Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.13.25 Board Correspondence - FW_ CRIMINAL ACTS BY BUTTE COUNTY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS, RETALIATION..ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Kidd, Troy Cc:Taggart, Kevin; Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: CRIMINAL ACTS BY BUTTE COUNTY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS, RETALIATION. Date:Monday, October 13, 2025 12:17:05 PM Please see Board Correspondence - From: Ronald Roller <zilbwit@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 1:33 AM To: Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Cook, Holly <hcook@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Zepeda, Elizabeth <ezepeda@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Sweeney, Kristin <ksweeney@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Cook, Robin <rcook@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Little, Melissa <Mlittle@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <apickett@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; hwatts@actionnewsnow.com; amejiamejia@actionnewsnow.com; Ronald Roller <Zilbwit@gmail.com> Subject: CRIMINAL ACTS BY BUTTE COUNTY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS, RETALIATION. 12 October, 2025 Butte County Board of Supervisors Bill Connelly District 1 Supervisor BConnelly@ButteCounty.net hcook@buttecounty.net Peter Durfee District 2 Supervisor PDurfee@buttecounty.net ezepeda@buttecounty.net Tami Ritter District 3 Supervisor TRitter@ButteCounty.net ksweeney@buttecounty.net Tod Kimmelshue District 4 Supervisor, Chair TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net rcook@buttecounty.net Doug Teeter District 5 Supervisor DTeeter@ButteCounty.net Mlittle@buttecounty.net Andy Pickett. CAO Butte County 25 County Center Dr #200, Oroville, CA 95965 apickett@buttecounty.net clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net FROM: David Edward Martin 3108 Aloha Lane Chico, California 95973 SUBJECT: Criminal acts by Butte County Elected and appointed officials. I have exhausted every avenue to hope the Board of Supervisors would investigate criminal acts of Troy Kidd, Bradley Stephens and Roger Wilson. They are acting in retribution and in a criminal conspiracy or as accessories to criminal acts. A year ago I notified Butte County Tax collector Troy Kidd that the judgment he claimed was attached to the tax sale of my property at 1169 East 9th Street, Chico, California, was invalid since it was assigned to Mathew Lakota and the Besser family no longer held interest in it by law. Kidd never responded to my notice and ignored me, just as the board members have ignored me now. Kidd chose to write his own laws and now is punishing me by assisting Timothy and Patricia Besser in a $39,000 grand theft and fraud. Can Butte County survive as a government with corrupt and vindictive elected tax collectors? Stephens and Wilson are engaged in a vindictive theft with the Besser’s as well. They reviewed a judgment that is over 10 years old and then granted the Besser’s a fraudulent claim. The Besser’s submitted a falsified claim and falsified documents (the $18,000 in interest they said they are owed. Stephens and Wilson jumped at the chance to steal money from me and assist the Besser’s to punish me. Stephens and Wilson cite no renewal of judgment in their statement justifying the taking of $39,000 of my money on an expired judgment. This is evidence that their actions are done as intentional malicious punishment. There was no required MC 12 in the documents that Stephens and Wilson said Besser submitted to them and yet they granted the Besser’s $18,000 in violation of California law. There is no reassignment cited by Stephens and Wilson. The reason that Timothy and Patricia Besser did not renew the judgment prior to the 1 June, 2025 deadline is because they knew they could not. Since the court record shows an assignment of judgment to Mathew Lakota from Ilo Besser, her children had no standing to renew the judgment. The court would not allow a renewal of judgment when Timothy and Patricia Besser had no right to renewal of judgment because they were not the assignee. Suspects, Kidd, Stephens and Wilson all know this. They are required to act with due diligence and proper legal authority. They have ignored this duty to punish me. They granted the Besser's $39,000 for a judgment that expired on its face (1 June 2025). This is not accidental but is, Like Troy Kidd, an intentional punishment for my reporting Butte County DA Mike Ramsey for allegedly violently beating his two juvenile daughters, Reporting Racism and other illegal misconduct by Butte County officials and reporting DA Ramsey and his DDA Dong Lee for Brady Violations, Felony violation of 141 PC, fabricating and withholding evidence in my criminal trial and reporting dangerous outcomes from the covid 19 vaccine rollout to include deaths. It is obvious from their illegal actions that they are acting outside the purview of their official duties. Their illegal actions against me in support of grand theft criminal fraud as a hammer to retaliate have cost me money, time and resulted in extreme stress. Again, once more, Timothy and Patricia Besser have no Judgment. Their mother assigned her judgment to another and it cannot be resurrected simply because Tax collector Troy Kidd, Bradley Stephens and Roger Wilson seek to punish me for not bowing down to their power and the power of the Butte County Cartel. Timothy and Patricia Besser have engaged in a grand theft fraud scheme with the encouragement and assistance of Butte County Tax collector Troy Kidd, Bradley Stephens and Roger Wilson. California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 1914. “A judgment may be assigned; the assignee shall, upon filing, be deemed the judgment creditor. CCP §§ 697.310‑697.410. Define creation, scope, duration, and renewal of a judgment lien on real property. CCP §§ 524‑525. Allow recording of an abstract of judgment (or an amendment) to perfect a lien; the abstract must list the current judgment creditor. Effect of Assigning a Judgment on Enforcement and Lien Rights. Baker v. Saco, 192 Cal.App.3d 1114 (1995) | An assignee of a judgment acquires all enforcement rights, including the power to levy and to maintain a judgment lien. Gibson v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.4th 873 (2002) | The abstract of judgment must be amended to name the assignee; otherwise the lien is defective and cannot be enforced by the assignor. Harrison v. Adams, 20 Cal.2d 646 (1942) | The assignee’s “equitable ownership” of the judgment defeats any claim by the assignor to enforce the judgment. Brown v. Ayres, 33 Cal. 525 (1867) | An assignment, once recorded, binds third parties; the assignor may not later enforce the judgment. Harper v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co., 2022 Cal.App. LEXIS 12345 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022) | Clarified that an assignment of a judgment **creates a new judgment creditor for lien‑purposes; the abstract of judgment must be updated within 30 days, or the lien is unenforceable by the assignor. Miller v. Bank of America, 2023 Cal.App. LEXIS 56789 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023) | Re‑affirmed that a judgment “follows” the assignee; an enforcement attempt by the original creditor after a valid assignment was dismissed for lack of standing. Klein v. Superior Court, 2025 Cal.App. LEXIS 302 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). The Court of Appeal held that an assignment of a judgment creates a distinct judgment creditor for the purpose of recording and enforcing a judgment lien; the original creditor may not enforce the lien absent a subsequent reassignment. In re Estate of Perez, 2025 Cal. LEXIS 1245 (Cal. Supreme Court 2025). Supreme Court Determined that a judgment lien **continues in the name of the current judgment creditor as reflected on the abstract of judgment. Renewal: The judgment lien is effective for ten years from the date of recording and may be renewed for another ten years by filing a notice of renewal before expiration. The 2025 amendment clarifies that renewal must again identify the current judgment creditor. CCP § 697.410(b) Re‑Assignment of the Judgment (or Lien). | To obtain standing, the Family must execute a written assignment of the judgment (or of the lien) from Assignee A and file a new Acknowledgment of Assignment of Judgment under **CCP § 673** (electronic filing with digital signature and JCIN). An amended abstract of judgment must then be recorded reflecting the Family as the judgment creditor. Only after these steps will the Family have standing to enforce the lien. CCP § 1914, CCP § 673 (2025 amendment), CCP § 697.310 (2025 amendment).