HomeMy WebLinkAboutADM22-0057 Permit - APPROVED 2022.11.03(Permit Requirements – Reverse) 1 of 2
TELECOMMUICATION FACILITY – CO-LOCATION
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT (BCC 24-184 ET SEQ.)
APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPLICANT’S NAME PHONE NUMBER
( )
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE
E-MAIL
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROPERTY OWNER (if different from the applicant) ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER
SITE ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE
ZONING APPROVED UP/MUP # FOR EXISTING COMMUNICATION FACILITY
CO-LOCATION DESCRIPTION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I certify that all of the information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have read and acknowledge
the permit requirements as set forth below (page 2) and agree to comply with them. I further understand that should the
design of the sign be modified or if the sign expands beyond the requirements of this permit, that I will notify the county to
obtain any necessary approvals.
APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE DATE
STAFF USE ONLY
PROJECT NUMBER
ADM_____-________
BUILDING PERMIT?
YES NO N/A
BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER
BP_____-_________
EH CLEARANCE
YES NO N/A
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL DATE
Butte County Department of Development Services
PLANNING DIVISION
7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
Planning Center Phone 530.552.3701 Fax 530.538.7785
dsplanning@buttecounty.net
FORM NO
PLA-26
Peter Perkins 916 266-7078
3140 Gold Camp Dr #30 Rancho Cordova CA 95670
John Starr 069-010-036
5263 ROYAL OAKS DR. Oroville 95966
N-C UP16-0005
8-24-2022
■22 0057 ■
Rowland Hickel Senior Planner 11-3-22
ANTENNA EQUIPMENT WILL BE LOCATED ON AN EXISTING MONOPINE:
-ADD (1) RADIO 4460, AND (1) RADIO 4480 PER SECTOR, 3 SECTORS, 6 TOTAL
RRU.
-ADD (1) RFS - APXVAALL24_43-U-NA20 AND (1) AIR 6419 PER SECTOR. 3
SECTORS, 6 TOTAL ANTENNA.
-ADD (N) ANTENNA SOCKS TO (N) ANTENNAS, 6 TOTAL.
Peter Perkins Digitally signed by Peter Perkins
DN: cn=Peter Perkins, o=T-Mobile, ou=Dev,
email=peter.perkins9@t-mobile.com, c=US
Date: 2022.08.24 14:07:29 -07'00'
2 of 2
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
1. The installation of co-location facilities allowed requires the issuance of a building permit
from the Building Division. The Building Division, based upon engineered calculations
submitted by the applicant, may determine that the wireless telecommunications facility
cannot safely physicallysuppor the requested co-location facility. If this is the case, the
colocation facility allowed on the wireless telecommunications facility shall only be
commensurate with what can be safely physically supported by the wireless communications
facility, as determined by the Building Division.
2. All equipment shelters, cabinets, or structures utilizied or built in connection with the
facilities shall be located within the building being utilized for the facility,or on the ground
outside of any setback area.
3. The antennas and array shall be painted to match the color of the existing antennas and pole
or tower.
4. Additional facilities shall not extend out horizontally from the pole more than the widest
existing projection. The use of proximity designs is encouraged.
Approval of this permit is final and effective after 5:00 p.m. on the 10th day following the date
the decision is rendered, when no appeal to the decision or call for review has been filed. In
the event the completion of appeal period falls on a weekend or County recognized holiday, the
decision shall be effective after 5:00 p.m. on the first business day following completion of the
appeal period.
A permit or approval not exercised within two years after the date of approval shall expire and
become void, except wher an extension of time is approved as allowed by BCC §24-247 C.
The Zoning Administrator may revoke its approval of this Administrative Permit, if any of the
following applies:
a. The applicant or property owner has altered the circumstances under which the permit was
granted to a degree that one or more of the findings required to grant the original permit can
no longer be made;
b. Permit issuance was based on misrepresentation by the applicant through the omission of a
material statement in the application;
c. One or more of the permit conditions of approval have not been complied with or fulfilled;
d. The applicant or property owner has failed or refused to allow inspections for compliance;
e. Improvements authorized by the permit are in violation of the Zoning Ordinance or any law,
ordinace, regulation, or statute; or
f. The use is being operated in a manner which constitutes a nuisance.
_______________
Applicant’s Initials
PP