The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11.24.21 11_22 Special BOS Meeting - Presentation Slides From:Ring, Brian To:BOS Cc:Pickett, Andy; Reaster, Kayla Subject:11/22 Special BOS Meeting - Presentation Slides Date:Wednesday, November 24, 2021 8:07:16 AM Attachments:Butte County Draft Plans 11.22 FINAL UPDATED.pdf Good morning Board – Attached are the updated slides from the consultant, that were presented during the Special BOS meeting on Monday, 11/22. These slides will be updated on the website this morning. Brian Ring Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Administration 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 T: 530.552.3311 | F: 530.538.7120 Butte County 2021 Redistricting Combining A3 & A4 Getting to a final plan ID 69836 Plan A6 DistrictR Fair Maps Act CriteriaCurrent LinesTwo Draft PlansNext Steps Agenda Things we will cover: appearance/function people, not citizens - districts should not hop/jump Relatively equal size Contiguous Follow city and census designated place boundariesKeep districts compact The Fair Maps Act passed by the Legislature mandates a set of criteria we must follow when drawing district plans. Traditional Redistricting Principles Complying with the Fair Maps Act ll plans will follow the required criteria, VRA, ACompactness, Contiguity, equal population, etc.Need feedback from the Board of Supervisors and community on potential versions. Redistricting Partners needs feedback from the board on potential draft plan versions. From COI to Draft Maps Getting from input to new proposed maps Overview PageData TablesIndividual district pages with data All Redistricting Partners Draft Plans will include: From COI to Draft Maps Getting from input to new proposed maps 54.4% 11.5%18.5%13.8%10.6% 5Ļǝ і - 5Ļǝ͵ 4,8877,8575,8544,515 23,115 - ЋЉЋЉ 47,39750,36748,36447,02519,395 , the Statewide Database released the th 12345 5źƭƷƩźĭƷ Final California Redistricting Data Statewide Database Released Final DatasetOn September 20prisoner reallocated dataset. This dataset is the final data we need to conduct this redistricting, with 916 people added to the total population of the county. Cohasset should be included in the foothill district, not with ChicoChico should be split as few times as possible and two compact Chico districts should be createdThe Bidwell Ave area should be moved District C, the northern Chico DistrictThe Barber Neighborhood should be unified in District B, the southern Chico District (in most plans) The Avenues should be united with Chico, not drawn into the Paradise seatThe City of Oroville should not be split, except for the airport areaBerry Creek should be with the City of Oroville Summary of Public Comment Since the draft plans were released, the has been public comment on these plans. The general themes from those public comments are: Follows the almost unanimous community of interest testimony received since last week Creates two compact urban Chico districtsUnites Cohasset with Forest Ranch in the foothills districtUnites MechoopdaKeeps Berry Creek with Oroville Minimally splits the City of Oroville, placing the airport into District DPopulation Deviation = 9.7% Draft Plan A6 Total Deviation of 9.7% ID 69836 ƚ ƷŷĻ ĻǣƷĻƓƷ ƦƩğĭƷźĭğĬƌĻͲ ƷŷĻ ŭĻƚŭƩğƦŷźĭ źƓƷĻŭƩźƷǤ ƚŅ ƚ ƷŷĻ ĻǣƷĻƓƷ ƦƩğĭƷźĭğĬƌĻͲ ƷŷĻ ŭĻƚŭƩğƦŷźĭ źƓƷĻŭƩźƷǤ ƚŅ The board shall adopt supervisorial district boundaries The Fair Maps Act Criteria EC 21500 (c)(c)using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:(2)ğƓǤ ƌƚĭğƌ ƓĻźŭŷĬƚƩŷƚƚķ ƚƩ ƌƚĭğƌ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ ƚŅ źƓƷĻƩĻƭƷ ƭŷğƌƌ ĬĻ ƩĻƭƦĻĭƷĻķ źƓ ğ ƒğƓƓĻƩ ƷŷğƷ ƒźƓźƒźǩĻƭ źƷƭ ķźǝźƭźƚƓ͵ shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single supervisorial district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.(3)ğ ĭźƷǤ ƚƩ ĭĻƓƭǒƭ ķĻƭźŭƓğƷĻķ ƦƌğĭĻ ƭŷğƌƌ ĬĻ ƩĻƭƦĻĭƷĻķ źƓ ğ ƒğƓƓĻƩ ƷŷğƷ ƒźƓźƒźǩĻƭ źƷƭ ķźǝźƭźƚƓ͵ DistrictR ID 69836 Ignores nearly all the community of interest testimony received to dateSplits Chico into four districts, splitting neighborhoods that sought to be kept together within one districtsSplits Cohasset from the foothills districtSplits Bidwell Park and places a portion into the foothill districtSplits MechoopdaCreates two agricultural districts on the westside of the countyTotal Deviation: 6.2% DistrictR . ID 69836 ŷĻ ĬƚğƩķ ƭŷğƌƌ ƓƚƷ ğķƚƦƷ ƭǒƦĻƩǝźƭƚƩźğƌ ķźƭƷƩźĭƷ The Fair Maps Act Criteria EC 21500 (d) & (e)(d) ĬƚǒƓķğƩźĻƭ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ƦǒƩƦƚƭĻ ƚŅ ŅğǝƚƩźƓŭ ƚƩ ķźƭĭƩźƒźƓğƷźƓŭ ğŭğźƓƭƷ ğ ƦƚƌźƷźĭğƌ ƦğƩƷǤ regard to supervisorial district boundaries means the passage of an ordinance or resolution specifying those boundaries. DistrictR drawn maps resulted in 3 - ID 69836 83% of the time these autoDemocratic and 2 Republican Districts by party registrationPlan ID 69836 results in 2 Democratic and 3 Republican Districts by party registrationThis plan is a partisan drawn map benefitting Republicans based on this analysis This plan was analyzed for compliance with the Fair Maps Act and specifically whether it benefitted or hurt a political party. For this analysis, a computer drew 1,000 compliant plans were drawn to compare this plan to. DistrictR Total Deviation of 6.2% DistrictR We can live line draw in MaptitudeWe can also bring up Maps to discuss Today is your opportunity to talk through these revised maps and offer final changes From COI to Final Maps Getting from input to final maps th th th the Board could pass their final plan, as both of Today these plans have been public for at least 7 days.The Board could also continue this discussion to Special Meeting on December 6NOTE: A final plan must be approved by December 15under the Fair Maps Act. Next Steps Approve a Plan or Continue to December 6