Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.06.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ TENNESSEE VAERS NUMBERS SENT TO SENATOR JANICE BOWLING! AND LAST TWO DEATHS WERE IN ARIZONA SO SENT TO REP RACHEL KESHEL.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: TENNESSEE VAERS NUMBERS SENT TO SENATOR JANICE BOWLING! AND LAST TWO DEATHS WERE IN ARIZONA SO SENT TO REP RACHEL KESHEL Date:Friday, February 6, 2026 5:01:41 PM Please see Board Correspondence - From: Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2026 2:49 PM To: Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; jhutchison@chicoer.com; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.net>; Michael Wolcott <mwolcott@chicoer.com>; mmyers@chicoer.com; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; hwatts@actionnewsnow.com; news@krcrtv.com; news@actionnewsnow.com; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Blankenship, DeAnne <DBlankenship@buttecounty.net>; Kasey Pulliam Reynolds <kasey.reynolds@chicoca.gov>; sheriff info <infosheriff@buttecounty.net>; bbarbosa@actionnewsnow.com; amarsden@actionnewsnow.com; abmiller1@csuchico.edu; lindawb@actionnewsnow.com; edelcarpio@actionnewsnow.com; Jerry Olenyn <jolenyn@actionnewsnow.com>; debbie.presson@chicoca.gov; tom.vanoverbeek@chicoca.gov; jangelo@actionnewsnow.com; mweber@chicoer.com; Krater, Sharleen <SKrater@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Lee, Lewis <lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; McGowan, Tom <tommcgowan@countyofplumas.com>; mimihall@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com Cc: Diana Dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com> Subject: TENNESSEE VAERS NUMBERS SENT TO SENATOR JANICE BOWLING! AND LAST TWO DEATHS WERE IN ARIZONA SO SENT TO REP RACHEL KESHEL TO SUPPORT HER BILL! WHY ARE YOU ALL NOT ACTING? I am supporting the legislators brave enough to establish a bill to stop the bioweapon. Arizona and now Tennessee (see Diana's email below). I have sent a draft bill for California to Senator Megan Dahle and Assemblymember Heather Hadwick. I hope they act. Julie Threet On Fri, Feb 6, 2026, 9:20 AM lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> wrote: Public Record “COVID-19 injections would be designated a bioweapons.” diana dreiss Begin forwarded message: From: Jon Fleetwood <jonfleetwood@substack.com> Date: February 6, 2026 at 8:14:45 AM PST To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: mRNA Shots Classified as Weapons of Mass Destruction in New Tennessee Bill: SB 1949 Reply-To: Jon Fleetwood <reply+33e3ug&kcryl&&42cee6f67d271e40fb82e612e8388b852264013f2 b272ac57591cfb92c2c298f@mg1.substack.com>  COVID-19 injections would be designated a bioweapons.͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moremRNA Shots Classified as Weaponsof Mass Destruction in NewTennessee Bill: SB 1949 COVID-19 injections would be designated a bioweapons. JON FLEETWOOD FEB 6 READ IN APP A new bill introduced last month in the Tennessee General Assembly would classify mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction, criminalize their manufacture, possession, or distribution, and impose felony penalties not only on private actors but also on state and local officials who fail to enforce the law. If enacted, the law would take effect July 1, 2026. The legislation, Senate Bill 1949, is formally titled the “mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act” and amends multiple sections of Tennessee Code Annotated, including Titles 8, 14, 39, 40, 53, 63, and 68, to integrate mRNA products directly into the state’s criminal and enforcement framework. The bill was introduced by Sen. Janice Bowling and has already passed first and second consideration in the Senate, where it has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Tennessee joins Arizona and Minnesota in efforts to designate mRNA shots, like the COVID-19 vaccine, as bioweapons. Upgrade to paid Share Share Jon Fleetwood · Follow us on Instagram @realjonfleetwood & Twitter/X @JonMFleetwood. · If you value this reporting, consider upgrading to a paid subscription. · For advertising & sponsorship opportunities reaching 300,000+ monthly viewers, contact us by clicking below. Message Jon Fleetwood mRNA Explicitly Designated as a Weapon of MassDestruction Unlike regulatory or health-policy legislation, SB 1949 places mRNA products squarely inside Tennessee’s criminal code governing weapons of mass destruction. COVID-19 mRNA shots alone have been linked to 38,983 deaths, according to VAERS data—a figure federally-funded Harvard Pilgrim researchers confirm represents as little as 1% of actual adverse events reported to the system, meaning the true number could be closer to four million. The bill declares legislative intent in unambiguous terms: “It is the intent of the general assembly to designate mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction and to prohibit possession or distribution of mRNA injections and products in this state.” This designation collapses the distinction between public health policy and criminal law by treating mRNA platforms not as medical interventions, but as prohibited weapons under state statute. Broad Definition Covers COVID-19 Shots, GeneTherapy, & Nanotechnology SB 1949 defines “mRNA injections and products” expansively, explicitly naming COVID-19 shots and next-generation gene technologies. With respect to COVID-19 injections, the bill defines prohibited mRNA as: “mRNA or modified messenger RNA as related to gene altering agents, with a structure altered by substituting two N-methyl-pseudouridine amino acids for the usual uridine components so as to elude immune destruction of the mRNA, allowing the mRNA that produces the pathogenic spike protein to exist within cells for a longer period of time.” The prohibition also applies to: “Any human gene therapy product for any infectious disease indication, regardless of whether the administration is described as an immunization, vaccine, or otherwise.” And extends further to include: “Nanotechnology or nanoparticles that alter genes and create a biosynthetic cell replication.” The only exclusion carved out by the bill is for: “Naturally occurring messenger ribonucleic acid that is a single-stranded molecule of RNA that corresponds to the genetic sequence of a gene.” Total Prohibition on Manufacture, Possession, orDistribution The bill establishes a new criminal offense making it unlawful to handle mRNA products in any capacity. It states: “It is an offense for a person to knowingly manufacture, acquire, possess, or make accessible to another mRNA injections and products.” No exemptions are provided for: · FDA approval · · Medical practice · Research · Public health programs Mandatory Enforcement—Officials FaceCriminal Exposure SB 1949 removes prosecutorial discretion by imposing affirmative enforcement duties on government officials. The bill makes it a crime: “For a state or local government official to fail or refuse to use all lawful means necessary to investigate or enforce a violation… after being provided with reasonable evidence of a violation.” The statute defines “state or local government official” to include: “The governor, attorney general and reporter, district attorneys general, county sheriffs, and state and local law enforcement officers.” Felony Penalties Tied to Weapons of MassDestruction Statute Violations of either the possession ban or the enforcement mandate are punished under Tennessee’s existing weapons of mass destruction law. The bill provides: “A violation of subdivision (c)(1) or (c)(2) is punishable as a violation of § 39- 13-806.” That statute governs criminal penalties for weapons of mass destruction, placing mRNA products in the same legal category as other prohibited WMDs under Tennessee law. Citizens Granted Standing to Sue the State Like similar legislation introduced in other states, SB 1949 grants private citizens the ability to sue for non-enforcement. The bill states: “A resident of this state may seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and economic, non-economic, and punitive damages from the state or a state and local government official for lack of enforcement of this section.” This provision creates civil exposure for the state and its officials independent of criminal prosecution. Bottom Line Tennessee’s SB 1949 would formally classify mRNA injections—including COVID- 19 shots, gene therapy products, and nanotechnology platforms—as weapons of mass destruction under state law, ban their manufacture and possession outright, mandate enforcement by government officials under threat of criminal liability, and authorize citizens to sue the state for non-enforcement. Like similar legislation introduced in Arizona and Minnesota, the bill represents a direct challenge to the federal regulatory framework governing mRNA products by re-casting them not as medical interventions, but as prohibited weapons under criminal statute. Upgrade to paid Share Share Jon Fleetwood · Follow us on Instagram @realjonfleetwood & Twitter/X @JonMFleetwood. · If you value this reporting, consider upgrading to a paid subscription. · For advertising & sponsorship opportunities reaching 300,000+ monthly viewers, contact us by clicking below. Message Jon Fleetwood Arizona Introduces Bill Classifying mRNAInjections as Biological Weapons, Felonies,and Acts of Terrorism JON FLEETWOOD ·JAN 30 Read full story Minnesota's 'mRNA BioweaponsProhibition Act' Declares COVID-19 Shots'Weapons of Mass Destruction' inLandmark Biowarfare Ban JON FLEETWOOD ·APRIL 22, 2025 Read full story South Carolina Bill Would Ban mRNAShots, Citing DNA Contamination,Shedding, and Fetal Harm: HB 4262 JON FLEETWOOD ·MARCH 28, 2025 Read full story Texas Bill Introduced to Ban Manufactureand Sale of mRNA Products for'Communicable Diseases': HB 3176 JON FLEETWOOD ·FEBRUARY 22, 2025 Read full story Kentucky Introduces Bill to Ban 'GeneTherapy Products' Like COVID-19, Bird FlumRNA Shots—Exempts Treatments forCancer, Genetic Disorders: HB 469 JON FLEETWOOD ·FEBRUARY 13, 2025 Read full story New Montana Bill Would Ban mRNA Shotsin Animals: HB 418 JON FLEETWOOD ·FEBRUARY 12, 2025 Read full story