HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.21.25 Board Correspondence - FW_ Bombshell_ Cardiologist Links COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer in the British Royal Family - King Charles III & Princess of Wales.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Bombshell: Cardiologist Links COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer in the British Royal
Family - King Charles III & Princess of Wales - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on
Globalization
Date:Monday, September 22, 2025 9:37:43 AM
Please see Board Correspondence -
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2025 8:53 PM
To: pcbs@countyofplumas.com; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>;
Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov;
davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney
<DA@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy
<APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug
<DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie
<mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter
<pdurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose
<Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>;
Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board
<ClerkoftheBoard@buttecounty.net>
Subject: Bombshell: Cardiologist Links COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer in the British Royal Family - King
Charles III & Princess of Wales - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on
Globalization
“A storm of controversy has erupted in Britain after a well-known cardiologist suggested that
COVID-19 vaccines may have played a role in the cancer diagnoses of King Charles III and the
Princess of Wales.
Speaking at the Reform UK political party conference, Dr. Aseem Malhotra said it was “highly
likely” that the shots had been “a significant factor” in the cancers suffered by the pair.
His remarks, which he attributed to information given to him by Professor Angus Dalgleish, one of
the UK’s most eminent oncologists, drew furious reactions from health officials and the
legacy/mainstream media. Yet they also revive some key questions that have never been fully
addressed. In particular, were these vaccines developed so quickly that they essentially formed the
largest medical experiment in history?
When the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out in late 2020, politicians promised they would
be a game-changing solution to the pandemic. With unprecedented speed, new
technologies based on RNA and DNA were rushed to the market. In normal circumstances,
vaccine development can take a decade or more, involving years of rigorous testing for
safety and long-term effects. This time, however, the process was compressed into a
matter of months. Regulatory agencies around the world were pressured to approve the
shots using ‘emergency use’ authorizations, despite the absence of long-term safety data.
Critics warned that this meant gambling with people’s health on a scale never seen before,
but few authorities listened.
Profound Concerns
Dr. Malhotra’s comments bring these issues into sharp focus. If, as he suggests, Professor
Angus Dalgleish, one of Britain’s top cancer experts, truly believes that COVID-19 vaccines
were a contributing factor in the illnesses of two of the most high-profile figures in the UK, it
is not credible to dismiss the matter as a scare story. The king and princess are not
anonymous patients; their diagnoses shocked the British people and were reported
worldwide. For vaccines that were promised to be both safe and effective, even the
suggestion of a link with cancer raises profound concerns that demand serious
investigation, not censorship or ridicule.
Establishment voices have been quick to condemn Malhotra. The British government’s
Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, accused Reform UK of giving a platform to “poisonous
lies,” while a professor from the University of Cambridge derided the cardiologist’s claims
as “pseudoscience.” Pharma-funded charity Cancer Research UK also weighed in,
predictably insisting there is “no good evidence” connecting the vaccines to cancer. But
behind these statements lies a glaring truth: long-term safety data cannot be produced
because the vaccines simply have not existed long enough for such evidence to be
gathered. In other words, when governments and authorities dismiss safety concerns as
“baseless,” what they really mean is that the necessary research has not been completed –
and, if they get their way, it probably never will be.‘
https://www.globalresearch.ca/cardiologist-links-covid-19-vaccines-cancer-british-royal-
family/5900220
diana dreiss