Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23-169BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. 23-169 A RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS OF FACT BY THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS UPHOLDING AN APPEAL AND OVERRULING AN INCONSISTENCY DETERMINATION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION FOR THE HAUQIANG WEI TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (TSM21-0001) (APN 030-200-100) WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Huaqiang Wei, filed an application with Department of Development Services in early 2021 for a Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM21-0001) to subdivide 20.77+/- acres into 108-110 single family residential lots; and WHEREAS, said map was referred by the Department of Development Services to the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for review and comment; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing of ALUC was held on February 17, 2021; and WHEREAS, ALUC made a determination that the project was not consistent with the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Oroville Municipal Airport solely on the ground of safety concerns because a portion of the project was within the ALUCP B2 Compatibility Zone which only allows one dwelling unit per five acres. ALUC also determined that the project was otherwise fully consistent with the ALUCPfor the Oroville Municipal Airport in regards to noise, airspace protection, and overflight concerns; and WHEREAS, the Department of Development Services then referred the project to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 22, 2023, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's appeal relatedto ALUC's finding of inconsistency and voted to recommend denial of the project by a 4-0-1 vote; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 2023, the applicant filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of TSM21-0001 with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 25, 2023, the Board of Supervisors considered the Planning Division's staff report, the applicant's appeal, all related evidence, and testimony on the proposed project, at which time the Board of Supervisors passed a motion of intent to grant the appeal and support the overrule by a vote of 4-1; and WHEREAS, at a continued public hearing on December 12, 2023, the Board of Supervisors considered two comment letters on the proposed findings for the overrule from the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission and the Aeronautics Program of the CalTrans Division of Transportation Planning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Butte County Board of Supervisors hereby takes the following actions based upon the following findings: I. Approves and accepts the appeal of the applicant regarding TSM21-0001 and ALUC's finding of inconsistency; and 11. Determines that TSM21-0001 is fully consistent and compatible with the ALUCP for the Oroville Municipal Airport in regards to noise, airspace protection, and overflight concerns, based upon the February 17, 2021, ALUC's determination on those subjects, the Planning Division's staff report datedJuly 25, 2023, and evidence and testimonyfrom the applicant presented on July 25, 2023; and III. Hereby overrules ALUC's determination that the project does not fulfill the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code section 21670 et seq.) and is not consistent with the ALUCP in regards to safety concerns in the proposed location. IV. The Board of Supervisors also makes the following findings of fact 1. There is an extreme deficit of housing available in Butte County to meet the needs of the public. The Department of Development Services has calculated that there is a deficit of over 4,000 dwelling units in unincorporated Butte Countyto meet the needs of the public. 2. TSM21-0001 will provide approximately 108-110 single family residences to help meet housing needs. 3. It has been a long time (2004) since a large subdivision of this size has been proposed in Butte County. 4. The Thermalito Water and Sewer District has analyzed its water and sewer capacity and has issued "will serve" letterto the applicant to serve all108-110 singlefamily residences on the project site with water and sewer. 5. Allowing this project to proceed will promote the efficient use of scarce residentially - zoned land. 6. The project site is the last large vacant parcel in this location and is surrounded virtually on all sides by similar existing residential land uses, all but one of which were built prior to adoption of the ALUCP. 7. It is economically infeasible for the applicant to develop a portion of the site at only one dwelling per five acres to comply with the density requirements of the ALUCP's B2 Compatibility Zone. 8. Adoption of the overrule findings is the only fair, timely and cost effective way to allow the applicant to continue processing TSM21-0001 and be able to reasonably utilizethe siteto build housing to help meet Butte County's severe housing shortage. 9. The ALUCP is intended to promote compatibility between the airports in Butte County and the land uses that surround them. As indicated in the State Aeronautics Act, the ALUCP has the following purposes: i. To "... provide for orderly development of each public airport and the area surrounding these airports as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards ..."and ii. To " ... protect public health, safety and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of the airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses." 10. The following findings of fact promote the goals and objectives of the State Aeronautics Act and provide substantial evidence supporting the overrule findings for the project. i. Safety: Defined as the protection of people on the ground and in the air from excessive risks to safety from aircraft accidents. 1. The ALUCP evaluates the risk that potential aircraft accidents pose to lands and persons around the Oroville Municipal Airport in terms of where aircraft accidents are likely to occur near the airport and the potential consequences of such accidents in various locations. 2. Approximately 50 percent of the project site is located within the ALUCP B2 Compatibility Zone on the northeast side of the airport. (ALUCP, Compatibility Factors Map: Safety, Exhibit 6-5.) Fifty-five lots of the 108-110 lots in the subdivision would be located in the B2 Compatibility Zone. The ALUCP density criteria for the B2 Compatibility Zone is 0.2 dwelling units per acre or one home per five acres of land. This is a dramatic reduction from what the underlying Medium Density Residential General Plan and zoning designations which would allow up to 6.0 dwelling units per acre in this location. (ALUCP, General Plan Land Use, Exhibit 6-9.) Abiding by that requirement would reduce the number of dwelling units on this 10 acre portion of the 20-acre site, down from 55 lots to two lots. The applicant testified that such a loss of approximately 50% of the project site to development makes the project economically infeasible to build because of the inability to amortize infrastructure costs over enough dwelling units to earn a reasonable rate of return on investment. 3 3. The ALUCP, Compatibility Factors Map: Safety, Exhibit 6-5, also includes six different CalTrans Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (CALUPH) safety zones on and around the Oroville Municipal Airport. The applicant's entire 20-acre site is shown as being within the CalTrans "Safety Zone 6 —Traffic Pattern Zone" (TPZ). This is the lowest risk zone. In the TPZ, the safety "risk level is low" such that "no limits" at all are recommended for "maximum residential densities" or for "average number of dwelling units per gross acre." (CALUPH, Figure 4-G, Safety Zone 6—Traffic Pattern Zone, p. 4-25.) Thus, the underlying General Plan and zoning density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre would be allowed under the CALUPH because they pose no excessive safety hazards in this location. 4. THE ALUCP and CALUPH both also recognize that "infill development" should get special, less restrictive treatment in the B2 Compatibility Zone. The applicant's site is virtually surrounded entirely by existing residential development and it is largely an island of vacant "infill" land, surrounded by 10 existing mostly built - out residential subdivisions, with names including Sherwood Estates, Calle Vista, Ghianda Heights, Upshaw Subdivision, Abercrombie Tract, Vista Del Oro Subdivision and four other un- named residential developments, all but one of which were approved and constructed prior to adoption of the ALUCP. 5. Under ALUCP Policy3.7.3, "Infill Project development of similar land uses may be allowed to occur in that area even if the proposed land use is otherwise incompatible with respect to compatibility criteria for that location." Similarly, CALUPH Policy 4: Infill agrees, "Where land uses not in conformance with the criteria set forth in the ALUCP exist at the time of the plan's adoption, infill of similar land uses may be allowed to occur in that area [later] even if the proposed new land use is otherwise incompatible with respect to the [ALUCP] compatibility criteria for that location." (CALUPH, Table 4F: Safety Compatibility, p. 4-34.) 6. Under the ALUCP, infill projects are "only permitted in Compatibility Zones B2 and C." Finding: The applicant's site is located exclusively within Compatibility Zones B2 and C. (ALUCP Policy 3.7.3(a).) 7. Under ALUCP Policy 3.7.3 (b), in order to qualify, infill development is required to meet the following requirements: 4 (a) Already be served with streets, water, sewer and other infrastructure. Finding: Paved streets access the site from two sides. Thermalito Water & Sewer District issued the applicant a "will serve" water and sewer assurance letter in 2020. Electrical power lines also abut the site; (b) Have at least 65% of the site's perimeter bounded by existing uses similarto, or more intensive than, those proposed. Finding: The site is 100% surrounded by existing residential land uses; (c) Be no largerthan 20 acres. Finding: "Net" developable acreage is less than 20 acres —the CALUPH on pages 4-27 says that for smaller sites like this "net" is the appropriate measurement; (d) Not extend the perimeter of the In -Fill Project areas defined by the surrounding uses. Finding: The site is an island parcel in the middle, not on the periphery, so it cannot extend the perimeter; (e) Cannot have been previously set aside as open space. Finding: The site has not been set aside; and (f) Must be consistent with the Local Agency's zoning regulations governing the existing, already developed, surrounding area. Finding: The site proposes 5.5 dwelling units per acre, less than the allowed 6.0 dwelling units per acre, and is very similarto the existing subdivisions surrounding the site. Conclusion: Under both the ALUCP and CALUPH, the project site qualifies as infill development and may be developed at densities similar to existing surrounding residential densities which include Medium Density Residential, and more intense, higher density Medium to High Density Residential zoning. ii. Furthermore, the ALUCP also requires retention of a 75 x 300-foot "open land" emergency aircraft landing area somewhere within the entire B2 Compatibility Zone. Finding: Because there are multiple open land areas of this size or larger remaining elsewhere in the B2 Compatibility Zone as shown on various ALUCP maps, no open land needs to be reserved on the project site. (ALUCP, Chapter 4.3, pp. 3-17 to 3-18.) V. California Environmental Quality Act review of the proposed overrule of ALUC's determination is not required because the action does not constitute a project. (Public Resources Code section 21065.) VI. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, based upon substantial evidence in the administrative record, the Board of Supervisors hereby finds that development of TSM21-0001, as proposed, provides for the orderly development of the Oroville Municipal Airport and the area surrounding the airport and promotes the overall goals 5 and objectives of California airport noise standards, and does adequately protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public on the ground and in the air while ensuring the orderly future expansion of the airport by the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around the airport to the extent that those areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses, all in compliance with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act. PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe Butte County Board of Supervisors on December 12, 2023, bythe following vote: AYES: Supervisor Connelly, Durfee, Ritter and Chair Kimmelshue NOES: Supervisor Teeter ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None rod Kimrr Butte Cou ATTEST: Andy Pickett, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board of Sup ery sors y: k i, ( , 1 Deputy hue, Chairperson Board of Supervisors