HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.8.19 Miocene Canal Status Wau h, Melanie
From: Gosselin, Pauli
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 1:46 PM
To: BOS
Cc: Clerk of the Board; McCracken, Shari
Subject: Miocene Canal Sttus
Attachments: Miocene Cana|_[ampFire Update1OO819.pdf
Board Members—
I attached a memo summarizing the status of the damage to the Miocene Canal. If you have any questions please let me
know.
Thank you.
Paul
Pau Director
Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation
308 Nelson Avenue
Oroville,CA 9e9$5
Office: (5a0) ss2'osow
Cell: (530) 574-7443
1
mp,m1Repi 1) Water and Resource Conservation Paul Gosselin, Director
L'141,21ir
AVO#ke,
4 Eft,
308 Nelson Avenue T: 530.552.3595 buttecounty.net/waterresourceconservation
Orovlile California 95965 F: 530.538.3807 bcwater@buttecounty.net
Butte County
WATER 8.RESOURCE CONSERVATION
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 8, 2019
TO: Butte County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Paul Gosselin, Director
RE: Camp Fire impacts to the Miocene Canal Update
Background
The Camp Fire destroyed portions of the Upper Miocene Canal which prevents water
delivery for numerous commercial agricultural operations, residential wells, CalFire and
critical wetland habitat. On March 29, 2019, the Board of Supervisors received public
comment from a group of affected landowners, who staff were already working with to
define issues and options. On April 23, 2019, the Board of Supervisors received a
report on the status of the impacts from the loss of water in the Miocene Canal and
potential remediation options. The Board of Supervisors directed staff to continue
working with PG&E, California Water Service (CWS) and stakeholders on possible
solutions as presented by staff. Butte County are continuing to facilitate discussions to
assist the parties in addressing the impacts of the loss of the Miocene Canal with a goal
that those responsible parties restore water supplies to affected beneficial users and
improve the longterm water supply resiliency.
County staff held five public meetings with PG&E, CWS, Paradise Irrigation District, Del
Oro Water Company and affected landowners. The most recent meeting was held on
September 27, 2019. At the previous meeting on August 5, 2019, the workgroup
agreed on a set of actions and recommendations as follows:
ALost 5, 2019 Recommendations
Restoring Water Supplies
After analysis of various options, there are two viable projects that would provide a
sufficient amount of water to Kunkle Reservoir and the Middle Miocene. PG&E
should support the two projects to restore water. Both projects could be operational
in 2020 if decisions are made soon. Butte County can facilitate discussions on an
equitable cost recovery structure between PG&E and landowners.
1. New Outtake Facility at Lime Saddle
A new dedicated outtake facility at Lime Saddle would supply water into the
Middle Miocene. Del Oro Water Company (DOWC) provided an estimate cost
for an outtake facility based on their system ($1.3 million capital/$1.2 million
operation). Final engineering specifications would need to be designed to deliver
a sufficient amount of water. Early decisions could have the outtake facility
operational by the summer of 2020.
2. Water Delivery to Kunkle Reservoir
Paradise Irrigation District (PID) and DOWC have an intertie that provides an
opportunity for a water exchange. Under the project, PID would supply water to
the DOWC customers (approx. 200) near Lime Saddle. In turn, DOWC would
delivery up to 8 acre-feet/day into Kunkle Reservoir. To overcome the uncertainty
of delivering 8 acre-feet/day into Kunkle, a pilot project should be pursued for
2020. The cost of the project is estimated at $250,000.
Resiliency
1. Extend Del Oro Water Company (DOWC) Service
Residential water including the Spring Valley School could be served by
extending the DOWC service connection down Pentz Road and Highway 70.
The area is within the DOWC service area. The project would cost $2.5-3.0
million. The County and DOWC will seek state and federal assistance to offset
the capital costs. The project would take 4-5 years to complete.
2. Technical Assistance
Butte County will utilize a grant from USDA to identify specific water supply
resource programs and provide direct technical assistance to landowners.
Through federal, state and local programs, individual landowners could improve
the resiliency of their water supply needs. Some projects may include creating
stock ponds, storage tanks, deepinglinstalling wells. The project will begin in
September and be completed by July 2020.
PG&E's Long-term Plan
PG&E's interests in the future of the Miocene Project (May 2019) includes:
• Timely and prudently decide the future of the Project
• Achieve a smooth transition to that future
Butte County partners and stakeholders have explored numerous short and long
term options including cost recovery for future operations. Many of the partners
have expended resources investigating options. PG&E and Toll House should
provide clear framework of their future plans for the Miocene system as soon as
possible.
Planning and Analysis
PG&E has verbally offered $60,000 to the County for planning. To date, no
formal offer by PG&E has been provided. If PG&E provides funds to the County
and the County accepts it, potential tasks for the grant include:
• Identifying all affected parcels (non-PG&E/CWS customers)
• Characterizing ecologically habitat along Miocene corridor
• Evaluating potential options to restore water supplies
• Restoration of portions of the Miocene Canal
• Alternative points of diversion
• Alternative water supplies
Timeline for Actions
Project Lead Cost Estimates Completion
Restore Water to Middle
Miocene
Lime Saddle Outtake PG&E $1.3 million 2020
Kunkle Pilot Project PG&E $250,000 2020
Resiliency
DOWC Service Extension DOWC/Butte $3.0 million 2023
County
Technical Assistance Butte $ 25,000 2020
County/UCCE
. ..................
PG&E's Long-Term Plan PG&E TBD
Planning Analysis Butte County $ 60,000 TBD
PG&E representatives announced that they would bring the recommendations to their
management for a decision.
Summary of the September 27, 2019 Meeting
PG&E has not provided any response to the recommendations that were made on
August 5th. PG&E did not attend or provide a response to any of the recommendations.
The failure of PG&E to respond to the recommendations was a clear indication that they
were not going to participate in any solution for the affected parties along the Miocene
Canal. I send a letter to PG&E on October 7, 2019 stating that it was apparent that they
were unwilling to participate in solutions. Supervisor Connelly attended the meeting and
offered to send a letter under his signature to state agencies and other regarding the
impacts. The workgroup would like to meet in January. A meeting summary was
distributed.
If you have any questions, please let me know.