HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSA_180_Hawk_PlaceQ
C
H n
7s (D
O O
r- rh
n I -h 0
O O I✓
3 nnl
Fi I
L< (D
O �5
G (t
Fi I
ct O 1
h H- I
O 0 1
�l (D I
Iv (n I
IQ I
�1) I
._ F4 .I
O
O
F-'
O
O
O
O
O
I I
N
r 1
I I
o
I H
CD I
I
I IOIr
1
O C
N I .'
I I
I I
N
I V
I I
o
I H
CD I
I
I IOIr
1
O C
O I
I
u Z co
C) I
I -C
I
I o I
(n
I
I
I I
1
I
I
I
tl H LTJ
I I
r
I
I O I
I O
1 O I
n
I O
I O I
C
I O
I I
I I
�iI
i
\
O
O
H
H
CTI
m
N
Q0
I
H
n
co
O
t=J
d
b
r
O I--
bd
O rn H
H 'G" LTJ
r�
t1l co 0
� F -C
C
tIJ
H
7d
C=]
d
C=]
b
H
� I
CTI H
Q
m
Ut
I- I
C) I
011
CD I
I
• IJ
1
O C
O I
I
u Z co
(D I
tri 1
H H
L I
�j O
;o C)
I
I
tl H LTJ
I
I
� • • . :tJ
I
O
I
Q0
I
I
I
o
I
I
o
I
tTJ I
O
O I
r I
W
C:) I
�y I
• I
I
CTI
CD I
C� I
O I
t=J I
W
H
H
LTJ
CEJ
H
d
H
t�J
H
H
W
O
N
O
N
L
p
Wco
O co
0
c00
O A
m co
W j
w �
x
O
TWW
U
3�ox
rn
bm o
n3
O
b
0
2
V
s1
P.O. Box 00 ****** INVOICE ****** PAGE: 1
2313 Durham -Dayton
Highway
n..,hn", r"x,"."'~ utZo°o
9/21/10 CUSTOMER SAID THAT PUMP WAS TRIPPING THE
BREAKER ON START UP. ADJUST TRIP SETTING ON MCP
BREAKER. RAN AND TESTED SYSTEM. NO OTHER PROBLEMS
AT THIS TIME.
0.00 1.00 1.00 SERVICE CALL 9/21/10 ' 100.00N0
/PSMATTS -`
SIGNATURE
E X C E41 L L E 1 N C" PE
NET INVOICE:
TAXABLE:
NON–TAXABLE:
.000% DISCOUNT:
TAXABLE PRGHT:
SALES TAX:
'---- ----
-- — INVOICE TOTAL:
' '~`~^ACCT. STATEMENT COPY
100.00
100.00
.00
100.00
.�0
.00
.00
10N.00
ham
INVOICE
NUMBER:
01156$2'(�IN
r
530-891-4821 tel
1.111010E
I.
DATE.-
10/26/112)
UM.
530-891-0613 fax
CUSTOMER
NO:
09-00053315
J76
NELSON
AVE
SHIP TO-.
f
RO V I LLE
CA
95965
BUTTE COUNTY
FIRE:` DEPT – 11AIN
JOB NAME:
CIONFIRM
YO:
DARREN READ
RED HAWlr�
PL
B/0 ORD 'SHIP
ITEM NO.
PRICE
EACH AMOUNT
9/21/10 CUSTOMER SAID THAT PUMP WAS TRIPPING THE
BREAKER ON START UP. ADJUST TRIP SETTING ON MCP
BREAKER. RAN AND TESTED SYSTEM. NO OTHER PROBLEMS
AT THIS TIME.
0.00 1.00 1.00 SERVICE CALL 9/21/10 ' 100.00N0
/PSMATTS -`
SIGNATURE
E X C E41 L L E 1 N C" PE
NET INVOICE:
TAXABLE:
NON–TAXABLE:
.000% DISCOUNT:
TAXABLE PRGHT:
SALES TAX:
'---- ----
-- — INVOICE TOTAL:
' '~`~^ACCT. STATEMENT COPY
100.00
100.00
.00
100.00
.�0
.00
.00
10N.00
MEMORANDUM
Local Agency Formation Commission
T4: CDF / BCFD, Darren Read
FROM: Jonna Houghton, Commission Clerk
SUBJECT: 05-08 -County of Butte -Formation of CSA No. 180 (Redhawk Ranch
Subdivision)
DATE: March 7, 2066
Please find enclosed the recorded Certificate of Completion with Resolution, legal
description, and map for the above -referenced annexation.
Please call me at 538-7784 if you need additional details.
T..
Requested by and when recorded mail to:
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CObaffSSION
2770 Olive Hiighway, Suite C, Oroville, CA 95966-6117
Attest: N d ZVCOC
The following , page document is a correct
copy of the original, on file and of record in the
LAFCO office.
By; -- V, Deputy
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
73105�00681-99-
Recorded I IAC FEE
Official Records l
GaBatte f
CNM J. BRUBBS i
County Clerk-Recarderi
KL
81:M 09 -Nov -2W I Page i. of 36
oil III III I III I'm I �N � III
I, PAULA LEASUM, the Executive Officer ofthe Butte Local Agency Formation Commission,
hereby certify that the District has completed a change of organization pursuant to the Cortese -Knox -
Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, as follows:
The name of the District is: '
Redhawk Ranch Subdivision kv
The name of the County or Counties in which the entire District is located is:
Butte County
The change of organization completed is:
Annexation/Reorganization Inhabited
X Formation X Uninhabited
The short title, if any, . of the above-mentioned proceeding is:
05-08 - Formation of County Service Area No. 180 , edhawk Ranch Subdivision)
The legal description of the territory for which this Certificate is being written is set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A." The map of the territory for which this Certificate is being written is set forth in the
attached Exhibit "B." The resolution ordering the change of organization for which this Certificate is
being written is set forth in the attached Exhiibit "C," including LA -FCO Exhibit "I" with attached
Exhibits "A" through "E," and LAFCO Exhiibit "2."
The change of organization was:
., X Ordered without an election and the Resolution ordering the change of
organization was adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission on
October 6.2005.
Confirmed by the voters. and the Resolution confirming the change of
organization atter confirmation by the voters was adopted by the govermng
Board of the District on
Local ency Formation Commission
Dated: November 7, 2005 By:
Paula Leasure, Executive Officer
Jam►1.1994
11 "C»
RESOLUTION N0.15 2005/06
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE COUNTY OF B MAKING DETERMINATIONS
AND APPROVING THE FORMATION OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO* 180
(REDHAWK RANCH SUBDIVISION) TO INCLUDE THE ADOPTION OF A
MIJNICII'AL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN
RESOLVED, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte, State of
California, that
WHEREAS, a resolution of application for the proposed formation of a county service area in the
County of Butte was heretofore filed by the Butte County Board of Supervisors and was accepted for filing
on August 29, 2005, by the Executive Officer ofthis Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title
6, Division 1, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Executive officer, pursuant to Government Code Section 56658, set October 6,
2005 as the hearing date and gave the required notice of public hearing; and
wHE�S, the Executive officer, pursuant to Government Code Section 566652 has reviewed
thisp � r osal and prepared a report including her recommendations thereon, and has furnished a copy of this
report to each person entitled to a copy; and
WHEREAS, this Commission called for and held a public hearing on October 6, 2005 and at the
hearing this Commission heard and received all oral and protests, objections and evidence which were
made, presented or filed, and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be heard with respect
to this proposal and the report of the Executive Officer; and
WHEREAS, this Commission considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant
to this proposal, including, but not limited to, factors specified in Government Cade Section 56668; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER, as follows:
Formation Findings
Section 1. Environmental Findings:
A. The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Addendum to the M igated Negative Declaration prepared ana adopted by
the County of Butte on June 24 and August 16, 2005, for the residential subdivision and
proposed district for__ .on to include the fixing of a sphere of influence, which does not
identify any significant impacts associated with the project that were not mitigated. The
Commission finds no compelling grounds to require supplementing the environmental
documents prepared by the County of Butte.
Section 2. Determinations:
A. The proposed county service area is formed pursuant to the County Service Area Law
(Chapter 2.2, Part 2, Division 2, Title 3 ofthe Government Code, commencing with Section
RESOLUTION NO* 15 2405106
25210.1) and has been initiated by Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 004-184 adopted
October 12, 2004.
B. Pursuant to Government Code Section 56100, the Commission proceedings are conducted
pursuant to the principal act with the C ' sion serving as the conducting authority.
C. The proposed district is only empowered to provide for the operation and maintenance of
storm drain 'ties, fire protection ' 'ties and street Lighting services, required by the
County as conditions ofapproval for the 7 lot residential subdivision on approxunmately 7.59
acres. Any expansion of powers oilier than approved herein will require the approval of the
Commission.
D. The subject temEtory includes approximately 7.59 acres of private property identified as
APN 047-460-005 and is assigned the following distinctive short term designat--05-08.
Formation of County Service Area No. 180 (Redhawk Ranch Subdivision).
E. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and approved the
engineer's report and proposed budget for the provision of necessary services and adopted
said charges by Resolution No. 04-268.
F. As this formation has been initiated by the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 04-184 and
has been supported by the affected landowners through the Ballot Proceeding identified in
Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 04-268, pursuant to Government Code Section 56100,
the Commission approves the fonras the conducting authority without fiuther action
required of the County.
G. The district proposal is consistent with the Commission policies found in Section 5.2 of the
Policies and Procedures in flax:
1. The proposed land uses to be served by the district have been determined by the
Commission to be consistent with the County General Plan Land Use Element and
the North Chico Specific Plan and that no other affected agency with land use
authority have objected to the proposal.
2. No existing agency in the area can more efficiently provide the desired services.
3. The proposal included a Plan for Services to be provided
4. The proposal will benefit the public by providing necessary urban services to new
development.
5. The Commission has received a projected multi-year budget that indicates the
district can remain fiscally capable of providing the proposed services.
Page 2 of 4
SOL TON Na. 15 2005!46
Section 3. Conditions adopted by LAFCO:
A All Butte County and State of California fees must be paid in full prior to filing the
Certificate of Completion.
B. The map and legal description shall comply with the Department of Public Works and State
Board of Equation requirements.
C. The legal description and map, if rejected by the State Board of Equalization or amended
by action of the Commission, will be revised at the expense of the applicant, prior to filing
the Certificate of Completion.
Municipal Service Review Findings
Section 1. Environmental Findings:
A. The adoption of the Municipal Service Review does not require environmental review
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, however, the C*sion certifies
that it has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum to
the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared and adopted by the County of Butte on June
24 and August 16, 2005, for the residential subdivision and proposed district formation to
include the Bing of a sphere of influence, which does not identify any significant impacts
associated with the project that were not mitigated The Commission finds no compelling
grounds to require supplementing the environmental documents prepared by the County of
Butte.
Sections 2. Determinations:
A. The Commission has considered the data, recommendations, and determinations 180-1
through 180-9 and contained in the Municipal Service Review attached to this staff report
and identified as LMCO Exhibit "1" and finds that:
1. The determinations accurately represent the characteristics of the district, the
intended servicers to be provided and the level of the services to be provided; and
2. The determinations demonstrate ti�at described services will be adequately provided
as described in the proposed budgets.
Sphere of Influence Plan ,I+"ndinews
Section I. Environmental Findings:
A. The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared and adopted by
the County of Butte on June 24 and August 16, 2005, for the residential subdivision and
proposed district to include the fixing of a sphere of . duence, which does not
Page 3 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 15 2005/06
identify any sign- cant impacts associated with the project that were not mitigated. The
Commission finds no compelling grounds to require supplementing the environmental
documents prepared by the County of Butte.
Section 2. Detelrm�inations:
A. The Csion has considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant
to this proposal, including, but not limited to, Government Code Sections 56425, 56427 and
56428 and as described in the staff report dated September 2I1, 2005 for the meeting of
October 6, 2005.
B. The Sphere of Influence Plan attached to this staffreport as LAFCO Exhibit "2," accurately
reflects the judgement of the Commission with respect to the:
1. Planned land uses within the district; and
2. Agricultural and open space land considerations; and
3. The need for and availability of services; and
4. The planned capacity adequacy of proposed facilities; and
5.- Any social or economic communities of interest.
C. The Sphere of Influence shall be coterminous with the boundary of the county service area.
Section I The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of
this Resolution as provided in Section 56882 of the Government Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Butte,
on the 6' day of October 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Beck, Connelly, Dolan, Dirk and Chair Leverenz
NOES: None
ABSTAINS: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cook and Hunter
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission
Page 4 of 4
FINAL
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW
for
COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 180
(REDHAWK RANCH SUBDIVISION)
Adopted October 6, 2005
LAFCO Resolution No. 15 2005/06
LAFCO Exhibit "1"
CSA No. 180
(Redhawk Ranch Subdivision)
REVIEW, ANALYSIS and DETERMINATIONS of SERVICE PROVISIONS -
The review and analysis of service provisions is based on the follow' wing sources of information:
• Initial Study and Proposed *luifiigated Declaration for Tentative Subdivision Map #04-06; and
• Addendum to the fungated Declaration for Tentative Subdivision Map ##04-06 and
• Butte County Planning Commission Agenda Report of ,dune 24, 2004 for TSM 04-06; and
County completed UuSR-I.nformation Collection'Quesfionnaire (EAiibft'A"y; and
• County prepared Plan for Services (Exhibit 13"); and
County Proposed budget for. F' 2006106 and Future Fears {Exhibit "Cl.
District Characteristics
CSA No. 180 (Redhawk Ranch Subdivision) is an area of unincorporated territory located in the north
Chico area within the boundaries of the North Chico Specific Plan; and provides the financing.for the.
provision of street ligh.ng, storm drainage and fire protection services. The CSA area is to be
developed with single family residential uses at suburban. densities and wiq serve seven. (7) parcels.
The'District's Sphere of Influence -is to be coterminous vvi#h its service area boundary. The- formatio
of the county servile area was initiated by the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 04-1$4 in 2004.
Infrastructure Needs and Deficiencies
Tbhe County Department of Public works reports that:
Three (3) individual street 11' is are intended to serve the residenfial subdivision. The .street
lights v�itl consist of tight f lures affDced to steel poles at various points throughout the -
neighborhood.
• The drainage facilities consist, of street side drains 'and a detention -basin designed- in..
accordance with accepted County engineering standards.
• The fire protection system consists of a single well, water pump and hydrant located on lot 2
of the subdivision.
The area will be fully developed with minimal opportunities for redevelopment 'in the future due to
sewer -service constraints,
Detefmination CSA 184-1. The CSA as deknbed appears to provide an adequate level of street
lighting,, storm drainage and rite protection services.
Growth and Population
The north Chico area is anticipated to grow at modest levels due to land use constraints primarily
related to parcel size restrictions of one acre or larger at densities consistent with current land use
Bate LAFCO 0 Municipal SeMce review * County Service Area No. 180
2
designations.The subdivision is expected to be fully developed with an estimated population of
approximately 15 persons.
Determination CSAR 180-2: A significant increase in populaf►on is not anticipated within this County
Service area. Planned faciffies as discussed above should be adequate to serve the project area
throughout -the five year! planning- period. :
Financing Constraints and Opportunities
This CSA vin71 be a post Proposition 13 district that is funded by individual parcel assessments subject
to voter approval pursuant to Proposition 218 requirements. Pursuant to Board of Supervisors
Resolution -No. X44-268., a.-maxi*munt parcel :chane ;of $50.1.72 was. e,statblished December. 14r4K
The currentper parcel charge being collected for the single -undeveloped parcel in the 2005/06 Budget
is $3,512 and is a deposit to be paid by the developer based on the approved 7 lot subdivision.
Subsequent years budgets vwIl be based on a. maximum parcel assessment of $512.7Zw.hich would.
generate $3,512 per year as. described in the approved budgets attached as Exhibit "O".
The current annual parcel assessments for this CSA appear adequate to provide- the intended
services based on current. County administrative/maintenance costs and Pacific Gas and 'Electric
charges remaining fairly. consistent over the planning period.
Deterrnination CSA 180-3: The current parcel assessment is adequate to provide intended services
_based on current County adrninistrafive/maintenance costs and existing rates charged by PG&E.
.Deten nina#ion CSA 180-4: if th6re is a significant increase in PG&E mates or a desire to expand the
.intended services, a Proposifion 218 election will be required in order to set a new tax rate.
Cost Avoidance Op. ortunities
Since the County -approved residential subdivision is required to provide the* intended services, the.
CSA is the only reasonably available funding mechanism for the provision of the necessary urban
improvements at this time. The anly way to avoid the costs of the CSA Would be to r6move* the
requirements for the intended infrastructure or allover the parcell to remain undeveloped.
Determination CSA 180-5: There am no realistic costavoidance opportunities available if the property
is to be developed in accordance with County plans. .
Opportunities for Rate Restructuring.
There are no reasonable opportunities for rate restructuring since the County administrative and
maintenance costs are fixed and PG&E charges are regulated by the Public Utilities Commission.
Determination CSA 180-8: Thea aro no opportunities for rate restructuring.
Butte LAFCO • Municipal Service Review -0 County Service Area No. 180
3
porfunifies for Shared Facilities 1 Government Structure options
There are limited existing overiapping jurisdictional services affecting the proposed CSA area that
would allow for shared operation and maintenance of the intended facilities. The proposed CSA area
is within CSA No. 87 (Keefer Road and Rock Creek Drainage District) which is empowered to install
basicflood-control�irnprovernents;-collectJdeveloper fees for additional -capital improvements- acquire
right-of-ways, and -maintain all drainage & flood control improvements and natural drainage courses.
Currently CSA 87 reportedly provides storfn drain maintenance and food control services. `there are
thirteen additional individual CSA's providing similar services to residential development in the north
Chico ' area. A map of the north Chico area CSA's is attached as Exhibit "D" to the report.
There is a logical opportunity for urban services. to be provided on a regional scale under a
consolidated CSA or other regional service providing mechanism such as a community services
district or Mello -Roos district. These options are not considered feasible by the County due to the
manner in which parcel charges and CSA budgets are administered on a project by project basis, thus
creating difficulty in evaluating service costs between subdivisions with potentially different levels of
service and number of contnibuting parcels. A consolidation. of CSA services would require a
tremendous analysis effort and would most likely result in multiple zones of benefit that would require
a similar amount. of administration as the current multiple individual CSA approach. The County
response to this question is contained' in their letter of August 10, 2005 which is attached as Exhibit
".E" to this report.. -
'To a. large degree, the opportunity for a regional approach to the delivery of urban services in the
north Chico area has passed as, individual- subdivisions were approved with each project being
designed independently of . the whole, thus severely smiting the opportunities for a unified plan for -
services. There does remain the future option for an expanded City of Chico Sphere of Influence and
eventual annexation. However, this option would require significant planning and administrative
functions making it an unrealistic option for the immediate development of the area.
Determination CSA 180- 7: Limited viable opportunities exist for shared facilities as .the opportunity
for a regional approach to the defivery of urban services in the north Chico area has passed as
individual subdivisions were approved with each project being designed independently of the whole,
thus severely limiting the opportunities thr a unified plan for services.
Management Efficiencies
The operation and maintenance of this County Service Area involves several layers of County
government to administer while. providing the identified services. The Butte County Board of
Supervisors is the governing board of the County Service Area; however, the County Administrative
Office is not the primary point of public -contact. Management responsibility is primarily distributed to
the Butte County Department of Pubric Forks (BCPWD) which provides staff to develop the annual
budget, maintains administrative oversights responds to public inquiries, coordinates -with PG&E for
the payment of street fighting services and maintains the drainage infrastructure. Fire infrastructure
is the responsibilfty of the Butte County Fire Department. Fiscal accountability is provided by the Butte
County Auditor's Office which prepares the annual Local Government Financing Act (LGFA) reports
required by the State. Additionally, the State Board of Equalization establishes the Tax Rate -Area for
Butte LAFCO 0 Municipal Service Review 0 County Service Area No. 180*
4
the purposes of collecting taxes and finally,. the Local Agency Formation Commission is responsible
for maintaining boundary maps and service evaluations.
Determination CSA 180-8: Outside of provOing common serwoes-on a regional scale, there are limited
opportunities for increasing management efficiencies due to the various functions necessary to
operate a countyserlce area.'
LocalAccountability and Governance
As. discussed in the Management Efficiencies section above, there are several levels of County
governance that exist along with the State regulated utility :provider, PG&E. Structurally, the County
is the service provider, but all point of service deUvery issues such as broken lights or damaged tight
poles are assumed by PG&E. In this regard, the public has no single point -of governmental contact
to seek remedial action. Inquiries from the public would be routed to the various management entities
depending on the issues involved, which can often cause frustration to the public. The budget for this
p 9
CSA is included in the greater Butte County budget and would be difficult for the general public to
access and understand. .
Determination CSA 180-9: There is minimal, but adequate accountability and local governance
through the public hearing process. However, a single point of public contact should be assigned by
the County Administrative Ofce with the authority to resolve public inquiries as they arise.
Summ ry Statement
County Service Area No. 180 is intended to provide -the identified services within its approved budget
and is the preferred option of the County forthe provision of individual project services. However., the
CSA as a method of providing common urban services should- be considered- on a regional scare
rather than on an individual project basis in order efficiencies to increase management eciencies and reduce
the number of governmental entities serving a defined region.
Final Statement of Determinations
The Butte Local Agency Formation Commission has made the. following Determinations for CSA No.
180. These Determinations are the basis for adopting or amending the CSA's Sphere of Influence
and possible reorganization options. it is understood that the changes in land uses and government
funding structures may require these Determinations. to be reviewed' periodically and- .possibly
amended to reflect changes in form or function.
Determination CSA 180-1: The CSA as descnbed appears to provide an adequate level of street
lighting, storm dMinage and fire protection services.
Determination CSA 180-2: A significant increase in population is not anticipated within this County
Service Area. Planned facilities as discussed above should be adequate to serve the project area
throughout the five year planning period.
Butte LAFG0 i Municipal Se ice Review 0 County Service Area No. 180
5 -
DetenninadW CSA X80-3: The cunt parcel assesses is adequate to provide Mended se ices
based on current County adrninrstrativvelmaintenance costs and exisffhg rates charged by PG&E.
Determination CSA 180-4: If there is a significant increase in PG&E rates or a desire to expand the
intended services, a Proposition 218'ele on will be regaled in order to set a tax rate.
Determinafion CSA 180-5: There are no realisffc cost avoidance opportunffies avaAable ifthe property
is to be developed in accordance with County plans. .
Determination CSA 180-6: There are no opportunities for rate restructuring.
Determination CSA 180-7: Limited viable opportunities ,exist for shared facifties. as the opportunity
fora regional approach to the delivery of urban services in the north Chico area has passed as
individual subdivisions were approved with each pro, ject being► designed independently of the. whole.,
19
thus severely limiting the opportunities forfia unied plan for services.
Determination CSA 180-8: Outside -ofproviding common services on a regional scale, there are limited
opportunities for increasing management efficiencies due to the various functions necessary to
operate a county service area.
Determination CSA 180-9: There is minimal; but adequate accountability and local governance
through the public hearing process. However, a single point. of public contact should be assigned by
,the County Administrative Office with the authority to resolve public inquiries as they arose.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Exhibit "A" - County completed MSR Information Collection Questionnaire.
2. Exhibit "B" - County prepared Pian for Services.-
3.
ervices:3. Exhibit "C" - County Proposed budgets for FY 2005/06 and Future Years.
4. Exhibit "D".- Map of North Chico Area County Service Areas.
5. Exhibit '"E" - August 10, 2005 letter from County discussing service options.
SOURCES
1. ISR Questionnaire completed by the Butte County Department of !works. Contact. Tom Blixt,
Administrative Analyst.
2. County of Butte, Planning Division, various. staff interviews, September 2004.
3. Cita of Chico Development Standards - Street Lighting.
4. Site reconnaissance of CSA boundaries and services, September 2005.
5. Pacific Gas & Electric, interview with Phil Lira, September 2004.
6. Butte County Planning Division, Geographic Information System mapping..
7. County prepared CSA Plan for Services.
8. -County CSA Proposed budget for FY 2005/06.
9. County Proposed CSA budget for future years.
10. leap of North Chico Area County Service Areas.
11: August 10, 2005 letter from County discussing service options.
Butte LAFCO 0 Municipal Service Review 0 County Service Area No. 180
Municipal Service_ Review
fo.r
CSA No. too (Red Hawk Ranch Subdlvlsion Street Lighting,
. Storm Drainage and,FireProsection) .
infaatlaff�[�ection�[�est�'`at���i�e
The following questions. are de -'signed. to help countyservice area districts and L'AFCO'
compile in -formation :needed to complete the Municipal Service Review. Answers to thesequestions.wiD be used 'by LAFCO to prepare the Service, Review which will be used to
update the district's .Sphere of Influence. This I s- only the preliminary request for
information: -l.AFCO wriil request additional informatio'n' 'as needed.-
Please review the following questions and provide as thorough' answers as possible.
Attach additional sheets 'as necessary.
I. Infrastructure' Needs and Deficiencies
.. A. What' is the present condition of the street lights? Does the district have
available resources to make necessary changes?
Three..street lights proposed to be installed by the Develoaer prior to�accepfance by CSA
Tfiere are no chances necessaiy..
B. How many street lights does the district maintain?
PG&E will maintain 3'street liahts'if they are accepted by the CSA:
C'. What is the location of the street lights?
The street lights locations are shown on the Plat submitted wish the LAFCo apafication
D, What is the present conditio-n of the storm dram infrastructure? Does the
district have avaiiabie resources to make necessary changes?
IT "A"
LAFCo Exhibit
IL
D. What is the present condition of the storm drain infrastructure? Doesthe
district have available resources to make necessary changes?
The storm -drainage system has been designed in accordance with Cauniv criteria and
accepted Engineering praciices: Acceptance of the system by the CSA Mif[ occur after
consirucflon has been completed in -.accordance with the approved afans and the
Developer's .one-vear, maintenance peri6d-has expired: There are. no changes
E.: Describe the type of firero.. ptection services the district provides. e.g. fire
hydrants, pumps, fire stations, etc.
The fire protection system consists of a well, fire protection pump and hydrants:
- FWhat is the location of the fire hydrants, pumps, fire'stations, etc.?
The fire protection pump and hydrant areproposed on lot 2 near the cul-de-sac.
. G. Are the districts physical resources. (vehibles, tools, equipment) adequate to
provide service io the public at this time? What about over the next 5, 10.115
years? .
Yes.
H. Where are the problem areas .and what are the future needs and plans?
There are no Arobiem areas identified.
Red Hawk Ranch MSR . _ 'Page 2 of 7
December 6, 2004
[[. Growth and Population projections for the affected area.
A. How will the projected population growth within the district- boundary affect
the ahrf lty toprovide future service?.
Pro166ted .. o. � elation- rAwth: s.n; antiaci ated=nor zs- it-a--deter-minLn -factory =e e_
-
delivery within the CSA:
B• Do'you estimate that there will �be future service needs withindistrict,
the
boundaries? if so, would the district have the ability to provide service to a
larger area?
• No.
C: What is the op ortuni for expansion of the district's sphere of influencep � exp p
through an-nexation?
No:.anticloated.
-D• what is the current estimated, population of the district?
Unknown and not a determininq factor for service delive within the CSA•
Financing Constraints and Opportunities
Red Hawk Ranch MSR Page-3 of 7
Ddeember 'S,' 2004 .
r
A. Is the current budget adequate to fund existing services?
T�e�rop�sed�ax�mur�.ser-fiebv-fhe$oard�f=Supa�xr�s�rs��aearir��q=
.• set for December 14.2004) then the .fee will be adequate: If ffie fee is not approved fihen
the GSA -will not be .formed:
B. Would. an: increase -inrevenue allow for services thatare not*.* currently
provided.? ' If so, what services?
No.
C. Do you anticipate that service demands will exceed revenues in 5, 10, 15.
years?
Noe - -
D. If yes to question C,. ghat consideration has been given to' increasing
revenues?
E, What is the current fiscal status of the distrlct?
The .current fiscal status none. District is in rocess of being formed and deposit
of first Years budget is a condition of approval.
Red Hawk Ranch MSR - -
December 6, 2004
Page 4. of 7
do
B. Is there a reasonable opportunity to increase current parcel charges igen
the constraints dictated by Proposition 218 voter approval -requirements?
No..
Iva Cost Avoidance Opportunities
Ae What cost avoidance measures does the district currently use to minimize
costs to citizens? (Budget process, bidding policies, etc.)
Budget for anticipated expenses only_
Be who-provides the street lighting maintenance?
PG&E.
C. .Mho provides the storm drainage maintenance? .
Butte County Public works- road crews:
D.. Who provides fire protection services?
Butte County Eire Department and' contracted service ,providers..
Red Hawk Ranch- MSR Page. 5 of 7
December. 6, 20Q4 .
E. Doesthe district have the opportunity for joint agency practices, such as
sharing insurance with'other county service area districts or agencies?
Unknown.
V. Opportunities for Rafe Restructuring
A. How does the district analyze and establish rates and fees?
Budget for anticipated expenses only..
Be How will. a Sphere of Influence action impact, the rates and fees within
p he
district?
Nofantici ated to happen.
C. How will the increased Sphere of influ.ence territories a their share of the
{ ., � pay .
district's cost for services?
Per parcel service charges..
VI, opportunities for Shared Facilities- .
a.- Does the district share facilities, staff, or equipment with other agencies?.
Red Hawk Ranch MSR Page 6 of 7
December 6,'2004
Yes. - See maintenance entities above.
VII.., Government structure Options.
A. Is there an alternative form or structure of focal governance that would be
preferable oto the use of a county service area?
Not for public facilities in this area. -
VIII. Management Efficiencies' & Budget Information
A. Please list the specific services that the county service area provides?
"Street lighting-, dra inacie and fire ixotection.
B'. are annual budget and..audit reports available- to the* public?
Yes,
Red Hawk Ranch MSR
December 6'2004
Page 7 of 7
Red Hawk Ranch
CSA Plan: For Services
Description -of .Services.
The CSA will provide to the Red Hawk Ranch Subdivision with the following
services: =
1. Street lighting — Including power and maintenance for the three street -lights
within'the subdivision. .
2. Storm Drain Quantity Mitigation--- Including the maintenance of the, storm
drain infiltration trench and piping system.
3. Fire suppression system — Including maintenance of the fire hydrant and • fare
Well' for &6 •suppression services.'
These services will- be extended. into the subdivision. when the public improvements are -
provided for the Red Hawk Ranch Subdivision: At.this point all roads and structure will
be built to: County standards and be -'dedicated to the County of Butte. See the attached
feasibility study, LAFCo Exhibit 8.
LA Exhibit "1"
ExrFrMIT "W9
f•
LA Exhibit "1"
ExrFrMIT "W9
y
Yeasibility Stuc :
Red Hawk � =6- Su t Divi f obi
Cost Breakdown
$'10.35 po
Feasibility Study
Red Hawk Ranch Subdivision,
Cost 13- ree0cclown
$1.7926
CSA Formation Red Hawk Ranch Subdivision
(.1 PARCEL)
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 2,005/2006**
.Budget
Code Description. Charge-
Maintenaceof equipment
Fire protection system pump 500-
544 Utilities -Street lighting ;
2- 100VV LS 1 E $ 600
1- 70WL51E $ 2-50
Fire.. protection system pump $ 500
554 Interfund. Services -Auditor $ 114
554.93 Interfund Services -Road Fund
Storm Drainage Maihtenan*,c*e' 50,0
554,111 Interfund. Services -Fire Departmen# $ 20G
554.181 Interfun'd, Services-GeneraI'Se r0bes
Administration Expense -Public Wo.* Lreft- $ 125
580 Appropriation- for Contingencies '
1/2 Fire protection system pump replacement (10 -year)
$9,300 Pump + $3,600. Hydrand't.+ Inflation $ 723'
Total $ 3,512
Single Parcel Charge $3,512/1 '31512,00
LAFCO ExWbit "1" EI{HBTT• ,•C�
f
CSA Formation. Red Hawk Ranch Subdivision
(7 PARCELS),-
PROPOSEDBUDGET--FOR`FUTURE FY
u�gef
_ _
Code
Description -
Charge
530
Mainte-nace of equipment
Fire protection. system pump.500
5,44.-
Utilities=Streef lighting`
"
28M 100VV iS1 E
$ 600
I - 70W LS -1. E
$ 250
Fire protection system pump
$ 500
554
Inteifiund Services -Auditor
$ 114
554,03.
Herfund. Services -Road Fund
Storm Drainage Maintenance
$ 500.
554.1
Interfund'Servi c -es- Fire Department
$ 2.00
654,018.1
1-n-terfun'd Services -General Services
Adm.inistratio'n'Expens"e--P.Ublic Works
$ 125
580'
Appropri ation for C6n*ti`ngencie's-
1/2'Fire, protection system pump replacement (1 0 -year)
$9;300 Pump + $3,600'HyOrandt +Infation
723
Total'$
3,512
Per Parce*l Charge $3,51217 =
$ 501.72
North Chico Area CSAs
® Chico Sphere
M Wildflower Estates Lighting & Drainage (128)
M Chico Mud Creek Drainage (024)
0 Keefer Creek Estates Lighting, Drainage, & Sewer (135)
® Rancho de Thunder Lighting (062)
M Ishi Valley Lighting, Drainage, & Fire (158)
Quail Run Estates Lighting & Drainage (76)
® Justin Manor Lighting, Drainage, & Fire (165)
Keefer Road Rock Creek 087 Drainage g (
®Pheasant Landing Lighting, Drainage, Sewage, &Fire (169)
Stoney Brook Estates Lighting & Drainage (097)
M Autumn Park Lighting, Drainage, Landscaping, & Fire (172)
Carnage Estates Lighting & Drainage (101)
= Pheasant Landing Estates Lighting, Drainage, & Fire (176)
® Meadowlark Acres Lighting & Drainage (102)
= Red Hawk Lighting, Drainage, & Fire (180)
CS
PA 101 ^rviLn
— r
CSA 176
_n
Rancho Rd
CSA 87 ;,C—
__ Kathyln
w
----- CSA 102 Y 00�
00
` trom-way 00
00
0.0,
a s----NtuyCSA 97 CSA 24
J
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CSA 180
N
Red Hawk Lighting, Drainage, and Fire District (Pending) 1000 0 1000 Feet
Data: Butte County & LAFCO
C:\projects\1afco_rojects\1afco_csas\csa 180
\csa_180.apr. Inst Update: 09/14/05
LAFCO Exhibit "1" EXHIBIT "D"
Works
D rtment
o u n t y. o f
B u t 't e
J. Michael Crump, Director
Stuart Edell Deputy� Director
rc
_ ....A�zt 1-0; 2-005
Steve Lucas
LA.FCo .
2770 Olive Hwy, Ste. C
• Oroville;� CA�9596
LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(534) 538-7266
(FAX) 538-7171
-a
Re: Red Hawk Ranch formation of a new County Service Area (CSA)
Dear Stever _
.As requested, this letter provides additional. information in response to the followingq uestions:
I. Question: As this CSA formation proposal is located within ageographic
- p p• area
that. is currently provided services by twelve GSA's (No. 's 765 875 97, 101, 1025-1282 135
1382 158 165, 169, 172), with sinular powers (street. lighting, drainage, fire protection
and sewage disposal maintenan.ce), explam why the County feels the need to create a new
governrn.ent agency before fully evaluating alternatives such as consolidation of services?
Response: we have discussed this in the past. The servicesy
rovided b these
P
CSAs are different and costs area lied to the I '
pp lots differently (i.e. an 8 lot
subdivis i on would a more per lot for street lighting than a 1 '
pay p; +.,. g g 6 lot subdivision
using the same lights). Consolidation of services would require the creation of '
zones of benefit within the consolidated CSA which significantly increases the
administration burden on the County and thereby increases the .CSA cost to the
homeowners: Each and. every year the TRAs and parcels. would need. to be
reviewed for any changes such as the Assessor changing'books or subdivision o
_ f
parcels, each of the TRAs would carry a portion of the cost that may char g a with
a change in parcels, this increases the time required to balance the service charges
and increases the time conlirming the charges are correct.
Separate CSAs generate their own TRA (a one shot project for the State Board of
Equalization), which remains constant, parcel changes within. the TRA are easy yto
fnd and all the parcels within. the TRA are charged the same amount. The annual
budget review and spread of the charges to each parcel is a quick, efficient, cost
effective process.
LAFCOExhibit "1" IT «L „
-
Red HawQuest'
k� Ranch. Page '2 of 3
f
August 1O, 200
Through the Proposition 218 process the maximum service charge for th
g e CSA .is -
established based upon the number of Lots existing prior to subdivision ••
in this
case one. Theper parcel charge drops significantly, in this instance one seve
. . nth
,
of the maxim service charge, providg amplee room for inflation ad'
Just�nn.ents
before a ballot proceeding would be required (costs would need to increa
se at least
700%). Establishment of this initial high maximum service charge g guarantees
funding for long term maintenance of the facilities.
2: Question: A statement of justification indicating why urban se -
. g Y services are being
extended .to lands that are outside of the County established Chico Urban Area.
N
.Response: we do not consider the proposed services to be "urban services"
. The
adoption of the North Chico Specific Plan and associated environmental
documents by the Board of Supervisors anticipated this a of
p type development
outside of the current Chico Urban Area. Annexation of this area to the
City - of
Chico would also require approval of a Sphere. Amendment b LA.BCo. -
Y Neither
the Butte County. Code nor adopted. Butte County hn rovement Standards
p define
fire protection, storm drainage maintenance- or street lighting -as "urban service "
A fire protection hydrant system is a requirement for any subdivision urban' an or
rural
creating 5 or more lots. If the fire protection hydrant system is not served by
a public water system or mutual water company then an appropriate maintenance
ce
entity must be established insure fire protection. facilities are operational- in
er
. hd tip {
tunes of need. A public water supply is not available and there are not enou
gh
lots in the subdivision to support a mutual water compan , therefore the formation
Y :
of a -CSA is appropriate. -
An entity for operation and maintenance •
p of storm drainage
detention/retention/leach field systems is required for any new subdivision roads
proposed. for County maintenance. Formation of a CSA is an option, however if
CSA is formed for fire protection it is more appropriate and efficient to include
storm drainage maintenance iri the CSA than -to form another entity.
.
Provisions - for - street lighting are required for residential subdivisions unless the
average lot street frontage exceeds 200 feet. The lights do not need to be installed
as part of the subdivision. However if the lights are installed and theproperty'.
..
owners choose to pay for the lights -through their tax bill formation of a CSA is an
option. As noted above if a CSA is fotmed for fire protection it is more
J, and efficient to include -street lighting in the CSA than to form an
other
Red Hawk Ranch Quesp"
t
1
August 1.05 2005
r Page 3 of 3
-more ef�cient-to_.include s p.osod ro
P p-o-wer in- #lie-..forznation.
rather -than come back later for an expansion ofp owers.
If you should have an questions • con�cernin this '
. Y q g matter, please contact this of�ee Moeda
through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 .m. at(530)- Y
3' p 53 8 7266.
Smeerely,
.7 3 .
Stuart Edell, P.E.: .
Manager, Land Development Division
SE'
cc: Mike Crump, Director of Public works (File .140.10, 302
Dan Breedon,. Principal Planner
FINAL
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN
for
COUNTY SERVICE AREA N0. 180
(REDHAWK RANCH SUBDIVI-SI,ON)
Adopted October 6, 2005
LAFCO Resolution No. 15 2005105
LAFCO Exhibit "2"
Table of Contents
1.
Sphere of influence Pian information Sheet sessesoes mass
3
2.
County Service Area Map..ssaa.s•sasswraows.aw■sssaas.mesa Base mausawessease.asssaawssease Sousa •.,sDuane
4
3.
Sphere of Influence Determinations..wws........s•ws■wsssw..s..ssausages* ..ss.e.ssssss...ago as.ass
5
4.
Municipal Service Review....ass .awawawaa.a.w message ..sa..w..a..a......wass a a.. See LAFCO Exhibit "1"
Butte LAFCO 0 Sphere of Influence Plan 0 County Seniice Area No. 180
2
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN
CSA N0.180 (REDHAWK RANCH SUBDPASION)
STREET LIGHTING, DRAINAGE AND FIRE PROTECTION
CSA: CSA No. 180 (Redhawk Ranch Subdivision)
Contact: Tom Blixt, Butte County Public Works Title: Administrative Analyst III
Address: 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 FAX: (530) 538-7171
Phone: (530) 538-7681 E -Mail: tblig@buttecountv.net
GOVERNING BOARD
Butte County Board of Supervisors
FORMATION INFORMATION
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LAFCO
Resolution No.: 04-184 Resolution No.:
Date Adopted: 10/6/05 Date Adopted: 10/6/05
File No.: TSM 0406 Fie No.: 05-08
EFFECTIVE FORMATION DATE
Recorded:
PURPOSE
1. Enabling Legislation: GC § 25210.1 et. seq.
2. Empowered Services: Operation and
maintenance of:
• storm drainage facilities; and
• fire protection facilities; and
• street lighting services.
3. Provided Services: Operation and
maintenance of:
• storm drainage facilities; and
• fire protection facilities; and
• street lighting services
CONDUCTING AUTHORITY
Resolution No.: N/A
Date Adopt: N/A
MAPPING
GIS Date: October 6, 2005
AREA SERVED
1. Parcels:7
2. Supervisorial District: 3
3. Acreage: 7.59 Acres
4. Estimated Population: 16 persons
5. Location Description: West of SR99, north of
Keefer Road, south of Parsley Avenue in the
north Chico area.
6. Sphere of influence: Coterminous with
approved district boundaries.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Maximum Per Parcel Charges: $501.72 pursuant to BOS Resolution No. 04-268, adopted 12114/04.
2005/06 Parcel Charges: $3,512.00 for one undivided parcel tentatively approved for 7 lots.
2006/07 Budget: $3,512.00 for 7 approved lots to be equally assessed.
Appropriation (GANN) Limit: N/A
NOTES:
Butte LAFCO ! Sphere of Influence Plan * County Service Area No. 180
3
Legend
County Service Area
Parcels and Sphere
County Parcels
1- Street Lighting
Q Drainage
Fire Protection
BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CSA 180
N
Red Hawk Lighting, Drainage, and Fire District 200 0 200 Feet
Action: Date: Res.: Agent:
Formation, MSR Adoption, SOI Plan October 6, 2005 15 2005/06 Data: Butte County &LAFCo
C:\projectsUafco_projectsUafco csas\csa180
\csa_180.apr. Inst Update: 09/23/05
Butte LAFCO • Sphere of Influence Plan • County Service Area No. 180
4
Sphere of Influence Plan Determinations for
County Service Area No. 180 (Redhawk Ranch Subdivision)
The Sphere of Influence Plan is prepared in support of the identified County Service Area and the
Sphere of Influence Boundary is coterminous with the district boundaries.
The Commission has considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this
proposal, including, but not limited to, Government Code Sections 56425, 56427 and 56428 and
as described in the staff report dated September 21, 2005 for the meeting of October 6, 2005 in
that:
Planned Land Uses
1. The unincorporated territory in question is located approximately one mile north of the City of
Chico in an area regulated by the North Chico Specific Plan. The County General Plan Land
Use Element designates this area for Agricultural Residential uses and the Zoning Ordinance
designates the area for Suburban Residential (SR -1) land uses on one acre or larger parcels.
The approximately 8 -acre parcel has been tentatively approved by the County Planning
Commission for a 7 lot residential subdivision. The land uses within the proposed District are
consistent with those described in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element and the
recorded subdivision map and there is no expectation of, or request for, services in excess of
the approved services of the District; and
Ao-ricuRural and Oren Space „Land Considerations
2. The affected territory has been designated by the County of Butte for residential uses with
provisions for limited agriculturally related uses such as animal keeping and hobby farms and
the site is currently approved for a residential development. The property is not designated for
large scale agricultural or open space uses under the current zoning and General Plan
designations and, therefore, no conversion of designated agricultural or open space lands will
occur as a result of the requested Sphere of Influence Amendment; and
Need and Availability, of Services
3. The present and probable need for additional public facilities and services in the District has
been considered and it has been determined that there is no expectation that the approved
residential development will require or desire any expansion of services to the affected area in
excess of the approved capabilities of the District; and
4. The planned capacity and adequacy of the District's facilities, as approved and requested by
the Board of Supervisors, approved by the Commission and described in the Sphere Plan, are
adequate to provide its authorized services; and
Social or Economic Communities of Interest
5. The existing approved development represents a distinct community for the provision of the
services, as identified in the Data Sheet and therefore the services are provided in an
equitable manner throughout the development area.
Butte LAFCO • Sphere of Influence Pian ! County Service Area No. 180
5
I
EXHIB IT' "A"
COUNTY SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
Being all that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California,
described as follows:
Being a portion of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 as shown on that certain map entitled `Keefer
Ranch" filed for record on February 24, 1912 in Map Book 7, page 21 in the Butte
County Recorder's Office more particularly described as follows;
COMMENCING at the most southerly corner of Lot 40 *as shown on that certain map
entitled "Quail Run Subdivision" fled for record on August 28, 1980 in Map Book 72,
pages 95-99 in the Butte County Recorder's Office;
1. Thence, leaving ' said point of commencement, along the westerly line said Lot 40,
North 05033142" West, 10.23 feet to the TRITE POE TT OF 18EGEWQNG;
2. Thence, leaving said point of beginning, South 72019`1099 west, 516.50 feet to a point
on -the easterly right-of-way line of Highway 99 as shown on that certain Record of
Survey f Ied for record on September 16, 1988 in Map Book* 110, pages 75--77 in the
Butte County Recorder's Office;
3. Thence, along said easterly right-of-way line of Highway 99, North 34054'02" West,
148.68 feet to an angle point in said easterly right-of-way line as shown on said Map;
4. Thence, along said easterly right-of-way line, North 30053900" West, 314.01 feet as
shown on said Map to a point on the southerly line of that certain parcel of land described
in the deed from: Eldred E.- Wolford, ET UX, to Donald E. Wolford, ET TJX, filed for
record April 10, 1964, in Book 1301, page 23, Official Records in the Butte County
Recorder's Office;
5. Thence, lea ' said easterly right-of-way line, along the southerly line of the Donald
. y � y � y
E. Wolford parcel North 72025'53."" East, 361.15 feet io the southeast. corner of said
Donald E. Wolford parcel, said point also being the most southerly corner of Parcel 2 as
shown on that certain parcel reap Med for. record on June 29, 1977 in Map Book 62, page
28 in the Butte County Recorder's Office;
6.. Thence, along the southerly line of said Parcel 2, North 25028'21" East, 257.53 feet as
shown on said Map Book 62, page 28;
Page 1 of 2
1
7. Thence, along the southerly line of said Parcel 2, North 84'20"34" East, 226.12 feet to
a point on the westerly line of said Map Book 72, pages 95-99, said point aaso being the
southeast corner of said Parcel 2;
8. Thence, along the westerly line of said Map Book 72, pages 95-99 South 5°33'42"
East, 601.19 feet to the point of be ' •
con ' • 7.59 acres more of less.
The basis of bearings for flus description is the same as that shown on that certain map
entitled "Quail. Run Subdivision" filed for record on August 28, 1980 in Map Book 72,
pages 9599 in the Butte County Recorder's Office.
The above-described parcel is comprised of Assessor's Parcel Number 047-460-005
�O LAND
NO.PLS 5616
0j�A9/30� 0���
o�•o M•f��
Page 2 of 2
1
COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
r
WN BY N5. E. pqh SEPTEMBER 2004 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY COUNTY
CKm QMH S�A� NO SCALE SERVICEAREA DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT
ROVED DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (Marshall &-Conroy) __"BH
SAND
J �
r
�c NO.PLS 5616 047-460-0 :—
� �C•� � • Q. 04 4 20,34E .
A 9 300 � N8 ' 37
22 12
26.12C047-500-037)
38 c:¢� _og _off •`y ^ � .
N N
047-500-038-)N r
G
(047-460-003 2 to z
3''E a, 0 8 39 c1 Crn
.25 5 o v; 0 (.00
N�Z to<
w047— 500— 03 9
36 �
' to � 1
7 v Ni Z
� 3 m � r
c.,O•
(047-460-005)40
�''� s�,�►. ®047-500-040
6
TRUE POINT OF
4 BEGINNING
-9� 5 �'
56.5 POINT OF
COMMENCEMENT
9'A0� ROPO
LINE TABLE
LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE
L1 N05'33042"W 10.23' Q
IL2 IN34*54#02"W 148.68'
TOTAL AREA= 7.59± ACRES
LEGEND
o CALCULATED POINT
047-460-005 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
COUNTY SERVICE AREA
BOUNDARY
C� COURSE NUMBERS
I -- wmmmvm�
COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DRAWN BY N5. E. ppm SEPTEMBER 2004 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY COUNTY
CHECKED QMH scare 1"=200' EXHIBIT
SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
s >
APPROVED DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (Ma'rshall BC COIliOy)
'_B'
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission
Request for Comments
Departments Report
To: Star Brown, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer
Darren Read, CDF/Butte County Fire Department
Perry Reniff, Sheriff
Rick Helman, Caltrans
Cheri Rockwell, Communications
P. Scott Browne, Legal Counsel
Kory Honea, Deputy Sheriffs Association
From: Jonna Houghton, Commission Clerk
Subject: Your comments regarding a future LAFCO Agenda
Date Mailed: September 6, 2005
Return By: September 20, 2005
IF NO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATIONS ARE RECEIVED BY THE RETURN DATE, THE
ASSUMPTION WILL BE MADE THAT YOUR AGENCY HAS NO COMMENTS.
The Butte Local Agency Formation Commission has received an application for annexation as
listed below. Application, maps, and legal descriptions are attached for each proposal.
LAFCo File No.: 05-08 - County of Butte - Formation of CSA No. 180 (Red Hawk Ranch
Subdivision)
APN Ws: 047-460-005
17-/q'o S
Prepared by: Department: Date
LAFCO Office Use only
LAFCO File No:. Application Submitted:
LAFCO Fees: Application Incomplete:
SBE Fees: Application Complete:
Sphere Fees: Certificate of Filing issued:
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission
.
Standard Application Form
1. Applicant(s): (LAFCO will send copies of the staff report to a maximum of three applicants.)
Name: Donn Marshall and PAt COnroy
Address: 1367 East Avenue Chico, CA 95926
893-3098 ex
Phone No.:
Name: NorthStar Engineering ( Nicole Ledford)
Address: 20 Declaration Drive Chico, CA 95973
Phone No.: 893-1600 ext 216
Name:
Address:
Phone No.:
2. Change of Organization or other Action Requested (Please check all applicable actions related to proposal)
• Annexation to a city
Formation of District
• City Incorporation
• Annexation to a district
x Formation of County Service Area
• City Disincorporation
• Detachment from a city
Consolidation of cities
• District Dissolution
• Detachment from a district
Consolidation of districts
• District Merger
• Service Agreement
Sphere of Influence Amendment
• Establishment of Subsidiary
Districts
3. Authority to File Application
• Resolution of Application of Affected Agency. Certified copies of the Resolution of Application shall
be included as "LAFCO Exhibit 1 "; or
• Petition of landowners or registered voters included as "LAFCO Exhibit 1". Complete the Petition
for Change of Organization. (Note: A petition is provided as LAFCO Form L-1)
4. Proposal Boundaries
• Provide a map of the subject territory meeting the specifications of the State Board of Equalization as
listed in the Application Instructions. The boundary map shall be included as "LAFCO Exhibit 2."
• A legal description of the boundaries of the subject territory meeting the specifications of the State
Board of Equalization. The legal description shall be included as "LAFCO Exhibit 3."
• Provide a Boundary Statement describing how the boundaries of this proposal were determined.
(Note: One of LAFCO's major responsibilities is to insure that public agencies have logical
boundaries. If your proposal would create an "island," peninsula, or other illogical boundary, you
may be requested to revise the boundaries.)
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 4
DISTRICT FORMATION SUPPLEMENT
A. Justification
1. Explain why the formation of a new district is being proposed. To provide maintenance
for the storm drain system, street lights and fire suppression
system roug a CSA.
2. Under what principal act will the new district be formed?
(Note: Pursuant to §56100, proceedings for the formation of a district shall be conducted as
authorized by the principal act of the district proposed to be formed, except that the commission shall
serve as the conducting authority and the procedural requirements of the Cortese -Knox- Hertzberg
Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 shall apply and shall prevail in the event of a conflict
with the procedural requirements of the principal act of the district.)
3. List all of the services to be provided by the proposed district and discuss why the services are
necessary at this time. Storm Drain trench and drainage inlet- maintenance
street light and fire suppression maintenance per the conditions
of approval for TSM 04-060'
4. Explain why a new district should be formed instead of annexing territory to an existing district?
(Note: Pursuant to §56886.5, if a proposal includes the formation of a dstrict, the commission shall
determine whether existing agencies can feasibly provide the needed service or services in a more
efficient and accountable manner. If a new single -purpose local agency is deemed necessary, the
commission shall consider reorganization with other single purpose local agencies that provide
related services).
There is not a current district avaible for annexation.
5. Describe how the district's board of directors would be established (elected, appointed by the County
Board of Supervisors, .or the County Board of Supervisors themselves?)
County Board of Supervisors
6. what is the potential for the proposed district to be expanded in the future or provide similar services to a.
larger area? Little, the surrounding area is developed.
r
i
7. why or how will the proposal provide greater efficiency in the delivery of governmental services?
No current way to provide facilities.
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 5
f �f
B. Boundaries and Sphere of Influence Information (Note: A "sphere of influence" is _defined as a
plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a district, as determined by LAFCO
(§56076).
1. Describe the rationale and methods used to establish the boundaries of the proposed district?
ropose U4- . Rect Hawkanc , OniLy the residences
within.the subdivsion will enni l
2. Will the district boundaries and sphere of influence boundary be coterminous? Yes
3. If a sphere of influence is proposed to exceed- the proposed district boundaries, explain the rationale used to
support the larger sphere of influence? Please show the sphere boundaries on the map of the district
boundaries.
4. Does the proposed district or its proposed sphere of influence overlap with any other local agency
boundaries or sphere of influence boundaries? If yes, please list the affected local agencies.
No.
C. Plan for Services
Please provide the following information that specifically describes how the proposed district will
provide the identified services. (Vote: Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 56653, whenever a
local agency submits a resolution of application for a change of organization or reorganization, the
local agency shall submit with the resolution of application a plan for providing services within the
affected territory.)
1. Provide a thorough description of the level and range of each service to be provided to the territory
within the proposed district.
Please see attached plan for services
2. When can the identified services be feasibly extended to the affected territory?
3. Identify any improvement or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other
conditions the new district needs to impose upon the affected territory.
4. Please provide the estimated cost of . extending the service and a description of how the service or
required improvements will be financed?
5. If retail water service is to be provided through the 'new district, provide a description of the timely
availability of water supplies for the, projected needs wi in the new district boundaries based upon
the factors found in §65352.5 as* required by §56668(k) N A
6. Please provide copies of the feasibility study for the formation of the new district labeled "LAFCO
Exhibit 8". The feasibility study must outline the anticipated structure of the governing body and
provide a projected three year budget for revenues and expenditures.
7. Will the new district share property tax revenue generated within the boundaries of the district? If
yes, please provide an approved tax sharing agreement between the affected local government
agencies labeled "LAFCO Exhibit 5" (!Vote: Any new taxes proposed for the new district must be
voter approved pursuant to the requirements of Proposition 218.)
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 6
8. Please complete the following table of service providers:
Service
Presently Provided By
Proposed Provider
Fire Protection
County of Butte
County of Butte
Police Protection
County of Butte
lCounty of Butte
Domestic Water Service
Private Well
Private Well
Agricultural Water Service
Private Well
N / A
Sewer Service
Private Septic
Private Septic
Solid Waste
Private-
Private
RoadlStreet Maintenance
N/A
County of Butte
Power
PG&E
PG&E
Street Lighting
N/A
County of Butte
Planning & Zoning
County of Butte
COunty of Butte
Schools
Chico Unified
Chico Unified
D. Land Use -
1. How many acres will the proposed district encompass? 7.98 ac
2. What is the current General Plan REAidentid izoning SR -1 designations on the
affected parcels?
Residential
3. What is the current General Plan and zoning SR -1 designations on adjoining
parcels?
4. Describe the existing land use on the subject parcels?
Single family home site
5. Describe any significant land use issues that will result from the proposed district formation?
N/A
6. Describe the topography of the subject area? Low veai.tation >2% Slope
7. Describe any concurrent land use applications? TSM 04-06 approval
E. Significant Issues .
1. Describe any unique issues and/or pre-existing uses or conditions such as flooding, groundwater
contamination, animal keeping, agricultural uses, ecological preserves, airport activity, traffic
movement, pedestrian uses, etc., that characterizes the area proposed for a new district?
Adjacent to SR -99 and Keefer Road.
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 7
F. Intergovernmental Coordination
1. Has the proposal been circulated to all affected local agencies? Yes_X No
2. Attach any responses/comments that have been received from the affected agencies listed.
3. What functions of identified agencies will be duplicated as a result of the district formation?
4. Are there any conditions requested by affected government agencies that will substantially affect or
impact the formation of the new district? No Yes , please describe.
G. Environmental Determination
1. Indicate what the Lead Agency has done to comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Categorical Exemption X Negative Declaration (with mitigations)
Environmental impact Report Other, please specify
Copies of the complete environmental documentation prepared by the Lead Agency (including the
initial study, any technical reports, and any written comments or recorded public testimony relative to
the environmental documents), and a copy of the Notice of Determination/Notice of Exemption,
showing the date filed with the County Clerk shall be included as "LAFCO Exhibit 4."
2. Was the environmental documentation circulated to the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission
prior to adoption by the Lead Agency? Yes X No please explain why?
3. Attach comments received from LAFCO if any.
H. - Support or Protest
1. How many residents are presently in the proposed district? 0 How many are registered
voters? 0
2. If the district formation facilitates development of parcels, how many residents are anticipated to be
in the district following formation?
3. What is the source for your calculations?
4. Provide a list or table labeled "LAFCO Exhibit 6" of all affected property owners within the proposed
district area that includes (Note: A sample table is provided as LAFCO Form L-2):
• • Assessor's Parcel Number (APN).
• • Situs Address of parcel.
• Property owners name and mailing addresses.
• Size of property in acres.
• Number of Registered Voters at each site address.
• Responses in favor of annexation, opposed to annexation or no response.
• Assessed land value as determined by the County Assessor.
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 8
I. ' Public Notice Requirements
1. Provide a mailing list of all property owners and registered voters located within the area to be
annexed AND a separate mailing list for those properties located within 300 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the area to be annexed. These mailing lists must be extracted from the most recent
assessment rolls prepared by the County at the time the local agency adopts a resolution of
application. Mailing lists shall be submitted with the application as "LAFCO Exhibit 7" The mailing
list shall also be submitted in electronic format compatible with WordPerfect or. Microsoft Word. The
mailing list shall include:
• • The property owners and registered voters name residing at address.
• • Mailing address and situs address.
• The assessor's parcel number.
• • Mailing labels
The LAFCO Application is intended to provide the Commission with all relevant data in order to make
an informed decision. LAFCO staff will review each application for completeness within 30 days of
submittal and inform the applicant in writing of any deficiencies or additional information required.
REQUIRED LAFCO EXHIBITS
LAFCO Exhibit 1: Certified copies of the Resolution of Application or Petition for Change
of Organization.
LAFCO Exhibit 2: Boundary map of proposed formation area.
LAFCO Exhibit 3: Legal description of proposed formation area.
LAFCO Exhibit 4: Copies of the complete environmental documentation.
LAFCO Exhibit 5: Tax Exchange Agreement.
LAFCO Exhibit 6: List of all affected property owners.
LAFCO Exhibit 7: Public Notice requirements mailing list.
LAFCO Exhibit 8: Feasibility Study
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission District Formation Application Revised 2001 Page 9
EXHIBIT 643"
COUNTY SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
Being all that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California,
described As follows:
Being a portion of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 as shown on that certain- map entitled `Reefer
Ranch" filed for record on February 24, 1912 in Map Book 7, page 21 in the Butte
County Recorder's Office moreparticularly described as follows;
COMMENCING. at the most southerly corner of Lot ' 40 as shown on that certain map
entitled "Quail Run Subdivision" filed for record. on August 28, 1980 in il/Iap Book_ 72,
pages 95-99 in the Butte County Recorder's Office;
1. Thence, leaving said point of commencement, along the westerly line said Lot 40,
North 050339142" West, 10.23 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEG G; .
2. Thence, leaving said point of beginning, South 72019' 10" West, 516.50 feet to a point
on the easterly right-of-way line of Highway 99 as shown on that certain Record of
Survey filed for record on September 16, 1988 in Map Book 110, pages 75-77 in the
Butte County Recorder's Office;
3. Thence, along said easterly right-of-way line of Highway 99, North 34°54' 02" West,
148.68 feet to an angle point in said easterly right-of-way line as shown on. said Map;
4. Thence, along said easterly right-of-way line, North 30°53'00" West, 314.01 feet as
shown on said Map to a point on the southerly line of that certain parcel of land described
in the deed from Eldred E. Wolford, ET UX, to Donald E. Wolford, ET UX, filed for
record April 10, 1964, in Book 1301, page 23,. Official Records in the Butte County
Recorder's Oftci�;
5. Thence;- leaving said easterly right-of-way line, along the southerly line of the Donald
E. Wolford parcel, North 7225'53" East, 361.15 feet to the southeast corner of said
Donald E. Wolford parcel, said point also being the most southerly corner of Parcel 2 as
shown on that certain parcel map filed for record on June 29, 1977 in Map Book 62, page
28 in the Butte County Recorder's Office;
6. Thence, along the southerly lune of said Parcel 2, North 25°28'21" East, 257.53 feet as
shown on said Map Book 62, page 28;
D:tvE+inword182941E.XHM -doc Page 1 of 2
7. Thence, along the southerly line of said Parcel 2, North 84120'34" East, 226.12 feet to
a point on the westerly line of said Map Book 72, pages 95-99, said point also being the
southeast corner of said Parcel 2;
8. Thence, along the westerly line of said Map Book 72, pages 95-99, South 5133'42"
East, 601.19 feet to the point of beginning;
Containing 7.59 acres more of less.
The basis of bearings for this description is the same as that shown on that certain neap
entitled "Quail Run Subdivision" Med for record on August 28, 1980 in Map Book 721
pages 95-99 in the Butte County Recorder's Office.
The above-described parcel is comprised of Assessor's Parcel Number 047-460-005.
L.P►ND
�t NO.PIS 5616 ' �c
F
�9TFi° 9/301 ��s
DAwinworai,8294\E3Mrr.&c Page 2 of 2
\,AND S
no
NO.PLS 5616® — ----
Ir 047-460-004
A 0 N84.20p34"E 37
g/301 �2'
226.1
CA1-\FC047-500--0-3-7
cl-09 -04
C047-500-038 td,,,
(047-460-003)
2U' cn
c
� ® 39 to 0
® 0361(047-500-039 `D .1 W
--
7 yN �
3 cn -
ti �
moo. i
C047-4607005-)40
C047-500-040)
6
TRUE POINT OF
•��' �� 4 BEGIN
y � � NING
-yam 5
POINT OF
19 516 COMMENCE ENT
� <r, 0 �. M
R0 P�
5� 21 ��FER
LINE TABLE
LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE
L1 N05'33'42"W 10.23'
L2 N34'54'02"W 148.68'
TOTAL AREA= 7.59± ACRES
LEGEND
o CALCULATED POINT
C047-460-005)ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
COUNTY SERVICE AREA
BOUNDARY
® COURSE NUMBERS
COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DRAWN BY N5. E. DATE SEPTEMBER 2004 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY COUNTY
CHECKED QMH SCALE 1 =zoo• EXHIBIT
SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
APPROVED DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (Marshall & Conroy)
_ 2"
FIRE HYDRANT INSPECTION & TESTING REPORT
WATER UTILITY
professipna) Services
1557 MILL STREET
PO BOX 31
NELSON, CA. 95958
530-531-5948
DATE OF
TESTING: 03-23-09
CSA #: 180
LOCATION: AT END OF HAWK PLACE
TEST CONDUCTED
BY: Kevin O'Shea
HYDRANT IS ;
✓
Wet Barrel
Wharf Style
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
Dry Barrel
SWARCO T-20
MAKE: CLOW MFG. DATE: 2004
MODEL: 950 # OF NOZZLES: 2 CONDITION OF CAPS: OK
NOZZLE SIZES: 2-1/2 4-1/2 CAP GASKETS: OK
GATE VALVE TURNS, DIREC 20 RH CAP CHAINS: missing
NON -FLOWING CHECKS:
✓ HYDRANT GATE VALVE OC DISTANCE FROM HYDRANT: 78" South
✓ LUBRICATE & OPERATE VALVE STEMS FLOW WATER OK
✓ HOSE CONNECTION THREADS OK CAPS ROTATE SMOOTH
✓ HYDRANT VISABLE , EXTERIOR OBSTRUCTIONS (3 FOOT CLEARANCE)
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE ON CENTER HEIGHT FROM GRADE: 18"
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE DIRECTION TO STREET: Perpendicular
✓ INSPECT BLUE REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER
FLOW TEST:
Static: 52 PSI Pitot: 32.5 PSI
Residual: 40 PSI Flow at 40 PSI: 960 GPM
FEDERAL STANDARD
HYDRANT BODY:
NOZZLE CAPS:
REFLECTIVE:
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
FS12246
SWARCO T-20
AS PER AWWA & NFPA)
CHROME YELLOW
ORANGE
GLASS BEADS
HYDRANT PROBLEMS & CORRECTIONS:
Replaced missing cap chain.
THE TESTING COMPLETED DOES NOT IMPLY OR WARRANT THAT RE
REPORT ONLY REFLECTS TESTING AND SITE CONDITIONS ON THE I
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT KEVIN O'SHEA IF YOU HAVE AN'KC
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
LL REMAIN AS TESTED. THIS
IN DATE AS NOTED ABOVE.
3 REGARDING THIS REPORT.
i
• - f .. � FI :t. � n f" e-+%. - " a . _ is +'ravr ,<. i r 1. -:1 �,Lc t 1 \ !N_ t. � - t. S-- = J
f � \ ' �� _ I 1 ,.? *ti: •- :��t � t. _ - t gr •t j1 ' r � t. -+ _ >_li, Cj.. a-{-f{•i .- -
. - t � - t ;;-r i • - ._.� - r �. ._.-.. '.r r i _ ':eKT'! - P ?'•rs'' 't i . - t r 1 • -
I _ _
1 _ '
. 1f :21` -e - Usti.- ... -. -. .� �-•. ,:i %=.�.': _-... 'i._:c '. rr•::. .._. _ "C.^i ... =is '.. .. .. �.. .._ _.. "i�J.�._ :L._' .: r_ .'i '•.:.. - .1-. .. �:.-,�__ _ .7 _. .: tom. - .
_3..-.. �'s�.:; , :'•:�'.. _ ^x ._ ....r _.. _•1 .S•.�' _ e 1 �.:. - E 1 _ "i',... -i";•. s •• i .. u3.'' �.'_' •
i
_
1
- t . t Z.:i • .1 . r
till
I _
Oil
. I _ _ - _ _ y•�. S � t it - - _,.: ..
lol-
1. { 1 "'•S �{ - . 1' • � . , t'. - !. 1�. ♦ -` 7 l f_, .. t
_ - .� �;.: vl-Jy•R. ;l:%-- .,•r _Ir �..r~ ^' -. 1 ,•l ,r: . •i. ••q '/ t..71 i' r 'T �i CYI { ii Ii .rte _ -
• - � ; :' • � �: � sad �_ r 1 •'�(: �'.:�. .. r r�, i t11 - � r >t j � -'� ' � � a. t. � 1 1:-.� y tc
a! = F1. ... .� t ,_F t; •/� a•1� . '�j ;r s S t . �.f I t. , a Z _
1 r • t • MA
_ / : "c I:1 a• .t :i..• i .r'
- _ . .. 1•,. , 1. 1 .. .i, .• '.E- r . , • ° : • . i. i ,.r. 051 .'..`e .i ..„i, ... r: 1 -,/ / _ _ _ .Jt•
_�� r, tr J.1 \i - _ �. .'r'-1 s� i-1' �!.•.fi 1.�
Al
.- - .. I _. 1��• �t�• ,` r .. _ . . ,• �
I 1 :, f r �. �:: - f- r -?.i .. t� ��_..'-� _ f.. :i ._. -`'4' -i•et- �, ... .•+r`�� 1 � _..,_ !�•. ` t• .. .... °_• -•i'`. .�i3r=•.i ..�I:, '�. rr �i�
r
I
FIRE HYDRANT INSPECTION & TESTING REPORT
WATER UTILITY
Professional Services
1557 MILL STREET
PO BOX 31
NELSON, CA. 95958
530-531-5948
CSA #: 180
LOCATION: AT END OF HAWK PLACE
DATE OF TEST CONDUCTED
TESTING: 05-02-11 BY: Kevin O'Shea
HYDRANT IS:
✓
Wet Barrel
Wharf Style
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
Dry Barrel
SWARCO T-20
MAKE: CLOW MFG. DATE: 2004
MODEL: 950 # OF NOZZLES: 2 CONDITION OF CAPS: OK
NOZZLE SIZES: 1 2-1/2 4-1/2 CAP GASKETS: OK
GATE VALVE TURNS, DIREC 20 RH CAP CHAINS: 1 missing
NON -FLOWING CHECKS:
✓ HYDRANT GATE VALVE OC DISTANCE FROM HYDRANT: 78" South
✓ LUBRICATE & OPERATE VALVE STEMS FLOW WATER OK
✓ HOSE CONNECTION THREADS OK CAPS ROTATE SMOOTH
✓ HYDRANT VISABLE , EXTERIOR OBSTRUCTIONS (3 FOOT CLEARANCE)
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE ON CENTER HEIGHT FROM GRADE: 18"
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE DIRECTION TO STREET: Perpendicular
✓ INSPECT BLUE REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER missing
FLOW TEST:
Static: 87 PSI Pitot: 35 PSI
Residual: 36 PSI Flow at 36 PSI: 1,000 GPM
FEDERAL STANDARD
HYDRANT BODY:
NOZZLE CAPS:
REFLECTIVE:
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
FS14120
SWARCO T-20
AS PER AWWA & NFPA)
CHROME YELLOW
GREEN
GLASS BEADS
HYDRANT PROBLEMS & CORRECTIONS:
Replaced missing pavement marker. Replaced missing cap chain.
THE TESTING COMPLETED DOES NOT IMPLY OR WARRANT THAT RESULTS WILL REMAIN AS TESTED. THIS
REPORT ONLY REFLECTS TESTING AND SITE CONDITIONS ON THE R05E&TION DATE AS NOTED ABOVE.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT KEVIN O'SHEA IF YOU HAVE Y QUES IONS REGARDING THIS REPORT.
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
lws
FIRE HYDRANT INSPECTION & TESTING REPORT
(NATER UTILITY
Professional Services
t,
1557 MILL STREET
PO BOX 31
NELSON, CA. 95958
530-531-5948
CSA #: 180
LOCATION: AT END OF HAWK PLACE
DATE OF TEST CONDUCTED
TESTING: 04-26-10 BY: Kevin O'Shea
HYDRANT IS :
✓
Wet Barrel
Wharf Style
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
Dry Barrel
SWARCO T-20
MAKE: CLOW MFG. DATE: 2004
MODEL: 950 # OF NOZZLES: 2 CONDITION OF CAPS: OK
NOZZLE SIZES: 1 2-1/2 4-1/2 CAP GASKETS: OK
GATE VALVE TURNS, DIREC 20 RH CAP CHAINS: OK
NON -FLOWING CHECKS:
✓ HYDRANT GATE VALVE OC DISTANCE FROM HYDRANT: 78" South
✓ LUBRICATE & OPERATE VALVE STEMS FLOW WATER OK
✓ HOSE CONNECTION THREADS OK CAPS ROTATE SMOOTH
✓ HYDRANT VISABLE , EXTERIOR OBSTRUCTIONS (3 FOOT CLEARANCE)
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE ON CENTER HEIGHT FROM GRADE: 18"
✓ PUMPER NOZZLE DIRECTION TO STREET: Perpendicular
✓ INSPECT BLUE REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER
FLOW TEST:
Static: 47 PSI Pitot: 35 PSI
Residual: 38 PSI Flow at 38 PSI: 1,000 GPM
FEDERAL STANDARD
HYDRANT BODY:
NOZZLE CAPS:
REFLECTIVE:
595B COLOR NUMBERS:
FS13538
FS14120
SWARCO T-20
(AS PER A1NWA & NFPA)
CHROME YELLOW
GREEN
GLASS BEADS
HYDRANT PROBLEMS & CORRECTIONS:
I had to reset the circuit breaker on the main panel to get the pumps to start. Changed nozzle cap
color code from orange to green.
THE TESTING COMPLETED DOES NOT IMPLY OR WARRANT THAT RE
REPORT ONLY REFLECTS TESTING AND SITE CONDITIONS ON THE
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT KEVIN O'SHEA IF YOU HAVE A19Y U
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
REMAIN AS TESTED. THIS
I DATE AS NOTED ABOVE.
REGARDING THIS REPORT.
Water Utility Professional Services
PO Box 31, 1557 Mill Street
Nelson, Ca. 95958
Customer
Name Office of Finance and Risk Management
Address 3-A County Center Drive
City Oroville State Ca ZIP 95965-3334
Phone
Qty Description
1 Fire Hydrant Services for CSA # 180
Inspection Reports Enclosed
Payment Select One...
Comments
Name _
CC #
Expires
Invoice No.
INVOICE
Misc
Date
6/15/2009
Order No.
BPA # 0144
Rep
FOB
Jobsite
Unit Price
I TOTAL
$ 75.00
1 $ 75.00
SubTotal 1 $ 75.00
Tax Rate(s)
Office Use Only