The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09.23.25 Board Correspondence - FW_ Revisiting Vaccine Biodistribution_ A Response to Dr. Jake Scott.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Revisiting Vaccine Biodistribution: A Response to Dr. Jake Scott Date:Tuesday, September 23, 2025 4:57:36 PM Please see Board Correspondence - From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 10:57 AM To: pcbs@countyofplumas.com; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <DA@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <pdurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <ClerkoftheBoard@buttecounty.net> Subject: Fwd: Revisiting Vaccine Biodistribution: A Response to Dr. Jake Scott Public Record diana dreiss Begin forwarded message: From: The Bolus Theory Series <covidmythbuster@substack.com> Date: September 23, 2025 at 8:08:21 AM PDT To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: Revisiting Vaccine Biodistribution: A Response to Dr. Jake Scott Reply-To: The Bolus Theory Series <reply+2vn8g2&kcryl&&5fa2aa5e856cec3d76de7927bf44535fb78e533d8ef8e54030cd52999ca595e3@mg1.substack.com> Unpacking the Intravascular Realities of Intramuscular Injections͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ Forwarded this email? Subscribe hereRevisiting Vaccine Biodistribution: A Response to Dr. Jake Scott Unpacking the Intravascular Realities of Intramuscular Injections MARC GIRARDOT SEP 23 READ IN APP The Bolus Theory Series is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, consider becoming a paying member or a founding member. Upgrade to paid After an interview with Dr. Tenpenny yesterday¹, I responded on X to a statement by Stanford Infectious Disease Professor, Dr Jake Scott - notably known for being schooled by Senator Ron Johnson on mRNA technology. What was Dr. Scott’s statement that caught my attention? Sadly, he erased not only his statement, but his entire X-account immediately after I posted my response… Dr. Scott contended that intramuscular vaccines stay in the muscle and migrate to the lymph node! Evidently, it immediately started a storm of comments as the Acuitas distribution study frontline, was not more transfected than other lymph node² consolidating that reality. Interestingly, I had been working on this topic for this t article over the weekend, and had drawn a few graphics that I thought would help you all understand better how vaccine and other injectables actually end up going intravascular each time, and why the outcome varies so widely. I have added these helpful images to the Tweet’s original text for educational purposes, and believe the article is more accessible and effective than the article I had started, so here is my response: ” Dr. Scott, Respectfully, you are 100% wrong and utterly uninformed: the vaccine doesn't stay in the muscle, and not much goes into the lymph node. It goes directly into the blood stream at random speeds, random concentrations, and random destinations. Effectively, it's a Russian roulette. Let me explain why. It's unequivocal as it's basic physics. When you insert a needle into a muscle, the needle will inevitably severe a multitude of blood vessel most capillaries, but also larger veinules and arterioles, and occasionally veins (like the cephalic vein³). When the vaccine fluid is injected into the muscle, it will expand in the interstitial tissue. The Law of pressure gradients dictate that the fluid as it expands, will reach low pressure blood vessels that have been severed, and will be injected directly into the circulatory system. This will cause a primary bolus of highly concentrated LNPs to go the right heart chambers, then the lungs, the left heart chambers, the aorta and the rest of the body. By my calculation, this early bolus has an instantaneous concentration 300,000 times higher than the peak concentration obtained after 2 hours when much of the dose is disseminated into the body. A small vessel of 0.1 millimeter distant of 1 mm of the tip of the needle, not an uncommon scenario, produces an instantaneous bolus of 26 million cytotoxic particles, with the theoretical power to destroy 350 sq.cm. of endothelium! Once this first bolus passed, another longer bolus will migrate to the holes pushed by the reaction of the muscle fascia to the abnormal pressure caused by the dose. The speed, and therefore the concentration of the secondary bolus intravascularly will be dictated by the largest hole. Both the Acuitas pharmacokinetic study and similar pharmaco kinetic studies (notably with epinephrine) show most of the dose goes IV within an hour, mostly in the first 20-30 minutes as the speed of leakage drops with pressure decrease. The percentage of the dose staying in the muscle is only dictated by the proportion of interstitial fluid that leaks. If the largest leak is located at the extreme end of the dose expansion, or even further away, indeed a greater portion of the dose will remain in the muscle. But, if the greater hole is close to the tip of the needle, all the dose will go IV. No matter what, all IM injections have an IV part. So much so that every vaccinated had leaky heart capillaries ( Nakahara et al. / Buergin et al.) even if transiently that's a very bad sign. One can extrapolate that every vaccinated had leaky capillaries in larger organs like the brain, the ovaries, the gut, the kidneys... The reality is that the intravascular injection is (delivering) tens of billions of cytotoxic (by proxy) LNPs in a: - non standardized - non calibrated - non route-compliant - non destination-compliant way. Feel free to reach out to me if you want to understand how this flaw in delivery protocl can create thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, calcification, fistulas, aneurysm, white clots, necrosis, leaky blood-tissue barriers, cancers and genetic disorders. #BolusTheory @ClareCraigPath” I hope you found this brief article interesting, and you now have a clearer view as to the inevitability of invisible intravascular injections when injecting in muscles. With ACIP '(Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) opening up the floor and asking questions about biodistribution, I hope Bolus Theory will get not only more visibility from the media and from investiagtors, but a more open and less adversarial mindset. It’s unfortunate that Dr. Scott refused the debate, because he’s not alone in thinking that delivery are not the problem. Most of the medical world has pushed aside without the very idea, even if repeatedly studies on animals have validated it. On the personal front, as I said in my last article, we moved out of Paris. My family is away from me, and I try to support them as much as I can with the little money I get from Substack. I am alone in a remote location in Southern France. As you can see from the material, I am not iddle, I am working actively 7 days a week to advance the Bolus Theory, to improve the message, to continue my understanding, and to communicate. Feel free to support my work and my family in any way you can. I continue to drive forward and help people. Feel free to reach out directly or in the comments. Love, Marc Upgrade to paid 1 It should air in a few weeks. 2 “Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning” by Luo et al. - Reference 3 “The clinical anatomy of the cephalic vein in the deltopectoral triangle” by Loukas et al. - Reference You're currently a free subscriber to The Bolus Theory Series. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 Marc Girardot548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 Unsubscribe