HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.28.25 Board Correspondence - FW_ Speak up for humanity!From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Speak up for humanity!
Date:Monday, September 29, 2025 10:46:49 AM
Please see Board Correspondence -
-----Original Message-----
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2025 2:38 PM
To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Soderstrom, Monica
<msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov;
davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <DA@buttecounty.net>;
Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill
<BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet
<julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa
<mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <pdurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>;
Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa
<CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board
<ClerkoftheBoard@buttecounty.net>
Subject: Speak up for humanity!
.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
Public Record
The Nuremberg Effect
The Nuremberg Effect refers to the profound shift in global consciousness following the post–World War II
Nuremberg Trials, where high-ranking Nazi officials were held accountable for atrocities despite claiming they were
“just following orders.” This precedent dismantled the age-old defense of superior orders, establishing that
individuals bear personal responsibility for their actions, even within hierarchical systems like militaries or
governments. It marked a turning point in international law, influencing the creation of bodies like the International
Criminal Court and embedding ethical accountability into legal frameworks worldwide. In essence, the effect
underscores that moral agency cannot be outsourced, forcing societies to confront how ordinary people can commit
extraordinary evils under the guise of compliance.
A key figure in shaping the ethical legacy of the Nuremberg Trials was Leo Alexander, an Austrian-American
psychiatrist and neurologist who played a pivotal role as a medical advisor during the proceedings. Alexander was
instrumental in drafting the Nuremberg Code, a set of ethical principles for human experimentation that emerged
from the Doctors’ Trial, where Nazi physicians were prosecuted for their horrific medical experiments. His work
emphasized the necessity of informed consent and the moral responsibility of individuals, particularly in the medical
and scientific fields, to prioritize human dignity over blind obedience to authority. Alexander’s contributions
extended beyond the courtroom, as he later warned about the dangers of dehumanizing practices in medicine and
society, reinforcing the Nuremberg Effect’s call for personal accountability.
Contemporary Relevance
Today, the Nuremberg Effect reverberates far beyond courtrooms, infiltrating discussions on corporate ethics,
military conduct, and everyday decisions. From whistleblowers exposing corporate malfeasance to debates over AI
accountability in warfare, it serves as a cautionary reminder against passive complicity. In an era of rising
authoritarianism and algorithmic decision-making, invoking this effect challenges us to question orders that violate
human rights, fostering a culture where individual conscience triumphs over institutional pressure.
When friends and family claim that Nuremberg does not apply to contemporary issues, such as mandatory policies
they view as benign, remind them that the core lesson is timeless: blind obedience enabled historical atrocities, and
rejecting it today prevents similar complicity in modern ethical dilemmas, whether in governance, medicine, or
technology.
While the Nuremberg Code specifically addresses medical experimentation without consent, the broader Nuremberg
Effect encourages scrutiny of any authority that demands unethical compliance. Ultimately, it teaches that history’s
darkest chapters were enabled not just by villains, but by the silent enablers who chose obedience over outrage.
Shadows of the Past in Modern Medicine
In the shadow of the Nuremberg Effect, reports of unusual fibrous clots—long, white, rubbery structures unlike any
seen in decades of embalming practice—has ignited a modern reckoning with medical accountability. Funeral
professionals, including embalmers like Richard Hirschman, have documented these anomalous formations since
early 2021, often stretching several inches (MAYBE MORE) and resistant to standard chemical dissolution. These
findings coincide strikingly with the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, prompting questions about whether
experimental interventions could be contributing to widespread vascular harm.
diana dreiss