roll over each year until a predetermined dollar amount is accumulated. I did not have the account number for this and so I did not identify it on the budgets. If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: H. Brachais B. Redding B. Holmes B. Orthel Chrono 00 CSA 171 CHAMBERS/PIERCE SUBDIVISION 97/98 Fire Dept. Budget 536 PROFESSION SERVICES $500 544 UTILITIES 500 554-100 INTERFUND SERVICES -FIRE 500 APPROPRIATION FOR CONTINGENCIES 2000 AND RESERVES TOTAL FIRE DEPT. $3500.00 CSA171.BUD 12-11-97 Durham ttPump �.� W. P. O. BOX 60 DURHAM, CALIFORNIA 95938 (916) 891-4821 BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPT -MAIN 176 NELSON AVENUE OROVILLE, CA 95965 PAGE: 1 STATEMENT DATE: 01131/99 ('�r .- S.ef- / � / CUSTOMER NO.: 01-0005315 CONTACT: TED CRAWFORD ►ATE REFERENCE DESCRIPTION CHARGE. CREDIT BALANCE � TOTAL: 1352.59 ••/••/•/•••••••///ff/f•t/f/•/••t//tf/ff/•tf•ttf\•//////•t•/••/•//••ttt•••t\t\//t/t\tff•tttttt\\•t•\\t\t\\\\t\\ttt•ttt■t/f/ttf\\tt\\•t\t\•t\\\tt\/\\■\t•\\•111\\1/t••f•\tf■t•\\t//t/t•••\\t\ CURRENT 30 DAYS 60 DAYS 90 DAYS 120 DAYS BALANCE DUE 769.82 296.42 286.34 OUR SERVICE CENTER IS NOW OPEN SATURDAYS 8 AM - 12 NOON FOR RETAIL SALES THROUGH AUGUST 1999. 1352.59 11/11/98 42133 -IN / S',� 135.40 135.40 � 11/11/98 42134 -IN e SA- l (o.5r, 100.00 100.00 � 11/11/98 42136 -IN 0"s 'e"- la'T 50.94 50.94 12/30/98 42557 -IN SERVICE AREA #128 85.29 85.29 /12/31/98 42582 -IN SERVICE AREA #155- 206.84 206.84 12/31/98 DEC0004-FC FINANCE CHA , 4.30 4.30 1/31/99 42984 -IN SERVICE A A#171 761.14 761.14 1/31/99 JAN0041-FC FINANCE CH 8.68 8.68 TOTAL: 1352.59 ••/••/•/•••••••///ff/f•t/f/•/••t//tf/ff/•tf•ttf\•//////•t•/••/•//••ttt•••t\t\//t/t\tff•tttttt\\•t•\\t\t\\\\t\\ttt•ttt■t/f/ttf\\tt\\•t\t\•t\\\tt\/\\■\t•\\•111\\1/t••f•\tf■t•\\t//t/t•••\\t\ CURRENT 30 DAYS 60 DAYS 90 DAYS 120 DAYS BALANCE DUE 769.82 296.42 286.34 OUR SERVICE CENTER IS NOW OPEN SATURDAYS 8 AM - 12 NOON FOR RETAIL SALES THROUGH AUGUST 1999. 1352.59 ti lAw Durham PUMP P.O. BOX 60 UT I 2313 DURHAM/DAYTON HWY. I c. C DURHAM, CALIFORNIA 95938 jt (530) 891-4821 FAX: (530) 891-0613 OR (530) 342-3217 K La SIGNATURE r L -j E- H T ACC. STATEMENT C©P _3 6 5 • E ij �Hy i:4 V E, cl-A J.* Cd c) 10 JL -i PR I CE 'r IY4 Ir R p ACE ii U Nii 'LVE D R I i •'4 T P I yj 1,7! L 'D. 14 I ic V. $4 L VE -OVEJR 1-.' -6- 6.� h - L 5 If) !2' S P r 1-110 LANGE P V PIE Pvc S c". 00 GASKE RING L3 L71 At 0 0 N L--iLl EC I E R SIGNATURE r L -j E- H T ACC. STATEMENT C©P uthor: TED CRAWFORD at BUTTE—RU ate: 11/6/98 1:21 PM riority: O: BILL Normal REDDING O: BTU - NORD STN 41 (A2) O: BTU - NORTH CHICO STN 42 (A3) O: BTU - SOUTH CHICO STN 44 (A4) O: BTU - DURHAM STN 45 (AS) ubject: fire hydrants out of service ----------------------------------- Message Contents ------------------------------------ The following two fire hydrants are out of service until repairs are done: Justin -Manor Subdivision on Felicidad Lane off Keefer Road and Chambers -Pierce Subdivision on Speedway off the Midway. Durham Pump was doing a routine service check and found neither pumps working. They think that the pump in Justin -Manor Sub may have a wire broken on the pony pump. Cost to pull this pump may be $300 to 400 to pull and replace plus parts. The fenced area around the pump is also locked and they have no keys. The pump on the Speedway at the Chambers -Pierce Sub will have to be pulled at a cost of about $800 to pull and replace. The fenced area is also locked and Durham Pump could not get inside without climbing the fence. Bill, I will call you Monday morning and discuss. In the meantime consider both these hydrants out of order. A thor: TED CRAWFORD at BUTTE—RU Date: 11/10/98 11:36 AM P iority: Normal To: BILL REDDING T BTU - NORD STN 41 (A2) T BTU - NORTH CHI CO STN 42 (A3) T : BTU - SOUTH CHICO STN 44 (A4) TD: GEORGE MORRIS B C : TED CRAWFORD Subject: Fire hydrants - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ( -9-4- / 7:1 Message Contents ------------------------------------ Bill, the following is a recap of the current problems and repairs going on now for the CSA fire systems: CSA128- Wildflower Estates. During normal semi annual testing by Durham Pump they determined that the pressure tank was leaking and quoted $582.00 for parts and labor to repair problem. After talking to you yesterday I had Durham Pump check records for any previous replacements. They could not find any but will check the code date on the tank and find out if it is still under warranty. This should happen today. CSA 165- Justin Manor (Felicidad Lane off Keefer). Durham Pump semi annual test revealed that the jocky pump was not working but the main pump was operating okay. This would indicate that the wiring in the well was broken somewhere under the well seal. Cost to fix was approx $400.00 in parts and labor to pull the pump and repair the wiring. This system has only been in the ground about 2 years, so I called Northstate Electric who installed the system. Ron Stillwell of Norhtgate met me at the well this morning and confirmed that the wiring was broken in the well and agreed to repair the system at no cost to us even though it was no longer under warranty. The system will still work now for any emergencies if we need it. Repairs should be done by next week. This system was installed 1-22-97. dCS:A171- Chambers/Pierce Subdivision on Speedway. Durham Pump test ed that neither one of the pumps were working and wanted to pull them to see why. Since this was also installed by Northstate Electric within the last 3 years, I had Northstate look at the unit this morning. He cleaned out some dirt and replaced a clogged up pressure gage and the system was running again. I have also asked Durham Pump why they could not have done the same thing instead of wanting $800.00 to pull the pump out. I am still waiting for an answer from Durham Pump. This pump was installed in July 1996. CSA 158-Ishi Valley Estates on Tuliyani Ct off Garner Ln. Durham Pump test indicated that the system was sucking sand and had very dirty water coming out of the hydrant and suggested that we lift the pump up inside the well casing to get if away from the bottom and the sand. I flowed the hydrant for about 15 minutes this morning and it continued to flow very dirty, sandy water the whole time. Ron Stillwell of Northstate Electric was with me and he stated that it is possible that the pump may need to be flushed for up to an hour to get rid of the accumulated sand in the system. He also stated that if the outside of the well casing were not backfilled with gravel when if was installed that any sandy soil would immediately flow with the aquifer waters through the holes in the casing and go into the well holding area and cause this problem. I have not contracted with anyone on this situation. CSA 155- Laurelwood Estates, Sycamore Drive off Hicks. Semi annual test indicate the need for a snubber on the main pump switch. I authorized Durham Pump to install one at $125.00 total. It will be done today. CSA 163- Thorntree Industrial Park off Cohasset Road. Tom Reed called me back today and said that the easement with Mr. Brown has been �L1�11CLd Qj14i L11Gi V rVv.iJL vtt ..&.j.yy.r.�+y va�rr ..... .� ..._ �.� _A. as soon as a backhoe could get into the field and dig the ditch to the old system. We have the CSA but the voters turned down the CSA fees when it was first started last year. Connection to the Cal -water system will eliminate the need for the fire protection part of the CSA. VAN- 17�cl000, '00 - _- - �`: ' . _ - - �, it -•� � � `a -- � �+ ! � •fit i - ..�.`� �{' i` _- '�.� .��-� • -. _ --, - ._ -�- _' — - ---- - - -. _. -, - �_ •�__ ���'�, -., .�_�: -���.QRf"la���•+1�wa _ __ 1 __.\�' -'� �k �� �_,_,�;.,1 -.. wy`. _ -�-�,'a`r ... .- . .. ..� All _ _ �_ 1 rc.` �- t ,� i /. y._ • _ _ '1 ice\ - -- - -_ - - l t i A' "_ -"�• ` �' 't • ~r~-� '�...r L ,h' . �.. • _ IN i - __- , a '� ! - .aJ� -�.1 - '��1! _ - P� �� � A �� � LL' - - "r - Z• - i�'•+i: ••' � .. .:at � � i _ �. t ����' `'�F`-.. `�:. �'1 ,�t�iT�' _ � i r" «�. � •t y � •.+ ' � , J.. ���-_ _ - `ler{�`� - - l} - - ! I f - - -_ _ .. _ _ _ ,fi�'".f � �' . �3 `'i .r' ; : �`�'•: • 1 .,.,. �.._f_`-t� rt t' •...j � .:� -��t�q , � _ i : - ..�"`—' -'" 57 AL :. --- FAA k*41 F OM: 5 BJ ECT: D T E: .OurrE Inter -Depart ' emorandum • OU ���• Ron McElroy, Public Works Ted Crawford, Fire Department jhItl CSA Budget Totals December 16, 1997 CC: S. Edell H. Brachais B. Redding B. Holmes Chrono Per your request, the following is submitted for the total dollar amounts that will be needed in each CSA for long term replacement of the fire hydrant systems: CSA 90 Southgate Industrial Park $20,000 CSA 128 Wildflower Estates 10,000 CSA 137 Durham Dayton Industrial Park 20,000 CSA 155 Laurelwood Estates 10,000 CSA 158 Ishi Valley Estates 10,000 CSA 163 Thorntree Industrial Park 20,000 CSA 165 Justin Manor Estates 10,000 CSA 169 Pheasant Landing Estates 15,000 CS Chambers/Pierce Estates 10,000 If there are any questions please contact me at 538-7994. CC: S. Edell H. Brachais B. Redding B. Holmes Chrono MEMORANDUM Local Agency Formation Commission TO: Star Brown, Administration Ted Crawford, Fire Department,/ Libby Haraughty, Caltrans P. Scott Browne, LAFCo Legal Counsel FROM: Barbra Duncan, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Your comments regarding a future LAFCo Agenda DATE: September 11, 1997 DISCUSSION: We have received an application for annexation of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538- 7784. Applications, maps, and legal descriptions are attached for each proposal. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that you return your comments prior to September 17, 1997. 98-06 - City of Chico - Formation of CSA No. 171 Chambers/Pierce Subdivision. Formation of CSA No. 171 for Fire Protection Services and Drainage Services Maintenance District. - The Chambers Subdivision -is located at 6 through 50, New FosterrPlace, Chico. The Assessor's Parcel Numbers for the parcel's within Chambers Subdivision ark40-040-066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, and 074. The size of Chambers Subdivision is 10 acres. ___-- The Speedway Subdivision is located -at -.56 Speedway, Chico. The Assessor's Parcel Number for Speedway Subdivision is 040-040-015. The size of the Speedway Subdivision is 8 acres. The size of the combined subject Property is 18 acres. 3 Planning DIvIsIon project No. SEP 0 q ISS7 O!'OYIIIe, CaIIfOrhla Butte County Loyal Agency Formation Commission Application Form 1. Subject Property ipplicant(s): (LAFCo will send copies of the staff report to a maximum of 3 applicants.) Name Beverly J. Chambers Address 586 Entler Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Phone (916) 891-1066 Name Lowell W. Pierce Deborah S. Pierce Address 2314 Turntree Court Durham, CA 95938 Phone (916) 895-1113 Name Beverly J. Chambers C/o Thomas E. Edgar, Esq. Address 682 East Seventh Avenue Chico, CA 95926 Phone (916) 893-5661 i. Proposal Applicants request the following change in organization: a. Applicants request the formation of a new Butte County Service Area which would assume ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the subject Property, using service charges which have been levied and collected from the owners of the Subject Property. b. Applicants hereby offer to dedicate the Fire Protection Facilities and the Fire Protection Easements to County of Butte and/or to the new Butte County Service Area to be [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [j 1 formed, subject to the agreement by Butte County to assume responsibility for the ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the Subject Property, In this regard: A. A description of the newly installed and completed Fire Protection Facilities, are described on Attachment 1. B. A true copy of the "Mutual Grant of Easements for Fire Protection Facilities and Maintenance Agreement and Offer of Dedication" (hereafter, Mutual Grant of Easements), as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Butte County, California, on October 9, 1995, as Document Number 95-034542, is included hereto as Attachment 2. c. Applicants request that the new Butte County Service Area also provide maintenance of the surface water drainage facilities for the Subject Property, using service charges which have been levied and collected from the owners of the Subject Property. Type of Pro j ect : Formation of a new Butte County Service Area For Fire Protection Services and Drainage Services Maintenance District Address or Location: The Subject Property includes two adjoining properties which are further described as follows: a. The Chambers Subdivision is located at 6 through 50, New Foster Place, Chico, Butte County, California. The Assessor's Parcel Numbers for the parcels within Chambers Subdivision are 040-040-066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, and 074. The size of ChaYabers Subdivision is 10 acres. b. The Speedway Subdivision is located at 56 Speedway, Chico, Butte County, California. The Assessor's Parcel Number for Speedway Subdivision is 040-040-015. [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 2 The size of the Speedway Subdivision is 8 acres. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: The Assessor's Parcel Numbers for the combined Subject Property are: 040-040-066, 067, 068, 0691 070, 071, 072, 073, and 074, plus 040-040-015. Size of Property: The size of the combined Subject Property is 18 acres, calculated as follows: Chambers Subdivision 10 Acres Speedway Subdivision 8 Acres Subject Property 18 Acres �I. Authority to File Application XXX- Petition of landowners or registered voters (Note: if filed by petition, the applicant must fill out a supplemental form indication why the agency has refused to authorize application by Resolution of Application.) This is a petition by landowners. Applicants are simultaneously seeking approval by the Butte County Board of Supervisors, requesting that said Butte County Board of Supervisors issue a Resolution of Application. A copy of the Petition By Landowners (as executed by Beverly J. Chambers, Lowell W. Pierce, Deborah S. Pierce) is included as Attachment 4. XXX- Resolution of Application of an affected agency Applicants are simultaneously requesting that the Butte County Board of Supervisors issue a Resolution of Applications A co of the proposed Resolution of pP copy Application is included as Attachment 4. (Petitions and Resolutions of Application must meet certain legal requirements. The Application Instructions include samples for applicant use.) Statement of Justification Provide a Statement of Justification for and explain the purpose of each request for a change of organization. Include in the statement [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 3 reasons why the proposal is more effective than the present organization and/or what services to the area are to be enhanced by the project. If any terms of conditions are proposed for this project, include them in the statement. a. As shown by Attachment 2, Applicants have, on October 91 1995, recorded the "Mutual Grant of Easements for Fire Protection Facilities and Maintenance Agreement and Offer of Dedication"`(the Mutual Grant of Easements). Said Mutual Grant of,Easements encumbers the ChaYnbers Subdivision and the Speedway Subdivision, described above (collectively, the Subject Property). Further, the Mutual Grant of Easements provides the following: A. The property owners within the Subject Property are currently, on a private basis, collecting the funds necessary to repair, maintain, replace, operate, and provide electrical service for the herein -described Fire Protection Facilities; B. Said Mutual Grant of Easements provides that, upon completion of the Fire Protection Facilities, the property owners shall jointly make application to Butte County for the formation of a new. Butte County Service Area, and shall offer to dedicate the Fire Protection Facilities and Fire Protection Easements to Butte County and/or to a new Butte County Service Area, to be formed, along with a request that the proposed County Service Area will assume ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities, using service charges which have been levied and collected from the owners of the Subject Property. b. On. August 14, 1996, the Butte County Fire Department and CDF Fire Protection approved the installation of the Fire Protection Facilities within the Chambers Subdivision, and on September 3, 1997, the Butte County Fire Department and CDF Fire Protection approved the installation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the Speedway Subdivision, as shown by Attachment 5 and Attachment 6, included herewith. c . Applicants have f iled for record in the Office of the County Recorder of Butte County,.California, that certain document entitled "Notice of Completion of Fire Protection, Facilities" a true copy of which is included hereto as Attachment 7 concerning the Subject Property. [] Butte County (] Local Agency Formation Commission (] Application Form (] March 1997 (] 4 d. Applicants submit that the health, safety, and economic convenience will be enhanced for the Subject Property and for the surrounding areas, -in the event that a new County Service Area is formed which assumes ownership and the repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities, plus provides drainage services, using service charges which have been levied and collected from the owners of the Subject Property. Boundaries A map (plus fifteen copies) of the subject territory meeting the specifications listed in the Application Instructions is included as Attachment 8. A legal description of the boundaries of the subject territory meeting the specifications listed in the Application Instructions is included as Attachment 9. Described how the boundaries of this proposal were determined (Note: One of LAFCo's major responsibilities is to insure that public agencies have logical boundaries. If your proposal would create an "island", peninsula, or other illogical boundary, you may be asked to revise the boundaries.): a. The conditions of approval of the Chambers Subdivision Map required the construction and installation of fire protection facilities, along with the recordation of CC&Rs which would provide the long term, private, ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the fire protection facilities, and/or required the formation of a new Butte County Service Area for the long term ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the fire protection facilities. A true copy of said conditions of approval of the Chambers Subdivision Map are included hereto as Attachment 10. Said Chambers Subdivision Map.was recorded in the Butte County Recorder's Office on May 3 1994, in Map Book 130, at Pages 94, 95 & 96), a true copy of which is included hereto as Attachment 11. b. The owners. of Speedway Subdivision (Lowell W. Pierce Deborah S. Pierce) have filed an Application for Approval Subdivision Map For Speedway Subdivision. The conditions of approval for Speedway Subdivision Map require the construction and installation of fire protection facilities, along with the formation of a new Butte County Service Area for the maintenance of [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 5 fire facilities, drainage facilities and landscape facilities. A true copy of said conditions of approval of the Speedway Subdivision Map are included hereto as Attachment 12. Said Speedway Subdivision Map has not yet been recorded. However, a true copy of the tentative subdivision map for Speedway Subdivision is included hereto as Attachment 13. C, The. Chambers Subdivision and the Speedway Subdivision are adjoining, contiguous properties. In this regard: !. A. The Applicants have jointly developed the Mutual Grant of Easements and the Fire Protection Facilities described herein, and have jointly constructed same in a central location, so as to provide fire protection facilities for the Chambers Subdivision and for the Speedway Subdivision. B. The Chambers Subdivision includes nine residential lots, and the proposed Speedway Subdivision Map provides for an intended eight residential lots. Therefore, upon recordation of the proposed Speedway Subdivision Map, there will be seventeen residential lots which will be available to provide funding for the long-term repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the Subject Property. This proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of all the affected agencies. (If you are not sure of each agency's sphere boundaries, check with LAFCo staff.) Describe access to the area: Both Chambers Subdivision and Speedway Subdivision are adjacent to, and contiguous with, Speedway Avenue, which is a public right-of-way, owned and operated by County of Butte. Chambers Subdivision includes New Foster Place •Roadway, which is privately owned and maintained, and which intersects Speedway Avenue. When Speedway Subdivision has been completed,, it will include Ranchwood Court, which will be privately owned and maintained, and which will intersect Speedway Avenue. ,Neighboring Properties A Public Notice List meeting the specifications listed in the [j Butts County [J Local Agency Formation Commission 11 Application Form [] March 1997 [] 6 6 Application Instructions is included as Attachment 14. Have the surrounding property owners been canvassed for approval or participation in the proposal? NO. There are no results of any survey of surrounding property owners, because no survey was performed. I. Land Use Describe the existing land use within the Subject Property: The Chambers Subdivision is single family residential property. The Speedway Subdivision is currently bare land with one single family dwelling. Butte County has tentatively approved the proposed Speedway Subdivision Map, which will provide for 8 new lots to be used for single family dwellings. Please identify parcels currently receiving service from your city/district: The Subject Property is located within the unincorporated portion of Butte County. The Subject Property is currently receiving fire protection from the Butte County Fire Department/CDF Fire Protection. The Fire Protection Facilities described herein have been designed and constructed according to plans and specifications established by BCFD/CDF. Following the formation of the proposed new Butte County Service Area, the Subject Property will continue to receive fire protection services from BCFD/CDF. The only change will be that the Fire Protection Facilities will be owned, controlled, repaired, maintained operated by a public entity. The Subject Property.is currently receiving maintenance of the surface water drainage facilities from the private landowners within Subject Property. The only change will be that the drainage facilities will be maintained by a public entity. 49 Does this proposal conform to the General Plan designation of the applicable planning jurisdiction in which the territory is located? (If you do not know what the applicable jurisdiction is, please refer to the LAFCo Operations Manual, Chapter 3, II(H) or contact LAFCo staff.) [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 7 811 Yes, the proposal conforms to the General Plan. Have any zoning changes, general plan amendments, subdivision maps, or conditional use permits been applied for on the subject property? Yes. In this regard: a. With regard to the Chambers Subdivision: A true` copy of said conditions of approval of the Chambers Subdivision Map are included hereto as Attachment 10. Said Chambers Subdivision Map was recorded in the Butte County Recorder's Office on May 31 1994, in Map Book 130, at Pages 94, 95 & 96), a true copy of which is included hereto as Attachment 11. b. With regard to Speedway Subdivision: A true copy of said conditions of approval of the Speedway Subdivision Map are included hereto as Attachment 12. Said Speedway Subdivision Map has not yet been recorded. However, a true copy of the tentative subdivision map for Speedway Subdivision is included hereto as Attachment 13. Will any such applications be made after approval of this proposal? No further applications are contemplated by the Applicants If this proposal is for an annexation to a city, a prezone map is included as Attachment N/A. Not Applicable; this does not involve annexation to a city. Does the project involve agricultural or open space lands? (Please refer to the LAFCo Operations Manual, Chapter 3, II(K) or contact LAFCo staff for the definition of agricultural or open space lands.) No. The Chambers Subdivision is a single family dwelling subdivision. Butte County has tentatively approved a single family dwelling subdivision (Speedway Subdivision) to be built upon the ,Speedway Subdivision, subject to certain terms and conditions. Public Services Please indicate which agencies presently provide public services to the subject territory, and which are proposed to provide service. If - Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 8 you are uncertain, you may leave spaces blank. Service Presently Provided By Proposed Provider Fire Butte County Fire Butte County Fire Protection Department And CDF Fire Department And CDF Fire Protection Protection Police Butte County Sheriff Butte County Sheriff Protection Domestic Individual Private ,. Individual Private Water Domestic Wells Domestic Wells Service Agricultural None None Water Service Sewer Individual Private Individual Private Service Septic Tanks Septic Tanks Solid Waste Private Waste Disposal Private Waste Disposal Companies Companies Road/Street Speedway Avenue Is A Speedway Avenue Is A Maintenance Public Roadway Which is Public Roadway Which is Owned And Operated By Owned And Operated By Butte County Butte County New Foster Place Roadway New Foster Place Roadway Is A Private Roadway Is A Private Roadway Which Provides Roadway Which Provides Roadway Access Within Chambers Access Within Chambers Subdivision; Maintenance Subdivision; Maintenance Is Provided With The Is Provided With The Road Maintenance Road Maintenance Agreement Recorded As Agreement Recorded Document Number As Document Number 94-019254 94-019254 Speedway Subdivision Speedway Subdivision (Speedway Subdivision) (Speedway Subdivision) Will Have A Private Will Have A Private Roadway to be Called Roadway To Be Called Ranchwood Court Which Ranchwood Court Which Will Provide Roadway Will Provide Roadway Access Within Speedway Access Within Speedway Subdivision; Maintenance Subdivision; Maintenance Will Be Provided With A Will Be Provided With A Road Maintenance Road Maintenance Agreement, To Be Agreement, To Be Recorded Recorded Snow Removal Not Applicable Not Applicable Power PG&E PG&E [] Butte County (] Local Agency Formation Commission (] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 9 Street PG&E Provides The PG&E Provides The Lighting Electricity For The Electricity For The Chambers Subdivision, Chambers Subdivision. There Are No Street There Are No Street Lights. Lights. PG&E Provides The PG&E Provides The Electricity For The Electricity For The Speedway Subdivision. Speedway Subdivision. There Are No Street There Are No Street Lights Contemplated, Lights Contemplated. Planning & Butte County Planning Butte County Planning Zoning Department Department Schools Chico Unified School Chico Unified School District District Fire CurrentlyThe Fire It is proposed that the Protection Protection Facilities Fire Protection Facilities Are Owned And Operated Facilities Will Be Owned By The Property Owners And Operated By The New Within The Subject Butte County Service Property Area, To Be Formed Surface Currently The Surface It is proposed that the Water Water Drainage Surface Water Drainage Drainage Facilities Are Owned And Facilities Will Be Owned Operated By The Property And Operated By The New Owners Within The Butte County Service Subject Property, Area, To Be Formed What is the probable effect of approval of this proposal on the type or level of services within the Subject Property? The Fire Protection Facilities have been installed and approved for these two subdivisions. The formation of the proposed new Butte County Service Area would provide a more stable and more secure mechanism for long term ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the Subject Property, which would provide improved fire protection services for the subject Property and for the surrounding neighborhood. What is the probable effect of approval of this proposal on public services outside the subject property? The Fire Protection Facilities have been installed and approved for these two subdivisions. The formation of the proposed new Butte County Service Area will provide a more stable and more secure mechanism for [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 10 long term ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for theSubjectProperty, which would provide improved fire protection services for the Subject Property and for the surrounding neighborhood. Will approval of this proposal place additional burdens on a public service provider? If so, what revenue will the change in organization generate to compensate the provide for the additional services? No, the Applicants do not believe that approval of this proposal will place additional burdens on a public service providers, as follows: a. The formation of the proposed new Butte County Service Area will provide a more stable and more secure mechanism for long term ownership, control, repair, maintenance, replacement and operation of the Fire Protection Facilities for the Subject Property, which would provide improved fire protection services for the Subject Property and for the surrounding neighborhood. b. It is anticipated that the proposed new Butte County Service Area will levy and collect sufficient service charges from the owners of the Subject Property to pay for all operating costs and replacement reserves and administrative overhead associated with this proposal. Have the affected agencies been notified of this proposal (per Government Code Section 56800 and/or Section 56828(b)? (These are generally any interested agency or agency which may be affected by the proposal.) The following affected public agencies have been notified of this Application: Stuart Edell Civil Engineering -Supervisor Butte County Department Of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 11 91 1f 1] Ted Crawford, Fire Captain Fire Protection Planning Butte County Fire Department and CDF Fire Protection 176 Nelson Avenue oroville, CA 95965 Population Estimate whether the subject territory contains: 12 or more registered voteIrs; XXX Less than 12 registered voters. ). Property Tax Exchange Government Code Section 56000 et seq, requires that a determination on property tax exchange be in place prior to LAFCo approval. The Tax and Revenue Code requires negotiations to be completed within 30 days of initiation, or the LAFCo application is considered null and void. In order to accommodate these short timelines, LAFCo requires applications to be accompanied by documentation that the property tax negotiations have been completed. The Master Tax Exchange Agreement is not applicable to this situation. If this application includes a Resolution of Application, does the Resolution include documentation that the agency is in agreement with the standing Master Tax Exchange Agreement? N/A The Master Tax Exchange Agreement is not applicable to this situation. If this application includes a petition, any documentation of applicants' request that the affected agencies initiate tax exchange agreements is included as Attachment N/A. The Master Tax Exchange Agreement is not applicable to this situation. Feasibility of Proposal What revenue will this proposal require for the accomplishment of its goals and what are the prospective sources of such revenues'? It is anticipated that the proposed new Butte County Service Area will levy and collect sufficient service charges from the owners of the Subject Property to pay for all operating [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 12 costs and replacement reserves and administrative overhead associated with this proposal. If the proposalinvolves a consolidation, incorporation or district formation a 3 year projected budget is included. See Attachment 15, included herein. Is a new tax or assessment being proposed as a part of this project? Yes. If so, a thorough discussion -of how the service will utilize the tax or assessment, as well as the legal authority for the agency to utilize the tax or assessment, is the following: Currently, the repair, maintenance, replacement, plus operating costs and replacement costs for the Fire Protection Facilities are provided by the Mutual Grant of Easements, included as Attachment 2. The formation of the Butte County Service Area is authorized by the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (California Government Code Section 56000, et seq.), as limited by Proposition 218, California Constitution, Article 13C, Section 2. Have agreements to mitigate the financial effects of this proposal been established with present service providers? Yes. Applicants submit that the Mutual Grant of Easements (included as Attachment 2) were negotiated and agreed-upon with Butte County Counsel's Office, Butte County Fire Department/CDF Fire Protection, and Butte County Public Works, as a mechanism for satisfying the fire protection requirements imposed upon the two subdivisions, prior to, and in conjunction with the formation of the Butte County Service Area. -= If so, signed copies of these agreements are included as Attachment 2. The Mutual Grant of Easements is included as Attachment 2, as recorded in the Butte County Recorder's Office on October 18, 1995, as Document Number 95-34542. [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 13 11. Z. Environmental Compliance Proposals where the Conducting Authority acts as Lead or Responsible Agency Is the Conducting Authority acting as Lead or Responsible Agency? Lead Agency XXX Responsible Agency Applicants submit that Butte County Public Works/Butte County Board of Supervisors will be the Lead Agency. Indicate what the Lead Agency has done to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Categorical Exemption _ Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Report - Other, please specify Copies of the complete environmental documentation prepared by the Lead Agency (including the initial study, any technical reports, and any written comments or recorded public testimony relative to the environmental documents), and a copy of the Notice of Determination, showing the date filed with the County Clerk are included as follows: a. With regard to Chambers Subdivision: A. A copy of the County of Butte Environmental Checklist Form -Evaluation of Environmental Impact for Chambers Subdivision, Dated August 29, 1991, is attached hereto as Attachment 16; Be A copy of the Conditions of Approval of the Chambers Subdivision Map, dated September 1, 1992, are included as Attachment 10; C. A copy of the Notice of Determination For Chambers Subdivision, as filed with --the Butte County Clerk's Office, is included herein as Attachment 17. Said Notice of Determination For Chambers Subdivision, provides that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for Speedway Subdivision. . b. With regard to Speedway Subdivision: A. The Agenda Report For The Butte County Development Review Committee For Speedway Subdivision (APN 0400-040-015), Dated September 29, 1994, is [j Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 14 included herein as Attachment 18. Said Agenda Report, at page 2, provides the following: The environmental review of the project was based on the 1992 Initial Study conducted by this Division for the Chambers Subdivision located directly east of this project. The Chambers project is a 9 lot subdivision with identical concerns and adequately addressed all present potential impacts for this project. All mitigation measures adopted for the Chambers project will all to this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been defined as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, is subject to the requirements of CEQA. An Initial Study has been prepared and adopted by the County on August 31, 1992 for the Chambers Subdivision located directly east of this project. Based upon the a review of this Initial Study, staff has determined that the Imhoff, Stof a, & Stone project impacts can be fully mitigated with the addition of mitigation measures added as conditions of approval for the project Be The Conditions of Approval of the Speedway Subdivision Map, dated November 28, 1994, are included as Attachment 12; C. The Notice of Determination For Speedway Subdivision, as filed with the Butte County Clerk's Office on December 7, 1994, is included herein as Attachment 19. Said Notice of Determination For Speedway Subdivision, provides that a Mitigated NegativeDeclaration was prepared for Speedway Subdivision. If you are not sure what constitutes -the complete environmental 'documentation, consult with the appropriate Lead Agency. It Was the environmental documentation circulated to the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission prior to adoption by the Lead Agency? 'yes XXX No If yes, copies of any comments made by LAFCo relative to the project, and any lead Agency responses are included as Attachment N/A. [] Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [] March 1997 [] 15 .f Not Applicable; no environmental documentation was circulated to LAFCO. (Note: If environmental documents were not circulated to LAFCo prior to adoption, LAFCo may require supplemental information.) oposals Where Lafco.Acts as Lead Agency In limited circumstances, LAFCo will act as Lead Agency for CEQA purposes. These circumstances are listed in LAFCO's CEQA Guidelines, and include situations where the Conducting Authority is unable or unwilling to act as Lead Agency. If the Conducting Authority has declined to act as Lead Agency, and the applicant wishes LAFCo to assume this responsibility, applicant must complete a Request for LAFCo to Act as Lead Agency (this form may be obtained at the LAFCo office). Applicants submit that Butte County Public Works/Butte County Board of Supervisors will be the Completed Request for LAFCo to Act as Lead Agency is included as Attachment N/A. Certification A plicants request that proceedings as described in this application be tken in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 56000 et s q. and here with affix their' signatures. Date Signature Printed Name Title 1• Beverly J. Chambers Landowner [Owner of APN 040-040-067, 040-040-073, - — 040-040-074] 2. Lowell W. Pierce Landowner [ Owner of APN -= 040-040-015] 3 ` Deborah S. Pierce Landowner [Owner of APN 040-040-015] Not the r 3: Applications may not be accepted without the signature of one or more of the following: 1) legal owner(s) or official agents with Power of Attorney or written authorization to sign, '.hief Petitioners, 3) Chair of the Legislative Body submitting a Resolution of Application. [J Butte County [] Local Agency Formation Commission [] Application Form [J March 1997 [j 16 [ M I 1 8719'00' E 982.54•POIT I I I 1 i i OF I j I I •oao 109 acaa m 5a BBEGINNIN 1 R I n aio rcn..c v a.c I 40-04-74 I • I 1 'I npr[cm�ncurca 1 I 40-04-66 wnaa nrs -..-_ I ; 1 � � 1 � 40-04-73 1 1 1 v 40-04-67 ti o 1 I I I I 1 - ; G__________ I_ I I b 1 I I I 1 1 40-04-72 N I i 40-04-68 I I 1 = 1 1 I I 1 I 1 [ _I�__R __________ 40-04-71 ; -ASS40-04-69 =Tmc� I NL%GM i I 40-04-70 40-44-15 - I 1 X 8107.00' E 978.06* CSA BOUNDARY LEGEND •-- WATER MAR[ .8 FIRE NTORART WATER VALVE C.S.A. NO._ COUNTY SERVICE AREA FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOCATION MAP N0 SCALE i LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT A Portion of Section 6, T. 21 N., R. 2 E., M.D.B. & M, and further described as follows: Chambers Subdivision A subdivision of lot 3 of the revised map of 2nd subdivision of the J. F. Entler Ranch, Butte County, California, as shown on the Subdivision Map for Jack and Beverly Chambers, Filed in the Official Records Of Butte County, California, May 3, 1994 in Book 130 of Maps at pages 94-96, Serial Number 94-19253, Subdivision Number 641 Speedway Subdivision A subdivision of a portion of lot 2 of the revised second subdivision of the J.F. Entler Ranch, Butte County, California, as shown on the Subdivision Map for Lowell and Deborah Pierce, Filed in the Official Records Of Butte County, California, on , 1997, in Book of Maps at Pages Serial Number , Subdivision Number 7