The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11.04.25 Board Correspondence - FW_ Misclassification of individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon to mislead the public!!.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Misclassification of individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon to mislead the public!! Date:Wednesday, November 5, 2025 4:27:19 PM Please see Board Correspondence - From: Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2025 10:35 AM To: Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; jhutchison@chicoer.com; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.net>; Michael Wolcott <mwolcott@chicoer.com>; mmyers@chicoer.com; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; hwatts@actionnewsnow.com; news@krcrtv.com; news@actionnewsnow.com; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Blankenship, DeAnne <DBlankenship@buttecounty.net> Cc: Diana Dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com> Subject: Misclassification of individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon to mislead the public!! For Public Record and Public Comment. PLEASE START DEMANDING ANSWERS. You just gave yourselves a huge raise so why not start working for the people instead of big pharma or CDPH? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH MY EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE? Julie Threet 510-358-7520 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jessica Rose from Unacceptable Jessica <jessicar@substack.com> Date: Wed, Nov 5, 2025, 9:57 AM Subject: Misclassification of individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon to mislead the public To: <julie4butte5@gmail.com> If you got 1 dose, you're injected [vaccinated] - a truer representation of MMWR data͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreMisclassification of individuals as“unvaccinated” using antibody jargon tomislead the public If you got 1 dose, you're injected [vaccinated] - a truer representation of MMWR data JESSICA ROSE NOV 5 READ IN APP I spent some time today revisiting the MMWR data for LA county that was published by the MMWR that claimed that most of the people who succumbed to SARS-2 “infection” were “unvaccinated”. I have written about this before as has Norman Fenton et al., and by ‘this’ I mean the improper classification of “unvaccinated” individuals that goes like the following: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e5.htm This is truly insincere and convoluted beyond belief. Read it twice. Or three times. Unvaccinated individuals were dosed. “Unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series OR 1 dose of the single dose vaccine.” Do you understand what they did here? Here’s what their hospitalization in the context of SARS-2 “infection” data look like as reported using this wildly convoluted definition of unvaccinated. Wow! Look! It’s the “unvaccinated” who were hospitalized the most! But seeing as how these “unvaccinated” individuals likely received at least 1 dose, then they were certainly qualify as being “vaccinated”, no? When speaking of hospitalization, we are referring to my ballpark: SAEs, such as hospitalizations reported to VAERS. If one ends up in the hospital shortly after receiving a COVID-19 injection, one MUST consider that this individual as INJECTED, ie: “vaccinated”. Serious adverse events in the context of biologicals are reported to pharmacovigilance databases such as VAERS precisely because they are in the context of a biological product such as the COVID-19 modmRNA-LNP injectable products. The “antibody” 14-day wait period has nothing to do with adverse events and these 2 things - antibody responses and AEs - cannot be confounded. Here’s the data replotted using R side-by-side with this same data replotted considering that 60% of the population of LA county were injected with at least 1 dose by the end of July 2021. The plot of the right is a much more likely accurate representation of the data. You see how the “unvaccinated” black dotted line is lower than the “partially-vaccinated” blue dotted line. This means that individuals who got 1 shot were hospitalized more. And they were. And here’s an even less convoluted representation of the data where we lose the stupid partially-vaccinated classification and simply go with Injected or Uninjected. think that most of the individuals who were hospitalized were “unvaccinated” as is portrayed in the data on the left. This reality seems to be making a comeback so I thought to lay it our really simplistically for everyone. It’s really clear what they did here: they misclassified individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon and entirely misled the public by claiming that most of the individuals who were hospitalized were “unvaccinated”. SHARE LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2025 Jessica Rose jessicarose1974@protonmail.com Unsubscribe