Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.2 - Julie Threet - WHY DID BUTTE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTER 72 ADULT DOSES INTO CHILDREN AFTER MISLABELING THEM AS _PEDIATRIC__.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Julie Threet To:Soderstrom, Monica; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; District Attorney; Kimmelshue, Tod; Pickett, Andy; Connelly, Bill; Teeter, Doug; Waugh, Melanie; Kitts, Melissa; Durfee, Peter; Ritter, Tami; Teri DuBose; Congressman Doug LaMalfa; Stephens, Brad J.; Clerk of the Board; jhutchison@chicoer.com; Beaudoin, Jarett; jolenyn@actionnewsnow.com; Michael Wolcott; mmyers@chicoer.com Cc:Diana Dreiss; Ronald Owens Subject:WHY DID BUTTE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTER 72 ADULT DOSES INTO CHILDREN AFTER MISLABELING THEM AS "PEDIATRIC"? Date:Thursday, October 2, 2025 11:19:16 AM For Public Record and Public Comment. Department. He went to Chico State and is the founder of VAERSAware.com. Here's his latest substack. GO TO HIS WEBSITE AND CHECK ON THE LOT NUMBERS ADMINISTERED BY BUTTE COUNTY. Wait, I did that already as we got a list from FOIA of all batch numbers and doses administered through August 2022. There are DEATHS associated with all lots they pushed into our citizens. Here's the list of PEDIATRIC lots and number of doses ACTUALLY PUSHED INTO OUR CHILDREN. Why are 72 doses listed as "Pediatric" when they are ADULT LOTS PER PFIZER? WHO IS ASKING QUESTIONS OF MONICA SODERSTROM? I will find a lawyer. Julie ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Closed VAERS from WelcomeTheEagle’s Substack <welcometheeagle@substack.com> Date: Thu, Oct 2, 2025, 8:38 AM Subject: Expanding On Dr. Jessica Rose's Observation of Malignant Neoplasm Reveals Manufacturer Collusion w/ CDC! To: <julie4butte5@gmail.com> Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Expanding On Dr. Jessica Rose'sObservation of Malignant NeoplasmReveals Manufacturer Collusion w/CDC! CLOSED VAERS OCT 2 READ IN APP Click to launch Tweet Published on Twitter Oct 2 at 4:09am PST and yes I wake up every morning and go down my list of names to triple check, I discovered something not shocking to me, but will be should be shocking to you! First off, my juices start flowing when I see these simplified graphs and I ask myself what “year” are we talking about? Are we talking about the vax year, recieved year, or published year? Folks should know by now what CDC says and does are always two different things. There is a lot going on in the retweet/response by Rose, but nucleaus of this tweet is this guys question and analysis of about the explosion of “malignant neoplasm” in Finland.: Click to launch tweet It’s easy to see 2025 on this chart, but again the fine print doesn’t specify the type of date? I speculate it’s as ambiguos as when Finland decides to consider “processed” by themselves. I bet these neoplasms could have developed from vaccinations for the last 5 years, but they chose to dump into the public domain now in 2025? I’ll bet the farm on this point! Anywhoo, let’s circle back to Rose and expand on her beautiful yet simple graph and see what else VAERS says. Just grabbing all medDRA containing the word “malignant” I get 1,879 reports for all vax types and location, basically the whole VAERS enchilada… Not the complete list of symptoms Here are those 1,879 by vax type: By Vax Date: By Published Date: Publshed per Medalerts.org and they did not come into existance until 2003, hence some wonking publishing dates in the beginning… By Vax Type Published: Blues are Covid & bivalents, Oranges are basically all other vax types You can see VAERS & VaersAware dashboard is backing up Rose’s graph but with finer granularity. However, there is a few sore thumbs that stick out like all the deaths with an earmarked vax date of supposedly Aug 9, 2023 and a bunch of Bivalent covids that publsihed on Aug 18, 2023. It turns out these are almost exclusively 22 deaths submitted by Moderna manufactuer (Bilavent) all from unknown domestic state location, and MedDRA/symptom code Neoplasm Malignant (10028997): Here are a few example reports, but they are basically boilerplates of the 22 deaths: Check them out for yourself by launching the actual report: 2668670 2668671 2668672 2668673 2668674 2668675 2668676 2668677 2668694 2668726 2668727 2668728 2668729 2668730 2668731 2668732 2668789 2668790 2668791 2669587 Conclusion: We will not have radical transparency without reasonable accountability from the CDC/FDA. I think the manufactuers known what these victims had for breakfast on vax day and death day, but reports the most ambigous report possible to VAERS. VAERS turns around and just dumps & pumps to the public fast. Dr. Rose does a quick sniff and here we are. When can we start asking how organic are these reports? When did Moderna really get these reports and why didn’t VAERS hold them for another week and request additional info from the submitter? This there any internal follow-up since report submitted? There has not been any additional follow-ups reported by VAERS to the public for any other these reports, and only about ~5K covid reports out of 1.6M reports any “follow-up” reports in VAERS, so please stop pulling my leg about radical transparency. God Bless. BTW: The great Kevin McKernan had me blocked for a couple days but somehow he came to senses! Thanks Kevin, I’m glad you put mission before ego. I’ll try better too. God Bless. Subscribed Share SHARE LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 WelcomeTheEagle88 Unsubscribe