Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard Correspondence - 12.10.24From:John S. To:Clerk of the Board Subject:3.9.a CSA 82 Stirling sewer Date:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:48:50 AM .ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. Many homes in Stirling City are on lots too small for onsite wastewater. The shared septic system is essential for the continued habitation of these residences and the survival of the town. Residents recognized this by voting in favor of year-after-year service fee increases to keep the system operating. Since that was what the state demanded in exchange for one-time funds to replace failing infrastructure, a commitment the state now prefers to evade. While this loan forbearance provides necessary short-term relief, the county should press for a long-term solution to keep this tight-knit historic community viable. John Stonebraker Upper Ridge Community Council .ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:BOS Cc:Daneluk, Paula; Nuzum, Danielle Subject:Public Comment - FW: BOS meeting comments Date:Monday, December 9, 2024 5:01:59 PM Attachments:Signature.png Proposed Tuscan Ridge Development.pdf Please see public comment for item 5.2. From: Allen Harthorn <allen@buttecreek.org> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 4:58 PM To: Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net> Subject: BOS meeting comments Comments on the Tuscan Ridge (Windy/Fiery Ridge) proposed development. -- Proposed Tuscan Ridge Development Comments submitted to the Butte County Supervisors by Allen Harthorn, resident of Butte Creek Canyon 12/09/2024 Public Notice Although the County has utilized the required noticing of neighbors as to the progress of this plan, it appears that there is a serious lack of “early and frequent communication with affected citizens and stakeholders”. The entire communities of Paradise, Magalia and the rest of the communities above this project have not been involved in this planning process. The fact that there was no Public Comments submitted prior to the Planning Commission meeting is a clear indication that the County and the Sponsors of the project have failed to communicate the issues with affected citizens and stakeholders. From the Land Use Element of the General Plan: Scenic Highway The Skyway is a Scenic Highway as designated by the General Plan. Much of this project is in the 350 foot zone of the SH designation. It would seem that building a mini city next to the Scenic Highway is inconsistent with the General Plan. The topography of the land is such that any attempted to hide this project would be futile. Water The current well on the site is not considered to be adequate for the project as there is no backup system. The suggestion that Paradise Irrigation District may bring a pipeline of potable water many miles