HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.4.22 Board Correspondence - FW_ No virus isolation
From:Paulsen, Shaina
To:Pickett, Andy; Ring, Brian; Alpert, Bruce
Cc:Reaster, Kayla; Valencia, Shyanne
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: No virus isolation
Date:Tuesday, January 4, 2022 12:16:45 PM
Attachments:Statement-of-Virus-Isolation-SOVI-by-Morell-Cowan-and-Kaufman.pdf
FYI – this was sent to the full Board.
Shaina Paulsen
Associate Clerk of The Board
Butte County Administration
25 County Center Drive, Suite 200, Oroville, CA 95965
T: 530.552.3304 | F: 530.538.7120
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:28 AM
To: Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Lucero, Debra
<DLucero@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; District Attorney
<District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Waugh,
Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>
Subject: No virus isolation
.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on
links, or replying..
Board of Supervisors, Clerk of the Board, Public Record, DA Ramsey, Sheriff Honea:
“Unable to show scientific evidence there is actually a virus.
The emperor has NO clothes.”
I did my own F.O.I.A. Request (California Public Record Act 6250 et. Seq.) December 31, 2020. Check it out with County Counsel.
Diana Dreiss
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Statement-of-Virus-Isolation-SOVI-by-Morell-
Cowan-and-
Kaufman.pdf__;!!KNMwiTCp4spf!XvuPAHePrnKtJHBhHLgXiNzsofLGQiulRKHYTVVpBBKyJxfbx74VyTJS70tytV53UKmAztv19qE$
Sent from my iPad
Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI)
Isolation: “The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated
or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.”
— From the Oxford English Dictionary
The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been
isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition,
common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased
person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never
been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’
existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific
consequences of this fact are:
-the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t
be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any
hypothetical spike or other proteins;
-the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be
known;
-“variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be
known;
-it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease
called Covid-19.
In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate,
characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood,
sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are
unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these
samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the
virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen.
This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate
1
1
bacteriophages and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then
allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of
identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and
purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or
microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may
be further characterized. This would include examining the structure,
morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic
makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the
purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger
sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an
analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in
origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown
2
products of dead and dying tissues. (As of May 2020, we know that
virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing
3
are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and
genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have
to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a
group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated,
purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be
transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by
clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually
causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an
infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus,
nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called
1
Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli
Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 -- accessed 2/15/21
2
“Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,”
Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full -- accessed 2/15/21
3
“The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020
May
2
pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these
steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a
relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then
minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto
tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of
which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.”
The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into
many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against
all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific
integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing
fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to
genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the
alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no
time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a
genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific
fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue
culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and
other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is
given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is
scientific fraud.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-
CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the
researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that
their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for
why actual isolation isn’t done:
1.There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients
to analyze.
2.Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell
in this manner.
3
If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people,
then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If
No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We
are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible
to find it?
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some
distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to
stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know,
if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if
the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing
and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those
injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose?
This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
Sally Fallon Morell, MA
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Please show your support by sharing this document with as many people as you can and then visit
https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi add your name to the list of supporters world wide.
4