Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01.21.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ _RNA_DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing_ - THIS IS CRIMINAL - THE DNA IS IN THE VIALS.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: "RNA:DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing" - THIS IS CRIMINAL - THE DNA IS IN THE VIALS Date:Wednesday, January 21, 2026 8:08:14 AM Attachments:1000010873.png 1000010874.png 1000010875.png Please see Board Correspondence - From: Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 7:52 AM To: Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; jhutchison@chicoer.com; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.net>; Michael Wolcott <mwolcott@chicoer.com>; mmyers@chicoer.com; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; hwatts@actionnewsnow.com; news@krcrtv.com; news@actionnewsnow.com; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Blankenship, DeAnne <DBlankenship@buttecounty.net>; Kasey Pulliam Reynolds <kasey.reynolds@chicoca.gov>; sheriff info <infosheriff@buttecounty.net>; bbarbosa@actionnewsnow.com; amarsden@actionnewsnow.com; abmiller1@csuchico.edu; lindawb@actionnewsnow.com; edelcarpio@actionnewsnow.com; Jerry Olenyn <jolenyn@actionnewsnow.com>; debbie.presson@chicoca.gov; tom.vanoverbeek@chicoca.gov; jangelo@actionnewsnow.com; mweber@chicoer.com; Krater, Sharleen <SKrater@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Lee, Lewis <lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov> Cc: Diana Dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com> Subject: "RNA:DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing" - THIS IS CRIMINAL - THE DNA IS IN THE VIALS - PLEASE DEMAND THIS PRODUCT BE PULLED FROM BCPH IMMEDIATELY AND PUT PHARMACIES ON NOTICE! Why are you all ignoring this - FOR PUBLIC RECORD AND PUBLIC COMMENT THIS IS HORRIFYING. A new paper published by Jessica Rose, Charles Rixey and Kevin McKernan. https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ima-jim-v02-n01-a04-rna-dna-hybrids-survive-digestion-in-mrna-vaccine-manufacturing.pdf THIS IS ENOUGH TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR FRAUD. And certainly cause you all to immediately demand the COVID vaccine be pulled from Butte County Public Health BEFORE INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE POISONED. Put warnings on your website. ARE YOU READING THIS CHAIRMAN CONNELLY? ARE YOU READING THIS MAYOR REYNOLDS? WHAT ABOUT YOU MELANIE? DID YOU GIVE THIS TO SHERIFF HONEA? DA RAMSEY - WE HAVE BEEN A VICTIM OF FRAUD. DR BEAUDOIN AND MONICA SODERSTROM - What do you read in this study? That this product is SAFE??? ARE YOU READING THIS? Julie Threet Poison Victim 510-358-7520 https://open.substack.com/pub/jessicar/p/rnadna-hybrids-survive-digestion-ff2?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3nvd55 The paper is entitled: “RNA:DNA Hybrids Survive Digestion in mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing”. It was published on January 13, 2026 in the Journal of Independent Medicine1 and it is about DNA being in the nucleoside modified RNA-LNP COVID shot vials (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) - in copious amounts - and it details why it’s in these vials. It verifies our hypothesis that the DNA in the vials escaped enzyme degradation during the production process because the wrong enzyme was used to clean out the DNA at the end of the process. This wrong enzyme called DNase1 could never degrade RNA:DNA hybrids - which inevitably form during the in vitro transcription (IVT) process - and the manufacturers knew this. Here’s a reminder of the modRNA synthesis process used as part of Process 2. The DNA template is the exact complement of the RNA produced (newly synthesized) during the IVT process, so naturally, the RNA strand can politely ask the [non-template strand] from the double-stranded DNA to scooch over to replace it. When the RNA and DNA strands stick together, which they inevitably do, they stick together hard. This is because the N1-methylpseudouridines have a high melting temperature (Tm) and thus require high temperatures to rip apart. They be sticky.2 And, by the way, when I say the manufacturers knew this, I mean it. “The specific activity of DNase I for RNA:DNA hybrids, however, is at least 100-fold below that for dsDNA (Sutton et al., 1997).”34 Wait, what? A BioNTech team published this in July 2024? In fact, all of the authors on this paper worked for BioNTech. I want to remind everyone that this is yet another point during the manufacturing/production process where the manufacturers did more than a big oopsie. Substituting in N1-methylpseudouridines into every single U position (there are 801)5 was a big mistake that lead to many problems such as frameshifting, and as is suggested in our paper, codon optimization for deposition of coding material into humans via LNPs leads to the significant enrichment of GC content.678 The reason that it is so significant that they used DNase1 instead of say, DNase-XT for degradation of potential RNA:DNA hybrids, is two-fold: 1. They knew DNase1 wouldn’t degrade potential hybrids efficiently and that any hybrids would inevitably be packaged into the LNPs, and 2. This would lead to inevitable delivery of these cancer-inducing foreign molecules into the cytosols, and perhaps even the nuclei, of cells. Did they not know the impact of introducing foreign RNA:DNA hybrids to human cells by transfection? Did they not fully understand that R-loops directly cause disease in humans when accumulations occur? R-loops do occur naturally in our cells (mostly during transcription) and can serve physiological roles like aiding gene regulation or replication, but they can also be pathological when persistent (or accumulative) leading to DNA damage (cancer), replication stress, or inflammation.9 So can you imagine - on top of normal ongoing physiological processes - what your poor cells have to deal with when introduced to hordes of these additional foreign molecules. Wouldn’t anyone with half of a brain cell anticipate R-loop accumulation that might lead to disease states like cancer? The other can of worms that our paper clearly describes is how the manufacturers had tests for Spike DNA detection10, but only used tests to find KAN DNA. It’s like “hide the Spike game” - en masse. Except this isn’t a game, is it? A LITTLE ABOUT THE KAN GENE: The KAN antibiotic resistance gene is the gene encoding neomycin phosphotransferase II (never mind) which confers resistance to [the aminoglycoside] antibiotics kanamycin and is often used as a selectable marker in molecular biology plasmids to identify successfully transformed cells → like our infamous E. coli colonies grown on kanamycin-containing media during the N1-modRNA-IVT-synthesis/manufacturing process. As you can see from Figure 1 in our paper, those DNase1 enzymes that they used at the end of the IVT synthesis process did not work on RNA:DNA hybrids. They did, however, work on the other DNA elements from the plasmid that were not designed to produce modRNA - like KAN DNA. DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM? Here’s a quiz for you guys: If you were an evil genius and you wanted to hide high potentially high DNA levels from regulators, what would you do, and what kind of tests would you run, to show low DNA levels? Maybe you even want to show high RNA levels. I’ll give you a big hint: According to a Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) document (Residual DNA Quantitation in Moderna mRNA Vaccines by qPCR), Moderna designed and used a qPCR detection method for KAN DNA.11 They have one for Spike as well, so why didn’t they use it?12 My guess would be because they knew the KAN DNA results would come up low to nil and that way, they could claim that there’s no DNA in the vials. Presto magico! The Moderna SOP-1020 can be found here, and notice that it was written on October 9, 2020. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-09/FOI%205286.PDF This document describes the method used for quantitating residual DNA in Spikevax mRNA vaccines by qPCR. READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE!! I am tired of copying and pasting because you people don't open attachments. Abstract: The process of mRNA vaccine manufacturing relies on proper DNA digestion following an in-vitro transcription reaction to remove residual contaminating DNA from the plasmid backbone from the process. To assess the quality and quantity of potential DNA impurities in mRNA vaccines, we analyzed unopened, cold-chain compliant vaccine lots for residual DNA contamination using quantitative PCR (qPCR), RNase A/Qβubit fluorometry, and Oxford Nanopore sequencing from two Pfizer and three Moderna vials. We compared spike-protein amplicons and plasmid-vector amplicons to distinguish between DNA contaminant as double stranded DNA (dsDNA) versus RNA:DNA hybrids, qPCR assays revealed more than a 100-fold discrepancy in quantitation between dsDNA with RNA:DNA hybrids consistent with uneven DNase I digestion efficiency during mRNA vaccine manufacturing. Indeed, treatment of vaccines with DNase I-XT resulted in 100-1000X higher degradation of spike DNA, particularly in plasmid regions that form RNA:DNA hybrids. Together these results indicate that residual DNA testing which relies on a single qPCR for dsDNA fails to accurately quantify impurities, and that treating vaccine preparations with DNase I-XT during the manufacturing process may improve the quality by reducing contamination due to RNA:DNA hybrids.