Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
9.12.22 Board Correspondence - FW_ The High-Speed, Bivalent Covid Boosters Are Here
.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Pickett, Andy; Nuzum, Danielle; Reaster, Kayla; Valencia, Shyanne Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: The High-Speed, Bivalent Covid Boosters Are Here Date:Monday, September 12, 2022 8:04:15 AM Shaina Paulsen Associate Clerk of The Board Butte County Administration 25 County Center Drive, Suite 200, Oroville, CA 95965 T: 530.552.3304 | F: 530.538.7120 From: JULIE THREET <prayinghawk144@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2022 5:32 PM To: York, Danette <DYork@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Lucero, Debra <DLucero@buttecounty.net>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net> Cc: Thomas McKnight, MD <cnsdomphinc@gmail.com>; Diana Dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>; reinette senum <reinettesenum@protonmail.com> Subject: Re: The High-Speed, Bivalent Covid Boosters Are Here I concur with Diana. THIS OMICRON BIVALENT PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS FOR "WE THE PEOPLE" WHO YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT. They tested this on EIGHT MICE. They created a BRAND-NEW SPIKE PROTEIN, tested it ON EIGHT MICE. And deemed those results to be perfectly justified to put in 50% of this new recipe and continue to advertise as SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. There is no way to know this so this is FALSE ADVERTISEMENT AT BEST, FRAUD more likely. PRE- MEDITATED MURDER when all is said and done. WHY ONLY 50% IF FOR THE NEW VARIENT AND NOT 100%? MAKES NO SENSE (that and again, was tested on EIGHT MICE). And OMICRON IS ALL BUT GONE ALREADY. THIS IS NOT LIKE THE FLU VACCINE PROCESS. THOSE ARE NOT UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION. So don't even try that weak argument. And yes, the other 50% is the old ORIGINAL SPIKE PROTEIN. CREATED FOR THE OLD ALPHA ORIGINAL STRAIN CREATED BACK IN 2019 (and there is proof ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE created it long before 2019 using funding from ANTHONY FAUCI using our own Government's funding which is OUR TAX DOLLARS and they conspired with THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY). WHAT IS THE LOGIC FOR KEEPING HALF AN OLD RECIPE? USE YOUR COLLECTIVE BRAIN. STOP LETTING DANETTE YORK LEAD YOU WITH NO PUBLIC MEETINGS. FOR ALL WE KNOW YOU ARE RUBBER STAMPING EVERYTHING BECAUSE YOUR CAMPAIGNS WERE FUNDED BY ENLOE, OR IT'S EXECUTIVES, OR BIG PHARMA. THIS IS ALL MAINSTREAM NEWS. JUST GOOGLE IT. You are now on notice that you are allowing a dangerous pharmaceutical under Emergency Use Authorization (when we are not under an Emergency Order in the County) to be made easily available to unsuspecting citizens. HALF of this "vaccine" poison (based on the alpha "virus" long wiped off the planet) has killed more than 30,000 people who had a death report entered into VAERS. AND THIS IS MORE LIKE 3,000,000M. KILLED BY THIS "VACCINE". MY MOTHER WAS ONE OF THEM. PLEASE WATCH MY BITCHUTE VIDEO FILMED BY ALBERT BENVIDES LAST WEEK OF ME ENTERING HER REPORT. ALBERT IS A GRADUATE OF CHICO STATE CLASS OF 1995. A really smart Chico State graduate who IS A DATABASE EXPERT WHO WORKED IN THE MEDICAL BILLING FIELD and created a PORTAL that pulls the data in from VAERS and presents it visually and gives a wonderful tool for people like me, who are hell bent on exposing the truth about what your Butte County Public Health Department is doing. I am vaccine injured. My daughter is a healthcare worker down in Alameda County forced to get shot, and now my Mom who was shot in Santa Clara County is dead. THREE GENERATIONS OF OTHERWISE HEALTHY PEOPLE INJURED (WITH MY MOTHER DEAD) BECAUSE OF YOUR RECKLESS AND UNCHECKED POLICIES. I demand you start holding hearings. You can use this rollout of the BIVALENT to ASK QUESTIONS. Like WHAT THE HELL IS THIS NEW EUA PHARMACEUTICAL THAT WAS TESTED ON EIGHT MICE GOING TO DO TO THE COMMUNITY? You cannot be that blind to see WE ARE NOT GETTING BETTER. MISCARRIAGES ARE UP. BLOOD CANCER UP. ORGAN FAILURES UP. STROKES UP. "SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH" IS NOT NORMAL. NONE OF THIS IS NORMAL. DO YOUR JOBS. SUPERVISOR TAMI RITTER YOU ARE MY CURRENT SUPERVISOR UNTIL THE NEW YEAR WHEN SUPERVISOR DOUG TEETER YOU INHERIT ME. I RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU HOLD MEETINGS FOR YOUR PEOPLE. OTHERWISE, IT'S BLATANT DERELICTION OF DUTY. AND YOU WILL BE PART OF ANY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS FOR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, FRAUD AND HOPEFULLY PRE-MEDITATED MURDER. You do not have plausible deniability. You are not covered by the protections of Public Health, or Enloe, or the pharmacies. I AM FAIRLY SURE YOUR OWN PERSONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PLANS INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR FRAUD. PRESERVE YOUR DOCUMENTS. WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH DEMANDS CEASE AND DESIST OF COVID-19 VACCINE PROGRAM: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/campaign/covid-19-vaccine-cease-and-desist/ BOOSTERS TESTED ON EIGHT MICE https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/ba5-boosters-8-mice-trial-actually? r=pegsb&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web TOTAL DEATHS FROM COVID-19 VACCINES (THESE ARE THE ACTUAL MED-ALERT REPORTS. ALL OF THEM. OPEN UP THE FILE AND PRINT. OVER30,000 INDIVIDUAL REPORTS WITH THEIR STORY AS APPROVED AND ENTERED BY THE CDC. THIS IS THEDETAIL AND NOT A SUMMARY. YOU ARE NOW IN RECEIPT OF THIS INFORMATION.) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&DIED=Yes FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAVE PFIZER $3.2B FOR THIS POISON IN JUNE. 105M DOSES. WHY DON'T WEINVEST IN THE CHEAP IVERMECTIN PHARMACEUTICAL THE CDC NOW RECOGNIZES ON IT'S WEBSITE AS ALEGITIMATE THERAPEUTIC? https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizer-signs-32-bln-deal-with-us-government- covid-vaccine-doses-2022-06-29/ MODERNA IS BUILDING A PLANT TO MANUFACTURE "NEEDLELESS" VACCINES. IF YOU DON'T STOP THIS NOW YOU ARE PUTTING YOUR CITIZENRY (WE THE PEOPLE) DIRECTLY IN HARM'S WAY. https://www.stewpeters.com/video/2022/08/needle-less-jabs-incoming-moderna-set-up-mrna-facility-vaxxas- develops-secret-jabs/ DR JOHN CAMPBELL A RESPECTED DOCTOR GIVES THIS DETAIL OF THIS BIVALENT OMICRON PRODUCT. HE IS OBJECTIVE AND TRUSTED. EVEN HE IS SCRATCHING HIS HEAD WITH HIS GOVERNMENT. https://youtu.be/VZ1ppIXCOsU WAKE UP. I PERSONALLY THINK YOU ARE FULLY AWAKE WHICH IS WORSE. BECAUSE THAT MEANS YOU ARE PART OF THE PLAN TO DEPOPULATE OUR COUNTRY AND THIS PLANET. MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOU. FILING MY MOM'S VAERS REPORT ON WELCOMETHEEAGLE BITCHUTE CHANNEL: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aQts1KLE5VZJ/ FAUCI IN 2019 SAYING WE SHOULD BLOW THE SYSTEM UP IN ORDER TO GET MORE PEOPLE VACCINATED: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WYV5agwFlzYQ/ PLAN TO DEPOPULATE THE PLANET: https://expose-news.com/2022/06/26/new-study-pfizer-docs-depopulation-infertility/ SHOTS INDUCING EPIGENETIC FACTORS: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/do-the-covid-19-injections-contain DR HUFF WHISTLEBLOWER ECO-HEALTH ALLIANCE, & DR FLEMING ON THE BIOWEAPON https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-8x7um-12aed76 VAERS COVID DASHBOARD AND PORTAL (USE IT OR DEMAND DANETTE YORK USE IT) https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/alberto.benavidez/viz/WelcomeTheEaglesVAERSCovidDashboard/Home YOU ALL LOOK LIKE INCOMPETENT IDIOTS FOR IGNORING ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORD MATERIALS DIANA HAS PILED INTO BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. DO SOMETHING. julie threet (note my lower case signature) On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, 11:16 PM lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> wrote: Board of Supervisors, Clerk of the Board, Public Record, Sheriff Honea, DA Ramsey, County Counsel: Why are the Bivalent Covid Boosters being use? STOP NOW! https://rescue.substack.com/p/the-high-speed-bivalent-covid-boosters?utm_medium=email Thanks, diana dreiss Sent from my iPad World Council for Health Calls for an ImmediateStop to the Covid-19 Experimental “Vaccines” Join on Telegram Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Cease and Desist We declare that Covid-19 vaccinations are dangerous and unsafe for human use. Themanufacturing, distribution, administration, and promotion of these injections violate basic principles of law. Nederlands (Dutch) English Français (French) Deutsch (German) Por tuguês (Por tuguese) Español (Spanish) Ελληνικά (Greek) Read the declaration About the Signatories Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Italiano (Italian) Hrvatski Polski Take action Share Serve 00:00 Support World Council for Health Donate Globally renowned exper ts, including Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Geer t Vanden Bossche, Prof. Dolores Cahill, and Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi, Ryan Cole, Richard Fleming, Robert W. Malone, Peter McCullough, Mark Trozzi, Michael Yeadon, Wolfgang Wodarg, and Vladimir Zelenko, among many others, consistently warn the world about the adverse effects resulting from Covid-19 experimental injections; they also warn about their longterm effects, which cannot be known at this time since most clinical trials will be not completed until 2023, and some as late as 2025. In June 2021, Dr. Tess Lawrie, co-founder of the World Council for Health and member of the Council’s Steering Committee courageously described the global crisis and Read Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here of the Council s Steering Committee, courageously described the global crisis and called for urgent action: “There is now more than enough evidence on the [UK] Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID- 19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects.” Read more… A . CONSENSUS OF WORLD’S FOREMOST EXPERTS Globally renowned exper ts, including Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Geer t Vanden Bossche, Prof. Dolores Cahill, and Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi, Ryan Cole, Richard Fleming, Rober t W. Malone, Peter McCullough, Mark Trozzi, Michael Yeadon Wolfgang Wodarg and Vladimir Zelenko among many others consistently Read the full declaration World Council for Health Calls for anImmediate Stop to the Covid-19Experimental “Vaccines” Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Yeadon, Wolfgang Wodarg, and Vladimir Zelenko, among many others, consistently warn the world about the adverse effects resulting from Covid-19 experimental injections; they also warn about their longterm effects, which cannot be known at this time since most clinical trials will be not completed until 2023, and some as late as 2025. In June 2021, Dr. Tess Lawrie, co-founder of the World Council for Health and member of the Council’s Steering Committee, courageously described the global crisis and called for urgent action: “There is now more than enough evidence on the [UK] Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian effor ts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects.” B. DECLARATION The World Council for Health declares that it is time to put an end to this humanitarian crisis. Fur ther, the Council also declares that any direct or indirect involvement in the manufacturing, distribution, administration and promotion of these injections violates basic principles of common law, constitutional law and natural justice, as well as the Nuremberg Code, the Helsinki Declaration, and other international treaties. C. UNCENSORED FACTS We now know that children are over one hundred times more likely to die from these experimental injections than Covid-19. Injected athletes, globally, are collapsing before our very eyes. In spite of the fact that repor ting systems are limited and passive, millions of adverse effects have been recorded, which include death, paralysis, blood clots, strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, spontaneous miscarriage, chronic fatigue and extreme depression. See: coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here See: vaers.hhs.gov See: ema.europa.eu/en/human- regulatory/researchdevelopment/pharmacovigilance/eudravigilance See: vigiaccess.org (search covid-19 vaccine) D. VICTIM TESTIMONIES The World Council for Health acknowledges and respects the experiences and testimony of the victims of this worldwide medical experiment. We also declare and con rm that safe, effective and affordable treatments for Covid-19 exist and should be made available to all who need them. See: realnotrare.com See: nomoresilence.world See: vaxtestimonies.org/en E. NOT SAFE, NOT EFFECTIVE Recent studies con rm the risks associated with Covid-19 experimental injections. Emerging research establishes that the injections are neither safe nor effective, and, in fact, are toxic. While some of the known ingredients of the injections cause biological harm, it is even more concerning that the unknown and undisclosed ingredients may present an even greater threat to human health. F. CEASE AND DESIST The World Council for Health is ethically and lawfully bound to issue this Declaration, demanding that governments and corporations cease and desist from direct or indirect par ticipation in the manufacturing, distribution, administration or promotion of Covid-19 experimental injections. The Council declares that every living man and woman has a moral and legal duty to take immediate and decisive action to halt this unprecedented medical Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here to take immediate and decisive action to halt this unprecedented medical experiment, which continues to cause unnecessary and immeasurable harm. G. NOTICE OF LIABILITY The right of bodily integrity and the right to informed consent are inalienable and universal human rights, which have been trampled by government mandates and corporate imperatives. Thus, the World Council for Health declares that any person or organization directly or indirectly par ticipating in the manufacturing, distribution, administration or promotion of Covid-19 experimental biologics will be held liable for the violation of principles of justice grounded in civil, criminal, constitutional and natural law, as well as international treaties. About the signatories We are your World Councilfor Health This declaration was created and signed by doctors, lawyers, and others assisting to steer the newly formed World Council for Health About Us Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here World Council for Health Signed November 29, 2021 Charles Kovess Dr. Jennifer Hibberd Dr. Naseeba Kathrada Dr. Rober t J McLeod Dr. Vince Vicente Dr. Tess Lawrie Dr. Mark Trozzi Dr. Maria Hubmer Mogg Michael Alexander Dr. Tracy Chandler Dr. Zac Cox Dr. Stephan Becker Karen McKenna Shabnam Palesa MohamedMake your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Serve the Cease and Desist Declaration Download Declaration PDF Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Frequently asked questions Who is this declaration for? Who has this declaration been served to? Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Who has this declaration been served to? How can I serve this declaration to my local government, decision-makers? What is the World Council for Health and who are the signatories? First Name Last Name Your Email Address First Name Last Name Email * Subscribe Cutting-edge news on world health from credible civil-society organizations. We promise. Get the latest updates from World Council for Health. Informed by over 120+ international groups of doctors, science and medicine journalists, and researchers. Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Read our recent statements Update on the WHO’s Request for Video Submissions on Pandemic Preparedness Posted on September 9, 2022 Share this The WHO’s new terms of par ticipation need your careful consideration. Last Monday, the World Council for Health (WCH) shared that the World Health Organization (WHO) is again inviting… Read More “Updated” Covid-19 mRNA Injections Approved After Testing on 8 Mice and 0 Humans Posted on September 6, 2022 Share thisOn August 31, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amended the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) of both the Moderna Covid-19 injection and the P zer-BioNTech Covid- 19 injection. The EUAs… Read More UK Government’s Contradictory Advice for Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women Posted on August 31, 2022 Share thisA recent update to the United Kingdom government website has brought to light a doc ment ad ising that pregnant and breastfeeding omen sho ld not be gi en the Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here document advising that pregnant and breastfeeding women should not be given the P zer/BioNTech Covid vaccine. … Read More Remaining Calm and Finding a Better Way in a Volatile World Posted on August 24, 2022 Share thisThe State of the Nations The world is witnessing an unprecedented shakeup in governments as leaders fall like dominoes across the globe; nations are seeing premiers removed from their… Read More Honouring the 75th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Code Posted on August 20, 2022 Share thisOn this day in 1947, in the Palace of Justice, the Nuremberg Code was rst read and shared with the world. Formulated in response to Nazi crimes, it enshrined… Read More Monkeypox Outbreak Does Not Constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern Posted on July 26, 2022 Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here A b o u t U s About us WCH Mission Values & Logo Steering Committee Coalition Par tners R e s o u r c e s Ar ticles Newsroom Videos Disclaimer C o m m u n i t y Donate Donor Dashboard Contact Jobs S o c i a l Telegram Gettr Odysee Rumble Linkedin Facebook Spotify Anchor Share thisOn July 22, 2022, World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus overruled the majority vote of the WHO expert committee and declared the monkeypox outbreak a public health… Read More Click here to read and sign The Great Barrington Declaration Read Disclaimer Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Terms Privacy About Cookies © 2022 World Council for Health Make your voice heard. #StopTheWHO Submit your video here Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED Inconsistency of Ba5 Booster makes it uniquely dangerous! Igor Chudov Aug 31 588 445 So, the FDA just approved the new Ba.5 bivalent booster, based on a trial of exactly 8 mice. Igor’s Newsletter FDA Charlatans Engage in Medical Quackery FDA defines “medication health fraud” (also known as quackery) as offering UNPROVEN and UNTESTED products to the public, like here: Today, the FDA approved “Bivalent Ba.5 Booster” because of an unspecified “emergency”. The booster was tested on, drumroll… Read more 9 days ago · 278 likes · 194 comments · Igor Chudov Steve Kirsch, in a reply to my previous post about the Ba.5 booster being medical quackery, asked a question, what happened to the 8 mice in the trial? Did they die? Given how amazing Steve is, I decided to take a look. Good thing I did! The scientists extracted their blood for analysis. Literally, the only data about these 8 mice come from the last two pages of Pfizer’s presentation. Pfizer analyzed Igor’s Newsletter Subscribe Sign in Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] their blood for antibodies: Since this picture might seem indecipherable, let me first explain what it means. This picture shows the outcomes of three different concoctions: BNT162b2 — the original 2020 Covid Vaxx — the first set of blue bars on the left OMI BA 4/5 — Vaccine based only on Ba4/5 variant spikes only — the second set of red bars in the middle BNT162b2 + OMI BA 4/5 — the so-called “Bivalent booster”, or a mix of Wuhan and Ba5 spike mRNAs that the Federal government plans on giving everyone in September. This is the circled set of purple bars on the right side of the picture. This last set is what we are interested in. What do the bars show? Each bar shows the ability of the given vaccine to produce “neutralizing antibodies”. For every vaccine, there are five bars showing titers of antibodies, affecting the neutralization of each variant: neutralization of the original Wuhan virus, Ba1, Ba2, Ba2.12.1, and Ba4/5 by that specific vaccine. The higher the values in the bar, the better, according to the FDA, although in real life these antibodies are more like electrolytes in Idiocracy: they are only good for counting and do not stop infections. So, look at that red-circled set of bivalent booster bars. You will see something strange: the Ba.5 bivalent Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] booster was incredibly consistent producing antibodies against the Wuhan variant. (look at the CONSISTENT tag and the arrows). The consistency is perfectly exemplary. Each mouse got an almost identical amount of Wuhan-related antibodies. Good! However, the bivalent booster was extremely INCONSISTENT when producing antibody responses against Ba.5 variant. Look at the rightmost bar. I created a custom picture placing that bar right next to the logarithmic scale so you can see the problem: Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] You can see that the antibody titers for the Ba.5 booster, against Ba.5 variant, are all over the place! One mouse had a titer of 300, two more had titers of 700, two more had a titer of 1,500, one had a titer of 3,000, one had a titer of 7,000, and the last one had a titer of 22,000! Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] So, the 8 Pfizer standardized Balb/c mice, quite identical and reacting identically at producing Wuhan antibodies, reacted WILDLY DIFFERENTLY when producing Ba5 antibodies!!! One of them had an immune reaction producing 300 antibody titers, while another similar mouse produced 73 times more antibodies, or 22,000 titers! Did the mouse who got a 73 times greater immune reaction, feel sicker? Did the mouse who got a 73 times lower reaction, get no protection from Ba.5 variant? Pfizer is not sharing that. Think for a second about what would happen if these were not mice, but people. Adam would get the Ba.5 booster and develop X amount of antibodies. Whereas, his counterpart Zack would get the same shot, but produce 73X, or 73 times more antibodies! So, Zack would have 73 times more intense, severe, or however you want to call it, reaction compared to Adam! Would Zack, with his 73 times greater reaction to the same concoction, be much more likely to die of myocarditis? Would Adam remain completely unprotected due to his 73 times lower reaction? We have no idea! Nobody has any idea about it: me, you, Pfizer, or the FDA. But we are giving 171,000,000 doses of this inconsistent concoction to the American people based on this single- page 8-mouse data that nobody even bothered to look at closely. Of the 171,000,000 future doses distributed, roughly 1/8 of them, or the highest-reacting 21,375,000 people, would have 73 times more severe and intense immune reaction than the bottom, lowest-reacting 21,375,000 people. Does that bother you? Since people, of different ages, races, immunological histories, varieties of covid infections, are not as identical as Balb/c lab mice, the variation will, in fact, be even greater than 73 times! All of the above is so obvious that I am wondering why nobody talks about it and why the FDA refused to even think about that slide for even a minute. Vaccine advocates and fact checkers might object and say that mice are not people. I would agree! Mice are NOT people! So why did you not test the bivalent booster on people? Anyway, I should shut up, I know that it is safe and effective and I want the bivalent booster so bad. (just kidding). Ba.5 Booster is Dangerous for People Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] P.S. Sep 1 — All 10 Moderna mice boosted with the Ba.5 booster, got sick with Covid when challenged with Ba.5 variant virus. Igor’s Newsletter All "Bivalent Boosted" Mice Got Covid When Challenged Remember how Joe Biden and Rachel Maddow said that Covid stops with every vaccinated person? Turns out that it was not true for people, and it is not even true for mice. All 8 mice, vaccinated with Moderna Ba.5 booster, became infected with Covid when challenged with Ba.5 variant virus… Read more 7 days ago · 44 likes · 14 comments · Igor Chudov Share Subscribe Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] 588 likes588 445 445 Comments Aug 31Igor Chudov ·edited Aug 31 Pinned Dear Readers: I forgot about the top-most point that produces a reading of 22,000 titers. So the difference Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] 443 more comments… Top New Community Vaccine Skeptics are the True Critical Thinkers We Overcame the Most Sophisticated Forms of Manipulation 7 replies between the lowest and the highest is not 23 times, but instead over 70 times! The article was correct but now it states an even stronger point -- the difference between the lowest and highest titer is over 70 times. Article edited 89ReplyCollapse 18 replies Writes Aug 31Conway Judge Mr medic's marvelous misinforma… Liked by Igor Chudov Eight blind mice, eight blind mice See how they run, see how they run They all ran after the mRNA shot The doctor opened them up and found a clot Did you ever see such a sight in your life as eight dead mice? Eight dead mice, eight dead mice See how they died, see how they died They all showed damage to organ cells Cancerous lesions and warning bells. Did you ever see such a sight in your life as eight dead mice? 239ReplyCollapse Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] IGOR CHUDOVAPR 17 1,664 2,848 AIDS-Like "Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ The Boosted Cannot Clear Covid Easily and Keep Getting Reinfected IGOR CHUDOVAPR 9 650 770 Vaccine Shedding Finally Proven! Statistically Significant Vaccine Shedding from Parents to Children IGOR CHUDOVMAY 2 736 805 See all Ready for more? Subscribe Bivalent Booster's "8-Mice Trial" Actually FAILED file:///C/Users/SValencia/Desktop/Bivalent%20Booster's%20_8-Mice%20Trial_%20Actually%20FAILED.html[9/12/2022 8:51:10 AM] © 2022 Igor Chudov ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Publish on Substack Get the app Substack is the home for great writing National Vaccine Information Center Your Health. Your Family. Your Choice.MedAlerts.org Search Results From the 9/2/2022 release of VAERS data: Found 30,796 cases where Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and Patient Died Government Disclaimer on use of this data Table Age Count Percent < 6 Months 2 0.01% 1-2 Years 2 0.01% 3-5 Years 4 0.01% 6-17 Years 145 0.47% 18-29 Years 391 1.27% 30-39 Years 557 1.81% 40-49 Years 844 2.74% 50-59 Years 1,791 5.82% 60-64 Years 1,533 4.98% 65-79 Years 7,057 22.92% 80+ Years 7,394 24.01% Unknown 11,076 35.97% TOTAL 30,796 100% Case Details This is page 1 out of 3,080 Result pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next VAERS ID:909095 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:66.0 Sex:Male Location:Colorado Vaccinated:2020-12-23 Onset:2020-12-25 Days after vaccination:2 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-25 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (MODERNA)) / MODERNA 011J20A / 1 RA / IM Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Foaming at mouth, Pain in extremity, Pallor, Pulse absent, Respiratory arrest, Somnolence, Unresponsive to stimuli SMQs:, Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Hyperglycaemia/new onset diabetes mellitus (broad), Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (broad), Anticholinergic syndrome (broad), Shock-associated circulatory or cardiac conditions (excl torsade de pointes) (narrow), Dementia (broad), Convulsions (broad), Oropharyngeal conditions (excl neoplasms, infections and allergies) (narrow), Acute central respiratory depression (narrow), Guillain-Barre syndrome (broad), Noninfectious encephalitis (broad), Noninfectious encephalopathy/delirium (broad), Noninfectious meningitis (broad), Hypotonic- hyporesponsive episode (broad), Generalised convulsive seizures following immunisation (broad), Hypersensitivity (broad), Respiratory failure (narrow), Tendinopathies and ligament disorders (broad), Hypoglycaemia (broad) Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-25 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Tamsulosin 0.4mg, Lactobacillus tablet, Nephro-vite tablet 0.8mg, Allopurinol 100mg, ferrous gluconate 324mg, melatonin 6mg, lisinopril 2.5mg, colace 100mg, metamucil powder, aspirin 81mg, amidoarone 200mg, hydrooxyzine 25mg, cholestyramine Current Illness: End stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, COPD, cirrhosis of the liver, hypokalemia, gout, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation. Preexisting Conditions: Refused dialysis frequently resulting in episodes of hypokalemia and hospitalization, resident dependent on supplemental oxygen. The resident refused to go to dialysis on 12/23/2020 and said he was feeling fine. Allergies: alprazolam, Lorazepam Diagnostic Lab Data: None CDC Split Type: Write-up: on 12/24/2020 the resident was sleepy and stayed in bed most of the shift. He stated he was doing okay but requested pain medication for his legs at 250PM. At 255AM on 12/25/2020 the resident was observed in bed lying still, pale, eyes half open and foam coming from mouth and unresponsive. He was not breathing and with no pulse VAERS ID:910363 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:84.0 Sex:Male Location:California Vaccinated:2020-12-23 Onset:2020-12-26 Days after vaccination:3 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-28 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (MODERNA)) / MODERNA LOT 039K20A / 1 RA / IM Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death, Hypophagia, Hypotension, Somnolence SMQs:, Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (broad), Anticholinergic syndrome (broad), Dementia (broad), Noninfectious encephalitis (broad), Noninfectious encephalopathy/delirium (broad), Noninfectious meningitis (broad), Hypoglycaemia (broad), Dehydration (broad), Hypokalaemia (broad) Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-28 Days after onset: 2 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: risperidone daily doxazosin Current Illness: dementia declining oral intake Preexisting Conditions: history of aspiration pneumonia BPH Allergies: none Diagnostic Lab Data: none CDC Split Type: Write-up: Patient had mild hypotension, decreased oral intake, somnolence starting 3 days after vaccination and death 5 days after administration. He did have advanced dementia and was hospice eligible based on history of aspiration pneumonia. VAERS ID:913143 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:84.0 Sex:Female Location:Texas Vaccinated:2020-12-29 Onset:2020-12-29 Days after vaccination:0 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-29 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH EL0140 / 1 LA / IM Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death SMQs: Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-29 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Gabapentin 100mg, Memantine 10mg Current Illness: Preexisting Conditions: dementia, aphasia, type 2 DM, iron deficiency, asthenia, osteoporosis, polyneuropathy, anxiety, MDD Allergies: codeine, phenobarbital, penicillin Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: Vaccine administered with no immediate adverse reaction at 11:29am. Vaccine screening questions were completed and resident was not feeling sick and temperature was 98F. At approximately 1:30pm the resident passed away. VAERS ID:913733 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:85.0 Sex:Female Location:Pennsylvania Vaccinated:2020-12-29 Onset:2020-12-29 Days after vaccination:0 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (MODERNA)) / MODERNA - / UNK - / - Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death SMQs: Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-29 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Current Illness: Preexisting Conditions: Allergies: Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: My grandmother died a few hours after receiving the moderna covid vaccine booster 1. While I don?t expect that the events are related, the treating hospital did not acknowledge this and I wanted to be sure a report was made. VAERS ID:914604 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:74.0 Sex:Male Location:Michigan Vaccinated:2020-12-16 Onset:2020-12-20 Days after vaccination:4 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH EH9899 / 1 - / IM Administered by: Other Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death SMQs: Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-20 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Current Illness: Preexisting Conditions: Allergies: Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: Spouse awoke 12/20 and found spouse dead. Client was not transferred to hospital. VAERS ID:914621 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:89.0 Sex:Female Location:Iowa Vaccinated:2020-12-22 Onset:2020-12-27 Days after vaccination:5 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (MODERNA)) / MODERNA 011J02A / 1 RA / IM Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death, Dementia, Fatigue SMQs:, Dementia (narrow), Noninfectious encephalopathy/delirium (broad) Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-27 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Current Illness: None Preexisting Conditions: Resident in long term care facility for 9+ years Coronary Artery Disease Dementia Hypothyroidism Hypertension Allergies: Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: Resident in our long term care facility who received first dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine on 12/22/2020, only documented side effect was mild fatigue after receiving. She passed away on 12/27/2020 of natural causes per report. Has previously been in & out of hospice care, resided in nursing home for 9+ years, elderly with dementia. Due to proximity of vaccination we felt we should report the death, even though it is not believed to be related. VAERS ID:914690 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:83.0 Sex:Female Location:California Vaccinated:2020-12-23 Onset:2020-12-24 Days after vaccination:1 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH - / 1 - / - Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Anxiety, Death, Pyrexia, Respiratory distress, SARS-CoV-2 test negative SMQs:, Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (broad), Anticholinergic syndrome (broad), Acute central respiratory depression (broad), Hypersensitivity (broad), Respiratory failure (narrow), Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (broad), Hypoglycaemia (broad), COVID-19 (broad) Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-26 Days after onset: 2 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Contact facility for medical records. We think levothyroxine daily and ativan prn. Current Illness: none known Preexisting Conditions: COPD Allergies: none known Diagnostic Lab Data: We were told her last COVID test was negative CDC Split Type: Write-up: Within 24 hours of receiving the vaccine, fever and respiratory distress, and anxiety developed requiring oxygen, morphine and ativan. My Mom passed away on the evening of 12/26/2020. VAERS ID:914805 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:63.0 Sex:Male Location:Illinois Vaccinated:2020-12-28 Onset:2020-12-29 Days after vaccination:1 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH EH9899 / 1 LA / IM Administered by: Other Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death SMQs: Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-29 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Asa-81mg, Lisinopril 10mg daily, ferrous sulfate-325, MVI with min, zyprexia- 20mg, Flomax-0.4, famotidine-20mg, vit C, carbamazepine-250mg bid, Depakote-750mg bid, metformin-1000 bid, sertraline-100 bid, albuterol,buspar-10mg TID, Fibercon- Current Illness: none Preexisting Conditions: dysphagia, violent behaviors, depressive disorder, schizophrenia, aspiration, gerd, hyperlipidemia, dipolar, rectal bleeding, HTN Allergies: NKA Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: RESIDENT CODED AND EXPIRED VAERS ID:914895 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:78.0 Sex:Male Location:Nebraska Vaccinated:2020-12-28 Onset:2020-12-30 Days after vaccination:2 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH EL1284 / 1 LA / IM Administered by: Senior Living Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death SMQs: Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-30 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Senna Plus, Loperamide, Ondansetron, Acetaminophen, Mucus & Chest Relief cough syrup, Oystershell Calcium Plus D, Vitamin D3, Escitalopram, Bupropion, Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen, Bisacodyl Suppositories Current Illness: Alzheimer''s Disease, Encephalopathy, Hypertension,Acute Kidney failure, Urine Retention, Recent UTI Preexisting Conditions: Alzheimer''s Disease, Encephalopathy, Hypertension Allergies: No known drug allergies Diagnostic Lab Data: CDC Split Type: Write-up: Injection given on 12/28/20 - no adverse events and no issues yesterday; Death today, 12/30/20, approx.. 2am today (unknown if related - Administrator marked as natural causes) VAERS ID:914917 (history) Form:Version 2.0 Age:63.0 Sex:Male Location:Illinois Vaccinated:2020-12-19 Onset:2020-12-23 Days after vaccination:4 Submitted:0000-00-00 Entered:2020-12-30 Vaccin ation / Manu facturer Lot / Dose Site / Route COVID19: COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) / PFIZER/BIONTECH EJ1685 / UNK - / - Administered by: Work Purchased by: ? Symptoms: Death, Myocardial infarction SMQs:, Myocardial infarction (narrow), Embolic and thrombotic events, arterial (narrow) Life Threatening? No Birth Defect? No Died? Yes Date died: 2020-12-23 Days after onset: 0 Permanent Disability? No Recovered? No Office Visit? No ER Visit? No ER or Doctor Visit? No Hospitalized? No Previous Vaccinations: Other Medications: Atenolol, Chlorthalidone, Tamsulosin Current Illness: None Preexisting Conditions: hypertension Allergies: None Diagnostic Lab Data: Death certificate CDC Split Type: Write-up: Death by massive heart attack. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Result pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next New Search Link To This Search Result: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php? TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&DIED=Yes Copyright © 2022 National Vaccine Information Center. All rights reserved. 21525 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 100, Sterling, VA 20166 June 30, 2022 · 4:49 AM PDT Last Updated 2 months ago 2 minute readBy Manas Mishra and Michael Erman P fizer signs new $3.2 billion COVID vaccine deal with U.S. government Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals My View Following Saved Feedback June 29 (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc (PFE.N) and partner BioNTech SE (22UAy.DE) said on Wednesday they signed a $3.2 billion deal with the U.S. government for 105 million doses of their COVID-19 vaccine, which could be delivered as soon as later this summer. The deal includes supplies of a retooled Omicron-adapted vaccine, pending regulatory clearance, according to Pfizer. Drugmakers have been developing vaccines to target the Omicron variant that became dominant last winter. Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com Advertisement · Scroll to continue Register 00:00 /00:00 Feedback The average price per dose in the new deal is over $30, a more than 50% increase from the $19.50 per dose the U.S. government paid in its initial contract with Pfizer. Some of the vaccine earmarked for adults included in the contract will be in single-dose vials, which are more expensive to manufacture but reduce waste of unused shots from open vials. "We look forward to taking delivery of these new variant-specific vaccines and working with state and local health departments, pharmacies, healthcare providers, federally qualified health centers, and other partners to make them available in communities around the countr y this fall," U.S. Health and Human Ser vices (HHS) official Dawn O’Connell said in a statement. 1/3 Test tubes are seen in front of displayed Pfizer and Biontech logos in this illustration taken, May 21, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic Feedback Advisers to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday recommended a change in the design of COVID-19 booster shots for this fall in order to combat more recently circulating variants of the coronavirus. read more Advertisement · Scroll to continue The U.S. government also has the option to purchase up to 195 million additional doses, bringing the total number of potential doses to 300 million, the companies said. The new contract should boost 2022 vaccine sales for Pfizer and BioNTech, which share profits from the shots. Pfizer has forecast COVID-19 vaccine sales of $32 billion this year. Analysts, on average, have forecast 2022 sales of around $33.6 billion for the shots. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Feedback The U.S. government has distributed close to 450 million doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in the United States since it was first authorized in December 2020, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Over 350 million of those doses have been administered. Because the Biden administration was unable to line up more COVID-19 funding from Congress earlier this month, it was forced to reallocate $10 billion of existing funding to pay for additional vaccines and treatments. Advertisement · Scroll to continue According to HHS, the money to pay for doses in this new contract comes from that funding. Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com Register Feedback Newsletter | Sent daily. Global Healthcare Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs, healthcare trends, pharmaceutical news and more. More from Reuters Reporting by Manas Mishra in Bengaluru and Michael Erman in New York; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta and Bill Berkrot Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. UK economy shows strain from surging prices Vietnamese EV maker sets sights on U.S. market UK fashion retailer ASOS warns of hit to sales The Week in Numbers: it's all about energy Cineworld accesses $785 mln in financial aid Feedback Sign up Sponsored Content Hands Down One of the Best Cards for Good Credit Sponsored by The Ascent Where do the world’s two largest economies go from here? Sponsored by Invesco Institutional Save for Retirement or Pay Off Student Loans? Sponsored by Charles Schwab 7 Mistakes You'll Make When Hiring a Financial Advisor Sponsored by smartasset Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Feedback WHO sees October COVID surge in Ukraine, cites polio concerns World · September 12, 2022 · 5:14 AM PDT The World Health Organisation expects a rise in COVID-19 in Ukraine to peak in October, possibly bringing hospitals close to their capacity threshold, WHO's director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Monday. Markets Hellofresh: working closely with U.S. regulator after public health alert 2:05 AM PDT World COVID rules cast clouds over Hong Kong schools September 10, 2022 Feedback Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals EU regulator backs Pfizer's BA.4/5-adapted COVID booster 11 min ago Future of Health U.S. FDA to review Perrigo's birth control pill for OTC use in November 7:45 AM PDT Sponsored Content Compare NerdWallet’s Top Picks for Credit Card Bonuses Sponsored by NerdWallet How Secure is Your Company's Data? Sign Up for a Free Trial Now Sponsored by Dashlane 7 Mistakes You'll Make When Hiring a Financial Advisor Sponsored by smartasset Don’t miss out on up to $2,000 with required activities. Member FDIC. Sponsored by EARN A CASH BONUS WITH CITI Sponsored Content Feedback Where do the world’s two largest economies go from here? Sponsored by Invesco Institutional Here’s Bill Bonner ’s “4th and Final Prediction”Sponsored by Stansberry Research 5 Companies That Send People Money When They ’re Asked Nicely Sponsored by The Penny Hoarder Estate Planning Basics [Free Guide]Sponsored by Fisher Investments Sponsored Content Trade with confidence with a leading broker. FX trading is risky. Sponsored by FOREX.com Why Should You Rebalance Your Portfolio?Sponsored by Charles Schwab Overhauling the global gas network Sponsored by The Oregon Group Reputation matters. Yours and ours. Apply today.Sponsored by Fidelity Investments Feedback Latest Home Media Videos Pictures Graphics Browse World Business Legal Markets Breakingviews Technology Investigations Lifestyle About Reuters About Reuters Careers Reuters News Agency Brand Attribution Guidelines Reuters Leadership Reuters Fact Check Reuters Diversity Report Stay Informed Download the App Newsletters Information you can trust Reuters, the news and media division of Thomson Reuters, is the world’s largest multimedia news provider, reaching billions of people worldwide ever y day. Reuters provides business, financial, national and international news to professionals via desktop terminals, the world's media organizations, industry events and directly to consumers. Follow Us Westlaw Onesource Checkpoint Thomson Reuters Products Feedback Advertise With Us Advertising Guidelines Cookies Terms of Use Privacy Digital Accessibility Corrections Site Feedback Do Not Sell My Personal Information All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes. See here for a complete list of exchanges and delays. © 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved Westlaw Build the strongest argument relying on authoritative content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology. Onesource The most comprehensive solution to manage all your complex and ever-expanding tax and compliance needs. Checkpoint The industry leader for online information for tax, accounting and finance professionals. Refinitiv Workspace Access unmatched financial data, news and content in a highly-customised workflow experience on desktop, web and mobile. Refinitiv Data Catalogue Browse an unrivalled portfolio of real-time and historical market data and insights from worldwide sources and experts. Refinitiv World-Check Screen for heightened risk individual and entities globally to help uncover hidden risks in business relationships and human networks. Refinitiv Products Feedback Do the COVID-19 injections contain epigenetic factors inducing cancer, autoimmunity, neurological disorders diabetes and more? Is the spike protein also an epigenetic factor? Jessica Rose Aug 16 I just adore the following schematic diagram and I chose to post it here because soon, we might not be able to re-post even something as simple as a schematic from a website or a published journal article. (That’s why CAMPFIRE WIKI is so important, by the way.) This schematic is just so… comprehensive. The chromosome, the DNA, the histones, the histone tails, the methyl groups, the genes, the epigenetic factors, the health endpoints… sigh. It’s beautiful. I wonder how accurate it is? Figure 1: Epigenetic mechanisms and health endpoints. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Epigenetic_mechanisms.png On epigenetics The word epigenetics is made up of the pre x ‘epi’ from the Greek ἐπι, eti; meaning ‘over, outside of, around, or ‘in addition to’, and the su x ‘genetics’ from the science of genes which comprises the traditional basis for inheritance.1 A gene is a chunk of coding material. DNA comprises a sequence of many genes. It also etymologically originates from the Greek γένος, génos; meaning generation or birth.2 It is interesting to me in these times of casual gene therapy use, that ‘gene therapy’ then etymologically necessarily implies the ‘curing’ of ‘generation or birth’. The word therapy comes from the Greek therapeia meaning “curing, healing, service done to the sick”.3 Now, this could be perfectly descriptive: to cure using genes. But, considering the data arising in these times surrounding declining fertility and birth rates in both females and males, it is worth paying attention to the speci c e ects of the COVID-19 shots, which are, in fact, mRNA based gene- therapy, on this facet of biological concerns. Epigenetic changes involve changes in expression or activity of genes - NOT DNA (DeoxyriboNucleic Acid) - to alter cellular and physiological phenotypic traits resulting from external or environmental epigenetic factors. Epigenetics can also be used to describe any heritable phenotypic change and is part of normal development. It is very important to understand that the role of epigenetics in normal development is essential, and is precisely how and why we can have many di erent cell types, for example. Problems arise in terms of ‘disease’ (from Latin dis; ‘lack of ’ and Old French aise; ‘well-being or comfort’4 5 implying a lack of well- being) in the context of impairment of this vital system that can arise with epigenetic modi cation. Please watch the following video to get a good idea of what this gene expression and alteration and DNA stu is all about, and why your ‘environment’ and microbiome are so vitally important to epigenetics and your health and well-being, in general. Epigenetics - An IntroductionEpigenetics - An Introduction On genomes in the context of epigenetics All of the genetic material in your body comprises your genome and amazingly, each and every cell in your body contains all of the genetic material in your genome. By the way, your genome is yours and it is unique.6 Except in the case of say, twins. Twins have identical genomes, but they are di erent. Can you guess why? Amazingly, if you laid out your genome on the oor (don’t try to do this), it would measure approximately 2 meters long! That's like, almost as long as my Takayama noserider! S o how does that all that DNA t inside the nuclei of your little cells? It is by way of the magic of specialized proteins called histones. Histones are octamers (they have 2 sets of identical 4 chunk units (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) = octa (8)) that DNA is spooled around. Think of it like thread wound around a spool. You can wind a very long piece of string around a single spool, right? This is a space saving technique designed by nature. Each DNA/histone unit is called a nucleosome. Bunches of nucleosomes are called chromatin and you can imagine that being like a series of spools interconnected by one single long thread, like what is illustrated at the bottom of Figure 2. Chromatin is condensed further to make up chromosomes - those X-shaped thingies essential to our biology. Think of all those spools linked by that single thread bunched together to make up an X- shaped basket now lled with more closely spaced spools of thread. Those would be chromosomes. Figure 2: Chromatin structural components. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Basic_units_of_chromatin_structur e.svg. As I alluded to before, the ability to modify gene expression (the e ect of a gene being turned on or o via promoters) is why each cell type in our bodies have the ability to be di erent. Muscle cells versus liver cells, as illustrated in the above video, are completely di erent, and impose di erent functions based on which genes are turned on and o . The key to gene expression and activity is the organization of the nucleosome and the architecture of the chromatin. Each nucleosome has histone tails (originating from the histone), that can be capped to modify the tightness of the wrapping of the DNA around the histone. Think of the histone as a wooden spool, and the histone tails like shaved splinters that project outward. And think of the caps like little wax buds melted onto the ends of the splinters so you don’t get poked by them. There are 2 primary types of epigenetic modi cations: DNA methylation and histone modi cation. DNA methylation is when a methyl group is added directly to a cytosine residue that exists in a CpG sequence to induce gene silencing (shh, quiet gene). As all of my readers know by now, DNA is made up of four base nucleotides called cytosine (C), guanine (G), adenine (A) and thymine (T)). When a methyl group is attached to this cytosine site it is methylated, and when this methylation is in a promoter region, the gene associated with that C site will remain silent - it is not expressed. So methyl and acetyl groups linked to gene promoters are like being in the gene library where you have to be quiet. My jokes are getting really bad but trust me, they will get worse. Figure 3: https://www.creative- biogene.com/blog/index.php/2017/06/12/science-demonstrate-the- mechanism-that-cytosine-methylation-regulates-the-dna-specific-binding- of-human-transcription-factors/ Histone modi cation, on the other hand, is when a methyl or acetyl group is added directly to speci c residues on histone tails, subsequently modifying gene expression. Activation or repression of genes will depend on the residues modi ed, and the type of modi cation. Lysine acetylation correlates with transcriptional activation, for example.7 Figure 4: Acetylation and methylation sites on histone tails. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Histone_tails_set_for_transcription al_activation.jpg Histone modi cation via methylation and acetylation is basically the juice loosener. The juice is the histone, and the juice looseners are the methyl and acetyl groups. And yes, ‘p’ is for psycho. And the president’s neck is missing. Seriously though, using the ongoing spool and thread analogy, it is far more like maintaining or melting the wax buds o the ends of the wooden spool splinters so that, somehow, the thread is either tightly or loosely wound around the spools. the juice loosenerthe juice loosener Methylation of histone tails that act to loosen up very tightly histone-wrapped DNA, can make the DNA accessible by other proteins that can subsequently read the genes therein for potential transcription. Note that histone tails can also undergo ubiquitylation, sumoylation and phosphorylation on speci c residues.8 I have no idea what those are. Just kidding. I might explain phosphorylation later. Lysine acetylation correlates with transcriptional activation, for example.9 The methylation/demethylation patterns determine which genes are turned on and which are turned o and pretty much, determine the health state of the being.10 By the way, in addition to DNA methylation and histone modi cations, epigenetic mechanisms involved in regulating gene expression and chromatin structure in human cells includes nucleosome positioning and histone variants and microRNAs (miRNA)s.11 On miRNAs miRNAs are important in this context. To make a long story short, DNA has component parts called introns (do not code for proteins) and exons (code for proteins) that are both transcribable into messenger RNA. We all know what messenger RNA is by now, right? Introns, however, are never translated. They are removed from the messenger RNA via a process called splicing whereby the exons re-combine to form the translatable version of the messenger RNA. Well that is, when all things are right. Introns can be le behind (called intron retention) sometimes to cause problems like cancer.12 Figure 5: Introns and exons and splicing. https://www.zmescience.com/medicine/genetic/intron-retention-cancer- 25012016/ The introns, which our wise and dynamic science community used to refer to as junk DNA, comprise regulatory noncoding (not translated into proteins) RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and piwi RNA (piRNAs), which are all extremely important for gene regulation. They can all silence genes by regulation of production of proteins. Just because I can’t myself, if now was back then, no one would have been allowed to question the junk DNA hypothesis and thus, we probably wouldn’t know anything about miRNAs now. Something to think about. Figure 6: Micro RNAs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MiRNA.svg miRNAs regulate gene expression by interfering with RNA or gene silencing. They come about via Drosha in the nucleus and Dicer in the cytoplasm. Each miRNA has a complementary messenger RNA that it can prevent from being translated to its protein. Kind of like a personal chastity belt if the miRNA is the belt and the messenger RNA is the person you want to dance to Barry White with. On speci c disease associations with epigenetic factors Cancer is basically the epigenetic modi cation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene: the guardian of the genome. I love that: the guardian of the genome. I should actually be called p43.7, I think. I guess p53 is catchier. The p53 protein not only enforces the stability of the genome by the prevention of genetic alterations in cells but also plays a role in regulating the epigenetic changes that can occur in cells.13 p53 suppresses tumor formation by regulating DNA repair. The impairment of this regulation can lead to cancer through loss of regulation of cell cycle. Its reintroduction into cancer cells, induces cell cycle arrest in the cancer cell. Expression levels, like everything in biology, is very important. Over expression of p53 can result in too much apoptosis (programmed cell death), and under expression can result in cancer.14 Epigenetic factors can a ect p53 expression levels.15 16 17 18 19 They can also a ect other DNA damage repair elements and their regulation. A brilliantly frightening and frighteningly brilliant paper was published in October, 2021 in the journal Viruses entitled “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro”20. When you read it, and you should read it, you will learn something very disturbing: the authors found that the spike protein was abundant in the nuclei of study cells. The nucleus is where most DNA repair occurs. They found that spike protein signi cantly suppressed both homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair mechanisms. These are essential components to DNA repair and proper functioning in adaptive immunity (T and B cells). But even more scary, they found that the spike protein directly a ects DNA repair in the nucleus by interfering with double-stranded DNA break (DSB) repair. By the way, you might have noticed that there was an order to retract this work, and it was retracted. The claim written in the retraction request was strange and ambiguous, in my opinion, and it was made by the rst author. The conclusion following ambiguous errors in methodology was that “conclusions related to vaccine safety are not validated and lacked experimental support”. Where have I heard this before? I will assume that the authors’ initial conclusions are the correct ones: I am suspicious of this retraction request. They write: Here, by using an in vitro cell line, we report that the SARS–CoV–2 spike protein signi cantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is required for e ective V(D)J recombination in adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our ndings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side e ects of full-length spike-based vaccines. Now, where have we heard of BRCA1 and 53BP1 before? Cancer context right? Breast cancer, right? BRCA1 is, in fact, a well-known breast cancer tumor suppressor gene and 53BP1 is a DNA damage checkpoint protein.21 What this means, is that evidence was published that proves that the spike protein is an epigenetic factor acting on DNA repair mechanisms to induce cancer. Period. And then it was retracted. Following peer review. So either the original reviewers were all completely inept and missed this error that entirely debunks the conclusions of this work, or something squinky is going on here with the rst author with regard to the retraction request. This is where I put the brakes on this article. But I am going to methylate (I have gone full-on nerd) a few additional points because, as we all know, there’s more to disease than cancer. On other disease associations with epigenetic factors Bacterial infections are connected to epigenetics as well.22 23 I mean, literally, everything is on the list of epigenetic factors associated with disease. Everything. I am just going to list some of them with a single reference each. Asthma24, Hematologic malignancies25, Alzheimer’s26, Sperm motility27, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia28, Myocardial injury29 and cardiac hypertrophy30, Autism31, Frontal brosing alopecia32, Diabetic Kidney Disease33, Autoimmune conditions (in general - there are MANY)34, Cancer35, COVID-1936 ... ruh roh On solutions Stop injecting yourselves with products with undisclosed ingredients that I, personally, am absolutely sure contain epigenetic factors causing all of the above, including cancer, by epigenetic modi cation. There are a few reasons I provided background on miRNAs in this article. They regulate toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathways involved in in ammatory diseases37. You can read about the connection between miRNAs, TLR-8 and severe COVID-19 here. Read Stephanie and Greg and Peter and Anthony’s paper to learn more about miRNA and SARS-nCoV-2/COVID-19 connections - they (3 speci cally: miR-155, miR-148a and miR-590) are shipped around the body via exosomes to block type I interferon (IFN) responses and induce neuroin ammation, for example.38 I truly have not done this amazing paper remote justice in this summary, so please read it. It is long, but FULL of revealing information. Also, read everything Stephanie Sene has ever written on glyphosate. Another reason is that miRNAs can be used therapeutically, in theory, to aid in COVID-19 pathology.39 Figure 7: Representation of blocking the binding, activation and replication of SARS-CoV-2 infection by miRNAs. From the publication entitled: The role of miRNAs in COVID-19 disease. https://doi: 10.2217/fvl-2020-0389. This isn’t over. Epigenetic modi cation covers just about everything disease-wise. It really does. Think about the past 100 years and think about di erences between the East and the West. And read about in ammatory bowel disease and worms. Ultimately, we need balance and the chemical shit storm we are currently surviving through nowadays is not promoting this. Figure 8: Epigenetics and gene activation for improved health and longevity (josephmaroon.com) hashtagsicko eingposioned 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene 3 https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=therapy 4 https://www.etymonline.com/word/ease? ref=etymonline_crossreference#etymonline_v_946 5 https://www.etymonline.com/word/dis-?ref=etymonline_crossreference 6 Varki A, Geschwind DH, Eichler EE. Explaining human uniqueness: genome interactions with environment, behaviour and culture. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Oct;9(10):749-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2428. PMID: 18802414; PMCID: PMC2756412. 7 Hebbes TR, et al. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J. 1988;7:1395–1402. 8 Kouzarides T. Chromatin modi cations and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. 9 Hebbes TR, et al. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J. 1988;7:1395–1402. 10 Neri F, Incarnato D, Oliviero S. DNA methylation and demethylation dynamics. Oncotarget. 2015 Oct 27;6(33):34049-50. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6039. PMID: 26461852; PMCID: PMC4741426. 11 Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Jan;31(1):27- 36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. Epub 2009 Sep 13. PMID: 19752007; PMCID: PMC2802667. 12 https://www.zmescience.com/medicine/genetic/intron-retention-cancer-25012016/ 13 Arnold J. Levine and Shelley L. Berger. The interplay between epigenetic changes and the p53 protein in stem cells. GENES & DEVELOPMENT 31:1195–1201. 14 Lakin, N., Jackson, S. Regulation of p53 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene 18, 7644– 7655 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203015 15 Tomicic MT, Dawood M, E erth T. Epigenetic Alterations Upstream and Downstream of p53 Signaling in Colorectal Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(16):4072. Published 2021 Aug 13. doi:10.3390/cancers13164072. 16 Levine AJ, Berger SL. The interplay between epigenetic changes and the p53 protein in stem cells. Genes Dev. 2017;31(12):1195-1201. doi:10.1101/gad.298984.117. 17 Saldaña-Meyer R, Recillas-Targa F. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Epigenetics. 2011;6(9):1068-1077. doi:10.4161/epi.6.9.16683. 18 Krepulat F, Löhler J, Heinlein C, Hermannstädter A, Tolstonog GV, Deppert W. Epigenetic mechanisms a ect mutant p53 transgene expression in WAP-mutp53 transgenic mice. Oncogene. 2005;24(29):4645-4659. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208557. 19 Ward A, Hudson JW. p53-Dependent and cell speci c epigenetic regulation of the polo- like kinases under oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e87918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087918. PMID: 24498222; PMCID: PMC3909268. 20 Jiang H, Mei YF. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro [retracted in: Viruses. 2022 May 10;14(5):]. Viruses. 2021;13(10):2056. Published 2021 Oct 13. doi:10.3390/v13102056. 21 Daley JM, Sung P. 53BP1, BRCA1, and the choice between recombination and end joining at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Apr;34(8):1380-8. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01639-13. Epub 2014 Jan 27. PMID: 24469398; PMCID: PMC3993578. 22 Bierne H, Hamon M, Cossart P. Epigenetics and bacterial infections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(12):a010272. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010272. PMID: 23209181; PMCID: PMC3543073. 23 Wang J, Liu Z, Xu Y, et al. Enterobacterial LPS-inducible LINC00152 is regulated by histone lactylation and promotes cancer cells invasion and migration. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:913815. Published 2022 Jul 25. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.913815. 24 Lavoie ME, Meloche J, Boucher-La eur AM, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of the asthma status in a French-Canadian cohort. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13789. Published 2022 Aug 13. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17959-6. 25 Hofmann WK, Trumpp A, Müller-Tidow C. Therapy Resistance Mechanisms in Hematological Malignancies [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 13]. Int J Cancer. 2022;10.1002/ijc.34243. doi:10.1002/ijc.34243. 26 Singh AK, Neo SH, Liwang C, et al. Glucose derived carbon nanosphere (CSP) conjugated TTK21, an activator of the histone acetyltransferases CBP/p300, ameliorates amyloid-beta 1-42 induced de cits in plasticity and associativity in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 12]. Aging Cell. 2022;e13675. doi:10.1111/acel.13675. 27 Guo H, Shen X, Hu H, et al. Alteration of RNA modi cation signature in human sperm correlates with sperm motility [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 12]. Mol Hum Reprod. 2022;gaac031. doi:10.1093/molehr/gaac031. 28 Bruch PM, Giles HA, Kolb C, et al. Drug-microenvironment perturbations reveal resistance mechanisms and prognostic subgroups in CLL. Mol Syst Biol. 2022;18(8):e10855. doi:10.15252/msb.202110855. 29 He L, Wang Y, Luo J. Epigenetic modi cation mechanism of histone demethylase KDM1A in regulating cardiomyocyte apoptosis a er myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13823. Published 2022 Aug 5. doi:10.7717/peerj.13823. 30 Han Y, Nie J, Wang DW, Ni L. Mechanism of histone deacetylases in cardiac hypertrophy and its therapeutic inhibitors. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:931475. Published 2022 Jul 26. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.931475. 31 Shirinian M, Chen C, Uchida S, Jadavji NM. Editorial: The role of epigenetics in neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:985023. Published 2022 Jul 25. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.985023. 32 Miao YJ, Jing J, Du XF, Mao MQ, Yang XS, Lv ZF. Frontal brosing alopecia: A review of disease pathogenesis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:911944. Published 2022 Jul 25. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.911944. 33 Rico-Fontalvo J, Aroca G, Cabrales J, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Diabetic Kidney Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8668. Published 2022 Aug 4. doi:10.3390/ijms23158668. 34 Mazzone, R., Zwergel, C., Artico, M. et al. The emerging role of epigenetics in human autoimmune disorders. Clin Epigenet 11, 34 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019- 0632-2. 35 Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Jan;31(1):27- 36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. Epub 2009 Sep 13. PMID: 19752007; PMCID: PMC2802667. 36 Delshad M, Sanaei MJ, Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi A, Bashash D. Host genetic diversity and genetic variations of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis and the e ectiveness of vaccination [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 8]. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;111:109128. 37 Arenas-Padilla M, Mata-Haro V. Regulation of TLR signaling pathways by microRNAs: implications in in ammatory diseases. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2018;43(4):482-489. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2018.81351. Epub 2018 Dec 31. PMID: 30799997; PMCID: PMC6384427. 38 Sene S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022;164:113008. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. 39 Fani M, Zandi M, Ebrahimi S, Soltani S, Abbasi S. The role of miRNAs in COVID-19 disease. Future Virol. 2021 Mar:10.2217/fvl-2020-0389. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2020-0389. Epub 2021 Mar 24. PMCID: PMC7989380. 39 Comments Write a comment… 1 reply by Jessica Rose Ron Manzanero Aug 16 Liked by Jessica Rose Dear Dr Rose. I read your most recent email commentary on epigenetics. (I am a medical doctor -- a non-scientist by fault of having gone through medical school and two residencies -- and long deprogrammed by just learning to question things!) I just wanted to chime in and say that i love your posts. I love the education you're giving all of us. And I love your courage to step out and speak out. Thank you, dear doctor! The information you have given me, along with people like Steve Kirsch, Joseph Mercola, Pierre Kory, Peter McCullough, and others, have been a god-send to a "country doctor" like me who needs the science to back up my anti-SARS gene jab education to my patients, and to some of my deaf colleagues. I appreciate you so much, all the way down here in Texas. Dr Ron 107 Reply Collapse 6 replies by Jessica Rose and others MeresK Aug 16 Liked by Jessica Rose “I, personally, am absolutely sure contain epigenetic factors causing all of the above, including cancer, by epigenetic modification.” Dr Rose: do you believe this was intentional? If so, why was this done? Thx. 19 Reply Collapse 37 more comments… © 2022 Jessica Rose ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Substack is the home for great writing Create Tableau Public has a fresh, new look! Check out our latest blog post to learn what else is new. WelcomeTheEagle's VAERS Covid Dashboard by Alberto Benavidez Resources Sign In Manufacturer Event (Cleansed)Event (CDC Original) Territory Age Ca Age (Cleansed)Age (CDC)Lot# (CDC Original)L Age Category (CDC Original) ID# CountC19 Only Sept 2, 2022 Territory by Cleansed Event Details 0 391 "How To" instruction videos: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Byr8RcZLr05v/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/nyc56ogIwrnh/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/67otWQEk8gUq/ Twitter: @welcometheeagle welcometheeagle88@protonmail.com Published: Sep 5, 2022 Updated: Sep 10, 2022 Published on:www.bitchute.com System Status Blog FAQ About Tableau Products Careers Contact Us L E G A L P R I VA C Y D ATA P O L I C Y U N I N STA L L D O N O T S E L L M Y P E R S O N A L I N F O R M AT I O N © 2 0 2 2 TA B L E A U S O F T WA R E , L LC , A S A L E S F O R C E C O M PA N Y. A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D. English (US) The High-Speed, Bivalent Covid Boosters Are Here Watch out. There is nothing good about them, and we should be worried about why they are being used. Mer yl Nass Writes MERYL NASS · Subscribe Sep 8 Editor’s Note: This is a must-read dispatch from Dr. Meryl Nass, a renowned Maine physician, anthrax and bioterrorism expert, and leading covid doctor and researcher who helped FLCCC.net develop long-haul treatment protocols. ~ M.C. Cape Town political cartoonist, podcaster, and radio host Jeremy Nell regularly sketches out the horrors of vaccinations at Jerm Warfare. On Wednesday, August 31, the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for new P zer and Moderna mRNA booster vaccines for covid. The next day, September 1, the CDC’s advisory committee and CDC Director approved the immediate rollout of the new vaccines. They will be administered in the US starting this week. Surprisingly, more than a month before either agency had given its okay to the entirely new formulation, the federal government ordered 105 million doses from P zer and 66 million doses from Moderna. The desired composition of the vaccine had only been formally determined by FDA a er its advisory committee had met on June 24, 2022. The vaccines contain a mix of the old, original Wuhan strain vaccine mRNA (now also referred to as the ancestral vaccine) and a new omicron BA.4/5 mRNA coding for the omicron spike protein. The total amount of mRNA for the P zer and Moderna booster vaccines is the same as before: 30 mcg for P zer and 50 mcg for Moderna. Each is composed of 50 percent omicron mRNA and 50 percent ancestral mRNA, and they are termed bivalent vaccines. The new vials and their boxes do not list the dose, hinting that the decision regarding how much to use was made very recently. Even the members of the CDC’s advisory committee did not know the dosage of the new bivalent vaccines until their September 1 meeting. This is the fastest rollout of a new vaccine in world history. How did it happen? Instead of this being a tale of human grit and ingenuity, it is a tale of human weakness and recklessness. Let me ask again: how did such a rapid vaccine rollout occur? It occurred the only way it could possibly occur: by bending the rules, creating a new regulatory playbook, and failing to obtain any human data for the new vaccines. The manufacturers did not have to go through months-long trials, and FDA did not have to pore over any human trial data, because there weren’t any. Let that sink in: the new BA.4/5 bivalent vaccines have only been tested in mice, not humans. Fastest vaccine rollout in world histor y Unexpected international coordination Here is an amazing fact: On the same day that the CDC gave its approval to start the vaccine program, September 1, health agencies in Canada, Switzerland and the European Union’s FDA (the European Medicines Association) also rolled out new, bivalent booster shot programs. Almost simultaneously, the UK authorized two di erent bivalent boosters on August 15 and September 3. The UK has told people to expect the largest rollout in history for the new bivalent boosters. And it has started the program by promising large bonuses to doctors if they manage to vaccinate every single resident of a nursing home by October 23. These other countries are using an earlier omicron mRNA as the template for their omicron-ancestral bivalent vaccines, while the US is using the mRNA code for the later omicron variant BA.4/5 spike. How are the mainstream media telling this story? With their usual spin, avoiding the sticky parts. Instead of helping you understand what just happened, the New York Times asks, “When should you get yours?” Not should you get it, just when should you get it. The Herald Tribune tells you why you should get it. STAT News says it answers your questions, but it never asks the relevant questions about why such a rapid, unprecedented rollout occurred—especially when we are at practically historic lows for deaths and ICU stays due to covid. The Associated Press did slightly better, at least posing the question of whether you should get a new booster. But then its answers don’t dig any deeper than its fellow media outlets. It looks like you won’t be getting the information you need to understand the boosters and the process by which they were ushered in from the major media. So the Defender has reviewed FDA documents, attended the all day CDC advisory committee meeting on September 1, studied a review of the boosters published in the New England Journal of Medicine on August 31, and evaluated a study of omicron boosters that were tested in non-human primates by Dr. Fauci's Vaccine Research Center. We will provide you real science. How can you get complete information on these boosters? FDA did not convene its advisory committee before issuing the authorizations, and it is not hard to guess why. Last year, its advisors voted against authorizing the ancestral boosters, because the data they were given indicated the old vaccines were continuing to work well. Two top o cials at FDA who disagreed with the 2021 booster rollout resigned, hinting that the decision to issue boosters had been imposed on the FDA. This year, FDA’s VRBPAC (Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) members have been complaining about being given less and less data as they are asked to sign o on vaccine programs for younger and younger ages. VRBPAC member Dr. Paul O t, a professor of pediatric infectious diseases at the University of Pennsylvania and coinventor of a Rotavirus vaccine said last month that “the x was in,” implying that the committee’s deliberations were a sham, because the White House announced it was purchasing the vaccine right a er the meeting ended. Dr. O t was quoted last week as saying the mouse data were not su cient to roll out the new boosters. So FDA chose not to give him and the other members a public venue where they would predictably complain about FDA’s laxity—what some might call recklessness, insubordination, or even gross malfeasance. A er all, according to the FDA’s mission statement, FDA “is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, e cacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices.” Not rubber-stamping untested vaccines. The FDA justi ed its authorizations using language that was probably intended to confuse the public. Here are several examples: Everyone knows the term “safe and e ective,” which is an o cial FDA stamp of approval for licensed drugs and vaccines. However, by law the term cannot be used by FDA to refer to unlicensed, experimental products, which is what all emergency use authorized drugs and vaccines are. So FDA tried to hint at the desired terminology without using it. In its press release on the new boosters, FDA used almost, but not quite identical terminology, quoting Dr. Peter Marks, the director of FDA’s vaccine center: “We have worked closely with the vaccine What did FDA say about its Emergency Use Authorization for the new boosters? manufacturers to ensure the development of these updated boosters was done safely and e ciently.” Dr. Marks also said, “The public can be assured that a great deal of care has been taken by the FDA to ensure that these bivalent COVID-19 vaccines meet our rigorous safety, e ectiveness and manufacturing quality standards for emergency use authorization.” Again, ‘safe and e ective’ is implied but not exactly stated. What Dr. Marks expects the public to miss is the fact that there are no quality standards for emergency use authorizations (EUAs). The statute authorizing EUAs simply requires that the known and expected bene ts outweigh the known and expected risks of the product. There are no quality requirements at all, and FDA is not even required to inspect the factories where EUA products are manufactured, as it must do for licensed products. Nor is it required to inspect the nal product. So the FDA is fooling us when it claims the standards are rigorous. Furthermore, Dr. Marks and the FDA know that all EUA products have been granted an extremely broad waiver of liability that covers Dr. Marks, the FDA, CDC, HHS, the manufacturers, distributors, doctors, pharmacists, and everyone involved in the vaccine program. So they can tell us anything, because the public has no recourse to the courts to bring suit when an EUA product is involved. FDA justi es its assessment that the untested vaccines are safe using the following argument: “The safety data accrued with the bivalent vaccine (original and omicron BA.1) and with the monovalent Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine are relevant to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent because these vaccines are manufactured using the same process.” This is the same as claiming that almond butter is safe, so peanut butter is safe, too, because it is manufactured using the same process. Is that really the best excuse for failing to perform its regulatory functions that FDA can o er? CDC knew that it would have a hard time convincing the public to take these vaccines, since almost everyone has already had covid, the earlier vaccine bene ts were overpromised, the disease has become milder, the vaccines do not prevent infection or What happened at the CDC ACIP (Advisor y Committee on Immunization Practices) meeting on September 1? transmission, and the fearfulness around covid is mostly gone. Therefore, CDC needed to employ new strategies. One strategy was to invoke the ‘bandwagon e ect.’ You try to convince the public that everyone else is getting the shot, so they too should jump on the bandwagon. A poll was presented at the ACIP meeting that claimed that 72 percent of people that were eligible planned to get the new boosters. How likely is that to be true? Only 33 percent of the population has already gotten a rst booster, while 67 percent have said, ‘No thanks.’ And the interest in covid jabs is way down. Under 5 percent of preschoolers have received a covid vaccine in the three months since they were authorized. CDC implied to the ACIP that 49 percent of the public had been boosted, while its own statistics in the New York Times say the actual number is 33 percent. Here is how CDC performed the calculation to make it appear the boosters are more popular than they are: 67 percent of the public is ‘fully vaccinated’ according to the CDC. 49 percent of those 67 percent (those who are fully vaccinated) is 33 percent. The federal government allocated a billion dollars to buy advertising and guarantee positive news coverage (and suppress bad news) to push the earlier covid vaccines. One wonders how much will be spent to push the new boosters. CDC says that 224 million Americans are ‘fully vaccinated.’ The ACIP members were told that of this number, 210 million are already eligible for the new boosters. The government has bought 171 million bivalent booster doses so far (105 million from P zer and 66 million from Moderna) which can be used for those aged twelve and up. FDA and CDC have yet to allow the rollout of new bivalent boosters for children under twelve, who have in the past received lower dose covid vaccines than adults. But the agencies said they plan to do so within weeks. Another testy issue for the ACIP committee was the question of how long these boosters will work, and how frequently they will be recommended. The ACIP members are responsible for giving advice on all vaccines, and they don’t want the covid vaccines to sour the public on other vaccines. Although a recommendation to give the bivalent boosters four months a er an earlier dose had once been oated, the ACIP committee was asked to approve the boosters when at least two months had passed since a prior dose. CDC’s Dr. Twentyman said that CDC is no longer counting the total number of doses. She said that even if a person has received four or ve prior covid vaccinations, a new bivalent booster “should not be denied,” as long as two months have passed since the last dose. According to this week’s NEJM article: “Increased neutralizing antibody titers, as well as clinical e ectiveness, have been shown to wane by four months a er a third messenger RNA immunization. A er a fourth messenger RNA immunization, protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 omicron has been reported to wane a er just four weeks, although protection against severe disease lasts longer. Hybrid immunity from both vaccination and infection provides greater and more durable protection than either alone.” Four weeks! Antibody titers sink four weeks a er the fourth dose. No wonder CDC is allowing, and may encourage, such frequent boosters. The covid vaccinators have coined a new term, hybrid immunity, ri ng o hybrid electric cars. It refers to the improved immunity a vaccinated person has if they also got the disease! As if being vaccinated but getting the disease anyway is to be normalized as desirable. A er CDC spent two years denying that natural immunity—the kind people get a er infection—even exists, CDC is now trying to take a lemon vaccine, add natural immunity, call it hybrid immunity, and make lemonade! Omicron variants have been present since last November, and it was soon discovered that both vaccine-induced and natural immunity due to earlier variants were very limited for omicron variants, because they are so di erent from the ancestral strain. The health agencies and manufacturers have been testing omicron vaccine prototypes for up to nine months. Most of those tests involved BA.1 and BA.2 omicron strains. However, 90 percent of current cases are caused by Omicron BA.5, which is genetically far from BA.1 and BA.2. How long will it work? How was this rollout justified? But there was some human data (involving a few hundred subjects each) for several of the earlier omicron vaccine prototypes, so the health agencies decided to simply pretend that mRNA designed for BA.1 and BA.2 was close enough to BA.5 that the data were comparable. Since 50 percent of the vaccine contents would be the old vaccine, FDA claimed it had already established the safety and e cacy of that half. Then, to round things out, there were data from mice, which generated comparable antibody levels to the new vaccines as they had to older vaccines. And of course, we can rely on mice to behave exactly like people, right? A er all, they have been ‘humanized’ to contain a human ACE-2 receptor. No, we cannot rely on mice. We cannot even rely on nonhuman primates as a model for vaccines, as every species reacts uniquely and unpredictably to infections and to vaccinations. But mice data do bulk up FDA’s authorization ‘package’ so it looks like FDA did a more thorough review. Having discussed how long this booster might last, one needs to ask how well it might work Predictions from Nature magazine and Dr. Fauci’s NIAID Vaccine Research Center at the NIH are that the new vaccines will not improve on the old vaccines. According to the VRC, “a study in nonhuman primates showed that an omicron speci c messenger RNA vaccine was not better than the original messenger RNA-1273 [ancestral Moderna] vaccine for protection against omicron challenge.” Nature notes, “an analysis [posted August 26] suggests that updated boosters seem to o er much the same protection as an extra dose of the older vaccines—particularly when it comes to keeping people out of hospital.” Neither of these studies was discussed at the ACIP meeting. No discussion was provided regarding why and how the bivalent vaccines were chosen. The reason why the omicron vaccines won’t stimulate a good omicron response is attributed by the NIAID VRC authors to antigenic priming, also known as original antigenic sin. This means that the immune system has been programmed to respond over and over again to the rst coronavirus infection or vaccine it encountered, even when it encounters di erent coronavirus antigens later. How well did the old vaccine work? The CDC slide below, presented by CDC’s Dr. Link- Gelles, is not well labeled, but it shows that whether you got two or three doses of the old vaccine, during the omicron period e cacy in all age groups was under 40 percent at three months. By six months it hovered around zero e cacy (no bene t), and a er that it was negative (harmful) for most ages. Negative e cacy means that the vaccinated are more prone to being infected with covid than the unvaccinated. This is consistent with what we are seeing from the UK and some other countries: the vaccinated become more likely to get covid. And it is this e ect that the public health agencies are probably trying to stave o , or hide, with perpetual boosters. It appears the public here and in many other countries is being misled to receive an untested (or in other countries a BA. 1 or 2 minimally tested) shot on the false promise it will be so much better than the older vaccine. The regulators know it is unlikely to be better, but their public relations engines are revved up to convince us otherwise. That is anybody’s guess, because you cannot assess human safety from animal models, since they don’t predict the human response. What was done to evaluate the safety of the bivalent vaccines? Reactogenicity is a word that refers to short term vaccine adverse reactions, like fever, redness, fatigue or muscle aches. According to the CDC briefers, the degree of reactogenicity from the omicron prototype vaccines was comparable to that from the older, ‘ancestral’ covid vaccines. There were no data on more serious side e ects, and Dr. Shimabukuro of CDC said there was no way to assess the risk of myocarditis due to the small number of subjects who received the prototype vaccines. However, if you look at P zer’s chart, prepared for the ACIP members, you will notice that there was greater reactogenicity (more acute side e ects) seen a er the omicron How safe are the new vaccines? Reactogenicity prototype vaccines than seen a er the older vaccines. This may be a signal that more severe reactions will result from the newer vaccines, but there is no way to be sure. Presenters to the ACIP claimed that myocarditis was less common a er booster shots of the old vaccine than a er the second dose of the initial series. However, slide 39 shown by Dr. Shimabukuro, which was quickly passed over, showed the opposite. For 16 to 17- year-old boys and girls, and for men aged 30 to 39, the chance of myocarditis was increased a er a booster. (See below.) So there is no reason to think the boosters will be any safer than the second dose, in terms of myocarditis. That risk, by the way, was about 1 in 2,000 young men aged 18 to 24 a er their second dose in one Kaiser study. Myocarditis Dr. Shimabukuro also said that if you get vaccinated soon a er recovering from covid, increased side e ects, at least short-term, are to be expected—but “there is a lack of evidence that it places you at increased risk of myocarditis.” I am not reassured by the lack of evidence. In fact, pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan last week reviewed all the evidence that Dr. Shimabukuro couldn’t nd. Getting vaccinated soon a er recovering from covid is foolhardy, and any o cials mandating the shots a er recovery are putting those in their charge at even greater risk of adverse reactions, including myocarditis. Some scientists, including Dr. Dan Barouch in a review in last week’s NEJM, assert that myocarditis is “far more frequent” a er a case of covid than it is a er vaccination. But he cited not a single source for this claim. Pediatric cardiologist Kirk Milhoan reviewed all the recent literature on the question of myocarditis rates a er infection versus a er vaccination. It appears that the vaccine puts you at more risk of myocarditis than a covid infection does, but there are many di erent factors that in uence risk, including age, gender, whether you already had covid and how recently, and the type of vaccines received. Moderna vaccines are more likely to cause myocarditis than P zer. Receiving a Moderna vaccine a er an initial P zer vaccine raises the risk even more than getting two Moderna vaccines. See Table 2 from an important study of myocarditis in four Nordic countries. France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Iceland have all halted Moderna covid vaccinations for young males. An ACIP member asked whether the Jynneos monkeypox vaccine, which can also induce myocarditis, could be given together with the new bivalent vaccines? Would this increase the myocarditis risk? The surprising response was, “Read the brie ng book,” which may have meant that this was not to be discussed in public. Speaking of what could be discussed in public, any discussion of pregnancy and covid vaccination was forbidden at the ACIP meeting. Multiple committee members asked for information on pregnancy, but the briefers steadfastly refused to provide any. Nothing on hospitalizations, deaths, fetal outcomes. The ACIP members were told they would be briefed on this at a future meeting. Dr. Miller, representing Moderna, said they were in the process of enrolling a total of 800 pregnant women in a study. Which would someday be completed. The only conclusion I can draw is that the CDC doesn’t like the results they have now. And they plan to delay providing them to the public for as long as possible. Yet CDC established a pregnancy registry for the covid vaccines nearly eighteen months ago. CDC and FDA must have data on many thousands of pregnancies. Every woman who receives a covid vaccine dose must provide information on whether she is pregnant before she can be vaccinated, and CDC collects all this information. Furthermore, there are thousands of VAERS reports on adverse pregnancy outcomes. FDA required P zer/BioNTech to study the e ect of the vaccine in pregnancy when it issued a license for Comirnaty on August 23, 2021. FDA also required additional vaccine safety studies in children and additional studies of myocarditis at the same time. The problem is that these studies won’t be completed for up to ve years, long a er billions of doses have been given and the vaccines will be long out of date. It is di cult to justify why FDA would ask for these studies to take so long. Was FDA requesting such long study durations in order to delay its vaccine safety assessment until a er the vaccines are no longer in use? The only conclusion I can draw is that FDA and CDC don’t like the safety results they already have. And they plan to withhold the bad news for as long as possible. The committee was also interested in long covid. Might the vaccines prevent this dread complication? CDC was mum. The CDC briefer claimed that CDC does not have “systematic data” on long covid. Nor has CDC developed a case de nition for long covid. Why has CDC delayed investigating this critically important complication? The New York Times revealed in February 2022 that CDC conceals the bulk of the public health data it collects. According to the Times, “Much of the withheld information could help state and local health o cials better target their e orts to bring the virus under control.” You are not going to nd a more public indictment from the Times of our Centers for Disease Control than that. Long covid Does vaccination fail to prevent long covid? Does it cause long covid? FLCCC founder and esteemed intensive care physician Dr. Paul Marik has postulated that both long covid and many covid vaccine injuries are due to the same thing: the prolonged presence of spike proteins in the circulation. If true, there may be considerable overlap between the symptoms and pathology of long covid and vaccine injuries, and CDC may be trying to conceal this, or perhaps be seeking a way to claim that all the vaccine injuries are due to covid. FDA revoked all P zer and Moderna emergency use authorizations for the old boosters on August 31. This was sudden and unexpected. Appointments had to be cancelled, because starting on August 31 the old vaccines were limited to use in only young children or for the initial series. The FDA did not withdraw or recall the licensed Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccines, which have also been approved as a booster dose. Is this a tacit acknowledgement that there is no licensed Comirnaty or Spikevax available in the US? Might the FDA have rolled out the new vaccines so quickly to justify removing most of the old vaccines from use, soon a er reports began circulating about their contents containing undisclosed and possibly harmful materials? The FDA and CDC have cooporated to issue emergency use authorizations and rollout new, bivalent P zer and Moderna covid vaccines this week, without any human trials, which is unprecedented. These vaccines continue to enjoy extraordinary protection from liability, while the recipient has no access to the legal system in the case of injury. There is no evidence that the new vaccines are safe, while there is limited evidence that they may be more harmful than earlier covid vaccines—but in the absence of human testing, there is no way to truly predict their safety. S afety data are being concealed by the federal health agencies. Messaging by them is misleading. There is no evidence the new bivalent vaccines will be more e ective than the older vaccines, and existing evidence suggests that any e cacy they provide will Conclusions persist no longer than one to several months. Covid vaccines appear to increase susceptibility to covid infections, on average starting six months a er an inoculation. Perpetual boosters brie y stave o the negative e cacy that develops a few months a er a covid vaccination. This may be why frequent boosters are being pushed. But frequent boosters may also weaken overall immunity and may even contribute to rising mortality rates in the US and UK. There is international coordination regarding bivalent boosters, and a major e ort will be undertaken to get them into arms, despite historically low levels of severe covid. Why? A guest post by Mer yl Nass Meryl Nass is a physician and researcher who proved the world's largest anthrax epidemic was due to biological warfare. She revealed the dangers of the anthrax vaccine. Her license was suspended for prescribing COVID medications and 'misinformation.' Subscribe to Meryl 18 Comments Type your email…Subscribe Write a comment… Mer yl Nass Sep 8 Author 16 more comments… 1 reply Appreciate MAA's helpfulness Margaret Anna Alice Writes Margaret Anna Alice Through the… 4 hr ago Thank you for reposting this important article by heroic truth warrior Dr. Meryl Nass. I noticed the author link at the top doesn’t go to her main account, where she publishes her main newsletter. Just wanted to make sure people have the correct link so they can read past articles and sign up for her mailing list: https://merylnass.substack.com/ Additionally, I wanted to share this satirical piece I recently published in an effort to shake parents awake to the hazards of the injection. Please read and share widely so we can save as many kids as possible 🙌 • “50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/50-reasons-to-give-your-child-the) 3 Reply Collapse Jason Sep 8 A very important article from a brilliant and noble human being. Thanks for sharing it. The greased-lightning rollout of this new poison, without any human testing whatsoever despite the horrific human deaths and severe injuries caused by the first batch of injected poisons, proves that this is a mass murder campaign. There is simply no other way to interpret this non-stop steamrolling of fatal and toxic injections. 15 Reply Gift a subscription Collapse © 2022 Michael Capuzzo & Teresa Capuzzo ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Substack is the home for great writing