Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.08.21 FW_ Educate Thyselves From:Snyder, Ashley To:Paulsen, Shaina Subject:FW: Educate Thyselves Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 1:33:55 PM Attachments:Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all study of 10 million finds News Lifesitenews.pdf No PCR Testing Equipment.docx To Our Local Lawmakers and Enforcers of Butte County and State Representatives.docx worldwide viral fatality rates.png masks dont work.docx The COVID-19 PCR Test Is Key to the Pandemic Fraud Principia Scientific Intl..pdf BOS Correspodence. Ashley N. Snyder Assistant Clerk of the Board Butte County Administration 25 County Center Drive, Suite 200, Oroville, CA 95965 T: 530.552.3307 | F: 530.538.7120 Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Pinterest From: CitizensofButteCountyCA <CitizensofButteCountyCA@protonmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 12:18 PM To: senator.nielsen@senate.ca.gov; Senator.Nielsen@outreach.senate.ca.gov; assemblymember.dahle@assembly.ca.gov; james@gallagherforassembly.com; kevin@electkevinkiley.com; Alpert, Bruce <BAlpert@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; BOS District 4 <District4@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Lucero, Debra <DLucero@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; CA01DLIMA@mail.house.gov; York, Danette <DYork@buttecounty.net>; Nuzum, Danielle <DNuzum@buttecounty.net>; Nicholas, Jodi <JNicholas@buttecounty.net>; McSpadden, Elaine <EMcspadden@buttecounty.net>; Putnam, Jodi <JPutnam@buttecounty.net>; ann.schwab@chicoca.gov; alex.brown@chicoca.gov; scott.huber@chicoca.gov; sean.morgan@chicoca.gov; karl.ory@chicoca.gov; kasey.reynolds@chicoca.gov; randall.stone@chicoca.gov; creynolds@cityoforoville.org; sthomson@cityoforoville.org; ahatley@cityoforoville.org; jgoodson@cityoforoville.org; dpittman@cityoforoville.org; esmith@cityoforoville.org; ldraper@cityoforoville.org; sheriff info <infosheriff@buttecounty.net>; Honea, Kory <KHonea@buttecounty.net> Subject: Educate Thyselves ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening .. attachments, clicking on links, or replying. Thereisnopublichealthemergency.Masksandlockdownsdon'twork.Asymptomaticspread doesn'thappen.PCRtestsarefraudulent.Youcannotsuppressthetruth. CitizensofButteCounty SentwithProtonMailSecureEmail. Btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!pg!DPWJE.2:!ejeoÉu!pddvs!bu!bmm-!tuvez pg!21!njmmjpo!Ñoet Pomz!411!btznqupnbujd!dbtft!jo!uif!tuvez!pg!ofbsmz!21!njmmjpo!xfsf!ejtdpwfsfe-!boe!opof!pg!uiptf!uftufe!qptjujwf!gps!DPWJE.2:/ Xfe!Efd!34-!3131!.!8;29!qn!FTU TIVUUFSTUPDL Cz!Njdibfm!Ibzoft! MjgfTjufOfxt!ibt!qspevdfe!bo!fyufotjwf!DPWJE.2:!wbddjoft!sftpvsdft!qbhf/Wjfx!ju!ifsf/! XVIBO-!Dijob-!Efdfncfs!34-!3131!)MjgfTjufOfxt*!Ä!B!tuvez!pg!bmnptu!21!njmmjpo!qfpqmf!jo!Xvibo-!Dijob-!gpvoe!uibu!btznqupnbujd!tqsfbe!pg!DPWJE.2: eje!opu!pddvs!bu!bmm-!uivt!voefsnjojoh!uif!offe!gps!mpdlepxot-!xijdi!bsf!cvjmu!po!uif!qsfnjtf!pg!uif!wjsvt!cfjoh!voxjuujohmz!tqsfbe!cz!jogfdujpvt- btznqupnbujd!qfpqmf/ Qvcmjtife!jo!Opwfncfs!jo!uif!tdjfoujgjd!kpvsobm!Obuvsf!Dpnnvojdbujpot-!uif!qbqfs!xbt!dpnqjmfe!cz!2:!tdjfoujtut-!nbjomz!gspn!uif!Ivb{ipoh!Vojwfstjuz!pg Tdjfodf!boe!Ufdiopmphz!jo!Xvibo-!cvu!bmtp!gspn!tdjfoujgjd!jotujuvujpot!bdsptt!Dijob!bt!xfmm!bt!jo!uif!V/L/!boe!Bvtusbmjb/!Ju!gpdvtfe!po!uif!sftjefout!pg Xvibo-!hspvoe!{fsp!gps!DPWJE.2:-!xifsf!:-9::-939!qfpqmf!uppl!qbsu!jo!b!tdsffojoh!qsphsbn!cfuxffo!Nbz!25!boe!Kvof!2-!xijdi!qspwjefe!dmfbs!sftvmut!bt!up uif!qpttjcjmjuz!pg!boz!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!pg!uif!wjsvt/ Btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!ibt!cffo!uif!voefsmzjoh!kvtujgjdbujpo!pg!mpdlepxot!fogpsdfe!bmm!bdsptt!uif!xpsme/!Uif!nptu!sfdfou!hvjebodf!gspn!uif!Dfoufst!gps Ejtfbtf!Dpouspm!)DED*!tujmm!tubuft!uibu!uif!wjsvt!Ædbo!cf!tqsfbe!cz!qfpqmf!xip!ep!opu!ibwf!tznqupnt/Ç!Jo!gbdu-!uif!DED!dmbjnfe!uibu!btznqupnbujd!qfpqmf Æbsf!ftujnbufe!up!bddpvou!gps!npsf!uibo!61!qfsdfou!pg!usbotnjttjpot/Ç V/L/!Ifbmui!Tfdsfubsz!Nbuu!Ibodpdl!bmtp!qspnpufe!uijt!nfttbhf-!fyqmbjojoh!uibu!uif!dpodfqu!pg!btznqupnbujd!tqsfbe!pg!DPWJE.2:!mfe!up!uif!V/L/ bewpdbujoh!nbtlt!boe!sfgfssjoh!up!uif!Æqspcmfn!pg!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo/Ç Ipxfwfs-!uif!ofx!tuvez!jo!Obuvsf!Dpnnvojdbujpot-!ujumfe!ÆQptu.mpdlepxo!TBST.DpW.3!ovdmfjd!bdje!tdsffojoh!jo!ofbsmz!21!njmmjpo!sftjefout!pg!Xvibo- Dijob-Ç!efcvolfe!uif!dpodfqu!pg!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo/! Ju!tubufe!uibu!pvu!pg!uif!ofbsmz!21!njmmjpo!qfpqmf!jo!uif!tuvez-!Æ411!btznqupnbujd!dbtftÇ!xfsf!gpvoe/!Dpoubdu!usbdjoh!xbt!uifo!dbssjfe!pvu!boe!pg!uiptf!411- op!dbtft!pg!DPWJE.2:!xfsf!efufdufe!jo!boz!pg!uifn/!ÆB!upubm!pg!2-285!dmptf!dpoubdut!pg!uif!btznqupnbujd!qptjujwf!dbtft!xfsf!usbdfe-!boe!uifz!bmm!uftufe ofhbujwf!gps!uif!DPWJE.2:/Ç Cpui!uif!btznqupnbujd!qbujfout!boe!uifjs!dpoubdut!xfsf!qmbdfe!jo!jtpmbujpo!gps!uxp!xfflt-!boe!bgufs!uif!gpsuojhiu-!uif!sftvmut!sfnbjofe!uif!tbnf/!ÆOpof!pg efufdufe!qptjujwf!dbtft!ps!uifjs!dmptf!dpoubdut!cfdbnf!tznqupnbujd!ps!ofxmz!dpogjsnfe!xjui!DPWJE.2:!evsjoh!uif!jtpmbujpo!qfsjpe/Ç Gvsuifs!fwjefodf!tipxfe!uibu!Æwjsvt!dvmuvsftÇ!jo!uif!qptjujwf!boe!sfqptjujwf!btznqupnbujd!dbtft!xfsf!bmm!ofhbujwf-!Æjoejdbujoh!op!Èwjbcmf!wjsvt(!jo!qptjujwf dbtft!efufdufe!jo!uijt!tuvez/Ç Bhft!pg!uiptf!gpvoe!up!cf!btznqupnbujd!sbohfe!cfuxffo!21!boe!9:-!xjui!uif!btznqupnbujd!qptjujwf!sbuf!cfjoh!Æmpxftu!jo!dijmesfo!ps!bepmftdfout!bhfe!28!boe cfmpxÇ!boe!ijhiftu!sbuf!gpvoe!bnpoh!qfpqmf!pmefs!uibo!71/ Uif!tuvez!bmtp!nbef!uif!sfbmj{bujpo!uibu!evf!up!b!xfblfojoh!pg!uif!wjsvt!jutfmg-!Æofxmz!jogfdufe!qfstpot!xfsf!npsf!mjlfmz!up!cf!btznqupnbujd!boe!xjui!b!mpxfs wjsbm!mpbe!uibo!fbsmjfs!jogfdufe!dbtft/Ç Uiftf!sftvmut!bsf!opu!xjuipvu!qsfdfefou/!Jo!Kvof-!Es/!Nbsjb!Wbo!Lfslipwf-!ifbe!pg!uif!Xpsme!Ifbmui!Pshboj{bujpoÉt!)XIP*!fnfshjoh!ejtfbtft!boe!{ppoptjt voju-!tife!epvcu!vqpo!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo/!Tqfbljoh!bu!b!qsftt!dpogfsfodf-!Wbo!Lfslipwf!fyqmbjofe-!ÆGspn!uif!ebub!xf!ibwf-!ju!tujmm!tffnt!up!cf!sbsf uibu!bo!btznqupnbujd!qfstpo!bduvbmmz!usbotnjut!poxbse!up!b!tfdpoebsz!joejwjevbm/Ç Tif!uifo!sfqfbufe!uif!xpset!ÆJuÉt!wfsz!sbsf-Ç!cvu!eftqjuf!ifs!xpse!dipjdf!pg!Æsbsf-Ç!Wbo!Lfslipwf!dpvme!opu!qpjou!up!b!tjohmf!dbtf!pg!btznqupnbujd usbotnjttjpo-!opujoh!uibu!ovnfspvt!sfqpsut!Æxfsf!opu!gjoejoh!tfdpoebsz!usbotnjttjpo!poxbse/Ç Ifs!dpnnfout!xfou!bhbjotu!uif!qsfepnjobou!obssbujwf!kvtujgzjoh!mpdlepxot-!boe!bu!uif!ujnf!uif!Bnfsjdbo!Jotujuvuf!gps!Fdpopnjd!Sftfbsdi!)BJFS* ijhimjhiufe!uibu!Ætif!voefsnjofe!uif!mbtu!cju!pg!sbujpobmf!uifsf!dpvme!cf!gps!mpdlepxot-!nboebufe!nbtlt-!tpdjbm!ejtubodjoh!sfhvmbujpo-!boe!uif!foujsf bqqbsbuvt!pg!dpnqvmtjpo!boe!dpfsdjpo!voefs!xijdi!xfÉwf!mjwfe!gps!uisff!npouit/Ç Txjgu!up!bdu-!uif!XIP!qfsgpsnfe!b!V.uvso-!boe!uif!ofyu!ebz!Wbo!Lfslipwf!uifo!efdmbsfe!uibu!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!xbt!b!Æsfbmmz!dpnqmfy!rvftujpo!½ Xf!epoÉu!bduvbmmz!ibwf!uibu!botxfs!zfu/Ç ÆJ!uijol!uibu!uibuÉt!njtvoefstuboejoh!up!tubuf!uibu!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!hmpcbmmz!jt!wfsz!sbsf/!J!xbt!sfgfssjoh!up!b!tnbmm!tvctfu!pg!tuvejft-Ç!tif!beefe/ Ipxfwfs-!uif!ofx!Xvibo!tuvez!tffnt!up!qsftfou!tpmje-!tdjfoujgjd!fwjefodf!uibu!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo!jt!opu!kvtu!sbsf!cvu!opofyjtufou/!Hjwfo!uibu!ju gpvoe!Æop!fwjefodf!uibu!uif!jefoujgjfe!btznqupnbujd!qptjujwf!dbtft!xfsf!jogfdujpvt-Ç!uif!tuvez!sbjtft!jnqpsubou!rvftujpot!bcpvu!mpdlepxot/! Dpnnfoujoh!po!uif!tuvez-!Uif!Dpotfswbujwf!Usff!Ipvtf!opufe!uibu!Æbmm!pg!uif!dvssfou!mpdlepxo!sfhvmbujpot-!nbtl!xfbsjoh!sfrvjsfnfout!boe!tpdjbm ejtubodjoh!svmft0efdsfft!bsf!cbtfe!po!b!dpnqmfuf!gbmmbdz!pg!gbmtf!bttvnqujpot/Ç!Uif!fwjefodf!qsftfoufe!jo!uif!tuvez!tipxt!uibu!ÆÈwfsz!sbsfÉ!bduvbmmz!nfbot ÈofwfsÉ!btznqupnbujd!tqsfbe!kvtu!epftoÉu!ibqqfo!Ä!FWFS/Ç Tvdi!b!mbshf!tdjfoujgjd!tuvez!pg!21!njmmjpo!qfpqmf!tipvme!opu!cf!pwfsmpplfe-!Kfggsfz!Uvdlfs!bshvfe!jo!uif!BJFS-!bt!ju!tipvme!cf!Æivhf!ofxt-Ç!qbwjoh!uif!xbz!Æup pqfo!vq!fwfszuijoh!jnnfejbufmz/Ç!Zfu!nfejb!sfqpsut!ibwf!cffo!wjsuvbmmz!opofyjtufou!boe!Æjhopsfe-Ç!b!gbdu!uibu!Uvdlfs!fyqmbjofe;!ÆUif!mpdlepxo!mpccz jhopsft!xibufwfs!dpousbejdut!uifjs!obssbujwf-!qsfgfssjoh!vowfsjgjfe!bofdepuft!pwfs!bo!bduvbm!tdjfoujgjd!tuvez!pg!21!njmmjpo!sftjefout!jo!xibu!xbt!uif!xpsmeÉt gjstu!nbkps!iputqpu!gps!uif!ejtfbtf!xf!bsf!uszjoh!up!nbobhf/Ç Uif!sfdfou!gjoejoht!tipvme!fobcmf!tpdjfuz!up!sfpqfo!podf!npsf-!bddpsejoh!up!uif!BJFS/!Xjuipvu!btznqupnbujd!usbotnjttjpo-!Æuif!xipmf!cbtjt!gps!qptu.dvswf. gmbuufojoh!mpdlepxot-Ç!mjgf!tipvme!sftvnf!boe!Æxf!dpvme!ublf!dpngpsu!jo!pvs!opsnbm!jouvjujpo!uibu!ifbmuiz!qfpqmf!dbo!hfu!pvu!boe!bcpvu!xjui!op!sjtl!up puifst/Ç Å!Bsujdmf!dpoujovft!cfmpx!Qfujujpo!Å ÆXf!lffq!ifbsjoh!bcpvu!ipx!xf!tipvme!gpmmpx!uif!tdjfodf-Ç!Uvdlfs!beefe/!ÆUif!dmbjn!jt!ujsfe!cz!opx/!Xf!lopx!xibuÉt!sfbmmz!ibqqfojoh/Ç! If!dmptfe!ijt!dpnnfoubsz!xjui!uif!rvftujpo;!ÆXjui!tpmje!fwjefodf!uibu!btznqupnbujd!tqsfbe!jt!opotfotf-!xf!ibwf!up!btl;!Xip!jt!nbljoh!efdjtjpot!boe xiz@# Jun Masks Don’t Work:A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD Masks and respirators do not work. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all showthat masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles. Furthermore, the relevant known physics and biology, which I review, are such that masks and respirators should not work. It would be a paradox if masks and respirators worked, given what we know about viral respiratory diseases: The main transmission path is long- residence- blocked, and the minimum-infective dose is smaller than one aerosol particle. The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history. (From Words from the Publisher: "We pledge to publish all letters, guest commentaries, or studies refuting \[Rancourt's\]general premise that this mask-wearing culture and shaming could be more harmful than helpful. Please send your feedback toinfo@rcreader.com.")\[UPDATE: August 12, 2020 Still No Evidence Justifying Mandatory Masks\] on www.youtube.com</a>, or enableJavaScript if it is disabled in your browser.</div></div> Review of the Medical Literature Here are key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., “N95”) does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness: Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 –419. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002 N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds. Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and- infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza- virus-a-systematic- review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein. bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750- 2659.2011.00307.x “There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016 https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567 “We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory- confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.” Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, Pages 1934–1942, https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747 “Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant”; as per Fig. 2c therein: Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214 “Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. ... Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masksagainst influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1-9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381 “A total of six RCTs involving9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory- confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” Conclusion Regarding That Masks Do Not Work No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below). Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit. Masks and respirators do not work. Precautionary Principle Turned on Its Head with Masks In light of the medical research, therefore, it is difficult to understand why public-health authorities are not consistently adamant about this established scientific result, since the distributed psychological, economic, and environmental harm from a broad recommendation to wear masks is significant, not to mention the unknown potential harm from concentration and distribution of pathogens on and from used masks. In this case, public authorities would be turning the precautionary principle on its head (see below). Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease and of Why Masks Do Not Work In order to understand why masks cannot possibly work, we must review established knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, the mechanism of seasonal variation of excess deaths from pneumonia and influenza, the aerosol mechanism of infectious disease transmission, the physics and chemistry of aerosols, and the mechanism of the so-called minimum-infective-dose. In addition to pandemics that can occur anytime, in the temperate latitudes there is an extra burden of respiratory-disease mortality that is seasonal, and that is caused by viruses. For example, see the review of influenza by Paules and Subbarao (2017). This has been known for a long time, and the seasonal pattern is exceedingly regular. (Publisher's note: All links to source references to studies here forward are found at the end of this article.) For example, see Figure 1 of Viboud (2010), which has “Weekly time series of the ratio of deaths from pneumonia and influenza to all deaths, based on the 122 cities surveillance in the US (blue line). The red line represents the expected baseline ratio in the absence of influenza activity,” here: The seasonality of the phenomenon was largely not understood until a decade ago. Until recently, it was debated whether the pattern arose primarily because of seasonal change in virulence of the pathogens, or because of seasonal change in susceptibility of the host (such as from dry air causing tissue irritation, or diminished daylight causing vitamin deficiency or hormonal stress). For example, see Dowell (2001). In a landmark study, Shaman et al. (2010) showed that the seasonal pattern of extra respiratory-disease mortality can be explained quantitatively on the sole basis of absolute humidity, and its direct controlling impact on transmission of airborne pathogens. Lowen et al. (2007) demonstrated the phenomenon of humidity- dependent airborne-virus virulence in actual disease transmission between guinea pigs, and discussed potential underlying mechanisms for the measured controlling effect of humidity. The underlying mechanism is that the pathogen-laden aerosol particles or droplets are neutralized within a half-life that monotonically and significantly decreases with increasing ambient humidity. This is based on the seminal work of Harper (1961). Harper experimentally showed that viral-pathogen-carrying droplets were inactivated within shorter and shorter times, as ambient humidity was increased. Harper argued that the viruses themselves were made inoperative by the humidity (“viable decay”), however, he admitted that the effect could be from humidity-enhanced physical removal or sedimentation of the droplets (“physical loss”): “Aerosol viabilities reported in this paper are based on the ratio of virus titre to radioactive count in suspension and cloud samples, and can be criticized on the ground that test and tracer materials were not physically identical.” The latter (“physical loss”) seems more plausible to me, since humidity would have a universal physical effect of causing particle/droplet growth and sedimentation, and all tested viral pathogens have essentially the same humidity-driven “decay.” Furthermore, it is difficult to understand howa virion (of all virus types) in a droplet would be molecularly or structurally attacked or damaged by an increase in ambient humidity. A “virion” is the complete, infective form of a virus outside a host cell, with a core of RNA or DNA and a capsid. The actual mechanism of such humidity- driven intra-droplet “viable decay” of a virion has not been explained or studied. In any case, the explanation and model of Shaman et al. (2010) is not dependent on the particular mechanism of the humidity-driven decay ofvirions in aerosol/droplets. Shaman’s quantitatively demonstrated model of seasonal regional viral epidemiology is valid for either mechanism (or combination of mechanisms), whether “viable decay” or “physical loss.” The breakthrough achieved by Shaman etal. is not merely some academic point. Rather, it has profound health-policy implications, which have been entirely ignored or overlooked in the current coronavirus pandemic. In particular, Shaman’s work necessarily implies that, rather than being a fixednumber (dependent solely on the spatial-temporal structure of social interactions in a completely susceptible population, and on the viral strain), the epidemic’s basic reproduction number (R0) is highly or predominantly dependent on ambient absolute humidity. For a definition of R0, see HealthKnowlege-UK (2020): R0 is “the average number of secondary infections produced by a typical case of an infection in a population where everyone is susceptible.” The average R0 for influenza is said to be 1.28 (1.19–1.37); see the comprehensive review by Biggerstaff et al. (2014). In fact, Shaman et al. showed that R0 must be understood to seasonally vary between humid-summer values of just larger than “1” and dry-winter values typically as large as “4” (for example, see their Table 2). In other words, the seasonal infectious viral respiratory diseases that plague temperate latitudes every year go from being intrinsically mildly contagious to virulently contagious, due simply to the bio-physical mode of transmission controlled by atmospheric humidity, irrespective of any other consideration. Therefore, all the epidemiological mathematical modeling of the benefits of mediating policies (such as social distancing), which assumes humidity-independent R0 values, has a largelikelihood of being of little value, on this basis alone. For studies about modeling and regarding mediation effects on the effective reproduction number, see Coburn (2009) and Tracht (2010). To put it simply, the “second wave” of an epidemic is not a consequence of human sin regarding mask wearing and hand shaking. Rather, the “second wave” is an inescapable consequence of an air-dryness-driven many-fold increase in disease contagiousness, in a population that has not yet attained immunity. If my view of the mechanism is correct (i.e., “physical loss”), then Shaman’s work further necessarily implies that the dryness-driven high transmissibility (large R0) arises from small aerosol particles fluidly suspended in the air; as opposed to large droplets that are quickly gravitationally removed from the air. Such small aerosol particles fluidly suspended in air, of biological origin, are of every variety and are everywhere, including down to virion-sizes (Despres, 2012). It is not entirely unlikely that viruses can thereby be physically transported over inter-continental distances (e.g., Hammond, 1989). More to the point, indoor airborne virus concentrations have been shown to exist (in day-care facilities, health centers, and on-board airplanes) primarily as aerosol particles of diameters smaller than 2.5 concentrations ranged from 5800 to 37 000 genome copies m . On average, 64 per cent of the viral genome copies were associated with hours. Modeling of virus concentrations indoors suggested a source deposition flux onto surfaces o Brownian motion. Over one hour, the inhalation dose was estimated to be 30 ± 18 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), adequate to induce infection. These results provide quantitative support for the idea that theaerosol route could be an important mode of influenza transmission.” to gravitational sedimentation, and would not be stopped by long- range inertial impact. This means that the slightest (even momentary) facial misfit of a mask or respirator renders the design filtration norm of the mask or respirator entirely irrelevant. In any case, the filtration virion penetration, not to mention surgical masks. For example, see Balazy et al. (2006). Mask stoppage efficiency and host inhalation are only half of the equation, however, because the minimal infective dose (MID) must also be considered. For example, if a large numberof pathogen- laden particles must be delivered to the lung within a certain time for the illness to take hold, then partial blocking by any mask or cloth can be enough to make a significant difference. On the other hand, if the MID is amply surpassed by the virions carried in a single aerosol particle able to evade mask-capture, then the mask is of no practical utility, which is the case. Yezli and Otter (2011), in their review of the MID, point out relevant features: 1Most respiratory viruses are as infective in humans as in tissue culture having optimal laboratory susceptibility 2It is believed that a single virion can be enough to induce illness in the host 3The 50-percent probability MID (“TCID50”) has variably been found 4There are typically 10 to 3rd powervirions per 5The 50-percent probability MID easily fits into a single (one) aerolized droplet 6For further background: 7A classic description of dose-response assessment is provided by Haas (1993). 8Zwart et al. (2009) provided the first laboratory proof, in a virus- insect system, that theaction of a single virion can be sufficient to cause disease. 9Baccam et al. (2006) calculated from empirical data that, with influenza A in humans,“we estimate that after a delay of ~6 h, infected cells begin producing influenza virus and continue to do so for ~5 h. The average lifetime of infected cells is ~11 h, and the half-life of free infectious virus is ~3 h. We calculated the \[in-body\] basic reproductive number, R0, which indicated that a single infected cell could produce ~22 new productive infections.” 10Brooke et al. (2013) showed that, contrary to prior modeling assumptions, although not all influenza-A-infected cells in the human body produce infectious progeny (virions), nonetheless, 90 percent of infected cell are significantly impacted, rather than simply surviving unharmed. All of this to say that: if anything gets through (and it always does, irrespective of the mask), then you are going to be infected. Masks cannot possibly work. It is not surprising, therefore, that no bias-free study has ever found a benefit from wearing a mask or respirator in this application. Therefore, the studies that show partial stopping power of masks, or that show that masks can capture many large droplets produced by a sneezing or coughing mask-wearer, in light of the above-described features of the problem, are irrelevant. For example, such studies as these: Leung (2020), Davies (2013), Lai (2012), and Sande (2008). Why There Can Never Be an Empirical Test of a Nation- Wide Mask-Wearing Policy As mentioned above, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public. There is good reason for this. It would be impossible to obtain unambiguous and bias-free results \[because\]: 1Any benefit from mask-wearingwould have to be a small effect, since undetected in controlled experiments, which would be swamped by the larger effects, notably the large effect from changing atmospheric humidity. 2Mask compliance and mask adjustment habits would be unknown. 3Mask-wearing is associated (correlated) with several other health behaviors; see Wada (2012). 4The results would not be transferable, because of differing cultural habits. 5Compliance is achieved by fear, and individuals can habituate to fear-based propaganda,and canhave disparate basic responses. 6Monitoring and compliance measurement are near-impossible, and subject to largeerrors. 7Self-reporting (such as in surveys) is notoriously biased, because individuals have theself-interested belief that their efforts are useful. 8Progression of the epidemic is not verified with reliable tests on large populationsamples, and generally relies on non- representative hospital visits or admissions. 9Several different pathogens (viruses and strains of viruses) causing respiratory illnessgenerally act together, in the same population and/or in individuals, and are not resolved, while having different epidemiological characteristics. Unknown Aspects of Mask Wearing Many potential harms may arise from broad public policies to wear masks, and the following unanswered questions arise: 1Do used and loaded masks become sources of enhanced transmission, for the wearer and others? 2Do masks become collectors and retainers of pathogens that the mask wearer would otherwise avoid when breathing without a mask? 3Are large droplets captured by a mask atomized or aerolized into breathable components? Can virions escape an evaporating droplet stuck to a mask fiber? 4What are the dangers of bacterial growth on a used and loaded mask? 5How do pathogen-laden droplets interact with environmental dust and aerosolscaptured on the mask? 6What are long-term health effects on HCW, such as headaches, arising from impededbreathing? 7Are there negative social consequences to a masked society? 8Are there negative psychological consequences to wearing a mask, as a fear-basedbehavioral modification? 9What are the environmental consequences of mask manufacturing and disposal? 10Do the masks shed fibers or substances that are harmful when inhaled? Conclusion By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle. In an absence of knowledge, governments should not make policies that have a hypothetical potential to cause harm. The government has an onus barrier before it instigates a broad social-engineering intervention, or allows corporations to exploit fear-based sentiments. Furthermore, individuals should know that there is no known benefit arising from wearing a mask in a viral respiratory illness epidemic, and that scientific studies have shown that any benefit must be residually small, compared to other and determinative factors. Otherwise, what is the point of publicly funded science? The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science thatserves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history. Denis G. Rancourt is a researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA.ca) and is formerly a tenured professor at the University of Ottawa, Canada. This paper was originally published at Rancourt's account on ResearchGate.net. As of June 5, 2020, this paper was removed from his profile by its administrators at Researchgate.net/profile/D_Rancourt. At Rancourt's blog ActivistTeacher.blogspot.com, he recounts the notification and responses he received from ResearchGate.net and states, “This is censorship of my scientific work like I have never experienced before.” The original April 2020 white paper in .pdf format is available here, complete with charts that have not been reprinted in the Reader print or web versions. RELATED COMMENTARY: An Unprecedented Experiment: Sometimes You Just Gotta Wear the Stupid Endnotes: Baccam, P. et al. (2006) “Kinetics of Influenza A Virus Infection in Humans”, Journal of Virology Jul 2006, 80 (15) 7590-7599; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01623-05https://jvi.asm.org/content/80/15/7590 Balazy et al. (2006) “Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?”, American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 34, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages 51-57. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.488.4644&r ep=rep1&type=pdf Biggerstaff, M. et al. (2014) “Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature”, BMC Infect Dis 14, 480 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480 Brooke, C. B. et al. (2013) “Most Influenza A Virions Fail To Express at Least One Essential Viral Protein”, Journal of Virology Feb 2013, 87 (6) 3155-3162; DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02284-12 https://jvi.asm.org/content/87/6/3155 Coburn, B. J. et al. (2009) “Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1)”, BMC Med 7, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-30 Davies, A. et al. (2013) “Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic?”, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Available on CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43 http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1935789313000438 Despres, V. R. et al. (2012) “Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review”, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 64:1, 15598, DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 Dowell, S. F. (2001) “Seasonal variation in host susceptibility and cycles of certain infectious diseases”, EmergInfect Dis. 2001;7(3):369–374. doi:10.3201/eid0703.010301 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631809/ Hammond, G. W. et al. (1989) “Impact of Atmospheric Dispersion and Transport of Viral Aerosols on the Epidemiology of Influenza”, Reviews of Infectious Diseases, Volume 11, Issue 3, May 1989, Pages 494–497, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/11.3.494 Haas, C.N. et al. (1993) “Risk Assessment of Virus in Drinking Water”, Risk Analysis, 13: 545-552. doi:10.1111/j.1539- 6924.1993.tb00013.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539- 6924.1993.tb00013.x HealthKnowlege-UK (2020) “Charter 1a -Epidemiology: Epidemic theory (effective & basic reproduction numbers, epidemic thresholds) & techniques for analysis of infectious disease data (construction & use of epidemic curves, generation numbers, exceptional reporting & identification of significant clusters)”, HealthKnowledge.org.uk, accessed on 2020-04-10. https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public- health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/epidemic-theory Lai, A. C. K. et al. (2012) “Effectiveness of facemasks to reduce exposure hazards for airborne infections among general populations”, J. R. Soc. Interface. 9938–948 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0537 Leung, N.H.L. et al. (2020) “Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks”, Nature Medicine (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2 Lowen, A. C. et al. (2007) “Influenza Virus Transmission Is Dependent on Relative Humidity and Temperature”, PLoS Pathog 3(10): e151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030151 Paules, C. and Subbarao, S. (2017) “Influenza”, Lancet, Seminar| Volume 390, ISSUE 10095, P697-708, August 12, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30129-0 Sande, van der, M. et al. (2008) “Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population”, PLoS ONE 3(7): e2618. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002618 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002618 Shaman, J. et al. (2010) “Absolute Humidity and the Seasonal Onset of Influenza in the Continental United States”, PLoS Biol 8(2): e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000316 Tracht, S. M. et al. (2010) “Mathematical Modeling of the Effectiveness of Facemasks in Reducing the Spread of Novel Influenza A (H1N1)”, PLoS ONE 5(2): e9018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009018 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009018 Viboud C. et al. (2010) “Preliminary Estimates of Mortality and Years of Life Lost Associated with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic in the US and Comparison with Past Influenza Seasons”, PLoS Curr. 2010; 2:RRN1153. Published 2010 Mar 20. doi:10.1371/currents.rrn1153 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843747/ Wada, K. et al. (2012) “Wearing face masks in public during the influenza season may reflect other positive hygiene practices in Japan”, BMC Public Health 12, 1065 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1065 Yang, W. et al. (2011) “Concentrations and size distributions of airborne influenza A viruses measured indoors at a health centre, a day-care centre and on aeroplanes”, Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2011Aug;8(61):1176-1184. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0686. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2010.0686 Yezli, S., Otter, J.A. (2011) “Minimum Infective Dose of the Major Human Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Transmitted Through Food and the Environment”, Food Environ Virol 3, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-011-9056-7 Zwart, M. P. et al. (2009) “An experimental test of the independent action hypothesis in virus–insect pathosystems”, Proc. R. Soc. B. 2762233–2242 http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0064 3.26 Acceptance of Donations from Northern Valley Community Foundation (NVCF) and Addition of Laboratory Equipment in the Capital Asset Ledger Good day. I am a resident of Butte County who strongly opposes the acceptance of Addition of Laboratory Equipment in the Capital Asset Ledger for the following reasons. Liability. I assert that Butte County owning and/or operating SARS-CoV- 2 RT-PCR testing equipment is a grave mistake because owning testing equipment would establish the county as complicit in a testing scheme that the public accepts on on good faith yet is unable to detect active live or hot infections but has been promoted as if it does. Additionally Butte County would be complicit in the misappropriation of test results by allowing them to be used to manufacture baseless "Covid case numbers" and distort reality as these test simply are not able to detect active infection (citations below). Contrary to acquiring additional lab equipment, Butte County has an obligation to reject the use of RT-PCR test results for confirming covid cases used to determine county coronavirus case totals and managing lockdown tiers.. Misleading the public with PCR inflated numbers needs to stop immediately. There are other methods of detecting active viral infection, but PCR is not one of them. Understand that Sars-Cov-2 RT-PCR test results are not like simple a pregnancy tests that provide a "yes" or "no" result. What we have with RT-PRC viral testing is a pipeline of misinformation that adulterates the needed data that epidemiologists rely upon. In the context of public health, promoting such a baseless test is deceitful and amounts to nothing more than assigning meaning where none exists. Things are about to change however. Top scientistshave beenproviding expert testimony, and opinion throughout Europe, U.S. and elsewhere in preparation for lawsuits affirming, more elegantly, one would hope, what I am telling you here. These suits will address the full extent of fraudulent tests, and the public health malfeasance that has transpired as it relates to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests leading up to and during the lockdown. By making this request to accept lab equipment, Butte County Board of Supervisors and Butte County Public Health leadership is verifying that it does not understand the scope of product limitations that have (for decades) been printed on the test inserts. Butte County has been remiss to not have informed the public about these limitations and how RT-PCR is incapable of detecting live infection or for providing infectious disease diagnosis. This failure allows Butte County to continue to count every positive test results as a "new case" when these "cases" are determined by the test to be infectious cases. I argue this is false misleading testing and it is not based on sound public health practice. Below is a collection of evidence to support my position. "...PCR does not distinguish between infectious virus and non-infectious nucleic acid." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140- 6736(20)30868-0/fulltext "SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR continued to detect the virus until the 63rd day after symptom onset whereas the virus could only be isolated from respiratory specimens collected within the first 18 days." https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/infectious-positive-pcr-test-result- covid-19/ HOW VALID IS THE PCR TEST? The biochemist and Nobel laureate Kary Mullis developed the PCR test in 1983 to amplify DNA sequences in vitro. According to Mullis, his test is not suitable for diagnostic purposes. Even nowadays, the test cannot determine whether an active virus infection is present. The gene sequences found with the test can just as easily come from a virus infection that has already been overcome or a contamination that does not lead to an infection at all. It is questionable whether the so-called Drosten test will find the correct gene sequence at all. Many German laboratories use so-called house tests on the basis of the test protocols published by the WHO (compare e.g. the so-called Drosten test assay of January 17, 2020). According to European standards, these basically require official validation. In practice, however, this has largely been avoided because of the “emergency”. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ HOW DANGEROUS IS SARS-COV-2? Fears that SARS-CoV-2 could be significantly more dangerous in terms of communicability, burden of disease and mortality than influenza have proven to be incorrect. In the vast majority of cases, the infection is symptom-free or with mild flu symptoms. Old, debilitated people with previous illnesses run a higher risk of developing Covid-19. Many of the very difficult courses, especially at the beginning of the wave of illnesses in March 2020, can be attributed to treatment errors caused by panic (intubation, etc.). Long-term effects have not yet been proven. An evaluation of a total of 23 studies carried out worldwide has shown that the corona infection death rate (IFR) for people over 70 years of age is around 0.12%, for people under 70 years of age it is only 0.04%. Lockdowns drive pandemics, as demonstrates in the article. Excerpt; Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths? Q: Why, indeed, was the virus so late to hit Mexico, and why did it wait until precisely the moment that Mexico was fully (and finally) prepared for it to start killing at levels that greatly exceeded normal deaths in that city? https://medium.com/@JohnPospichal/questions-for-lockdown- apologists-32a9bbf2e247 https://medium.com/@JohnPospichal/questions-for-lockdown- apologists-mexico-city-5261d981992d The Smoking Gun Disclaimers | Product Inserts PRODUCT DISCLAIMERS: SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR testing: BOS, PLEASE READ THE FINE PRINT OF THE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL LANGUAGE FOUND ON PRODUCT INSERTS FROM SEVERAL RT-PCR TEST MANUFACTURERS. Product Insert - Excerpt of testing limitations (partial list); "This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens." "Nucleic acid may persist in vivo, independent of virus viability. Detection of analyte target(s) does not imply that the corresponding virus(es) are infectious or are the causative agents for clinical symptoms. " "This test is a qualitative test and does not provide the quantitative value of detected organism present." "This test has not been evaluated for patients without signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection." ___________________________ Association is not causation. RT-PCR testing is capable of finding the "needle in a haystack" alright but functionally incapable of detecting infectious states or infectiousness. This misrepresentation is literally being used against the population, a pretext for inflating active case counts in Butte County. The evidence provided herein provides a glimpse of a body of evidence This must change. Test limitation disclaimers should be made mandatory to accompany every test given in Butte County. We also need an ordinance to prevent BCPH from assigning positive RT-PCR test results as part of the case count unless infection is present. New York Times here article explains a small snapshot of the actual testing problems. Here in Chico, one lab I talked to confirmed that Covid nasal swab tests are processed at a 45 Ct (cycle threshold) Remember the number 45 - as it will be important as one reads the NY Times article all about RT-PCR testing. This article attempts portray 45 cycle threshold for coronavirus is pure science fiction. Other labs in Chico are also currently testing at the upper limit threshold range between 42-45 Ct also. "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Maybe it's time we listened to Mark Twain who knew a thing or two, about more than a thing or two. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus- testing.html PCR Test The Covid testing fraud in a nutshell: https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/03/ten-fatal-errors-scientists-attack- paper-that-established-global-pcr-driven-lockdown/ Regards, Concerned Citizen of Butte County Bcpvu!VtDpoubdu!Vt IPNFMBUFTU!OFXTTVQQPSUQVCMJDBUJPOTQSPNBCPVUDPOUBDU!VT Uif!DPWJE.2:!QDS!Uftu!Jt!Lfz!Up!Uif Qboefnjd!Gsbve Qvcmjtife!po!Tfqufncfs!9-!3131 Xsjuufo!cz!Kpio!P(Tvmmjwbo Gpmmpx!Vt" Epobuf!Upebz" Dvssfoumz-!kpjojoh!QTJ!jt!gsff/!Xifo zpv!nblf!b!epobujpo!pg!uif tvhhftufe!bnpvou!pg!%36!)boz bnpvou!xjmm!ifmq-!uipvhi"*!zpv!xjmm ifmq!up!tqpotps!tpvoe-!bmbsnjtu. gsff!tdjfoujd!xpsl/ Uif!qpmznfsbtf!dibjo!sfbdujpoqpmznfsbtf!dibjo!sfbdujpo!)QDS*!uftu!Ä!vtfe!bt!uif!cfmmxfuifs!gps!dpspobwjsvt!Ä!jt!opu!u!gps!qvsqptf/ Ifsfjo-!xf!tvnnbsj{f!ejtdsfejufe!DPWJE2:!uftujoh!boe!fodpvsbhf!zpv!up!ep!zpvs!pxo!sftfbsdi!boe!cfdpnf cfuufs!jogpsnfe!bt!up!ipx!njtejsfdujpo-!jodpnqfufodf!boe!tdjfoujd!gsbve!jt!hsbwfmz!ibsnjoh!pvs!qfstpobm!boe tpdjfubm!xfmm!cfjoh/ Ojdl!Efmhbep!xspuf!bo!fydfmmfou!qsjnfs!jo!Bqsjm!pg!ipx!uijt!DPWJE2:!uftu!jt!xjefmz!cfjoh!vtfe!)boe!bcvtfe*!boe xf!jodpsqpsbuf!tpnf!pg!ijt!bobmztjt!ifsfjo/!Eftqjuf!qspcmfnt!lopxo!fwfo!uifo-!uif!QDS!uftu!sfnbjot!uif!nptu dpnnpomz!vtfe!DPWJE.2:!uftu!cpui!jo!uif!VT!boe!hmpcbmmz/ Uif!QDS!uftu!xbt!jowfoufe!cz!Lbsz!Nvmmjt!)qipup-!upq*!jo!2:96!cvu!ju!xbt!ofwfs!joufoefe!gps!efufdujoh!ejtfbtf<!juÉt qsjnbsz!bqqmjdbujpot!jodmvefe!cjpnfejdbm!sftfbsdi!boe!dsjnjobm!gpsfotjdt/ Cfgpsf!ijt!efbui!jo!312:!Nvmmjt!upme!sfqpsufst; Hfu!Zpvs!Dpqz!Upebz"!)Hfu!Zpvs!Dpqz!Upebz"!)Bnb{poBnb{po** Nvmmjt!pgufo!tqplf!pvu!bhbjotu!vtjoh!ijt!uftu!gps!ejbhoptjoh!jmmofttft/!Tp.dbmmfe!fyqfsut!jhopsfe!uif!xbsojoh/!Cvu opx-!nboz!joefqfoefou!tdjfoujtut!boe!nfejdbm!qspgfttjpobmt!bsf!dpnjoh!gpsxbse!up!efopvodf!uif!jejpdz!pg hpwfsonfout-!uif!nfejb!boe!OHPÉt!gps!qvtijoh!uif!ovncfs!pg!opwfm!dpspobwjsvt!ÆdbtftÇ!)opu!efbuit*!qsfnjtfe po!tqvsjpvt!sftvmut!gspn!uijt!qspcmfnbujd!QDS!uftu/ Mbuftu!Ofxt Sfqpsujoh!po!uif!psjhjobm!2:91Ét!hsfbu!csfbluispvhi!pg!uif!Nvmmjt!Qpmznfsbtf!Dibjo!Sfbdujpo!joopwbujpo-!uif Xibu!Zpvs!Epdups!Gpshpu!Up!Ufmm !xspuf; Zpv!bcpvu!Dpwje.2:!Wbddjoft Gfcsvbsz!7-!3132 Ipx!epft!uif!FbsuiÉt!Hsffoipvtf Ffdu!xpsl@!)Ijou;!Ju!epftoÉu* Gfcsvbsz!7-!3132 Puifs!uibo!EfmhbepÉt!fydfmmfou!jouspevdupsz!bsujdmf-!xf!sfdpnnfoe!sfbejoh!Bmmbo!Xfjtcfdlfs!xip!pfst!b!npsf vq!up!ebuf!)Bvhvtu!27-!3131*!bobmztjt!djujoh!sfdfou!fwjefodf!fyqptjoh!uif!gbmmbdjft!bspvoe!DPWJE!uftujoh/!\\2^ ÈQjmf!pg!spqfÉ!po!b!Ufybt!cfbdi!jt!b xfjse-!sfbm.mjgf!tfb!dsfbuvsf Xfjtcfdlfs!qptft!uif!lfz!rvftujpo!xf!tipvme!btl!pvstfmwft; Gfcsvbsz!7-!3132 Epdupst!Dbmm!po!VT!up!Beesftt JoejbÉt!Q{fs!DPWJE!Wbddjof!Cmpdl Gfcsvbsz!7-!3132 Q{fs!jo!DPWJE!Wbddjof!Sfusfbu Bgufs!Joejb!Efnboet!Npsf!Ebub Gfcsvbsz!7-!3132 Npsf!Tipdljoh!DPWJE!Wbddjof Nvmmjt!boe!puifst!dpssfdumz!dbmmfe!pvu!uif!jejpdz!pg!hspvquijol!Ä!uif!sfmjbodf!po!jmm.jogpsnfe!boe!njthvjefe Efbuit!gspn!JubmzGfcsvbsz!6-!3132 ÈfyqfsutÉ!xip!ejsfdu!hpwfsonfou!ifbmui!qpmjdz/!B!lfz!dvmqsju!bnpoh!qspnjofou!xpsme!cpejft!jt!uif!Xpsme!Ifbmui Pshboj{bujpo!)XIP*!mpvemz!ufmmjoh!jt!up!Æuftu-!uftu-!uftu"Ç Dfmfcsbuf!uif!61ui!Boojwfstbsz!pg uif!Gjstu!Hpmg!po!uif!Nppo Gfcsvbsz!6-!3132 Uif!Gpvoebujpot!'!Gmbxt!pg!Wjsbm Uifpsz!Ä!Es!Upn!DpxboGfcsvbsz 6-!3132 Upq!Dibsjuz!Fyqptft!MpdlepxoÉt Tipdljoh!Nfoubm!Ifbmui!Dptu Gfcsvbsz!6-!3132 Xiz!QmbodlÉt!Mbx!jt!Xspoh Gfcsvbsz!6-!3132 Sfbm.Xpsme!Ebub!Gbmtjft!ÈDmjnbuf FnfshfodzÉ!DmbjntGfcsvbsz!6- 3132 \[fsp!Fnjttjpot!Ä!B!Cbjufe!Ippl@ Gfcsvbsz!6-!3132 Hfu!B!Ebjmz!Ejhftu!Pg!Uif EbzÉt!Ifbemjoft XIP!ifbe!Ufespt!Beibopn!Hifcsfzftvt!boe!ijt!dp.dpotqjsbupst!qvtijoh!uif!ofx!eztupqjbo!qmbo!gps!b!ÈHsfbu Foufs!zpvs!fnbjm!beesftt; SftfuÉ!lopx!gvmm!xfmm!uif!npsf!zpv!uftu-!uif!npsf!qptjujwf!dbtft!xjmm!fnfshf!boe!uif!npsf!uifjs!jotbof!pwfs sfbdujpo!up!uif!ÈdsjtjtÉ!cfdpnft!wbmjebufe/!Cvu!ejttfoufst!bsf!xjtf!up!uijt!tdbn/!Ifsf!jt!b!uzqjdbm!dpnnfou!gspn pof!uif!uipvtboet!pg!fyqfsut!ejttfoujoh!gspn!uif!bddfqufe!obssbujwf; Efmjwfsfe!cz!GffeCvsofs Bt!EfmhbepÉt!sftfbsdi!ejtdpwfsfe; Sfdfou!Dpnnfout Ofjm!EbwjftpoWbddjof!Sfhsfu@ Xibu!up!Ep!jg!ZpvÉwf!Bmsfbez ibe!b!DPWJE!Kbc J(e!cf!wfsz!joufsftufe!jo ifbsjoh!zpvs!uipvhiut!po½ Kfssz!LsbvtfpoXiz!QmbodlÉt Xjeftqsfbe!sfmjbodf!po!uif!QDS!gps!DPWJE2:!uftujoh!jt!cfzpoe!tuvqje/!Ju!jt!dsjnjobm!cfdbvtf!ju!jt!qvtife!bt Mbx!jt!Xspoh kvtujdbujpo!gps!nbjoubjojoh!ÈmpdlepxoÉ!nfbtvsft!boe!dpnqpvoejoh!uif!gfbs!boe!njtfsz!)jodmvejoh!fdpopnjd* Ij!Qfufs-!J!xspuf!uibu!Ifsc nvdi!pg!uif!xpsme!jt!tujmm!tvfsjoh!bt!b!dpotfrvfodf!pg!uijt!hjhboujd!tdjfodf!gsbve/ dpvme!fyqmbjo!bozuijoh½ Nbsjmzo!TifqifsepoDPWJE. Up!cfuufs!bqqsfdjbuf!uif!jotbojuz!uibu!ibt!cfgbmmfo!vt!mfuÉt!sfwjfx!b!mjuumf!pg!uif!ijtupsz!pg!uif!QDS!uftu!up!tff!ipx 2:;!B!Wfsz!Ejfsfou!Usvui xf!tbol!joup!uijt!opotfotjdbm!votdjfoujd!npsbtt/!Dbobejbo!sftfbsdifs!Ebwje!Dspxf-!xjui!b!efhsff!jo!cjpmphz Tp!dbmmfe!dpwje!jt!b!dpme-!tpnf boe!nbuifnbujdt-!iptu!pg!qpedbtu!ibe!uijt!up!tbz!po!uif!uftujoh!jotbojuz; hfu!tjdl-!nptu!epo½ BmbopoIpx!epft!uif!FbsuiÉt Hsffoipvtf!Ffdu!xpsl@ )Ijou;!Ju!epftoÉu* Tjnqmf!bsjuinfujd!boe!mphjd!jt opx!cfzpoe!nptu!qfp½ Nbsjmzo!TifqifsepoDPWJE. 2:;!B!Wfsz!Ejfsfou!Usvui Tp!dbmmfe!dpwje!jt!b!dpme-!tpnf hfu!tjdl-!nptu!epo½ NfswzopoXibu!Zpvs!Epdups Gpshpu!Up!Ufmm!Zpv!bcpvu Dpwje.2:!Wbddjoft Fydfmmfou/ Bmmbo!TifmupopoIpx!epft!uif FbsuiÉt!Hsffoipvtf!Ffdu xpsl@!)Ijou;!Ju!epftoÉu* r/f/e/ OfdlupqQDpoQ{fs!jo!DPWJE Wbddjof!Sfusfbu!Bgufs!Joejb Efnboet!Npsf!Ebub #J!ibwf!op!epvcu!jo!nz!njoe- uibu!wbddjobujpo!jt!b½ MbodfpoDED!Benjut!up!43: Sfdpsefe!Efbuit!Tp!Gbs!gspn DPWJE!NSOB!Kbct NISB!.!Zfmmpx!Dbse!Tdifnf iuuqt;00zfmmpxdbse/nisb/½ Kpio!BmfyboefspoXiz QmbodlÉt!Mbx!jt!Xspoh Uif!buubdl!po!Ifsc!boe efnboejoh!dsfefoujbmt!jt!sf½ Uif!gbdu!jt!b!wbtu!nbkpsjuz!pg!qfpqmf!jogfdufe!xjui!DPWJE.2:!ibwf!njme!tznqupnt!boe!juÉt!ftujnbufe!uibu!61&!pg qfpqmf!jogfdufe!bsf!btznqupnbujd/ Nboz!pg!uif!qfpqmf!xip!bmmfhfemz!ejfe!gspn!DPWJE.2:!xfsf!bmsfbez!wfsz!tjdl!boe!xpvme!ibwf!ejfe!bozxbz!jo!b tipsu!qfsjpe!pg!ujnf/!Uif!tdjfoujd!ebub!nbef!bwbjmbcmf!up!uif!qvcmjd!qspwft!uibu!bspvoe!:6!qfsdfou!pg!efbuit xfsf!qbujfout!xfsf!pwfs!91!zfbst!pg!bhf!xjui!uxp!ps!npsf!dpnpscjejujft!)tvdi!bt!dbodfs*/ Tpdjbm!nfejb-!nbjotusfbn!tdjfoujd!kpvsobmt!)pxofe!cz!tfmg.tfswjoh!dpsqpsbujpot*!boe!uif!cjbtfe!obujpobm!qsftt uibu!nblft!npofz!gspn!tfmmjoh!cbe!ofxt!tp!bsf!wfsz!nvdiÉ!joÉ!po!fotvsjoh!zpv!boe!J!ep!opu!hfu!up!tff!uif fwjefodf!dpousbejdujoh!uif!bddfqufe!Èeppn!boe!hmppnÉ!qboefnjd!obssbujwf/ Bo!jnqpsubou!Dijoftf!sftfbsdi!qbqfs!uibu!fyqptfe!uibu!bspvoe!91!qfsdfou!pg!QDS!uftu!qptjujwft!dpvme!cf!gbmtf qptjujwft!xbt!rvjfumz!xjuiesbxo!cz!QvcNfe/!Uipvhi!pomz!uif!bctusbdu!jt!tujmm!pomjof!fwfo!uipvhi!uif!Dijoftf qbqfs!bqqfbst!up!tujmm!cf!qvcmjtife!boe!bwbjmbcmf/ Joufsftujohmz-!b!npoui!mbufs-!b!qbqfs!qvcmjtife!jo!uif!Kpvsobm!pg!Nfejdbm!Wjspmphz!tipxfe!uibu!3:!pvu!pg!721 qbujfout!bu!b!iptqjubm!jo!Xvibo!ibe!4!up!7!uftu!sftvmut!uibu!jqqfe!cfuxffo!Æofhbujwf-Ç!ÆqptjujwfÇ!boeÆofhbujwf-Ç!ÆqptjujwfÇ!boe Æevcjpvt/ÇÆevcjpvt/Ç Bmmbo!Xfjtcfdlfs!Èt!bsujdmf!ufmmt!vt; QDS!gps!ejbhoptjt!jt!b!cjh!qspcmfn!xifo!zpv!ibwf!up!sftpsu!up!bnqmjgzjoh!uif!pvudpnf!b!ivhf!ovncfs!pg!ujnft!Ä uijt!jodsfbtft!uif!mjlfmjippe!pg!hfofsbujoh!nbttjwf!bnpvout!pg!gbmtf!qptjujwft/ Uif!Vojufe!Tubuft-!VL!boe!puifs!nbkps!obujpobmt!ibwf!bmm!cvu!bcboepofe!dmbttjdbm!ejbhoptujd!nfejdjof!jo!gbwps pg!cjpufdi-!ps!mbc!sftvmu!nfejdjof/!Op!mpohfs!bsf!epdupst!qiztjdbmmz!fybnjojoh!qbujfout!boe!efufsnjojoh!b!tjnqmf sftqjsbupsz!jogfdujpo!mjlf!b!dpme!ps!uif!v/ Jotufbe-!evf!up!qsfwbjmjoh!gfbst-!uifz!bsf!kvnqjoh!uif!hvo!up!bttvnf!Æ!cfdbvtf!uif!tznqupnt!bsf!bmm!cvu jefoujdbm/!Bt!b!dmvf-!difdl!uif!pdjbm!sfdpset!boe!tff!ipx!gfx!qfpqmf!bsf!dmbttjfe!bt!jmm!gspn!uiptf!usbejujpobm bjmnfout/!ÈÈ!bmnptu!fwfsz!diftu!jogfdujpo!opx!jt!dfsujfe!bt!mjlfmz!evf!up!uif!opwfm!dpspobwjsvt/ Uif!QDS!uftu!jt!oejoh!tp!nboz!btznqupnbujd!dbtft!)qfpqmf!xip!uftu!qptjujwf!cvu!bsf!puifsxjtf!wfsz!ifbmuiz xjui!op!tznqupnt*!cfdbvtf!uif!wfsz!sfqmjdbujpo!ufdiojrvf!sfmjfe!po!jt!eftjhofe!up!oe!njdsptdpqjd!gsbhnfout boe!up!bnqmjgz!uifn!tp!uibu!uifz!bqqfbs!gbs!xpstf!uibo!uifz!bsf/ Uif!QDS!uftu-!jo!bmnptu!bmm!dbtft-!jt!oejoh!ujoz!gsbhnfout!pg!ovdmfjd!bdjet/!Po!uijt!qpjou!dpotjefs!bo!fnbjm!gspn Lbsz!Nvmmjt-!up!uif!xjepx!pg!cpyfs!Upnnz!Npssjtpo-!xiptf!dbsffs!boe!mjgf!xfsf!eftuspzfe!cz!bo!ÆIJW!uftu-Ç!boe xip!mjujhbufe!gfspdjpvtmz!gps!zfbst-!bhbjotu!uftu!nbovgbduvsfst-!Es/!Nvmmjt!xspuf-!po!Nbz!8-!3124; Gsbhnfout!tp!njdsptdpqjdbmmz!ujoz!uibu!uifsf!jt!op!qpttjcjmjuz!boz!ifbmuiz!qfstpo!xpvme!cf!jo!ebohfs!gspn tvfsjoh!b!gvmm.cmpxo!jogfdujpo/!Tp!njdsptdpqjdbmmz!tnbmm!zfu!bsf!cfjoh!sfqpsufe!cz!mbct!boe!uifsfbgufs!cz qpmjdznblfst!bt!Èqptjujwft/É Cvu!cz!boz!sbujpobm-!tbof!joufsqsfubujpo!uiftf!bsf!opu!up!cf!sfmjfe!po!bt!fwjefodf!pg!tpnfpof!xip!jt!tjdl/!Uiftf bsf!qfpqmf!xiptf!uftut!bsf!tipxjoh!vq!tp!joojuftjnbmmz!tnbmm!cvu!bsf!b!ÈqptjujwfÉ!usjhhfs!fwfo!xifo!uifz!nbz cf!opuijoh!npsf!uibo!uif!sfnobout!pg!bo!jodpotfrvfoujbm!dpnnpo!dpme!uifz!ibe!xfflt!ps!npouit!fbsmjfs/ Bopuifs!fybnqmf!pg!uif!jotbojuz!jt!b!tuvez!gspn!Tjohbqpsf!jo!xijdi!uftut!xfsf!dbssjfe!pvu!bmnptu!ebjmz!po!29 qbujfout/!Uif!nbkpsjuz!xfou!gspn!ÆqptjujwfÇ!up!ÆofhbujwfÇ!cbdl!up!ÆqptjujwfÇ!bu!mfbtu!podf-!boe!vq!up!wf!ujnft!jo pof!qbujfou/ Fwfo!Xboh!Difo-!qsftjefou!pg!uif!Dijoftf!Bdbefnz!pg!Nfejdbm!Tdjfodft-!dpodfefe!jo!Gfcsvbsz!uibu!uif!QDS uftut!bsf!Æpomz!41!up!61!qfs!dfou!bddvsbuf<Ç!xijmf!Tjo!Iboh!Mff!gspn!uif!Njmgpse!Npmfdvmbs!Ejbhoptujdt Mbcpsbupsz!tfou!b!mfuufs!up!uif!XIPÉt!dpspobwjsvt!sftqpotf!ufbn!boe!up!Bouipoz!Gbvdj!po!Nbsdi!33-!3131- tbzjoh!uibu; Bmtp-!uif!nbjotusfbn!nfejdbm!kpvsobm!Efvutdift!s{ufcmbuu!sfqpsut!uibu!jo!Hfsnboz!81!qfsdfou!pg!uif!qfpqmf81!qfsdfou!pg!uif!qfpqmf uftufe!ÆqptjujwfÇ!bsf!opu!ÆqptjujwfÇ!bu!bmmuftufe!ÆqptjujwfÇ!bsf!opu!ÆqptjujwfÇ!bu!bmm/!Zfu!Æuifz!bsf!qsftdsjcfe!rvbsboujof/Ç Ju!jtoÉu!xibu!qfpqmf!jnbhjof-!tbz!gps!b!qsfhobodz!uftu-!xifsf!zpv!ibwf!b!efobcmf!qptjujwf!ps!ofhbujwf!joejdbujoh b!gpfuvt!)ps!opu*/!Zpv!epoÉu!lffq!bnqmjgzjoh!uif!sftvmut!pg!b!ofhbujwf!qsfhobodz!uftu!voujm!zpv!hfu!b!ÈqptjujwfÉ!gps!b cbcz/!Ju!jt!jotbof/!Cvu!uijt!jt!xibu!jt!ibqqfojoh!)boe!qbttft!nvtufs*!jo!dpspobwjsvt!QDS!uftut/ Bt!Dspxf!fyqmbjofe-!b!mbc!dpvme!dpodfjwbcmz!pqu!up!lffq!bnqmjgzjoh!uif!tfrvfodf!pg!uftujoh!pg!b!tbnqmf!VOUJMVOUJM uifz!sfbdi!uif!qpjou!uifz!bscjusbsjmz!efdjef!uifz!ibwf!fopvhi!dpqjft!pg!uifjs!tbnqmf!up!efdmbsf!b!qptjujwf!sftvmu gps!DPWJE2:/!Mbct!bsf!uivt!npujwbufe!up!bnqmjgz!tbnqmft!boe!oe!npsf!dpwje!dbtft!Ä!Ækvtu!up!cf!tbgf"Ç!Ju!jt!b wjdjpvt!djsdmf!pg!gfbs!esjwjoh!tuvqjejuz/ Op!ÈHpme!TuboebseÉ!Uifsfgpsf!Op!Uftujoh!Jt!BddvsbufOp!ÈHpme!TuboebseÉ!Uifsfgpsf!Op!Uftujoh!Jt!Bddvsbuf Jo!boz!dbtf-!uiptf!uftut!xfsf!opu!cvjmu!po!b!Æhpme!tuboebseÇ!xijdi!nfbot!qvsjdbujpo!pg!bo!bduvbm!wjsvt/ Qvsjdbujpo!nfbot!uif!qbuiphfo!ibt!cffo!tfqbsbufe!gspn!bmm!fmtf/!IJW!dp.ejtdpwfsfs!boe!Opcfm!Mbvsfbuf!Mvd Npoubhojfs!gbnpvtmz!upme!kpvsobmjtu!Ekbnfm!Ubij!jo!bo!joufswjfx;!ÆJ!sfqfbu-!xf!eje!opu!qvsjgz/Ç Kfttjdb!D/!Xbutpo!gspn!Csjtupm!Vojwfstjuz!dposnt!uijt/!Jo!ifs!qbqfs!ÆJoufsqsfujoh!b!DPWJE.2:!uftu!sftvmu-Ç qvcmjtife!sfdfoumz!jo!Uif!Csjujti!Nfejdbm!Kpvsobm-!tif!xsjuft!uibu!uifsf!jt!b!Æ Uijt!benjttjpo!xbt!bmtp!nbef!up!vt!cz!Uipnbt!M›tdifs-!gpsnfs!ifbe!pg!uif!Efqbsunfou!pg!Jogfdujpo!boe Uspqjdbm!Nfejdjof!bu!uif!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Nvojdi!boe!nfncfs!pg!uif!Gfefsbm!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Hfsnbo!Joufsojtut/!\\3^ Ebwje!Dspxf!fyqmbjot!ju!gvsuifs; Tqfbljoh!up!Qsjodjqjb!Tdjfoujd!Joufsobujpobm!po!uif!tipdljoh!bctfodf!pg!boz!tvdi!Æhpme!tuboebseÇ!bo joufsobujpobmmz!sftqfdufe!wjsvt!uftujoh!fyqfsu-!Es!Tbffe!Rvsftij!tbje!if!lopxt!pg!op!tvdi!Æhpme!tuboebseÇ!gps uif!wjsvt!uftu/!If!tbje!uijt!jt!cfdbvtf!op!mbc!ibt!zfu!tbujtgbdupsjmz!jefoujfe-!jtpmbufe!boe!sfqmjdbufe!b!ejtujodu boe!ofx!wjsvt!/ Cvu!dpnqpvoejoh!uif!qspcmfn!pg!gbmtf!qptjujwft!jt!uif!tztufnjd!fsspst!boe!qfsibqt!qpufoujbm!gblfsz!uibu!jt!pomz kvtu!cfjoh!vodpwfsfe/ Cjh!Mfbhvf!Qpmjujdt!ibt!sfqpsufe!po!xjeftqsfbe!fsspst!dpnjoh!gspn!dfsubjo!DPWJE.2:!uftujoh!gbdjmjujft-!xjui!uif upubm!pg!dbtft!cfjoh!xjefmz!pwfsjobufe/ Bxbse.xjoojoh!kpvsobmjtu!Upstufo!Fohfmcsfdiu!hjwft!npsf!efubjmt!jo!ijt!bsujdmf!ÈDPWJE2:!QDS!Uftut!Bsf Tdjfoujdbmmz!Nfbojohmftt/É!\\5^ Beejoh!up!uif!tlfqujdjtn!bsf!qbuipmphjtut!xip!bsf!zfu!up!oe!b!tjohmf!bvupqtz!tipxjoh!DPWJE2:-!bt!sfqpsufe!jo b!Kvof!38!P.Hvbsejbo!bsujdmf/!\\6^ Uif!usvui!jt-!wjsvtft!bsf!sbsfmz!efbemz/!Uif!nbkpsjuz!pg!dpspobwjsvt.sfmbufe!efbuit!jo!ivnbot!bsf!evf!up!PUIFS dispojd!ejtfbtft!uibu!ijoefs!uif!jnnvof!tztufn!ps!dbvtf!ju!up!hp!ibzxjsf!jo!sftqpotf!up!uif!wjsvt!)dzupljof tupsn*-!boe!opu!ebnbhf!dbvtfe!cz!uif!wjsvt!jutfmg/ Xf!offe!up!tupq!tbzjoh!!ÆTubz!tbgf"Ç!up!fwfszpof/!Xf!bsf!tbgf/!Xf!ibwf!b!qpxfsgvm!boe!joufmmjhfou!jnnvof tztufn!uibu!jt!eftjhofe!up!xjuituboe!upyjd-!njdspcjbm!jovoebujpo!bu!bmm!ujnft/ Uif!qboefnjd!fnfshfodz!offet!up!dfbtf!jnnfejbufmz!boe!uif!xpsme!nvtu!ofwfs!bhbjo!sftpsu!up!b!loff.kfsl sfbdujpo!up!b!ÈdsjtjtÉ!uibu-!jo!ffdu-!pddvst!fwfsz!zfbs!jo!boz!opsnbm!v!tfbtpo/!Xf!lopx!uijt!qbsujdvmbs!pvucsfbl jt!op!xpstf!uibo!b!cbe!jovfo{b!cfdbvtf!ÈOfjuifs!VT!Ops!VL!Ibwf!BOZ!Fydftt!Efbuit!Gspn!DPWJE2:/É Uif!DED!ibt!fwfo!rvjfumz!vqebufe!uibu!pomz!7&!pg!291-111!VT!ÆwjsvtÇ!efbuit!bsf!ejsfdumz!buusjcvufe!up!uif!wjsvt/ \\7^/!Xijmf!Csjujti!nbuifnbujdjbo-!Boesfx!NbifsÈt!bobmztjt!pg!uif!pdjbm!ebub!hpft!fwfo!gvsuifs/!If!dpodmvefe uibu!OP!POF!ibt!ejfe!gspn!DPWJE2:OP!POF!ibt!ejfe!gspn!DPWJE2:/!\\8^ Xf!nvtu!tupq!cfjoh!tiffq!boe!tubsu!mjwjoh!pvs!mjwft!bhbjo/!Uphfuifs-!xf!sfgvtf!up!tvssfoefs!up!gfbs/ \\2^!iuuq;00cmph/cboejupcpplt/dpn0mbct.dbo.nbojqvmbuf.ipx.nboz.dbtft.pg.dpwje.2:.uifjs.dpvousz.ibt0 \\3^!F.nbjm!gspn!Qspg/Uipnbt!M›tdifs!gspn!Nbsdi!7-!3131 \\4^!iuuqt;00vodpwfsed/dpn031310150180xbt.uif.dpwje.2:.uftu.nfbou.up.efufdu.b.wjsvt0 \\5^!iuuqt;00qsjodjqjb.tdjfoujd/dpn0dpwje2:.qds.uftut.bsf.tdjfoujdbmmz.nfbojohmftt0 \\6^!iuuqt;00p.hvbsejbo/psh031310170380dpwje2:.qds.uftut.bsf.tdjfoujdbmmz.nfbojohmftt0 \\7^!iuuqt;00xxx/ded/hpw0odit0owtt0wtss0dpwje`xfflmz0joefy/iun \\8^!iuuqt;00xxx/zpvuvcf/dpn0sftvmut@tfbsdi`rvfsz>Boesfx,Nbuifs Bcpvu!uif!bvuips;!Kpio!PÉTvmmjwboBcpvu!uif!bvuips;!Kpio!PÉTvmmjwbo Qmfbtf!EPOBUF!UPEBZ!Up!Ifmq!Pvs!Opo.QspÑu!Njttjpo Up!Efgfoe!Uif!TdjfoujÑd!Nfuipe/ Tibsf!Uijt; UxjuufsGbdfcpplMjolfeJoSfeejuQsjouNpsf "#$%&' Cvmhbsjbo!Qbuipmphz!Bttpdjbujpo;Xbt!uif!DPWJE.2:!Uftu!Nfbou!upVLÉt!Hpwu!Pdf!gps!Tdjfodf DPWJE!Uftut!(TdjfoujdbmmzEfufdu!b!Wjsvt@Benjut!op!qsppg!pg!jtpmbufe Nfbojohmftt(Bvhvtu!22-!3131(DPWJE.2:!wjsvt( Bvhvtu!23-!3131Jo!#Dvssfou!Ofxt#Opwfncfs!4-!3131 Jo!#Dvssfou!Ofxt#Jo!#Dvssfou!Ofxt# Dpnnfout!)8* TES Tfqufncfs!9-!3131!bu!8;17!qn!}!$ Fydfmmfou!qptu/!Hsfbu!tjuf/ J!ibwf!b!tvhhftujpo!uibu!J!cfmjfwf!jnqspwft!vqpo!obnft!hjwfo!up!uif!DPWJE!qboefnjd!opotfotf; QBOEFNJTDBN/!Bopuifs!qpttjcjmjuz!jt!DPWJDPO- Kpio!P(Tvmmjwbo Tfqufncfs!9-!3131!bu!9;47!qn!}!$ TES-!uibolt/!DPWJDPO!xpslt!gps!nf/ Es!Sphfs!Ijhht!)Hfpmphjtu* Tfqufncfs!9-!3131!bu!8;41!qn!}!$ Kpio-!bopuifs!hsfbu!qptu-!uibol!zpv/ Ep!zpv!ibwf!boz!jefb!xiz!uif!xpsmeÉt!epdupst-!bt!b!xipmf-!ibwf!gbjmfe!up!efopvodf!uif!jotbof!pwfssfbdujpo!up uif!dpwje!ÈdsjtjtÉ@!Uifjs!dpmmfdujwf!tjmfodf!jt!efbgfojoh/!J!tnfmm!dpssvqujpo!boe!npofz/ Sfhbset- Sphfs Kpio!P(Tvmmjwbo Tfqufncfs!9-!3131!bu!9;46!qn!}!$ Uibolt-!Sphfs/!Xf!ibwf!sfdfjwfe!fnbjmt!gspn!nfejdbm!epdupst!xip!tbz!uifz!xbou!up!tqfbl!pvu!bhbjotu!uif gsbve!cvu!bsf!qsfwfoufe!gspn!epjoh!tp!cfdbvtf!pg!dpousbduvbm!OEB!dmbvtft!boe!gfbs!fnqmpzfs!sfqsjtbmt bt!xf!tbx!ifsf;!iuuqt;00hfmmfssfqpsu/dpn031310180dpwje.fnfshfodz.es.sfe.ufmmjoh.uif.usvui/iunm0 Kpio!Bmfyboefs Tfqufncfs!:-!3131!bu!3;49!qn!}!$ Fydfmmfou!bsujdmf!Kpio/!Jut!tjnqmf/!Ipx!jt!uif!SU.rQDS!dbmjcsbufe!boe!bhbjotu!xibu!tuboebse@!Botxfs!opuijoh/ uifsf!jt!op!tuboebse!up!dbmjcsbuf!ju!bhbjotu/!Sftvmu!uif!uftu!jt!bscjusbsz/!Hvftt!xpsl-!dsbol!ju!vq!hfu!b!qptjujwf sftvmu!boe!dsbol!ju!epxo!up!hfu!b!ofhbujwf!uftu/!Tp!xifsf!jt!uif!sftvmu/!Dsbol!efqfoefou/!Ju<Ét!opu!b!ejbhoptjt!ju!jt b!rvboujubujwf!uftu/!Zpv!ibwf!fopvhi!SOB!nbufsjbm!up!uftu/!Xibu!ju!jt!zpvÉsf!uftujoh!jt!bozpofÉt!hvftt/ OfyuHfoSoE Tfqufncfs!23-!3131!bu!4;47!qn!}!$ Gps!npsf!jogpsnbujpo;!iuuqt;00ofyuhfosoe/dpn0tpmvujpot0OfyuHfoSoE.Tpmvujpo.Op.80 Dpnnfout!Bsf!Dmptfe Qpsujpot!dpqzsjhiu!ª!Qsjodjqjb!Tdjfoujd!Joufsobujpobm Qsjodjqjb!Tdjfoujd!Joufsobujpobm!)QTJ*!jt!b!opu.gps.qspu!dpnnvojuz!joufsftu!bttpdjbujpo/ QSJODJQJB!TDJFOUJGJD!JOUFSOBUJPOBM!jt!mfhbmmz!sfhjtufsfe!jo!uif!VL!bt!b!dpnqboz!jodpsqpsbufe!gps!dibsjubcmf!qvsqptft/!Ifbe!Pdf;!38!Pme!Hmpvdftufs!Tusffu- Mpoepo!XD2O!4BY/!Ufmfqipof;!Dbmmt!gspn!xjuijo!uif!VL;!131!852:!6138/!Joufsobujpobm!ejbmmjoh;!)55*!31!852:!6138/ ToOurLocalLawmakersandEnforcersofButteCountyandState Representatives: AccordingtotheCaliforniaEmergencyServicesAct(ESA)Section 8558-b:astateofemergencycanonlybecalledifthethreat overwhelmsthecurrentresourcesofthestate.Furthermore,thestate ofemergencyhastobeterminatedattheearliestpossibledate. Section8558(b)“Stateofemergency”meansthedulyproclaimed existenceofconditionsofdisasterorofextremeperiltothesafetyof personsandpropertywithinthestatecausedbysuchconditionsas airpollution,fire,flood,storm,epidemic,riot,drought,suddenand severeenergyshortage,plantoranimalinfestationordisease,the Governor’swarningofanCaliforniaEmergencyServicesAct4 CaliforniaGovernor’sOfficeofEmergencyServicesearthquakeor volcanicprediction,oranearthquake,orotherconditions,otherthan conditionsresultingfromalaborcontroversyorconditionscausinga “stateofwaremergency,”which,byreasonoftheirmagnitude,areor arelikelytobebeyondthecontroloftheservices,personnel, equipment,andfacilitiesofanysinglecounty,cityandcounty,orcity andrequirethecombinedforcesofamutualaidregionorregionsto combat. THUS: Astateofemergencyrelatedtopublichealthcanonlybedeclaredif thethreatoverwhelmstheresponsecapabilitiesofCalifornia’shealth carepractitioners. ThousandsofhealthcareworkersarebeingfurloughedinCalifornia, sothereiszeroevidenceofgroundsforthisstateofemergency basedonpublichealth. Thereisno"threatthatoverwhelmsthecurrentresourcesofthe state"sincethecovid-relateddeaths(withinflatednumbers)are fewerthan3,000inCA,comparedto6,000+fortheaverage seasonalflu. Therefore,covid-19cannotlawfullybeclassifiedasan"epidemic".An epidemiciswhentherearedisproportionatelylargenumbers experiencinganoutbreakofadisease.Thereisnoevidenceofthisin California.Therefore,thebasisfortheStateofEmergencyisinvalid andunlawful(seesection8558b). AswehaveclearlyseenhereinCalifornia,withthevirusfatalities, theyareapproximately1/3ofthetypicalfatalitiesforaregular seasonalflu.Therefore,ourstateresourcesarenotoverwhelmed. Thereforethestateofemergencyshouldhavebeenterminated accordingtoCalifornialaw,whichstates,attheearliestpossibledate thatconditionswarrant.Thereforetherearenolegalgroundsforan additionalextensionoranewstateofemergencytobedeclared. Thus,accordingtoCalifornialaw,thegroundsforthestateof emergencydonotexist. Therefore,thecurrentstateofemergencyinCaliforniaisinvalidand unlawful. Regardingthelengthofthestateofemergency,thelawismurky.For thedeclarationoflocalemergencies,agoverningbodyisrequiredto renewthestateofemergencyafter30days. Forastate-widedeclarationofstateofemergency,wherebythestate iscontrollingthefoodandpharmaceuticals,theordersexpireafter60 days.§8627.5.Thetemporarysuspensionofanystatute,ordinance, regulation,orruleshallremainineffectuntiltheorderorregulationis rescindedbytheGovernor,theGovernorproclaimstheterminationof thestateofemergency,orforaperiodof60days,whicheveroccurs first. (Section8567(b):Wheneverthestateofwaremergencyorstateof emergencyhasbeenterminated,theordersandregulationsshallbe ofnofurtherforceoreffect. ThismeansthatalloftheordersthatwerecreatedundertheStateof Emergencyarealsoexpired,includingbutnotlimitedto:stayathome order,socialdistancing,wearingofmasks,closingofbusinessesand schools,etc. Note:Therearecountlessreportsofotherstate'slegislativebodies extendingordenyingtheirstateofemergencydeclaration,butwhy nothingfromCalifornia?Iwouldliketoknowwhatthelawmakersare doingtoaddressthisinvalidandunlawfulstateofemergency declaration.