Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.3 - Chris Rauen - Public Comment - FW_ Written comments for agenda item 5.3 - Board of Supervisors.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:BOS Cc:Daneluk, Paula; Nuzum, Danielle Subject:Public Comment - FW: Written comments for agenda item 5.3 - Board of Supervisors Date:Monday, May 12, 2025 11:22:54 AM Attachments:Strategies - Overview.pdf Upper Ridge Community Plan - Magalia Center.pdf Planning Commission - Analysis.pdf Magalia Center Map.pdf Public Comment for 5-13-25.pdf Please see Public Comment received below for item 5.3 on the agenda. From: c_rauen@comcast.net <c_rauen@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2025 8:17 AM To: Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net> Subject: Written comments for agenda item 5.3 - Board of Supervisors Hi Melissa, please confirm that you've received this. Many thanks for your help, Chris To the Board of Supervisors: Written Comment for Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Item 5.3 – Rezone of Magalia Center / Lakeridge Parcels There are several things within this rezone and land use recommendation that you are being asked to approve. I want to voice my opposition to one item: the request by the Paradise Recreation and Park District to change the zoning of parcel # 066-340-005, the 1.26 acre parcel referenced in your agenda packet, from Mixed Use (MU-2) to Public. This is located on Lakeridge Circle, in the Magalia Center area referenced in this item. First, the process with this request was poorly executed. The Planning Commission meeting on February 27 was intended to recommend for your approval, a zoning change of many parcels on Lakeridge Circle and Old Magalia from the old designation of Retail/Commercial to Mixed Use or MU-2, to meet the strategies set forth in the Upper Ridge Community Plan to permit greater opportunities for affordable housing, retail or a mix of both, which you adopted as part of the overall General Plan 2040. Those of us who worked on and gave input to this plan support this zoning and land use change. On February 26, *one day prior to this meeting,* the District Manager at PRPD submitted a letter to the Planning Commission to include the rezoning of this one parcel from MU-2 to Public. There was no notice of this change to the agenda and no public outreach, and should not have been placed on the agenda in that manner. To correct this, the Planning Commission did schedule a re-hearing for the entire item on March 24, including the District’s request with it, and it was duly noticed, however such notices are only mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site in question. No one lives within 300 feet of this location, therefore very few people who actually reside in Magalia received the notice which limited the opportunity for residents to speak in favor or against this agenda item. This request from PRPD should never have been included in this rezone recommendation – it is an incongruity and does not belong in a package with a completely separate focus in mind. This brings up the second point of opposition: does the recommended rezone of the 1.26 acre parcel from Mixed Use to Public actually meet a specific strategy outlined in the Upper Ridge Community Plan? Does it meet the goals and intent of the hundreds of Magalia residents who participated in the process? The Planning Commission states that all of the changes recommended in item 5.3 support the land uses anticipated under the Upper Ridge Community Plan. In the case of 066-030-005, it does not. When I worked with the consultant and other community members to provide input on the URCP, at no time did any of us state that we were in favor of rezoning any parcels in Magalia, from its current zoning & land use to Public, and no such consideration would ever have been given to Magalia Center. Nor does any such strategy appear in the plan, or in the documentation that has been supplied to you by the Planning Commission. Many of us did express a general desire for greater recreational opportunities, and all existing and proposed recreation projects at the time were included in the plan. PRPD purchased the parcel on January 1, 2022. The Upper Ridge Community Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 2023. If the park district was planning to use the parcel for park amenities, why did they wait 3 years to request a rezone, after the final URCP plan had been approved and incorporated into the General Plan 2040? Attachments: 1. Please refer to the attached overview page from the Planning Commission, which shows that the zoning and land use change from Commercial to MU-2 does align with Strategies LU-2.5 and LU-2.6 in the Upper Ridge Community Plan. However no strategies are cited for the redesignation and rezoning of land from MU-2 to Public. Only a broad reference to supporting “the creation of additional parklands.” I support this as a broad goal, but this was not asked for by the participants in URCP who desired to have the Lakeridge Circle parcels specifically be set aside for retail and housing. The park has been in design stage for years utilizing land that was previously owned or leased by the district, with most versions excluding the 1.26 acre parcel. This type of request runs counter to the will of the people who participated in the Upper Ridge Community Plan process and approving this will set a bad precedent. It sends the message that it’s OK to amend a plan after it has already been approved as fixed and final. 2. Please refer to pages 3-4 through 3-11 of the Upper Ridge Community Plan. These pages show the community supporting the rezone of the parcels on the east side of Lakeridge Circle to Mixed Use to accommodate and encourage new types of housing and retail. The proposed Lakeridge Park is already accounted for here and the proposed site is already zoned Public, just east of the parcels on Lakeridge Circle, in addition to one single lot the district purchased in 2010 to gain access to the new park. The plan does NOT refer to the 1.26 acre parcel that is the subject of this proposed rezone from Mixed Use to Public. That parcel was designated for housing & retail, along with many other parcels on the east side of Lakeridge Circle, not additional parkland. 3. Attached is a map showing the proposed zoning and land use changes. The brown shaded parcel outlined in yellow is the 1.26 acres in question, which should remain mixed use to be consistent with the zoning of the property around it and the Upper Ridge Community Plan. 4. The 1.26 acre parcel was also the only lot that had active retail and housing prior to the Camp Fire. Photo attached as it appears today. Retail and mixed use properties are of great value to us in Magalia, as there are few buildable sites on the Upper Ridge where this type of development would work. Magalia Center is the heart of our “downtown” where we are working to help promote & stimulate economic & housing recovery. Rezoning a parcel in this region from MU-2 to Public makes it very difficult to ever have the property re-zoned back to MU-2 again, and Public zoning will significantly decrease its property value (the parcel was purchased by the district for $100,000). Further, based on the latest park design the intended use of this parcel has been for a parking lot. A land use change & zoning change is not required for a parking lot. This land currently has a parking lot and three septic systems of unknown condition. There have been multiple versions of the park design, all of them excluding this parcel except the most recent one. There is no evidence in any of the documentation provided by the district or the planning commission that park construction cannot move forward if the zoning is left as is. I respectfully ask that the Board of Supervisors vote “no” on this resolution, or if possible, an amended version approving the re-zone and change of land use of all parcels as recommended with the exception of # 066-340-005, which should not be rezoned from MU-2 to Public. Regards, Chris Rauen, Magalia Resident & Participant in the Upper Ridge Community Plan