The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06.26.2024 Board Correspondence - FW_ Environmental and Recreational Compliance Report submitted in FERC P-619-000 by Pacific Gas and Electric Company,et al.From:Clerk of the Board To:Bennett, Robin; Clerk of the Board; Connelly, Bill; Cook, Holly; Cook, Robin; Durfee, Peter; Jessee, Meegan; Kimmelshue, Tod; Kitts, Melissa; Lee, Lewis; Pickett, Andy; Ritter, Tami; Stephens, Brad J.; Sweeney, Kathleen; Teeter, Doug; Zepeda, Elizabeth; Loeser, Kamie Cc:Nevers, Dawn Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Environmental and Recreational Compliance Report submitted in FERC P-619-000 by Pacific Gas and Electric Company,et al. Date:Thursday, June 27, 2024 11:09:53 AM Please see Board Correspondence - -----Original Message----- From: 'FERC eSubscription' <eSubscription@ferc.gov> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 11:55 AM Subject: Environmental and Recreational Compliance Report submitted in FERC P-619-000 by Pacific Gas and Electric Company,et al. .ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. On 6/26/2024, the following Filing was submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Washington D.C.: Filer: Pacific Gas and Electric Company No Organization Found (as Agent) Docket(s): P-619-000 Lead Applicant: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Filing Type: Environmental and Recreational Compliance Report Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits request for authorization to construct recreation improvements at the Grizzly Forebay, part of the Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project under P-619. To view the document for this Filing, click here https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filelist?accession_num=20240626- 5116__;!!KNMwiTCp4spf!A9hgHO65-KwB4SuJbSkfHDleVkrrBaZuEr4M- D72Nm5m3X_5MOUGryFuEncPjqZbcGjHOe3Z0B9JTrX9DA6z_9uT4oLnRsePWalz$ To modify your subscriptions, click here: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ferconline.ferc.gov/eSubscription.aspx__;!!KNMwiTCp4spf!A9hgHO65- KwB4SuJbSkfHDleVkrrBaZuEr4M- D72Nm5m3X_5MOUGryFuEncPjqZbcGjHOe3Z0B9JTrX9DA6z_9uT4oLnRk8_iWF3$ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please do not respond to this email. Online help is available here: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.ferc.gov/efiling-help.asp__;!!KNMwiTCp4spf!A9hgHO65- KwB4SuJbSkfHDleVkrrBaZuEr4M- D72Nm5m3X_5MOUGryFuEncPjqZbcGjHOe3Z0B9JTrX9DA6z_9uT4oLnRvU6Ybbj$ or for phone support, call 866-208-3676. Power Generation 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 28209 Oakland, CA 94604 June 26, 2024 Via Electronic Submittal (E-File) Frank L. Blackett, P.E., Regional Engineer Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Division of Dam Safety and Inspections 100 First Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105-3084 RE: Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 619-CA Authorization Request for Grizzly Forebay Recreation Improvements Dear Frank L. Blackett: This letter presents an application to construct recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay, which is part of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) No. 619. FERC issued a new license for the Bucks Creek Project on June 16, 2022. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) Condition 21 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service’s (Forest Service) section 4(e) Condition No. 55 require the licensees implement the Bucks Creek Recreation Management Plan (RMP). Table 3.1-1 of the RMP identifies the following recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay in license year 1 (2023): Facility Activity Grizzly Forebay Campground - Perform Trail Maintenance - Install Wildlife Resistant Food Lockers - Fuel Treatment Grizzly Forebay Gauging Station Trail - Perform Trail Maintenance Due to significant precipitation and unprecedented snowpack in 2022/2023, access to the Bucks Creek project was restricted until early June which delayed site condition assessments and planning. Due to these constraints, PG&E was only able to implement the following RMP year 1 activities: • Grizzly Forebay Campground: Perform Trail Maintenance and Fuel Treatment • Grizzly Forebay Gauging Station Trail: Perform Trail Maintenance PG&E sought approval from the Forest Service to complete the remainder of the year 1 work (Install Wildlife Resistant Food Lockers) by December 31, 2024, in an email dated May 19, 2023. The Forest Service provided a concurrence email on June 30, 2023 . This was filed with FERC on May 8, 2024. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Frank L. Blackett, P.E., Regional Engineer June 26, 2024 Page 2 In addition to installation of the wildlife resistant food lockers, PG&E is taking advantage of the facility closure and accelerating the RMP implementation schedule to complete the following recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay (originally required in license year 3 - 2026): Facility Activity Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area - Replace restroom - Install signage The wildlife resistant food lockers and bathroom installation are prefabricated with a standard design; therefore PG&E did not have the typical 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design stages. The 100% design package was provided to the Forest Service on June 25, 2024. A Project Description, including 100% design drawings, is provided in Enclosure 1. A Quality Control Inspection Program is included as Enclosure 2. Documentation of initiating Forest Service consultation is provided as Enclosure 3. This project is scheduled for construction from October 1, 2024 through November 15, 2024. Dates are subject to change due to weather, resource availability, and emergent projects in the area. For general questions, please contact Jamie Visinoni, senior license coordinator for PG&E, at (530) 215-6676. Sincerely, Kyle Ingvoldsen Manager, Power Generation Project Engineering Enclosures: 1. Project Description including 100% Design Drawings, prepared by PG&E, and dated June 2024 2. Quality Control Inspection Program, prepared by PG&E, and dated May 2024 3. Forest Service Consultation Record Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ENCLOSURE 1 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION GRIZZLY FOREBAY RECREATION AREA REPLACE RESTROOM PLUMAS COUNTY, CA FERC PROJECT NO. 619 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 3 1. FACILITY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 3 2. DIRECTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 3 3. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................ 3 4. PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................. 4 5. FERC AND DSOD PROCESS ................................................................................................ 4 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................. 5 B. PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................................................................ 6 1. SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................. 6 2. ACCESS, STAGING, LAYDOWN AND SPOILS SITES ................................................................ 7 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL ............................................................................................................... 9 4. FIRE HAZARD PREVENTION ................................................................................................. 9 5. DISPOSAL CLEANUP AND DEMOBILIZATION ....................................................................... 10 6. WORK SHIFT ...................................................................................................................... 10 C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ................................................................................... 10 1. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 10 2. CULTURAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................................... 14 3. EROSION CONTROL AND FUGITIVE DUST ABATEMENT ...................................................... 18 4. WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................................... 19 5. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................... 19 D. PERMITS AND APPROVALS ........................................................................................... 19 1. PERMITS ............................................................................................................................. 19 2. REVIEWS/APPROVALS ........................................................................................................ 20 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location .............................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2: Project Site/Area of Potential Effects .............................................................................. 8 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT DRAWINGS (11X17 REDUCED SCALE) Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 A. BACKGROUND 1. FACILITY DESCRIPTION Grizzly Forebay Dam is a part of PG&E's Bucks Creek hydroelectric system (FERC Project No. 619-CA) in the northern Sierra Nevada. Grizzly Forebay Dam is on Grizzly Creek, a tributary of the North Fork of the Feather River, in Plumas County, about 17 miles west of Quincy, California, as shown on Figure 1. The primary purpose of the project is hydropower generation. The reservoir serves as the forebay for the Bucks Creek Powerhouse and afterbay for the Grizzly Powerhouse. In addition to the dam and spillway, facilities included as part of the Bucks Hydroelectric Project include a power tunnel and two penstocks which convey water to the Bucks Creek Powerhouse. Grizzly Forebay Recreation area is a parking area with 12 single-vehicle parking spaces (including 1 accessible space), 1 single‐unit vault restroom and a boat launch. The recreation facility is located approximately 30 miles northeast of Oroville. The campground is classified as a Forest Service Development Scale 2 campground and within United States Forest Service (USFS) land. See Figure 1 for Project Location. 2. DIRECTIONS From Hwy 70 near Oroville take CA-162 E/Oro Dam Blvd E exit and follow CA-162 E for 1.2 miles. Turn right onto CA-162 E/Olive Hwy, continue onto Oroville Quincy Hwy/Spanish Ranch County Rd for about 54 miles. Turn left onto PNF 36 Rd and continue approximately 5.2 miles. Stay right at the fork and continue for 4 miles. Turn left and continue for approximately 1 mile to the Grizzly Forebay Recreation area parking lot. 3. LAND USE The proposed improvements would be implemented within the existing Bucks Creek Project boundary on possessory parcels of the licensee (SBE Parcels 113-32-012-1 and 113-32-011-1). The Bucks Creek Recreation Management Plan identifies three recreation facilities at the Grizzly Forebay based on the associated activity: Grizzly Forebay Gaging Station Trail, Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area, and Grizzly Forebay Campground. Recent measures implemented at Grizzly Forebay under the Recreation Management Plan include trail maintenance (Grizzly Forebay Gaging Station Trail and Grizzly Forebay Campground) and wildfire fuels treatment (Grizzly Forebay Campground). The current measures would take place in the Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area and Grizzly Forebay Campground as follows: • Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area − Replace Restroom (Including ORAR) Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 − Install Signage • Grizzly Forebay Campground − Install Wildlife Resistant Food Storage Lockers Access to the Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area and the Grizzly Forebay Campground is by way of the existing Grizzly Forebay Access Road (Road 16B in the Plumas Forest/PG&E Road Maintenance Agreement). The Grizzly Forebay Campground may also be accessed by way of the existing Grizzly Powerhouse Access Road (Road 21B in the Plumas Forest/PG&E Road Maintenance Agreement). The Grizzly Powerhouse Access Road is equipped with a gate that is normally locked for safety and security purposes. A temporary gate on the Grizzly Forebay Access Road is proposed during construction activities. No new staging areas or access routes will be required, and no facility expansion is proposed. Some staging is likely to occur at the existing Laydown Area 3 south of Haskins Bay. This is an existing staging/LZ area on licensee-owned land within the existing p-619 license boundary. 4. PURPOSE AND NEED The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a new license for the Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project (FERC 619) on June 16, 2022. As part of the new license, PG&E must complete recreational enhancements to meet license conditions that incorporate State of California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) Conditions and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Service)4(e) Conditions. A Recreation Management Plan (RMP) with a date of October 2019 was submitted in support of the Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project (FERC 619). The purpose of the plan was to describe protection, mitigation and enhancement measures for recreation resources that will be implemented during the license term and document consultation with state and federal agencies regarding the measures. As part of this RMP, PG&E has committed to replacing the existing vault toilet and installing bear resistant food storage boxes. 5. FERC AND DSOD PROCESS FERC issued a new license for the Bucks Creek Project on June 16, 2022. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) Condition 21 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service’s (“Forest Service”) section 4(e) Condition No. 55 require the licensees implement the Bucks Creek Recreation Management Plan (RMP). The Grizzly Forebay restroom replacement and food storage lockers installation are required by the RMP, as such, the project will require FERC authorization. Implementation of the construction Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 project will not require a license amendment or variance request, but upon completion may require updates to the Exhibit R. The planned construction project will not require submitting a project application to DSOD since the project will not affect any dams. 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE Upon authorization of this Project, PG&E’s General Construction Civil crew will perform work as stated in the scope of work section of this Project Description. All work within the scope of this project will take approximately five weeks to complete, and is planned to begin on October 1, 2024. • 1/2 week – mobilize and prep work area • 1 week – demo AC and existing restroom facility • 1 week – excavation and rough grading • 1 week – install new restroom and finish grading • 1 week – concrete flat work • 1/2 week – misc., paint, signs, demob Figure 1: Project Location Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 B. PROPOSED ACTION 1. SCOPE OF WORK The license Recreation Management Plan (RMP) recommends the Grizzly Forebay Recreation area relocate the existing sign, replace the existing restroom, and install bear boxes at existing camp sites. The project scope includes: • Replace existing handicap accessible parking with new concrete accessible parking and loading zone. • Relocate existing information sign. • Remove and replace existing vault toilet. • Install bear resistant food cabinets at walk-in camp sites. It is requested and anticipated that the campground and rest area will be temporarily closed to the public during construction. Although this may cause minor inconvenience to the recreating public, the duration will be relatively short (1 month) and this will ensure the safest means possible for the public and the construction crew. Upon project construction kick off, the constructor will mobilize to the jobsite. A temporary gate will be installed just south of the intersection of Bucks Penstock Rd (24N34) and Grizzly Forebay Rd (24N34A). The gate will be supported by above ground concrete blocks. No ground disturbance nor excavation is required, and gate/blocks will be completely removed at the end of construction. Crews will begin by brushing back any vegetation that is encroaching on the work area. This is anticipated to be only minor trimming and should not require the removal of any large vegetation. Crews will then sawcut the asphalt pavement along the lines where pavement is to be removed. Pavement will be removed with an excavator and loaded into a dump truck. Asphalt pavement spoils will be taken to the nearest aggregate quarry for recycling. Crews will then demo the existing restroom facility per Plumas County decommissioning standards. All trash generated will be placed in an appropriate dump bin and hauled to the appropriate disposal facilities. Using equipment with a box grader and a roller compactor, crews will then use native materials and imported Class 2 AB to bring the jobsite to rough grade. Using an excavator, crews will dig a new pit for the new restroom, per the design drawings. The new restroom will be installed and backfilled per manufacturer’s directions. Crew will then complete subgrade. On top of subgrade the crew will construct and pour the concrete flatwork per plan. After stripping formwork, final grading will be completed, as well as miscellaneous signs, paint markings, etc. The crew will also install new bear proof food storage lockers at the walk-in campground. One locker will be installed at each of the seven camp sites, as shown in the design drawings. Vehicle access is unclear at this time. If vehicle access is not available, Bear Boxes may be able to be transported to the campgrounds on a hand dolly. If the weight of the boxes or access trails do not allow for hand dolly, then the crew will have to fly the Bear Boxes into place with a helicopter. This would be a short one or two day flight for only a few hours to set the boxes in place. Once boxes are in place, the crew will dig a hole and set an anchor post in concrete for each box. When the post concrete cures, the bear boxes will be attached to the posts using manufacturers hardware. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Upon completion, the crew will clean up any residual trash for proper disposal. All residual materials and equipment will be removed from the jobsite In order to complete this scope of work, it is anticipated that the crew will have the following equipment onsite… • Large Tracked Excavator • Sheeps Foot Roller Compactor • Smooth Drum Roller Compactor • 4000 Gal Water Truck • 10 Yard Dump Truck • Flat Bed Trailer • Skip Loader with Grading Box • Misc Concrete Tools • Misc Hand and Power Tools • Small generator and air compressor • 2 to 4 Utility Type Crew Trucks (i.e. F250, F550) Materials onsite may include, but are not limited to… • Concrete • Rebar • Wood Form Boards • Class 2 AB • Prefab Concrete Restroom • Prefab Metal Bear Proof Lockers • Misc Signs and Marking Paint Quality Control – All work described above will be performed by PG&E General Construction and a qualified inspector will be onsite to ensure the Quality Control Inspection Plan (QCIP) is adhered to. The inspector will take photographs which will be incorporated into a scaled back final construction report, if required. 2. ACCESS, STAGING, LAYDOWN AND SPOILS SITES The construction crews will access the jobsite as described above in the Directions section. All access will be on existing roadways, foot trails, etc. No additional work is anticipated for construction access. It is anticipated that all staging will be done at the PGE laydown Staging site 3 (just off Bucks Lake Road near Haskins Bay) and within the parking area of the jobsite. Due to the small size of this job, it is anticipated that the volume/quantity of materials will be low. As described above, all trash/spoils will be properly disposed of or recycled at local quarries. Figure 2 shows the area of potential effects. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Figure 2: Project Site/Area of Potential Effects Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL Traffic control will not be necessary for this work. However, it is anticipated that the Forebay access road and campground will be closed during construction. Advanced signage will be placed on Bucks Lake Road to notify the public that the recreation area will be closed during construction. 4. FIRE HAZARD PREVENTION Site preparation and construction will take place during the normal fire season. The provisions below outline the channels of responsibility for fire prevention and suppression activities and establish an attack procedure. Project personnel will make all reasonable efforts to prevent and suppress wildfires. Fire Prevention Requirements • Burning – No burning will take place on this project. • Welding, air-arc gouging, oxy-acetylene cutting, and grinding of pipe, steel or rebar is referred to as Hot Work. Hot work will be always monitored. Areas where hot work is being performed will be cleaned to mineral soil, and all brush, duff and other organics will be cleared a minimum of 10 feet away. Work pieces will be allowed to cool before being moved and will be cooled before the site is closed each night. Extinguishers will be maintained at all sites where hot work is being performed. • A shovel and a five-gallon supply of water will also be available. A permit is required during the fire precautionary period. • Smoking – Smoking may only be done in vehicles, on roads, or areas cleared to mineral soil for a diameter of at least three feet. • Vehicles and equipment can be ignition sources resulting from hot exhaust sparks, catalytic converters, hot brakes, and vehicle fires. Equipment used on the site will be maintained with spark arrestors as appropriate. Parking and laydown areas will be cleared of grass or other flammable materials. Fire extinguishers will be maintained on all vehicles. Trucks will be fueled at the headquarters and construction equipment will be refueled by a refueling pickup truck at the site. Required Fire Equipment • One shovel, one axe, and one extinguisher U.L. rated 4 BC or more on each pickup, crew truck, and personnel vehicle. • One shovel with each tractor, backhoe, or other heavy equipment. • One shovel and one backpack five-gallon water filled pump with each welder. • One shovel and one chemical pressurized fire extinguisher (fully charged) located at a point not greater than a distance of 25 feet from the work site, for each gasoline powered tool, including but not restricted to chain saws, rock drills, etc. Fire extinguishers shall be of the type and size set forth in the California Public Resources Code Sec. 4431 and the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sec. 1234. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 • Shovels shall be a type “O”, and overall length of not less than 46 inches. Axes or Pulaski’s (Pulaski’s are recommended) shall have a 2 ½ pound or larger head, and not less than 28 inches in overall length. 5. DISPOSAL CLEANUP AND DEMOBILIZATION Following completion of construction activities, the job site will be returned, as much as is reasonably practical, to its original condition. All environmental mitigation measures stipulated by agency approvals and permits will be implemented in a timely manner. All equipment and surplus materials will be removed from the site. 6. WORK SHIFT A five-day work week (Monday through Friday), and 10-hour workday is anticipated. Should the need arise, the crew may increase the work shift to 7 days per week. C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 1. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Numerous projects have been conducted at Grizzly Forebay that have utilized the day use parking area and helicopter pad for staging in recent years. These projects have required environmental surveys for botanical, avian, and amphibian resources on several occasions between 2017 and 2022. In addition, surveys were completed in this area in 2023 as part of license implementation studies. As a result, the biological resources in this area are well documented. Mildred’s clarkia, a sensitive plant, is known to occur in this area, including along the access road and in portions of the campground. These plants were flagged for avoidance during fuel reduction work in 2022. California spotted owl and northern goshawk historically nested near Grizzly Forebay on the opposite side of the reservoir. Surveys in 2023 did not find any California spotted owl or northern goshawk, nor have they been detected in several surveys of this general area in previous years. In May 2024 and active northern goshawk nest was discovered approximately 0.25 miles north of the campground. There is an established bald eagle nest across the reservoir from Grizzly Powerhouse. The bald eagle nest was occupied as of May 7, 2024. However, this work is sufficiently distant from the nest and of relatively low disturbance, so impacts to the nest or the eagles are not anticipated, assuming helicopters are not used in support of the work. If helicopter support is required, this has the potential to impact both the goshawk and the eagle nest. This area is below the elevation occupied by Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog, but within the elevational range of foothill yellow-legged frog. Neither species has been observed here in multiple surveys, including during license compliance studies in 2023. Bat surveys during relicensing found no evidence of bat use at the restrooms. This information suggests that there is limited potential for the project to affect environmental resources with the application of the following avoidance and mitigation measures (AMMs). These AMMs must be implemented in the execution of the project. Contact the Project Biologist Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Larry Wise (Lawrence.Wise@pge.com, 925-588-3931), if compliance with the measures cannot be maintained to determine of alternative measure can be developed. General Protection Measures • Advise the Project Biologist of your planned start date at least three weeks in advance to allow them to coordinate preconstruction surveys. • All employee’s working on the project shall receive environmental training before the start of work. Training will include a review of: 1) pertinent environmental laws and regulations, 2) FERC license requirements, 3) sensitive species with the potential to be observed on site, and 4) the AMMs for this project. All employees shall be present for this training. • No in-water work shall be conducted. • All heavy equipment, vehicles, and activities will be confined to existing access roads, road shoulders, staging areas, and disturbed or designated parking and work areas where conditions allow. Equipment, when not in use, will be stored in upland areas away from all waterbodies. • All equipment will be well maintained to prevent leaks of fuels, lubricants, or other fluids. All equipment and the ground underneath such equipment will be inspected prior to be being brought on site, and daily while on site for evidence of leaks. Any leaking equipment will be removed from the site immediately and repaired before being allowed to return to any PG&E work site. • Vehicles and equipment will not be maintained or refueled in areas where hazardous materials may enter a stream or lake (minimum of 107 ft). • Check underneath vehicles for wildlife prior to moving if to avoid crushing any wildlife that may have taken refuge there. • Extreme caution will be used and all applicable laws and regulations will be followed when handling and/or storing chemicals (e.g., fuel, hydraulic fluid, pesticides, etc.). Chemicals should not be stored near waterways, except within existing Project buildings designated for such storage. All applicable hazardous waste BMPs will be followed. Appropriate materials will be on site to prevent and manage spills. • When possible, activities near wetlands, waterways, or on saturated soils will be conducted during the dry season. If work is necessary during the rainy season, it should be conducted during dry spells between rain events. • Vegetation removal and ground disturbance will not exceed the minimum amount necessary to complete work. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 • Spoil sites will not be located within any waterbodies or aquatic habitat (including meadows) where spoils may be washed back into any waterbodies or aquatic habitat, or where it may cover aquatic or riparian vegetation. • All trash and waste items generated by project or crew activities will be properly contained and removed from the project site at the end of each work day to prevent attracting wildlife to the project area. • Any animal encountered shall be allowed to leave the site on its own. Stop work near the animal and leave the animal alone. Do not harass the animal to get it to leave. If it does not leave, contact the project biologist. Work will not resume until the situation has been resolved to the project biologist’s satisfaction. • Before moving vehicles and heavy equipment, check for amphibians and other wildlife to ensure they are not crushed. • Erosion control materials shall be composed entirely of natural-fiber biodegradable materials within 107 ft of Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog suitable habitat. Geotextiles, fiber rolls, and other erosion control measures shall be made of loose-weave mesh, such as jute, coconut (coir) fiber, or other products without welded weaves. • Synthetic (e.g., plastic or nylon) mono-filament netting will not be used for erosion control or other purposes within 107 ft of Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog suitable habitat to ensure that individuals do not get entangled, trapped, injured, or killed. Nesting Birds • Avoid vegetation removal (e.g., tree removal, brush mastication, and significant tree limbing) during the general nesting bird season of February 1 through August 31. If vegetation removal cannot be avoided during this time, a qualified biologist will conduct a survey for active bird nests within the work area, plus a 500-ft (raptors) and 250-ft (non- raptors) survey area, within 5 days of vegetation removal activities. • Helicopter work has the potential to impact the northern goshawk and bald eagle nests. Helicopter work cannot be conducted prior to August 31, 2024. If helicopter work cannot be avoided prior to this time, monitors with stop work authority will be required for both nests to assess disturbance. Please advise the Project Biologist if helicopter support will be required at least 3 weeks in advance of this helicopter support to coordinate a monitor. Northern Goshawk • Avoid conducting potentially disruptive activities, as indicated below within a 0.25 mile buffer of known northern goshawk nests and/or suitable habitat during their breeding Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 season (Feb 15-Aug 31). Project activities that would trigger the actions described in this measure include: o Helicopter operations involving extended circling or hovering (e.g., >5 min) multiple round-trips, or repeated sling-loading of equipment into a site o Project operations or maintenance requiring blasting o Project operations or maintenance requiring jackhammering in areas with natural to low ambient activity (e.g., light vehicular traffic and small power tools [USFWS 2006]) o Tree-felling (e.g., hazard tree removal) or trimming of woody vegetation requiring extended chainsaw use (e.g., >1 hr) and/or a masticator o Removal of large slides at Project facilities or along Project roads that would require use of heavy equipment (e.g., a backhoe or an excavator) o Ditch and/or culvert cleaning along non-paved (i.e., remote) Project roads extensive enough to require a backhoe • The restroom and parking are outside the 0.25 mile buffer, so those activities may proceed, subject to the other measures included herein. • Bear box replacement may also proceed, in compliance with this condition. • No helicopter use is allowed between February 15 and August 31. If this cannot be avoided, contact the project biologist. Special Status Plants • Special status plants and special status natural communities will be flagged within 100 ft of the work area prior to starting construction activities. Flagged areas will be avoided during construction. If this is not possible contact the Project Biologist to determine appropriate mitigation actions. Pre and post construction monitoring will be conducted to determine if disturbance of flagged resources has occurred. Invasive Weeds • Grade soil stockpiles to match local contours and mulch and/or reseed the disturbed areas with certified weed-free and/or native plant materials (when available, it is preferable to use mulch from on-site materials [e.g., chipped trees/slash] • Use certified weed-free straw/mulch when available. It is preferable to use mulch from on- site materials [e.g., chipped trees/slash]) for all construction, erosion control, or restoration needs. Use gravel and sand from weed-free sources where possible. • Restrict travel to established roads and motorized trails, and avoid traveling through areas with known NNIP occurrences when possible. Use areas known to be weed-free for staging and laydown when possible. If entering or staging within a NNIP infestation cannot be avoided, the Licensees will conduct work in NNIP-free area(s) first and clean equipment (e.g., brush tires and/or undercarriages of off-road equipment) after leaving the infested area(s) as soon as reasonably practical to do so. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 • Topsoil stockpiles that will remain in place for longer than 1 month shall be seeded with native plant seed to maintain soil microbe health and to help prevent the establishment of NNIP. Contact Shannon Johnson (SXDM) for sources of native plant seed. • non-resident off-road equipment (all logging, construction (e.g. excavators, back hoes, graders), and brushing machinery/equipment (e.g. brush hogs, masticators, chippers) will be cleaned/washed (pressure washed) before being brought into the watershed. Equipment will be considered clean when a visual inspection does not disclose soil, seed, plant material, and other such debris. Disassembly of equipment components or specialized inspection tools will not be required. • Notify the Forest Service at least 7 to 10 working days prior to moving off-road equipment on to NFS land to allow PNF the opportunity to inspect any piece of off-road equipment, originating outside the watershed. Bats • A preconstruction survey of the restroom will be conducted to determine if any maternal roosts are present. If a maternal roost is present, contact the project biologist to determine next steps. 2. CULTURAL RESOURCES A cultural resources desktop review was completed to assess the potential for the proposed activity to adversely affect historic properties or previously unidentified or unevaluated cultural resources. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) was covered by a pedestrian surveys conducted in 2015 for the relicensing effort (Cardno 2016). As a result of these surveys, there is one historic property within the APE. The Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Historic District was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places in 2016 (FERC_2014_0806_001). No contributing features of the district are in the APE. There are no additional cultural resources in the APE. The Historic Property Management Plan Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, Plumas County, California, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Project No. 619 (HPMP) provides a management protocol and framework to protect historic properties and manage existing or potential effects for the term of the license, including project activities. Per Section 6.5 of the HPMP, some activities have a very low potential to affect historic properties, including upgrades and improvements to Project facilities that have been formally determined not to meet NRHP eligibility criteria and routine operations and maintenance activities in areas that have been previously surveyed and where there are no historic properties. As this area has been previously surveyed, the project involves minimal ground disturbance, and there are no contributing features Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 of the Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Historic District in the APE, the potential for this undertaking to affect historic properties is very low and is exempt from additional cultural resources review or consultation. Based on the information provided above, there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed activity pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1). Should there be an unanticipated discoveries during project implementation, the process outlined in Section 5.3 of the HPMP will be followed. Treatment of Unanticipated Discoveries Project undertakings, operation, or maintenance, and other activities could expose and damage previously unidentified cultural resources. In addition, previously unknown constituents of recorded cultural resources may become exposed. If such unanticipated discoveries are made, the following steps will be taken: 1. All work in the immediate area will cease and all artifacts left in place until the Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS (or their designee) and PNF Heritage Program Manager, as appropriate, are able to assess and evaluate the find. 2. If the cultural materials constitute isolated material, or an “isolated find” (e.g., less than five unformed-non-diagnostic artifacts per square meter, isolated formed tools, isolated historic items), the Licensees’ (i.e. PG&E) CRS or their designee will document the material as such to current National Park Service (NPS) standards on a Primary Record, and the construction activity may continue without any further consultation. An exception would be for isolated cultural materials or a feature that could be eligible for the NRHP on their own merit following application of the NRHP criteria (for examples: rock art, paleo- period projectile point). 3. If the cultural materials constitute a “site” (e.g., greater than five unformed artifacts per square meter) or an isolated find that may be eligible for the NRHP on its own merit, the Licensees’ (i.e. PG&E) CRS or their designee will document the property to current NPS standards, and the material will be assumed eligible for the NRHP in accordance with 36 CFR 800.13. 4. Following documentation, where feasible, measures will be taken to protect newly discovered sites from further disturbance. The Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS shall consult with the Tribes and PNF, as appropriate, to seek ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential adverse effects. 5. PG&E, as a co-licensee, will notify SHPO and the Tribes within 48 hours of the new site discovery in accordance with 36 CFR 800.13(b)(3). The notification will describe any assessment of NRHP eligibility (either formal or informal) and the recommended actions to be undertaken to resolve potential adverse effects. 6. In accordance with 36 CFR 800.13(b)(3), SHPO and the Tribes will have 48 hours to respond to the notification of a new site discovery. Any response will be taken into account by the Licensees (i.e., PG&E), who will assume lead role as delegated by FERC and coordinate with PNF, as appropriate. If no response is received within 48 hours, PG&E Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 will assume that no comments are forthcoming, that SHPO and the Tribes concur with the proposed actions, and PG&E may proceed with implementing the actions. Following completion of the actions, work in the vicinity of the find may continue. 7. Following completion of all construction activities, the Licensees (i.e., PG&E) shall provide to SHPO, the Tribes, and PNF, as appropriate, and the California Historic Resources Information Center at CSU Chico, a report of the actions that were undertaken during construction activities and copies of all field documentation and consultation. This report will describe in detail the isolated finds and potential historic properties (sites) identified during construction activities, all measures undertaken to resolve potential adverse effects and copies of all consultation documents. Treatment of Human Remains Human remains, graves, and cemeteries that may be encountered during Project-related activities are protected by state and/or federal law. Under federal law, and on National Forest System land, the provisions of the ARPA, AIRFA, and NAGPRA protect human graves, associated funerary objects, and the free expression of Native American religious beliefs. On privately owned lands, the California Health and Safety Code (7050.5, 7051, 7054), and California Public Resources Code CPRC (5097) prohibit damage, defacement, or disinterment of human remains without legal authority, and establish civil and criminal penalties. These statutes are also applicable to anyone who knowingly loots prehistoric or historical Native American and/or other graves. In all cases, human remains and associated funerary objects must be treated with respect. Sensitivity toward all interested parties is essential whenever human remains are concerned. For all Project-related activities, the general policy shall be strict avoidance of all human burials, whether marked or unmarked, whenever possible. Re-interment in place and avoidance of further disturbance through redesign will be conducted where feasible. Any Project‑related activity in burial areas may continue only after all steps defined by applicable state and federal laws have been completed. Public Land If potential human remains are discovered during any Project activity on lands administered by the Forest Service or other federal agencies, the procedures identified in the NAGPRA will be closely followed and the following steps will be taken: 1. All activities that may further disturb the potential remains will cease immediately in the vicinity of the discovery. 8. The work supervisor shall notify Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS, who will contact the elected Cultural Resources Representative of the affected Tribe and PNF Heritage Program Manager. 9. The remains are to be secured and protected and non-destructive, in-situ evaluation undertaken by Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS and PNF Heritage Program Manager to determine if they are human. If there is any question regarding whether or not the remains are human, the County Coroner will be contacted to provide further evaluation. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 10. If the remains are determined to be human, the County Coroner will be contacted by Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS and/or PNF Heritage Program Manager to determine if the burial contains a victim of either a recent prosecutable crime or an accidental death. 11. Should the remains be of Native American ancestry as determined by the County Coroner, the NAHC and the Chair of the appropriate Tribe will be notified by the PNF Heritage Program Manager by telephone and email within 24 hours of the discovery as specified in NAGPRA Subpart 10.4 and 10.51a. 12. Should the remains be of Native American ancestry, as determined by the County Coroner, Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS, and the PNF Heritage Program Manager, in consultation with elected Cultural Resources Representative of the affected Tribal Band (or their designee), shall make a determination as to whether the burial can be adequately and safely restored in-situ or whether the burial should be disinterred completely and re-interred in another location. 13. In cases where re-interment in place is possible, the Licensees’ (i.e., PG&E) CRS and the PNF Heritage Program Manager, in consultation with the elected Cultural Resources Representative of the affected Tribal Band, shall cause the burial to be backfilled, stabilized, and protected from further disturbance by either human activities or natural processes that may have caused the disturbance in the first instance. 14. In cases where re-interment in place is neither prudent nor feasible, the elected Cultural Resources Representative of the affected Tribal Band and the PNF Heritage Program Manager will be consulted regarding proper re-interment as per NAGPRA Subpart 10.4. Private Land When human remains are discovered on privately owned land, other than a dedicated cemetery, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains will cease until the County Coroner has been notified and has determined that the circumstances, manner, and cause of death do not require further investigation (CH&SC 7050.5(b)). If the coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the Licensees will contact the NAHC to identify the Most Likely Descendant. The Licensees will also coordinate with the PNF regarding Tribal Contacts to obtain Most Likely Descendant information. With the permission of the landowner, the descendants may inspect the site of the discovery and recommend means for treating the human remains and any associated grave goods with appropriate dignity. The descendants will have 24 hours to complete their inspection and make their recommendation. If the NAHC is unable to identify a descendant, and/or the identified descendant fails to make a recommendation, and/or the landowner rejects the recommendation of the descendant and mediation fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner will re-inter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance (CPRC 5097.98). Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Specific procedures to be followed by the Licensees in the event that human remains are discovered in the Project APE are summarized below. In addition to these policies and procedures, the Licensees will summarize all relevant legal requirements regarding the discovery and treatment of human remains in construction and maintenance contracts and will take appropriate steps to ensure that its employees are familiar with the required procedures. NAGPRA Action Plan If human remains are discovered on federal lands (i.e., non-FERC Project area), all activity in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease immediately. As required under NAGPRA, Licensees will notify the PNF and FERC by telephone within 24 hours of discovery, followed by written confirmation within 3 days of discovery. The PNF will be responsible for notifying Native Americans and initiating tribal consultations required by law. The Licensees will make a reasonable effort to protect the items discovered before resuming any ground-disturbing activity. Activity shall not resume in the immediate vicinity of discovery until: 1) 30 days after the PNF Heritage Program Manager certifies receipt of the written confirmation of the discovery; or 2) a binding recovery plan is signed between the PNF and the affiliated Native American Tribes (whichever occurs first). Human remains or associated funerary objects shall not be excavated or otherwise removed unless a permit is issued under ARPA, and only after consultation with the appropriate Native American group is completed. Disposition of any such remains discovered on or removed from federal lands will follow protocols established in negotiation among the Tribes, PNF, and Licensee. NAGPRA and ARPA also require that funerary objects, whether discovered incidentally or inadvertently, be treated in accordance with the procedures summarized above. Funerary objects are those reasonably believed to have been placed intentionally at the time of death or later with or near individual human remains. A burial site means any natural or prepared physical location, whether originally below, on, or above the ground, into which individual human remains were deposited and includes rock cairns or pyres that do not fall within the ordinary definition of a grave. Moreover, any person who knowingly removes, without authority of law, any Native American artifacts or human remains from a Native American grave or cairn is guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in state prison (CPRC 5097.99). 3. EROSION CONTROL AND FUGITIVE DUST ABATEMENT The proposed work activity will cause minimal soil disturbance (< .9 acres). Erosion and sediment control will be managed in accordance with PG&E Water Quality Group approved, Good Housekeeping, Activity Specific Erosion Sediment Control Plan (A-ESCP). Dust abatement will be implemented by routinely wetting down surfaces with water trucks or totes. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 4. WATER QUALITY Water quality will not be impacted by this project. No water quality monitoring is recommended. 5. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS All hazardous material will be managed and stored under the direction of the ENVR 3000P-01 Procedure. All materials will have legible labels, stored in appropriate containers and stored in secured/contained areas. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) or Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) will be available at the job site upon request. Quantities of hazardous materials will be below thresholds (55 gallons/500 pounds/200 cubic feet) quantities for less than 30 days. Trucks and equipment will be refueled from non-bulk, truck-mounted fuel tanks. All refueling operations will be attended by trained personnel and be conducted in accordance with applicable BMPs and PG&E policies. Prior to operation, all equipment will be inspected for fluid leaks and for signs of worn or damaged parts that may result in a release. All hazardous waste products will be placed in the proper containers and transported from the job site to an authorized Hazardous Waste Collection Site under the direction of PG&E’s remote hazardous waste consolidation requirements (ENV-4000P-03). Small engine powered equipment will be provided with secondary containment. Whenever possible, vehicles and equipment with engines supplying motive power will be parked in designated areas located 200-feet or more from water. Drip pans or other containment measures will be placed under vehicles and equipment when not in use while located within 200-feet of water. In accordance with PG&E policy, all hazardous substance releases to the environment are reported internally. A spill kit will be maintained on site to ensure prompt containment in the unlikely event of a release to the environment. All media impacted by a spill will be cleaned up and disposed off-site in accordance with all applicable regulations. D. PERMITS AND APPROVALS 1. PERMITS The proposed recreation improvements would take place within the existing p-619 project boundary. No work is proposed within potentially jurisdictional waters of the US. The improvements would take place entirely in upland areas. Similarly, the proposed improvements would not occur in previously undisturbed areas. The Restroom and ORAR improvements and sign relocation would take place within the footprint of the existing parking and restroom facilities. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Existing amenities at the 7 walk-in campsites include site markers, fire rings, picnic tables, and tent pads. A new food locker will be installed within each of these existing campsites. The pole mount installation, as depicted in drawing 314688, is anticipated. A single, twelve-inch-wide hole will be dug at each food locker location within the existing campsites. As described on page 3-31 of the Bucks Creek RMP, on NFS land, the Forest Service will approve the site development plan and construction plan prior to submitting the plans to FERC. Therefore, Forest Service approval of the development and construction plans is anticipated pursuant to the RMP. The anticipated FERC submittal and review processes are described in Section D.2 of the Project Description. Based on the preceding discussion, discretionary approvals from resource agencies would not be required. 2. REVIEWS/APPROVALS The proposed project is expected to require review and authorization/approval from FERC. The regulations require that PG&E allow at least 60 days for FERC authorization; however; allowing 90 to 120 days for FERC authorization is prudent whenever possible. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 DSG/ DWN APVD REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPVDSG/ DWN APVD DATE APVD APVD SUPV CHKD DWN DSG REVISION 1 SHEET NO SUPSD BY SUPSDS DWG LIST BILL OF MATL SHEETS REVPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FOLD A B C D E FOLD C D E DR A W I N G N U M B E R F4350 SCANNED INDEXED POWER GENERATION - ENGINEERING 1AGrizzly Fbay RA Repl Restr Title Specs.dwg A B REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT PROJECT TEAM: PACE ENGINEERING, INC. 5155 VENTURE PARKWAY REDDING, CA 96002 (530) 244-0202 PROJECT MANAGER: BOB HARP EMAIL: BHARP@PACEENGINEERING.US CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OWNER: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. KEY MAP NTS YREKA MT. SHASTA BURNEY CHICO REDDING EUREKA SACRAMENTO I- 5 I- 5 0 5 I- 5 HW Y 10 1 OAKLAND ANDERSON A6 PROJECT SITES HWY 70 AUBURN ESTIMATED QUANTITIES: 1.ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH CALTRANS 2022 STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALOSHA AND OSHA REQUIREMENTS, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 3.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS RELATED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4.CARE SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES AND APPURTENANCES THAT WILL NOT BE REMOVED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AT LEAST TWO DAYS PRIOR TO EACH INSPECTION REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AS INDICATED IN THESE DRAWINGS AND THE QCIP. 6.DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DRAWINGS AND FIELD CONDITIONS AND/OR OMISSIONS ON THE DRAWINGS REQUIRING CLARIFICATION OR REVISION SHALL PROMPTLY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER IN WRITING (RFI) AND REPLIED TO BY THE EOR BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH AFFECTED WORK. 7.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND STABILITY OF SHORING/UNDERPINNING OF TEMPORARY CUT SLOPES AND TRENCHES. IN ANY CASE, UN-SHORED TEMPORARY CUT SLOPES AND TRENCHES SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE TOLERANCES ALLOWED BY CALOSHA. 8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING REQUIRED EROSION AND DUST CONTROL PLANS CONFORMING TO PG&E ACTIVITY-SPECIFIC EROSIONS AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. ALSO, THE PLANS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS HAVING CONTROL OVER THE PROJECT AND THESE DRAWINGS. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA LOCATE (1-800-227-2600) 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. EXISTING OR NEW IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE EXPEDITIOUSLY REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SURVEY MONUMENTS OR MARKERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS OR MARKERS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE PROJECT SITE IN A CLEAN, SAFE, AND USABLE CONDITION. ALL SPILLS OF SOIL, ROCKS, OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED. ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN, SAFE AND USABLE CONDITION. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PER PG-1902S FOR ALL WORK THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. SUCH DRAWINGS SHALL RECORD ALL AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTION AND AN INITIAL SUBMITTAL SHALL BE DELIVERED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. FINAL AS-BUILT SUBMITTAL MUST BE PROVIDED 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. MARKED-UP RECORD PRINTS MUST CONFORM TO THE RED-GREEN-BLUE PENCIL FORMAT. GENERAL NOTES: 1.BUCKS CREEK LC GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT. 1.1.REPLACED EXISTING HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING WITH NEW PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL AND LOADING ZONE. 1.2.REMOVE AND REPLACE VAULT TOILET. 1.3.RELOCATE INFORMATION SIGN. 1.4.ADD BEAR RESISTANT FOOD CABINETS AT WALK-IN CAMP SITES. SCOPE OF WORK: 1.ROAD SECTION 1.a.TRAFFIC INDEX: 6.5 (ASSUMED) 1.b.R-VALUE: 15 (ASSUMED) 2.STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS, 2022 EDITION (CALTRANS ) 3.ASSUMED ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE:1,500 PSF 4.WIND LOADING: RISK CAT II, 95 MPH (3 SECOND GUST), EXP B, I = 1.0 5.SEISMIC LOADING: RISK CAT II, SITE CLASS D, S = 0.611, S = 0.764, S = 0.289, R = 3.5, I = 1.0 6.SNOW LOADING: 200 PSF (ROOF) 7.ROOF LIVE LOAD: 70 PSF 8.ROOF COLLATERAL LOAD: 3 PSF DESIGN CRITERIA: SURVEY NOTES: 1.STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION (CALTRANS) 2.PG&E DRAWINGS 358534 & 358536 REFERENCES: 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS FROM DEMOLITION. 16.ALL PRODUCTS REFERENCED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, INSTALLED, AND/OR APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 17.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING IN WRITING ALL WORK THAT DEVIATES FROM THESE PLANS AND SUBMITTING TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 18.DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE RELEVANT REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 19.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL MUST BE HAULED OFF-SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GENERAL NOTES: (CONTINUED) SHEET INDEX:CODES AND STANDARDS 1.ASCE 7-16, MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 2.CAL OSHA, GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 8. 3.ACI 318-19, BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 4.STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION (CALTRANS) 5.CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 2022 EDITION. (1) GRADING 1 LS 6" CONCRETE (SIDEWALK, ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA)750 SF SINGLE CONCRETE VAULT TOILET 1 EA STRIPING (STRIPES, CROSS HATCH)1 LS SIGNS (ACCESSIBLE SIGN, INFORMATIONAL SIGN)1 LS CAMPSITE BEAR RESISTANT FOOD STORAGE BOX 7 EA (1)CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES. HIGHWAY 70 FEATHER RIVER DS S I W e 064163 1 OF 5 3114685 31 1 4 6 8 5 BHARP/TJONES TJONES 3114685 BHARP BHARP CIVIL TITLE SHEET GRIZZLY FOREBAY RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT BHARP BH/TJ1A BH BH BH 2/29/24 2/29/24 100% FINAL 74054961 SHEET LIST TABLE PAGE #SHEET #SHEET TITLE 1 3114685 TITLE SHEET 2 3114686 SPECIFICATIONS 3 3114687 DEMOLITION AND GRADING PLAN 4 3114688 DETAILS 5 3114689 CXT BUILDING PLANS QUINCY BUCKS CREEK LOWER BUCKS LAKE BUCKS LAKE GRIZZLY FOREBAY PROJECT SITE BUCKS LAKE ROAD TO O R O V I L L E TO Q U I N C Y PNF 36 24N34A OHV RD 9 1828.488 2/29/24 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 DSG/ DWN APVD REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPVDSG/ DWN APVD DATE APVD APVD SUPV CHKD DWN DSG REVISION 1 SHEET NO SUPSD BY SUPSDS DWG LIST BILL OF MATL SHEETS REVPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FOLD A B C D E FOLD C D E DR A W I N G N U M B E R F4350 SCANNED INDEXED POWER GENERATION - ENGINEERING 1AGrizzly Fbay RA Repl Restr Title Specs.dwg A B REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV FOUNDATION AND SITE WORK: AGGREGATE BASE (AB): 1.CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (AB), REFERRED TO AS AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE 3/4" MAX. GRADATION CONFORMING TO CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 26. VIRGIN CRUSHED ROCK SHALL BE UTILIZED. ALL AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE SPREAD AND MECHANICALLY COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION IN LAYERS NOT MORE THAN 6" COMPACTED THICKNESS. RELATIVE COMPACTION IS BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 U.O.N. FIELD DENSITY AND MOISTURE TESTING SHALL BE MADE IN EACH COMPACTED LAYER PER ASTM D6938. FIELD DENSITY AND MOISTURE TESTING SHALL BE MADE IN EACH COMPACTED LAYER PER ASTM D6938. RELATIVE COMPACTION IS THE RATIO OF IN-SITU DENSITY DETERMINED BY ASTM D6938 DIVIDED BY THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY FROM ASTM D1557. 1.EARTHWORK GRADING SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE CALTRANS SECTION 19 - EARTHWORK. 2.DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, MATERIALS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED AND IMPLEMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3.VOLUME AND DIMENSIONS OF EXCAVATION AND FILL MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. 4.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND STABILITY OF SHORING/UNDERPINNING OF TEMPORARY CUT SLOPES AND TRENCHES. UNSHORED CUT SLOPES AND TRENCHES SHALL COMPLY WITH CAL-OSHA, AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTAINING SURFACE RUNOFF AND CONCRETE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATERS. 6.DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RELEVANT REGULATORY PLANS. 7.PRIOR TO GRADING THE SITE THE AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE STRIPPED TO REMOVE ALL VEGETATION AND ANY DEBRIS. 8.FILL MATERIAL: SHALL CONSIST OF A SILTY SAND OR A REASONABLY WELL-GRADED SILT, SAND, AND GRAVEL MIXTURE WITH A MAXIMUM SIZE OF 3 INCHES AND A SAND EQUIVALENT OF 30. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS, ORGANIC MATTER AND DEBRIS. NATIVE MATERIAL MAY BE USED ONLY IF IT MEETS THIS SPECIFICATION. MOISTURE CONDITION TO NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, PLACED IN UNIFORM LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 8 INCHES IN LOOSE THICKNESS AND MECHANICALLY COMPACT TO NOT LESS THAN 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION. RELATIVE COMPACTION IS BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557. FIELD DENSITY AND MOISTURE TESTING SHALL BE MADE IN EACH COMPACTED LAYER PER ASTM D6938. RELATIVE COMPACTION IS THE RATIO OF IN-SITU DENSITY DETERMINED BY ASTM D6938 DIVIDED BY THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY FROM ASTM D1557. 9.BUILDING FOUNDATION SHALL BE SUPPORTED ON SUITABLE NATIVE SOILS OR BEDROCK. 10.ALL PAVEMENT SHALL BE FOUNDED ON ENGINEERED FILL OR SUITABLE NATIVE SOILS. 1.RESTROOM SHALL BE A PRE-CAST CONCRETE BUILDING SINGLE USER WATERLESS RESTROOM, ADA COMPLIANT. 2.RESTROOM SHALL HAVE A BELOW GRADE VAULT WITH A MINIMUM OF 1,000 GALLON CAPACITY AND A WASTE CLEANOUT HATCH. 3.SINGLE VAULT RESTROOM SHALL BE A PRECAST CONCRETE GUNNISON TOILET BUILDING MANUFACTURED BY CXT INCORPORATED (800 696-5766) OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4.RESTROOM SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. 5.RESTROOM SHALL COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 6.EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE BARNWOOD STYLE, COLOR SPECIFIED BY OWNER. 7.ROOF SHALL BE CEDAR SHAKE STYLE, COLOR SPECIFIED BY OWNER. 8.DOOR SHALL BE METAL (3-0 BY 6-8) 9.INTERIOR (WALLS, CLG, FLOOR) SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE. 1.CONCRETE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 318-19. 2.CONCRETE STRENGTH AND MIX REQUIREMENTS: a.CONCRETE SHALL CONTAIN A WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURE (WRDA) b.CONCRETE SHALL CONTAIN AIR ENTRAINMENT ADMIXTURE (AEA) TO ACHIEVE A TOTAL AIR CONTENT SPECIFIED. 3.CEMENT SHALL BE CLEAN, FRESH, TYPE II, LOW ALKALI, MODERATE HEAT PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C150. 4.AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C33. MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE SHALL CONFORM TO THE SIZES SHOWN UNDER "CONCRETE STRENGTH AND MIX REQUIREMENTS". AGGREGATES AND SAND SHALL BE FREE OF MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO ALKALI-AGGREGATE REACTIVITY (ALKALI-SILICA REACTIVITY AND ALKALI-CARBONATE REACTIVITY). 5.REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60 FOR ALL REBAR. REBAR SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF RUST SCALES. 6.MINIMUM REINFORCING STEEL COVER REQUIREMENTS : a.CAST AGAINST AND EXPOSED TO EARTH, 3", b.FORMED AND EXPOSED TO EARTH, LIQUID, OR WEATHER, 2", UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7.REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE PLACED IN AS LONG OF LENGTH AS POSSIBLE. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE "COLD BENT." 8.ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE EDGES SHALL HAVE 3/4" CHAMFER OR RADIUS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9.CONCRETE HORIZONTAL SURFACES SHALL HAVE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH. 10.ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED WITH A MECHANICAL VIBRATOR. 11.PLACEMENT PRACTICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 305 FOR HOT WEATHER AND ACI 306 FOR COLD WEATHER. CONCRETE THAT HAS BEEN BATCHED FOR MORE THAN TWO HOURS IN COLD WEATHER AND ONE AND ONE-HALF HOURS IN HOT WEATHER BEFORE BEING PLACED SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE REJECTED. CONCRETE SHALL NOT FREE FALL MORE THAN SIX (6) FEET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12.CURING OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FOR AT LEAST 5 DAYS BEGINNING IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OF FINISHING. WET CURING OF SLABS USING DAMP BURLAP OR BURLEEN IS PREFERRED. CURING TIME AND PROCEDURES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO SUIT HOT AND COLD WEATHER CONDITIONS. CURING COMPOUNDS MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF WET CURING. CURING COMPOUND SHALL MEET ASTM C309, TYPE 2, CLASS A. 13.FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE UNIFORMLY FLAT AND FREE OF SURFACE DEFECTS SUCH AS BUG HOLES, FORM BOARD JOINTS, ROCK POCKETS, ETC. FLATNESS TOLERANCE SHALL BE 1/8-INCH BETWEEN ANY TWO POINTS IN 10 FEET. LINE SHALL BE WITHIN 1/4-INCH IN 50 FEET. EXPOSED SURFACES THAT ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SHALL BE CORRECTED OR REPLACED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 14.BACKFILL AND OTHER STRUCTURAL LOADING SHALL NOT BE PLACED AGAINST ANY CONCRETE UNTIL IT HAS DEMONSTRATED THROUGH CYLINDER BREAKS THAT THE CONCRETE HAS ACHIEVED ITS DESIGN STRENGTH, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONCRETE: LOCATIONS 28-DAY CONCRETE STRENGTH MAX SIZE AGGREGATE SLUMP MIN SACKS PER CUBIC YARD WATER / CEMENT RATIO ALL LOCATIONS 4,000 psi 1"4"-6"6.0 0.45 (0.05±) FOR GENERAL NOTES AND DWG INDEX SEE DWG 3114685 ABBREVIATIONS: L AB AGGREGATE BASE ACI AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE ADJ ADJACENT AGGR AGGREGATE APPROX APPROXIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING MATERIALS AWPA AMERICAN WOOD PROTECTION ASSOCIATION @ AT BOT BOTTOM BVC BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE C CENTERLINE CLR CLEAR CL CLASS CL2 AB CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CONC CONCRETE CONSTR CONSTRUCTION CONTR CONTRACTOR/CONTRACTOR CP CONTROL POINT CTR CENTER CY CUBIC YARD DBL DOUBLE DET DETAIL DIA, Ø DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DWG DRAWING (E), EXST EXISTING EA EACH EL, ELEV ELEVATION ENGR ENGINEER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EPDM ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE MONOMER EVC END VERTICAL CURVE FG, FIN GR FINISH GRADE GA GAGE, GAUGE GR GRADE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HDG HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED HMA HOT MIX ASPHALT HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL INSP INSPECTOR JT JOINT LF LINEAL FEET LS LUMP SUM MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS (N)NEW NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE O/ OVER OG ORIGINAL GROUND PERF PERFORATED PIPE PNT POINT #POUNDS PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION QCIP QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION PROGRAM R RADIUS RC REINFORCED CONCRETE REQD REQUIRED SCH, SCHED SCHEDULE SD STORM DRAIN SF SQUARE FOOT SH, SHT SHEET SP SPACE OR SPACES SPECS SPECIFICATIONS SQ SQUARE STD STANDARD S/W SIDEWALK TBR TO BE REMOVED TP-#TEST PIT TR TO REMAIN THK THICK(NESS) TYP TYPICAL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VC VERTICAL CURVE VERT VERTICAL W/ WITH W/I WITHIN W/O WITHOUT SHOP DRAWING AND SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SIGNS SUBMIT SIGN DATA SHEETS FROM MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER AND PROPOSED VERBIAGE FOR APPROVAL. RESTROOM SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHEETS, INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, DRAWINGS, AND CALCULATIONS (STAMPED AND SIGNED BY CALIF CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER) RESTROOM: EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHEET, INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, AND EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. AGGREGATE BASE SUBMIT AGGREGATE BASE DATA SHEET FROM MATERIAL SUPPLIER. CONCRETE SUBMIT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND CURING COMPOUND DATA SHEETS. 064163 2 OF 5 3114686 31 1 4 6 8 6 BHARP/TJONES TJONES 3114686 BHARP BHARP CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS GRIZZLY FOREBAY RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT BHARP BH/TJ1A BH BH BH 2/29/24 2/29/24 100% FINAL 74054961 1828.488 AIR ENTRAINMENT ADMIXTURE 4% TO 6% 2/29/24 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD DATE APVD APVD SUPV CHKD DWN DSG REVISION 1 SHEET NO SUPSD BY SUPSDS DWG LIST BILL OF MATL SHEETS REVPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FOLD A B C D E FOLD C D E DR A W I N G N U M B E R F4350 SCANNED INDEXED POWER GENERATION - ENGINEERING 1AGrizzly Fbay RA Repl Restr Grading Plan.dwg A B N 804020 FEET 020 SCALE: 1"= 20'-0" DSG/ DWN DSG/ DWN 064163 3 OF 5 3114687 31 1 4 6 8 7 BHARP/TJONES TJONES 3114687 BHARP BHARP CIVIL DEMOLITION AND GRADING PLAN GRIZZLY FOREBAY RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT BHARP BH/TJ1A BH BH BH 2/29/24 2/29/24 100% FINAL 74054961 1"=20' DEMOLITION PLAN 1"=20' GRADING PLAN TC/FP 4389.34± TC/FP 4388.90± TC/FP 4388.94± TC 4388.62 TC 4388.35 TC 4388.83 TC 4388.40 TC 4388.45 TC 4388.45 EP 4388.5± TC 4388.56 TC/FP 4388.11± PARKING AREA 24N34A OHV RD 9 GRIZZLY POWERHOUSE GRIZZLY CREEK TYPICAL WALK-IN CAMPSITE SEVEN SPOTS ALONG TRAIL. INSTALL NEW FOOD STORAGE BOXES AT SITES PER 6 688 7 688 1 687NTS GRIZZLY FOREBAY TRAIL SITE 688 GRIZZLY CREEK ACCESS RD 1828.488 LEGEND: (E) ASPHALT (N) CONCRETE (E) PAVEMENT DEMOLITION AREA (E) RESTROOM/BUILDING DEMOLITION PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED EP EXISTING EP PROPOSED RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY TRAIL GRIZZLY FOREBAY 2 687NTS CONC STRUCTURAL SECTION 6" CONC W/ #4 @ 18" OC 6" CL2 AB 2 ~ SAWCUT, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF 1100± SF OF EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING RESTROOM BACKFILL VOID WITH COMPACTED COMPETENT SOIL MATERIAL 1.5 % 1% 3% 1% 5.6% 5% 4.4±% (N) CXT "GUNNISON" LEFT HAND VAULT RESTROOM, ACCESSIBLE. FF EL 4833.45 SEE SHEET 3114689 AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA GRADE TRAIL FROM PARKING AREA TO (E) TRAIL WITH A SMOOTH UNOBSTRUCTED SURFACE. (N) SIGN,3 688 RELOCATE (E) SIGN, RELOCATED (E) GRIZZLY FOREBAY WALK-IN CAMPGROUND SIGN 21.9' 22 ' 28.1'11 . 6 ' 25 . 9 ' 25.3' 2% 1% GR A D E B R E A K GRAD E B R E A K TOOLED CONTROL JNT 1 12" DEEP 2 - #4 x 5'-0" DIA BARS NOTE: LAP REBAR 24" @ SPLICES BEND BARS AT ALL CORNERS WITH 24" HOOK 2/29/24 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD DATE APVD APVD SUPV CHKD DWN DSG REVISION 1 SHEET NO SUPSD BY SUPSDS DWG LIST BILL OF MATL SHEETS REVPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FOLD A B C D E FOLD C D E DR A W I N G N U M B E R F4350 SCANNED INDEXED POWER GENERATION - ENGINEERING 1AGrizzly Fbay RA Repl Restr Grading Plan.dwg A B DSG/ DWN DSG/ DWN 064163 4 OF 5 3114688 31 1 4 6 8 8 BHARP/TJONES TJONES 3114688 BHARP BHARP CIVIL DETAILS GRIZZLY FOREBAY RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT BHARP BH/TJ1A BH BH BH 2/29/24 2/29/24 100% FINAL 74054961 12" 36" NO PAR K I N G 20 ' NOTE: REFER TO CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C 2 688NTS ACCESSIBILITY STALL EMBLEM ~ 1 688NTS ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL (SINGLE)687 12' 36 " 18' 21 ' SLOPE TOP OF FTG REFLECTORIZED SIGN FACE 1 12" SCH 40 HDG STL PIPE SIGN R99(CA) SIGN R7-8b SIGN R99B (CA) ACCESSIBILITY SIGN PER 11B-502.6.1 AND WITHIN THE LOADING AND UNLOADING ACCESS AISLE PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN 12" HIGH LETTERS MIN. COLOR WHITE. STRIPE, PAINTED WHITE 2" PAINTED WHITE LINES INTERNATIONAL DISABLED SYMBOL (2'-8.5"x3') BLUE BACKGROUND CONCRETE PARKING AREA 2 ~ STRIPES AT 36" MAX ON CENTER PAINTED COLOR CONTRASTING W/ THE PARKING SURFACE PREFERABLY BLUE OR WHITE. LOADING AND UNLOADING ACCESS AISLE BORDER PAINTED BLUE. CXT R E S T R O O M LEVEL & FLUSH TRANSITION FROM RESTROOM TO PARKING CONCRETE 5' 3 688NTS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL 687 5 688NTS FOOD STORAGE BOX WITH GROUND MOUNT 6 688NTS FOOD STORAGE BOX POLE MOUNT SYSTEM 3 ~ 5' 5' 1828.488 (E) WOOD BARRIER BOLLARDS, TYP PLACE 4"X6" CONCRETE BLOCK AT EACH LEG GRADE BREAK GR A D E B R E A K 12" EXP BOLT 2/29/24 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD REV DATE DESCRIPTION JOB NO CHKD SUPV APVD DATE APVD APVD SUPV CHKD DWN DSG REVISION 1 SHEET NO SUPSD BY SUPSDS DWG LIST BILL OF MATL SHEETS REVPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FO L D FOLD A B C D E FOLD C D E DR A W I N G N U M B E R F4350 SCANNED INDEXED POWER GENERATION - ENGINEERING Grizzly Fbay CXT Restr.dwg A B DSG/ DWN DSG/ DWN 064163 5 OF 5 3114689 31 1 4 6 8 9 BHARP/TJONES TJONES 3114689 BHARP BHARP CIVIL CXT BUILDING PLANS GRIZZLY FOREBAY RESTROOM GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT 1828.488 BHARP FOR GENERAL NOTES AND DWG INDEX SEE DWG 3114685 BH/TJ1A BH BH BH 1A2/29/24 2/29/24 100% FINAL 74054961 THIS SHEET IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FINAL ENGINEERED, STAMPED, AND SIGNED DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE BY PG&E. VENT STACK TO HAVE RAIN CAP ADDED PGE TO PROVIDE LOCK AT CLEANOUT 2/29/24 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ENCLOSURE 2 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 PREPARED BY: Gavin Rhoads, P.E. POWER GENERATION DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: Jeff Jukkola, P.E. APPROVED BY: Kyle Ingvoldsen, P.E. DATE: MAY 2024 BUCKS CREEK PROJECT GRIZZLY FOREBAY RA REPLACEMENT RESTROOM PROJECT Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 619-CA QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION PROGRAM REVISION 1 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION PROGRAM REVISION LOG Revision Revised Item Date Prepared By 1 Initial issue of QCIP document 05/23/2024 Gavin Rhoads Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose......................................................................................................1 1.2 Background ...............................................................................................1 1.3 Description of Structures and Types of Construction ..........................1 1.4 Specialized Construction Techniques and Equipment .........................2 2. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING RESPONSIBILITIES.....................................2 2.1 Responsibilities of Various Organizations.............................................2 2.1.1 Licensee ........................................................................................2 2.1.2 Designer ........................................................................................3 2.1.3 Quality Control Inspection Organization........................................3 2.1.4 Constructor....................................................................................3 2.1.5 Regulator.......................................................................................3 2.2 Number of Staff and Availability Required .............................................3 2.3 Titles, Duties and Responsibilities of Staff ............................................4 2.3.1 QC Manager..................................................................................4 2.3.2 Field Inspector...............................................................................4 2.3.3 Engineering Manager ....................................................................5 2.3.4 Responsible Engineer ...................................................................6 2.3.5 Engineer of Record........................................................................6 2.3.6 Subject Matter Expert....................................................................7 2.3.7 Project Manager ............................................................................7 2.3.8 License Compliance Lead .............................................................8 2.3.9 Environmental Lead.......................................................................8 2.4 Specialty Inspectors .................................................................................9 2.5 Lines of Communication and Authority..................................................9 2.6 Approval and Rejection of Work..............................................................9 2.7 Authority to Stop Work.............................................................................9 2.8 Statement of Independence ...................................................................10 2.9 Resumes ..................................................................................................10 3. INSPECTION PLAN AND FIELD PRACTICES ..................................................10 3.1 Inspection Criteria...................................................................................10 3.2 Knowledge of Construction Plans and Specifications........................10 3.3 Inspection Equipment and Resources..................................................11 3.4 Constructor Operations..........................................................................11 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 3.5 Coordination with Constructor’s Schedule..........................................11 3.6 QCIP Operations .....................................................................................11 3.7 Frequency of Inspections.......................................................................12 3.8 Documentation and Follow-up Action ..................................................12 3.9 Training....................................................................................................12 4. DOCUMENTATION.............................................................................................12 4.1 Daily Inspection Reports........................................................................12 4.2 Nonconformance Reports......................................................................13 4.3 Other Periodic Reports...........................................................................14 4.4 Maintenance of Records.........................................................................14 4.5 Photographs/Videos ...............................................................................15 5. TRAINING............................................................................................................15 5.1 Study Materials........................................................................................15 5.2 Classroom Instruction............................................................................15 5.3 On-the-Job Training and Supervision...................................................15 5.4 Proficiency Testing and Certification....................................................16 5.5 Resume Update.......................................................................................16 6. MATERIAL TESTING..........................................................................................16 6.1 Testing Schedule ....................................................................................16 6.2 Testing Standards...................................................................................16 6.3 Testing Organization ..............................................................................17 6.4 Adequacy of On-Site Laboratory...........................................................17 6.5 Adequacy of Off-Site Laboratory...........................................................17 6.6 Evaluation of Testing Data and Actions Required...............................17 6.7 Documentation........................................................................................18 7. EROSION CONTROL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE .......................18 7.1 Environmental Compliance Plan ...........................................................18 7.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan......................................................18 7.3 License Requirements............................................................................20 7.4 Specialized Plans, Permits, and Approvals..........................................20 7.5 Frequency of Inspections.......................................................................21 7.6 Documentation and Corrective Actions................................................21 7.7 Environmental Deficiency Report..........................................................21 8. SCHEDULE .........................................................................................................22 8.1 Start and Finish Dates ............................................................................22 8.2 Anticipated Construction Sequence .....................................................22 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 8.3 Staged and Phased Construction..........................................................23 9. PLANNED USE OF CONSULTANTS.................................................................23 9.1 Areas of Inspection and Review............................................................23 9.2 Consultants Names and Resumes ........................................................23 APPENDICES A. QCIP Organization Chart B. Resumes for QCIP Personnel with Stop-Work Authority C. Reference List of Project-Related Documents D. Inspection and Hold Point Checklist E. Material and Field-Testing Requirements F. QCIP Reporting Templates Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This quality control inspection program (QCIP) is regarding Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (PG&E) project (the project) to Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area (RA) Replacement Restroom at Grizzly Forebay Parking Area which is part of PG&E’s Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) No. 619 The purpose of this QCIP is to ensure the quality construction of this project. The responsible engineer (RE) is accountable for development of the QCIP for this project. This QCIP has been prepared in compliance with the following Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements and guidelines: •Title 18, Chapter I, Sub-Chapter B, Part 12, Subpart E, Section 12.50 of the Code of Federal Regulations •FERC’s Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, Chapter VII, “Construction Quality Control Inspection Program” 1.2 Background The purpose of the Grizzly Forebay RA Restroom Replacement project is to replace the existing pit toilet with a new vault toilet (restroom) with increased waste volume capacity, Sweet Smelling Technology, external waste pumping access, and improved handicap parking and path of travel between the parking and restroom. Also, this project will install new bear resistant food storage lockers. 1.3 Description of Structures and Types of Construction The Grizzly Forebay Restroom Replacement Project consists of replacement of the existing wood framed pit toilet with a new precast concrete vault single toilet facility by CTX, Gunnison model with Sweet Smelling Technology. Walls are built with 4” thick reinforced UL752 bullet resistant concrete. A rain and debris screen will be added to the vault’s vent stack. The adjacent handicap parking space, unload zone, and path of travel to the restroom do not comply with current acceptable grades per handicap accessibility standards. As part of this project, PG&E will replace them with cast-in-place concrete pavement that will be compliant with current standards. Bear resistant food storage boxes will be installed at each of the (7) walk-in campsites located along the shore of Grizzly Forebay. PG&E plans to utilize their general construction (GC) group to perform all aspects of the on-site construction work. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 2 1.4 Specialized Construction Techniques and Equipment There are no specialized construction techniques or equipment needed for this project. The work can be performed with conventional materials, techniques, and equipment. 2. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Responsibilities of Various Organizations The responsibilities of various organizations involved with the construction of this project are described in the following sections. 2.1.1 Licensee PG&E is the owner and licensee of this FERC-licensed hydroelectric project. PG&E is responsible for implementing quality control (QC) on this project to confirm that construction is performed in a safe manner and complies with the FERC license conditions, agency permits, environmental requirements, drawings, and specifications. PG&E manages the constructor’s scope of work and monitors and enforces the constructor’s compliance with the contract terms and conditions. PG&E is responsible for interaction with all regulatory and resource agencies and the public during construction. PG&E has the responsibility and the authority to stop work in progress or reject any work that, in PG&E’s view, does not comply with the drawings, specifications, applicable codes, or regulations or is potentially damaging to the environment. 2.1.2 Designer The designer is responsible for providing a design that is safe, and meets the project criteria and operational, performance, environmental, and regulatory requirements. The designer is responsible for the design and preparation of drawings and specifications, technical assistance, design verification during construction, preparation of design changes, and preparation of as- built drawings. The designer will provide appropriate field inspections and reviews during construction to ensure that the final completed project will meet the design intent. The designer will designate one individual to act as the engineer of record (EOR) for the project. 2.1.3 Quality Control Inspection Organization PG&E’s inspection organization is responsible for field inspection and testing on this project. PG&E’s inspection organization will provide independent inspection and testing in accordance with the inspection requirements in the drawings and specifications and special inspection instructions when directed by the EOR. The inspection organization will also provide and/or coordinate all field and material testing required by the drawings, specifications, or as directed by the EOR. The inspection organization will coordinate all on-site and off-site laboratory testing required by this project. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 3 2.1.4 Constructor The constructor for this project is PG&E GC. The constructor is responsible for furnishing all materials, labor, and equipment necessary to construct the project in accordance with the project drawings, specifications, and contract documents. The constructor does not have a role and/or responsibility to perform the QC tasks described in this QCIP. 2.1.5 Regulator FERC establishes the regulations, license requirements, and guidelines that govern the development of this QCIP. FERC does not perform the QC tasks described in this QCIP. FERC may perform inspections during construction, independent of this QCIP, to verify that good construction practices are being followed. 2.2 Number of Staff and Availability Required The number of staff assigned to implement this QCIP are shown in Appendix A, “QCIP Organization Chart.” The on-site availability of QCIP personnel is shown in the table below. QCIP Role Onsite Availability QC Manager As required Field Inspector Full time RE Periodically and as required EOR Periodically and as required Environmental Lead As required 2.3 Titles, Duties and Responsibilities of Staff The organization chart in Appendix A identifies the QCIP personnel involved in this project. The responsibilities of QCIP personnel assigned to this project are described below. 2.3.1 QC Manager Responsibilities: The QC manager is responsible for assigning independent, qualified field inspectors, special inspectors; and testing laboratories/facilities to the project. The QC manager provides high-level coordination for resolution of nonconformance and environmental deficiency issues. At the end of the project the QC manager provides a Certification of Construction attesting that the results from the inspection and testing program result in the conclusion that the project was constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to PG&E’s manager of Hydro Inspections and direct communication with the field inspector, project manager (PM), RE, license compliance lead, and environmental lead. Authorities: Has the authority to stop work because of adverse quality conditions. The QC manager has the authority to assign or replace field inspectors, with FERC authorization, based Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 4 on the scope of work and in accordance with the project drawings, specifications, this QCIP, and specific inspection instructions directed by the EOR. 2.3.2 Field Inspector Responsibilities: The field inspector: •performs and/or coordinates inspection and testing according to this QCIP; •provides independent inspection and testing during construction in accordance with the inspection requirements in the drawings, specifications, this QCIP, and specific inspection instructions when directed by the EOR; •may perform environmental inspections in accordance with the Environmental Release to Construction (ERTC) and under the direction of the environmental lead; •immediately notifies the license compliance and/or environmental lead of potential regulatory nonconformance or environmental deficiency issues; •immediately notifies the license compliance and/or environmental lead of inspections performed by regulatory agencies; •provides documentation of tests and reports with all discrepancies identified; •provides field markups for preparation of as-built drawings; •notifies the QC manager of any stop-work or recommendation to stop work resulting from an adverse quality condition; •may issue nonconformance reports and environmental deficiency reports in coordination with the appropriate lead or subject matter expert; and •if a specialty inspector is required as part of the project (e.g., certified welding inspector), confirms the individual has the proper qualifications before beginning the specialty inspection. The field inspector role may be filled PG&E personnel, or a consultant retained to act on behalf of PG&E. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to the QC manager and direct communications with the RE, EOR, PM, environmental lead, license compliance lead, and the constructor. The field inspector provides inspection and test reports to the RE, EOR, and PM. Authorities: Has the independent, on-site authority to stop work for activities that are noncompliant with the design drawings or specifications, noncompliant with the regulatory or permit conditions, or damaging to the environment. The field inspector has authority to approve and reject the constructor’s work. The field inspector reports identified nonconformance or environmental deficiency to the constructor, RE, PM, license compliance lead, or environmental lead, as applicable. 2.3.3 Engineering Manager Responsibilities: The engineering manager is responsible for assigning a qualified RE and EOR for design and technical oversight of the project. The engineering manager acts on behalf of PG&E as the licensee. At the end of the project the engineering manager provides a Certification Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 5 of Construction attesting that the construction fulfills the design intent and was constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications reviewed by FERC. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to PG&E’s director of power generation engineering. Has direct communication with the RE and QC manager. Authorities: The engineering manager has the authority to assign the RE and EOR based on the scope of work for this project. 2.3.4 Responsible Engineer Responsibilities: The RE: •coordinates implementation of this QCIP; •reviews and accepts the EOR’s and other consultant’s engineering and design; •coordinates and manages the EOR’s QC effort during construction; •manages resolution of engineering issues that may arise during construction, including design changes and identified construction deficiencies or nonconformance; •in conjunction with the subject matter expert (SME), coordinates with FERC on engineering issues and changes; and •coordinates activities with other departments regarding engineering, geotechnical, and design issues. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to PG&E’s engineering supervisor and manager of project engineering. Has direct communication with the field inspector, EOR, PM, and SME. The RE has interactive communication with and constructor, consultants, and regulatory agency representatives. Authorities: Accepts the EOR’s engineering design, specifications, and design changes. The RE has the stop-work authority for activities that are noncompliant with the design drawings and specifications, noncompliant with the regulatory or permit conditions, or damaging to the environment. 2.3.5 Engineer of Record Responsibilities: The EOR: •provides engineering design drawings and specifications for the project components in accordance with the project design requirements and acceptable industry, regulatory, and professional standards; •provides oversight and engineering support during construction to confirm that the completed project is in accordance with the design intent; •reports identified situations that are noncompliant with the design drawings and specifications to the RE, PM, and field inspector for action; •reviews inspection reports and material testing reports; •prepares and approves design and field changes; and Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 6 •prepares as-built drawings at completion of construction. At the end of the project the EOR provides a Certification of Construction attesting that the construction was in accordance with the design intent. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to the RE and direct communication with the field inspectors on matters associated with QC. Authorities: The EOR: •has the sole authority, pending FERC authorization, to issue the original approved-for- construction drawings and specifications, minor field changes that deviate from the approved design drawings, and major design changes caused by changed field conditions; •has the authority to approve and reject the constructor’s work; and •has the authority to stop work for activities that are noncompliant with the design drawings or specifications. 2.3.6 Subject Matter Expert Responsibilities: The SME reviews and accepts the EOR’s and other consultants’ project engineering and design. The SME, in conjunction with the RE, also coordinates with FERC project submittals, engineering issues, and design changes. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to the project engineering manager. Has interactive communications with the RE, PM, and regulatory agency representatives. Authorities: Accepts the EOR’s engineering design, specifications, and design changes for submittal to FERC. The SME has the authority stop work for activities that are noncompliant with the design drawings and specifications, noncompliant with the regulatory or permit conditions, or damaging to the environment. 2.3.7 Project Manager Responsibilities: The PM manages the project scope, construction contract, cost estimate, management approval, cost monitoring, and status reporting associated with the project. The project manager is responsible for constructor negotiations and scheduling of construction. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to PG&E’s project management supervisor and manager of project management. Has direct communication with the RE, PM, license compliance lead, environmental lead, and constructor. Authorities: The PM has the authority to approve or reject work and coordinate all project activities. 2.3.8 License Compliance Lead Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 7 Responsibilities: The license compliance lead informs the QCIP team of FERC license and/or regulatory agency conditions. In coordination with the environmental lead, may serve as liaison with regulatory agency representatives. Works with the environmental lead to acquire and summarize necessary regulatory permits for construction activities and communicate with agencies regarding nonconformance or deviations. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to the licensing supervisor. Has interactive communications with the environmental lead, PM, RE, and regulatory agency representatives. Authorities: Has the authority to advise the PM on matters of environmental compliance. Has the authority to recommend stop-work based on an actual or potential adverse license condition. 2.3.9 Environmental Lead Responsibilities: The environmental lead: •manages PG&E’s environmental compliance process; •with on-site support by the field inspector, confirms construction activities follow the ERTC and resource agency permit conditions; •performs periodic inspections and involves environmental SMEs as needed; •obtains and manages contracts for environmental monitors and other environmental support, as needed; •provides guidance for field inspection and monitoring to confirm that the construction activities follow the environmental requirements and that adequate measures are implemented to minimize any potential environmental impacts, may perform the monitoring; •assists the field inspector in issuing environmental deficiency reports; and •in conjunction with the license compliance lead, communicates with agencies regarding nonconformance or deviations. Lines of Communication: Has direct reporting relationship to the environmental manager and interactive communications with the field inspector, license compliance lead, PM, and RE. Authorities: Has the authority to advise the PM on matters of license compliance. Has the authority to recommend stop-work based on an actual or potential adverse environmental condition. 2.4 Specialty Inspectors Not applicable. 2.5 Lines of Communication and Authority Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 8 The lines of communication and authority for each role are described in Section 2.3 of this QCIP. Section 2.7 lists personnel who have authority to stop work because of adverse quality, environmental, or license conditions. 2.6 Approval and Rejection of Work PG&E’s field inspector has the on-site authority to approve and reject work. The RE and EOR have the authority to approve or reject work. The field inspector communicates directly with the RE and EOR for situations where the drawings or specifications do not appear to be appropriate for the conditions encountered or where rejection of work is under consideration or has been decided. The PM has the authority to approve or reject work in accordance with the contract documents. 2.7 Authority to Stop Work The following QCIP personnel have authority to stop work due to adverse quality, environmental or license conditions: •QC manger, •Field inspector, •RE, •EOR The following personnel have authority to recommend stop work to the RE or field inspector because of adverse environmental or license conditions: •License compliance lead and •Environmental lead. As part of PG&E’s commitment to safety, all project personnel have the authority to stop work because of an unsafe or potentially unsafe condition or work practice. 2.8 Statement of Independence PG&E implements this QCIP with personnel independent from personnel responsible for construction. The organization chart in Appendix A delineates the independent relationship between the constructor and the QC inspection personnel. 2.9 Resumes Resumes for QCIP personnel authorized to stop work or recommend stop-work are provided in Appendix B. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 9 3. INSPECTION PLAN AND FIELD PRACTICES The purpose of this section is to provide guidance for implementation of this QCIP and to describe the inspection, reporting, and documentation procedures to be used for the project. 3.1 Inspection Criteria PG&E will perform inspection of this project according to the criteria defined in the approved- for-construction design drawings, project specifications, and this QCIP. Environmental compliance criteria are specified in the ERTC, project-specific permits, license conditions, and resource agency agreements. The relevant documents are referenced in Appendix C, “Reference List of Project-Related Documents.” The project-specific inspection checklist is included in Appendix D, “Inspection and Hold Point Checklist,” and the material and field-testing checklist is included in Appendix E, “Material and Field-Testing Requirements.” The project specifications, design drawings, and this QCIP may be revised as necessary during construction to reflect field changes and requirements from resource and regulatory agencies. Any proposed revisions to the drawings or specifications must be coordinated with the regulatory agencies and may require additional regulatory authorization. All construction work and field inspections will be performed in accordance with the latest approved revisions to the project design and construction documents. 3.2 Knowledge of Construction Plans and Specifications The QCIP team will have a complete understanding and knowledge of the specifications, design drawings, and environmental compliance requirements. The EOR and the RE are responsible for ensuring that the field inspector is familiar with the specifications, design drawings, and the inspection requirements for the project. 3.3 Inspection Equipment and Resources The staffing plan and materials testing laboratory used to support this QCIP are shown in the organization chart in Appendix A. An off-site laboratory will be used for material testing on the project. The material testing is described in greater detail in Section 6 of this QCIP. 3.4 Constructor Operations The constructor will operate independently from QCIP personnel and is responsible for safely constructing a quality project. The constructor is responsible for their own methods, schedule, and phasing, within the limitations of the contract, where applicable. PG&E’s field inspector will inspect and verify the constructor’s work and has the authority to stop work because of nonconformance or deficiency. The constructor will be informed of personnel, as outlined in Section 2.7 of this QCIP, that have the authority to stop work because of nonconformance or deficiency. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 10 3.5 Coordination with Constructor’s Schedule The field inspector will coordinate schedules with the constructor to confirm all testing and inspections take place as required by the approved-for-construction drawings, specifications, and this QCIP. 3.6 QCIP Operations The field inspector is responsible for performing and/or coordinating the inspection and testing requirements of this QCIP to validate and confirm compliance with the project specifications, design drawings, and environmental requirements. When deficiencies are identified, the inspector should take the actions shown in the table below. Type of Deficiency Identified Inspector Actions Construction quality or nonconformance Report the findings immediately to the RE, the EOR, the constructor, and the PM for follow-up actions Environmental Report the finding immediately to the license compliance lead and the environmental lead Nonconformance issues that can be resolved in the field Coordinate with the constructor to enforce immediate corrective actions Nonconformance that requires further technical review and evaluation Seek input from the EOR and the RE to develop the appropriate corrective actions QCIP personnel, as defined in Section 2.7, have the authority to stop work, at any time, if the non-compliant condition presents a safety risk, or, if its continuation would cause a deficiency to the project or potential damage to the environment. 3.7 Frequency of Inspections The frequency of inspections and testing is described in Appendix D, “Inspection and Hold Point Checklist,” and Appendix E, “Material and Field-Testing Requirements.” 3.8 Documentation and Follow-up Action Procedures for reporting, producing documentation, and following up with action for QCIP- related reports are described in Section 4 of this QCIP. Report templates are provided in Appendix F. “QCIP Reporting Templates.” 3.9 Training A training program is not required for this project. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 11 4. DOCUMENTATION The purpose of QCIP reporting is to document the observation, investigation, testing, and analysis of inspection work. This section describes the proposed QCIP-related reporting for this project. 4.1 Daily Inspection Reports The field inspector will use the daily inspection report to document construction activity each day. A sample report is provided in Appendix F, “QCIP Reporting Templates.” The report will contain the following information: •date; •all relevant activities of the field inspector and constructor for the reporting day; •pertinent conversations with the constructor and instructions given to constructor; •inspections, acceptances, and rejections; •factual comments within field inspector’s area of responsibility; •detailed record of work performed by the constructor; •problems (e.g., relating to installation, design, equipment, damages, claims, quality); •details of labor, equipment usage, and standby equipment hours; •weather conditions; •work delays, reasons, and remedial actions; •change order information; •safety observations or infractions brought to the constructor’s attention; •details (e.g., quantities, clearances) recorded or observed by field inspector; •field inspector’s name and signature; and •photographs (i.e., construction progress photos). The RE, EOR and PM will review the daily inspection reports and follow-up with the field inspector for any clarification or further information needed. 4.2 Nonconformance Reports If a nonconformance with the specification, design drawings, or license conditions is identified, that work activity will be stopped and the following reporting, documentation, and follow-up process will be followed: •Initiation: The field inspector will immediately notify the RE, EOR, and constructor of the nonconformance condition related to construction quality. If the nonconformance is Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 12 related to a license condition the license compliance lead should also be notified immediately. •Coordination, Review, and Distribution: Nonconformance Type Actions Issue that can be resolved in the field Field inspector coordinates with the constructor to enforce immediate corrective actions Issue that requires further technical review and evaluation •Field inspector will, within 1 calendar day, complete the initial portion of the nonconformance report (NCR) by documenting the location, date, and description of the discrepancy and submit a copy of the report to the constructor, EOR, RE, license compliance lead, DSE or SME, and PM •EOR will develop the corrective action in coordination with the RE, constructor, PM, license compliance lead, and the appropriate regulatory agencies. •If applicable, the license compliance lead, RE, and DSE or SME, will obtain the appropriate agency approvals for the corrective action. •Follow-up and Resolution: Upon approval and authorization of the corrective action, the field inspector will coordinate with the constructor to enforce and manage implementation of the corrective action. The field inspector will monitor and inspect construction of the corrective action to confirm that the nonconformance condition is corrected. •Tracking: Upon the field inspector’s acceptance of the corrected construction the field inspector will complete the corrective measure section of the NCR with a description of the corrective measures taken and the date of completion of the corrective measures. The field inspector, RE, and EOR will sign and date the completed report as of the date the correction was accepted. Construction activities that were stopped because of the nonconformance will resume after the NCR is completed and signed. 4.3 Other Periodic Reports The environmental deficiency report is described in Section 7 of this QCIP. Additional reporting required as part of the regulatory authorization for this project are listed below: Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 13 •Final construction report (if required) 4.4 Maintenance of Records The original copies of QCIP-related documentation will be filed in the project electronic files. The field inspector will keep copies of all QCIP-related reports at the project field office. QCIP- related reports will be distributed to project personnel as described below. •Daily Inspection Report: PM, EOR, and RE •Inspection and Hold Point Checklist: PM, EOR, and RE •Material Test Report: field inspector, EOR, RE, PM, and constructor •NCR: field inspector, PM, EOR, RE, DSE/SME, QC manager, constructor, and license compliance lead •Environmental Deficiency Report (EDR): field inspector, PM, environmental lead, constructor, and license compliance lead 4.5 Photographs/Videos The field inspector and other project staff will document the construction progress with photographs. Photographs are also included as part of the Daily Inspection Report. Photograph and video records will be stored on PG&E’s project record file after completion of the project. 5. TRAINING Team members assigned to the project are trained and qualified in their areas of expertise. Field inspectors have experience with similar work and have the appropriate certifications necessary to inspect the project. 5.1 Study Materials Not applicable 5.2 Classroom Instruction Not applicable 5.3 On-the-Job Training and Supervision The RE and EOR are responsible for providing project specific QCIP awareness training for the field inspectors and engineering staff assigned to be on-site. All on-site QCIP personnel will have full knowledge and understanding of the design drawings, specifications, and this QCIP. The environmental lead will provide training on the environmental requirements (ERTC) for the project. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 14 5.4 Proficiency Testing and Certification Not applicable 5.5 Resume Update If personnel with stop-work authority on the project changes, Appendix A and B of this QCIP will be updated and resubmitted to FERC for review and authorization. 6. MATERIAL TESTING The approved-for-construction drawings and specifications establish testing requirements for the project and the standards and codes to which the work will conform. The QCIP team will use the specified tests to verify that the work is performed in accordance with these documents. 6.1 Testing Schedule Appendix E summarizes the project testing schedule that specifies the type and number of tests required to validate and confirm that all work elements comply to the specified standards. 6.2 Testing Standards Appendix E summarizes the test method, standard, and/or code that is specified in the project drawings and specifications. 6.3 Testing Organization Testing laboratories are identified in the Appendix A, “QCIP Organization Chart.” 6.4 Adequacy of On-Site Laboratory Not applicable 6.5 Adequacy of Off-Site Laboratory The material testing laboratory to be used for this project is fully equipped to perform the tests listed in Appendix E of this QCIP. The testing lab is accredited to perform the tests specified and conforms to the requirements set forth by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Adequate on-site storage will be provided for concrete cylinder molds and curing boxes as needed. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 15 6.6 Evaluation of Testing Data and Actions Required The EOR and RE will review and evaluate all material test results. If the results of material testing indicate nonconformance with specified requirements the constructor may be directed to remove and replace substandard materials. 6.7 Documentation Material test documentation and any necessary follow-up action will be retained in the project files as outlined in Section 4 of this QCIP. 7. EROSION CONTROL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE 7.1 Environmental Compliance Plan Project-specific environmental permits and compliance requirements are specified in the PD, dated May, 2024. The ERTC was developed for the scope of work defined in the (PD). The field inspector and environmental lead are responsible for confirming compliance with the environmental requirements during construction. 7.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan The proposed work activity will cause minimal soil disturbance (< .9 acres). Erosion and sediment control will be managed in accordance with PG&E Water Quality Group and Good Housekeeping. 7.3 License Requirements Not applicable. 7.4 Specialized Plans, Permits, and Approvals The following approvals and authorizations are required prior to the start of construction: •FERC authorization is required for project construction. 7.5 Frequency of Inspections The frequency of environmental inspections by the field inspectors and the environmental lead are specified in Appendix D, “Inspection and Hold Point Checklist.” The project-specific Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is listed in Section 7.2. 7.6 Documentation and Corrective Actions Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 16 The field inspector will document inspection observations and assessments of environmental conditions as described in Sections 3, 4, and 7.7 of this QCIP. Corrective actions necessary to remedy environmental nonconformance will be implemented as described in Section 7.7 below. 7.7 Environmental Deficiency Report If an environmental nonconformance condition is identified, the field inspector or environmental lead will complete an EDR. Documentation and corrective actions will be accomplished in accordance with Sections 3 and 4 of this QCIP. If a nonconformance with the environmental requirement is identified, the following process will be followed: •Initiation: If an environmental nonconformance is identified by the field inspector they will immediately notify the PM. The PM will then immediately coordinate with the environmental and/or license compliance lead to determine the course of action for mitigations and timely external reporting requirements. •Coordination and Distribution: The field inspector or the environmental lead will complete the EDR within 1 calendar day noting the location, date, and description of the nonconformance. The field inspector or the environmental lead will submit a copy of the EDR to the constructor, RE, EOR, license compliance lead, PM, and environmental lead and/or field inspector. If a major deficiency results in impacts to the environment, the field inspector or the environmental lead will stop the construction activity, and, if immediate action is required to mitigate ongoing impacts, contact the PM and constructor to initiate such effort. Consistent with PG&E’s Power Generation Department’s incident reporting procedures, the license compliance or environmental lead will immediately report the environmental deficiency to the appropriate regulatory, resource, and permit agency representative(s). •Follow-up and Resolution: The constructor will prepare a plan of measures for review and acceptance by the field inspector and environmental lead. Corrective measures will be implemented upon approval by the field inspector environmental lead, and, if necessary, the regulatory agency representative(s). The environmental lead and the field inspector will inspect the corrected construction for compliance with environmental requirements. •Tracking: If the completed corrective measure is acceptable, the field inspector and the environmental lead will sign and date the EDR with the date the correction was accepted. Construction will resume (if it was necessary to halt work) after the EDR is completed and signed. The license compliance or environmental lead will advise the regulatory agency representative(s) of the corrective action and provide necessary documentation. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 17 8. SCHEDULE 8.1 Start and Finish Dates Proposed Start Date: October 1, 2024 Proposed Finish Date: November 30, 2024 8.2 Anticipated Construction Sequence The preliminary construction sequence and schedule is provided in the table below. The LC will be notified of any adjustments to the scheduled start or finish construction dates and these changes will be communicated to FERC. #Activity Description Schedule 1 Mobilization to the project site Oct 2024 2 Saw cut pavement, demo pavement and restroom Oct 2024 3 Set vault toilet and Food Cabinets Oct-Nov 2024 4 Finish grading and concrete pavement Nov 2024 8.3 Staged and Phased Construction Not applicable. 9. PLANNED USE OF CONSULTANTS Not applicable. 9.1 Areas of Inspection and Review A Board of Consultants is not required for this project. 9.2 Consultants Names and Resumes Not applicable. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program 1 APPENDIX A QCIP ORGANIZATION CHART Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program QC Manager(1) Larry McKee Field Inspector(1) Scott Johnson Testing Laboratory NV5 - Licensee - Engineering Manager Joe Landucci Responsible Engineer(1) Gavin Rhoads Engineer of Record(1) Robert Harp SME(1) Jeff Jukkola Project Manager Drew Petersen Constructor Christian Baxter (PG&E General Construction) Regulatory Compliance License Compliance(2) Lead Jamie Visinoni Environmental Lead(2) Jim Mckay QCIP Organization Chart •(1) AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK DUE TO ADVERSE QUALITY, EVIRONMENTAL, or LICENSE CONDITIONS. RESUMES ATTACHED IN APPENDIX B. (2) AUTHORITY TO RECOMMEND STOP WORK DUE TO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL OR LICENSE CONDITIONS. RESUMES ATTACHED IN APPENDIX B. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program APPENDIX B RESUMES FOR QCIP PERSONNEL WITH STOP-WORK AUTHORITY Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Gavin Rhoads, PE Civil Responsible Engineer Email: GTR5@pge.com Power Generation │ 300 Lakeside Drive │ Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 530-370-6685 1 PROFESSIONAL SINCE: 2017 LICENSES •California Licensed Civil Engineer (No. 88085) EDUCATION •Degree B.S., Civil Engineering California State University, Chico, CA, 2010 TRAINING •PG&E Dam Safety Training o Introduction to Dams o PG&E Dam Safety Program o Basic Dam Surveillance and Monitoring o Basic Dam Inspections o Basic Dam Maintenance o Dam Surveillance and Monitoring o Inspection of Embankment Dams o Inspection of Concrete and Masonry Dams •Competent Person Certification – Fall Protection PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Gavin Rhoads has over 12 years of experience in engineering design and project management of dam, hydropower conveyance, water resource, embankment, road, bridge, and infrastructure projects. Specific expertise includes: •Responsible Engineer for large, complex, multi-discipline projects related to hydroelectric powerhouses, dams, gates, low level outlets, bridges, roads, cofferdams, tailraces, recreation facilities, and associated hydropower infrastructure. •Dam Repairs/Modifications – Act as Responsible Engineer, participate as a civil engineering reviewer, and manage Engineer of Record (EORs), evaluating and selecting repair alternatives, and designing and constructing the selected alternative, including structural concrete/shotcrete projects. •Low level outlet and tailrace condition assessments – Act as the Responsible Engineer to evaluate existing conditions for concrete low level outlet and tailrace. These condition assessments involved borescope inspection, Non-Destructive Evaluation (methods include: Impact Echo (IE), Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW), Slab Impulse Response (SIR) and compressional (P-) wave tomography), core drilling and laboratory testing and cementitious patching of core holes. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Gavin Rhoads, PE Civil Responsible Engineer Email: GTR5@pge.com Power Generation │ 300 Lakeside Drive │ Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 530-370-6685 2 PROJECTS •Poe LC - Bardees Bar Rec & Cul Resource Imp 2023 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install recreational facilities at Bardees Bar on the Feather River. Activities included access road improvements for approximately a half mile stretch, placing aggregate base and compacting, install and compaction of large aggregate base parking lot, install of a CTX vault toilet, concrete access and install of a concrete pad with a steel shade structure. Structural steel for shade structure required shop visits and weld inspections. •Caribou 1 Intake – Concrete Repairs and Landside Anchors 2023 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install a new walkway connecting mechanism, protective steel corner guards and repair the concrete deterioration of the intake structure for Caribou 1 powerhouse. Activities included installation and inspection of large steel corner guards and new steel framing to anchor the floating walkway to the tower, use of temporary docks and boats for safe access, repair of concrete on intake structure with Sika 211SCC Plus, chipping away unsound concrete, installation of supplemental rebar and anodes, use of divers, grout injection, installation of new log boom anchor on tower and installation of two landside anchors for the floating walkway and log boom. Excavation and subsurface preparation of soil for new anchor blocks. •Cresta Powerhouse – Tailrace Erosion Repairs 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to repair the concrete erosion of the tailrace and localized area of erosion on the slope adjacent to the end of the tailrace training wall. Activities included cutting in an access road to the river level, constructing a crane pad, installing an engineered sack cofferdam, dewatering the tailrace, monitoring pressure under the tailrace slab and behind the training walls during dewatering, drilling additional weep holes to equalize pressure, pumping nuisance water, placing concrete and verifying that concrete met specifications, investigation of void space under tailrace slab via borescope and by taking depth measurements. •Canyon Dam Low Level Outlet - Install Cutoff Wall 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install a cutoff wall and wing wall and inject grout into void found under the concrete flip bucket at the downstream face of the low level outlet (LLO) structure at Lake Almanor (Canyon Dam). Activities included improving the existing access road, installation of a 40 cubic feet per second (CFS) bypass system to supply the Upper North Fork of the Feather River (UNFFR) with instream flow releases (IFR), closing and sealing of gates at the intake structure, preparing and adhering to a drilling program plan (DPP) for subsurface investigation, developing and adhering to a temporary construction surveillance and monitoring plan (TCSMP), adjusting the design with design change notifications (DNCs) due to conditions found during excavation, excavating sump holes and diverting nuisance water, placement of dentil concrete, structural concrete and contact grouting. •Canyon Dam Low Level Outlet – Concrete Repairs 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Gavin Rhoads, PE Civil Responsible Engineer Email: GTR5@pge.com Power Generation │ 300 Lakeside Drive │ Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 530-370-6685 3 Served as Responsible Engineer to investigate and repair concrete damage of the LLO structure at Lake Almanor. Concrete condition assessment involved Non-Destructive Evaluation (methods include: Impact Echo (IE), Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW), Slab Impulse Response (SIR) and compressional (P-) wave tomography), core drilling and laboratory testing and cementitious patching of 4” core holes. Repair methods involved chipping away unsound concrete, pull testing concrete substrate, saw-cutting concrete edges, installation of supplemental rebar and Rawl pins, epoxy injection of cracks, form-and-pour placement of Sika 211, and shotcrete application of MasterEmaco 488. •DeSabla Forebay – Slope Erosion Control 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to reestablish downstream dam face and place riprap for erosion protection. Activities included removing loose material on downstream dam face, excavating trenches to toe-in riprap, placing 1,950 cubic yards of riprap to mitigate future erosion, excavate and recompact benches on upstream slope of dam to reestablish crest width. •DeSabla Reservoir Dam – Install Piezometer Stairs 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install safe access for the piezometer on the downstream face of the dam. Activities included installation of stairs and rails with a landing for accessing a piezometer. •Philbrook Reservoir Dam – Install Piezometer Stairs 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install safe access for the piezometer on the downstream face of the dam. Activities included installation of stairs and rails with a landing for accessing a piezometer. •Scott Dam – Replace and Relocate Catwalk 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to install safe access for toe drains near the left groin downstream of the dam. Activities included installation of stairs and rails with multiple landings, using a helicopter for placing aggregate base for step backfill, using a helicopter for placing concrete for the rails, demolishing the existing catwalk, compacting step fill to firm and unyielding condition. •Haskins Valley Campground – Replace Boat Ramp 2021 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as Responsible Engineer to replace the existing boat ramp and parking lot at Haskins Valley Campground at Bucks Lake. Activities included removal of existing pavement, meeting subgrade and compaction, installing a new culvert, installing riprap and access stairs, and re-paving the parking lot. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer 2021 to Present •Served as Responsible Engineer on large-scale, complex, multi-discipline capital and expense projects related to hydroelectric powerhouses, dams, low level outlets, tunnels, pipelines, tailraces, bridges, roads, cofferdams, recreation facilities, and associated hydropower infrastructure. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Gavin Rhoads, PE Civil Responsible Engineer Email: GTR5@pge.com Power Generation │ 300 Lakeside Drive │ Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 530-370-6685 4 Gas Transmission Systems, Engineer 2011 to 2021 •Provided natural gas pipeline project designs for both transmission and distribution piping systems. Designs included replacements of existing systems as well as new facilities. •Provided field support during construction to address issues and challenges as they were discovered during construction. •Provided field engineering support for pipeline cutoffs and replacement during the rebuild of Paradise CA after the Camp Fire. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ROBERT F. HARP Principal Engineer ROLE Structural Engineer EDUCATION BS, Architectural Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, 1983 AA, Architecture, Shasta College, Redding, California, 1980 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION California, Civil Engineer, 1986 California, Structural Engineer, 1989 MEMBERSHIPS •Structural Engineers Association of Central California, Director of the Board •Shasta Cascade Structural Engineers Association – Board of Directors, Technical Programs Committee Member, Past President •American Society of Civil Engineers •American Concrete Institute •American Welding Society •International Code Council •American Council of Engineering Companies •International Concrete Repair Institute •American Institute of Steel Construction •Construction Specifications Institute •American Society of Safety Engineers OVERVIEW Mr. Harp has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 1984 and is a stockholder in the firm. He is the Vice President and Principal Engineer in charge of Hydro and Heavy Civil Projects. He has extensive civil and structural engineering experience in managing and providing successful solutions for a variety of unique and complex civil and structural engineering projects. His areas of expertise include: •Hydro-Facilities Design and Engineering •Hydro Gates, Gate Hoists, and Gate Seals •Dams and Cofferdams •Service Center Design and Engineering •Powerhouse renovations and modernizations •Landslide Repairs and Mitigation •Water Conveyance Systems: Canals, Liners, Flumes, Gates, and Trash Racks •Construction Administration •Buildings, Water and Wastewater Facility Structures •Bridges, Industrial Facilities, and Retaining Structures •Failure Investigations, Forensic Engineering, and Expert Witness •Roofing and Waterproofing (above and below grade) •Drainage Systems •Moisture Intrusion Investigations and Repair Recommendations •Design of Structural Repairs and Retrofits •Seismic Evaluations and Retrofits •Structural Design of Repairs and Upgrades to Historical Facilities •Fall Protection Systems and Lifelines •Alternatives Analysis, Engineering Reports, and Cost Analysis •Deep Foundations: Micro-piles, Caissons, Piles, Sheet Piles, and CIDH •Cranes and Hoists •All types of recreational facilities, including campgrounds, day use areas, picnic areas, hiking trails, pedestrian bridges, visitors’ centers, and causeways, boat launches, swim areas and beaches, river boater put-ins/takeouts, fishing piers, and roads. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ROBERT HARP PAGE 2 KEY PG&E PROJECTS Tiger Creek Afterbay Gate Repair Tiger Creek radial gate was damaged from impacting the dam crest. Repairs to the gate included partial replacement of damaged structural steel (some fracture critical), new lifting brackets, hoist modifications and testing, design and construction of a temporary cofferdam, new seals, recoating of structural steel, and permitting assistance. Construction included diver and helicopter support. Pit 1 Reservoir Cofferdams Design of a structural steel cofferdam that facilitates dewatering both radial gates for ongoing maintenance. Inskip Dam Repairs Designed repairs for flood damage to the radial gate, spill crest, dam toe, intake structure undermining and slope erosion. This project also included design of a dewatering plan consisting of pumped bypass and temporary cofferdam. Gansner Bar Fish Barrier Removal Project Removal of Gansner Bar fish barrier required routing river flows away from the site, allowing work to be performed in the dry. This required extensive planning and design to develop a manmade bypass channel. Flow was diverted into the channel using a series of waterfilled bladder cofferdams and concrete block and river bottom liner. Scott Dam Radial Gate Hoist Replacement and Slide Gate Repair Scott Dam has 5 radial gates and 26 slide gates. The radial gate hoist was replaced with a new cart-mounted trolley-drive hoist, a new prime power generator was added, and all slide gates were either repaired or replaced. Mr. Harp led the engineering design team responsible for all aspects of this project (structural/mechanical, civil, corrosion/coatings, electrical/controls). Construction included helicopter support. Krause 2 Flume Replacement and Landslide Stabilization The Krause 2 Flume was constructed within an active landslide causing significant movement and structural damage to the flume. Mr. Harp managed the engineering design team in preparation of alternatives analysis, cost estimate, and final engineering and design for relocation and replacement of the flume and landslide remediation, as well as Post Design Services. PG&E Burney Service Center Renovation and Upgrades Mr. Harp is the principal engineer for this project, that is currently on hold due to Covid 19. This project includes a significant renovation of the existing service center, replacement of existing buildings, upgrades to the heliport, outdoor storage and laydown area improvements, and new wood and welding shop additions. Pit3, Rock Creek and Wise Powerhouse Renovations and Modernizations Mr. Harp was the principal architectural designer and engineer for these significant renovations and modernizations of PG&E’s hydro-electric powerhouses. These projects included interior renovation, sound proofing, fire proofing, new operations centers, new kitchens and restrooms, ADA upgrades, and new roofing, HVAC and electrical. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ROBERT HARP PAGE 3 Pit 3, 4, 5 Relicensing Project Mr. Harp was project manager and design engineer providing engineering services during construction to Barnard Construction for the Pit 3, 4, 5 Relicensing Project. Services provided include construction staking, Pit 4 Dam cofferdam, electrical inspection of stand-by generator at Pit 5 Dam, fall protection, crane pad, bridge analysis, crane access review, assistance with design modifications to Pit 4 Dam trash rack, and crane supported drill rig/man basket. Pit 3, 4, 5 Recreational Improvements Mr. Harp managed PACE’s design team for the Pit 3, 4, 5 Recreation Improvements Project. This project included improvements or replacement of recreational facilities at 30 separate sites along the Pit River, from the upper reach of Lake Britton to just upstream of Pit 5 Powerhouse. The project involved civil, structural, electrical, water, and wastewater engineering, and surveying and included renovations to existing campgrounds, new campgrounds, beach access and beach renovation, day use and picnic areas, information kiosks and boards, road improvements, river access hiking trails, boat launches, river boat in-put/takeout, and vista viewing points. Bear River Canal Emergency Repairs During spring of 2011, the Bear River Canal was taken out of service from a landslide. With the onset of summer and the need for water to be delivered to downstream users, this project became a race against time. PACE provided quick-to-implement solutions for temporarily bypassing water at the affected area providing water to downstream users before the onset of hot weather. Mr. Harp managed PACE’s team of dedicated engineers in this endeavor. Pit 6 Powerhouse – Emergency Transformer Replacement While contractors were working within the dam’s tailrace, one of the two hydro-generators’ transformers failed. This required directing all Pit River flow through just one unit, as the construction work within the spill channel inhibited releases over the dam. Bringing the down unit back online as soon as possible was paramount to preserving redundancy in the system. Mr. Harp led PACE’s team of structural, civil, and electrical engineers who worked tirelessly with PG&E’s engineers and contractors to replace the failed transformer ahead of schedule. OTHER RELEVANT PG&E PROJECTS Mr. Harp was the project manager for the following PG&E projects: •Balch Camp Road Storm Damage Repairs •Drum Area Penstock and Canal Stairs and Platforms •Inskip Eagle Canyon Access Replacement Project •Rodger Flat Parking Lot Pavement Replacement •Lake Britton HPMP (slope stabilization project) •Fiddler Green Flume Catwalk Replacement •South Canal YB 78 Radial Gate Hoist Replacement •Pit 6 & 7 Powerhouse Tailrace Gate Hoist Replacement •Deer Creek Canopy Failure •Gansner Fish Barrier Removal •Hendricks and Philbrook Gauging Stations •Pit 5 Powerhouse Road Storm Damage Survey and Mapping •Rock Creek Crossing Seismic Upgrade – Geotechnical/Geological Investigation, Shoring, and Retaining Systems Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ROBERT HARP PAGE 4 OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Forks of Butte Hydroelectric Project Project Manager for the structural design of a powerhouse, landslide stabilization, and penstock for a 14.5 megawatt, $52M (1986) hydroelectric power generation facility in Magalia, California. Mr. Harp was responsible for the design of the concrete powerhouse structure that supported a 1.0-million-pound generator and is located at the base of an active landslide. Shasta College Project Manager for campus wide re-roofing and waterproofing projects. Roof areas total more than 250,000 square feet. Responsible for preparing plans, technical specifications, contract documents, and construction management, including inspection on various campus wide projects. Shasta County Administration Center Project Manager for the structural design of a 105,000-square-foot, 3-story administration building and a 120,000-square-foot, 3-story parking structure. This fast-track project was $3M under budget and completed on schedule. City of Redding Project Manager for structural projects for the City of Redding, including Convention Center, electrical control buildings, sub-stations, street-covered mall, bridges, and water and wastewater treatment plants. Bridges Mr. Harp has experience designing bridges for highways, streets, and pedestrian usage. Mr. Harp has designed bridges constructed with concrete, steel, wood, and cable suspension materials. He has also prepared falsework designs for contractors. Forensic Engineering Project Manager for numerous investigations involving structural failures, material failures, failing roofing, and waterproofing systems. Mr. Harp has served as an expert witness on many cases including engineering and construction defects and has provided expert testimony in arbitration, depositions, and trial. Investigations include buildings constructed with concrete, steel, and wood, as well as slabs on grade and penstocks. Waterproofing failure and moisture intrusion investigations include most roofing types, exterior decks, below grade waterproofing (basements), and wall and window systems. PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS “Design and Construction Recommendations for Steel Moment Frames,” report to City of Redding, 1998. Co-authored, “Guide to Repairing and Strengthening Your Home before the Next Earthquake,” in conjunction with Larry Boisclaire for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the aftermath of the April 25 and 26, 1992, Cape Mendocino earthquake in South Humboldt County. Presentation, American Construction Inspectors Association for Structural Masonry, July 13, 1994. Presentation, Shasta Cascade Structural Engineers Association Technical Program on plate connected wood trusses, 1992. Guest lecturer for Professional Practice Class at Chico State University. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Jeff A. Jukkola, PE Senior Consulting Civil Engineer Email: JAJV@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: (530) 624-8640 1 Confidential PROFESSIONAL SINCE: 2001 LICENSES •California Licensed Civil Engineer (No. 67711) EDUCATION •Degree B.S., Civil Engineering California State University, Chico, 2001 TRAINING •PG&E Dam Safety Training o Introduction to Dams o PG&E Dam Safety Program o Basic Dam Surveillance & Monitoring o Basic Dam Inspections o Basic Dam Maintenance o Dam Surveillance and Monitoring o Inspection of Embankment Dams o Inspection of Concrete and Masonry Dams •Qualified Person and Competent Person Certification – Fall Protection •QSD/QSP Training – SWPPP Development, September 2011 •Autodesk University, November 2007 •Resident Engineer (RE) Academy, May 2005 •Storm Water Pollution Prevention Training, April 2005 •Federal Project Series, Caltrans/ITS 2002-2005 •PADI Divemaster/Advanced Open Water Diver/Rescue Diver/Open Water PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Jeff Jukkola has 23 years of experience in engineering design, construction and project management of dam, hydropower conveyance, water resource, embankment, road, bridge, and infrastructure projects. Specific expertise includes: •Responsible Engineer for large, complex, multi-discipline projects related to hydroelectric powerhouses, dams, gates, penstocks, tunnels, pipelines, fish ladders, weirs, bridges, roads, cofferdams, marine dredging, recreation facilities, and associated hydropower infrastructure. •In-Water Engineering and Construction – Act as Responsible Engineer support for dive inspections, bathymetric survey sediment modeling, and marine construction activities, including cofferdams, barge design reviews, and barge mounted dredging. •Dam Repairs/Modifications – Act as Responsible Engineer, participate as a civil engineering reviewer, and manage Engineer of Record (EORs), evaluating and selecting repair alternatives, and designing and constructing the selected alternative, including structural concrete/shotcrete projects. •Dam and Spillway Condition Assessments - Acted as the Responsible Engineer to evaluate existing conditions for concrete dams and spillways. These condition assessments involved bathymetric survey, ROV inspection, Non-Destructive Evaluation (methods include: Impact Echo (IE), Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW), Slab Impulse Response (SIR) compressional (P-) wave tomography and infrared Imaging (IR)), core drilling and laboratory testing (mostly from swing stage or rope access) and cementitious patching of core holes. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Jeff A. Jukkola, PE Senior Consulting Civil Engineer Email: JAJV@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: (530) 624-8640 2 Confidential PROJECTS •Rock Creek Bench Recreational Access Project 2016 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer and Project Manager to construct a parking area for recreational access to the North Fork of the Feather River. Activities included preparing temporary access, clearing/grubbing and tree removal, processing and trucking ~25,000 cy of fill material from borrow site, construction of sub drains, a rip rap key way, spreading and compacting fill in lifts, rip rap, culverts, metal and/or rock bollards (barriers), hot mix asphalt paving, metal beam guardrail, gates, information kiosk, pavement delineation, and new signage The facility will be located above an existing bench located about one-quarter of a mile •Grizzly Forebay Dam Access Improvements 2022 to 2023 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer for the installation of new handrails on the top of the dam, and new concrete foundations and fabrication of steel stairways on both left and right groins to access the downstream river channel and LLO. •Condition Assessments for Bucks Diversion and Grizzly Forebay Dams 2017 to 2021 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer o Grizzly Forebay Dam Condition Assessment/Alternative Analysis Phase 1 – Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Investigation Phase 2 - Core Drilling and Laboratory Testing (2021) o Bucks Diversion Dam Condition Assessment/Alternative Analysis Phase 1 – Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Investigation Phase 2 - Core Drilling and Laboratory Testing (2017) Served as the Responsible Engineer for condition assessments at both Bucks Diversion Dam and Spillway and Grizzly Forebay Dam. These condition assessments involved bathymetric survey, ROV inspection, Non-Destructive Evaluation (methods include: Impact Echo (IE), Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW), Slab Impulse Response (SIR) compressional (P-) wave tomography and infrared Imaging (IR)), core drilling and laboratory testing (mostly from swing stage or rope access) and a cementitious patching of 6” core holes. •Butt Valley Replace Valve House Bridge and Abutments 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer for the removal and replacement of the bridge abutments, wing walls, and placement of a new bridge. The project included subsurface geotechnical investigation including drilling of four exploratory borings (using six-inch diameter hollow stem auger), laboratory testing, placement of CLSM, structural concrete foundation, abutments and wingwalls, concrete armored RSP and concrete approaches. Cofferdams and a bypass water system was used to divert Butt Creek around the work location. •Potter Valley Cape Horn Dam Fish Hotel Improvements 2022 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Jeff A. Jukkola, PE Senior Consulting Civil Engineer Email: JAJV@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: (530) 624-8640 3 Confidential Served as the Responsible Engineer for the fabrication and installation of steel doors at the downstream face of the fish hotel openings that can be rapidly deployed and reopened, to mitigate sediment loading within the fish hotel during high flow events, which has prevented fish from moving upstream. Activities included the use of cranes, structural steel fabrication, installation of structural steel modifications to existing concrete structure and steel coatings. •Butt-Gansner Road Install L-Wall Project 2017 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer to repair the outer fill slope of the mountainous Butt-Gansner Road where erosion had caused the road to be narrowed and inboard ditch had filled with debris and was not functional. Preliminary engineering included geotechnical exploration of the subsurface materials, excavation of 14 exploratory test pits, logging the encountered materials, sampling of the subsurface soils, and project design. Construction included demolition and excavation, installation of new cast-in-place headwall drainage inlets and 24” CMP, construction of four cantilever concrete retaining walls, reconstruction of compacted road section. •Caribou Road at French Creek 2017 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer to repair a culvert crossing at French Creek located approximately 700 feet from the Caribou Powerhouses. The French Creek culvert crossing had been damaged from overtopping during storm events or debris flows from recent area wildfires, which could result in washouts and roadway sloughing into the adjacent reservoir due to heavy surface flow. Road failures in this location could potentially prohibit vehicle access to the powerhouses. The project preliminary engineering included geological reconnaissance mapping, geophysical (seismic refraction) surveys, hydrologic analysis drainage and culvert design. Construction included demolition of two primary 60-inch-diameter CMP culverts and two secondary 18-inch-diamter CMP culverts, demolition of existing timber wall, constructing four 48-inch diameter CMP culverts along a wider length of road, regrading existing basin to direct flows through new culverts, stability design of the gravity retaining wall system, construct new redi-rock wall, and reinforce culvert outlet and toe of gravity wall with rip rap rock slope protection. •Caribou Road at Mile Post 6 Soldier Pile Wall 2017 Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer Served as the Responsible Engineer to repair a 700-foot-long stretch of paved road serving as primary the access to the Caribou Powerhouse and Belden Dam. The repair location consists of a sweeping internal curve which had evidence of settlement along an approximate 300-foot length of the steep outboard roadway shoulder, which concentrated surface drainage discharge in this location to an existing 18” CMP culvert crossing under the road. The internal curve is located in a large swale that is potentially a historic landside feature and which posed a global stability concern in the long term. Additionally, the outboard slope of the road had deteriorated and undermined the edge of the road between sections of existing timber cribbing. The project preliminary engineering included geological reconnaissance mapping, geophysical (seismic refraction) surveys and design. Construction included demolishing existing timber and log crib walls, Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Jeff A. Jukkola, PE Senior Consulting Civil Engineer Email: JAJV@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: (530) 624-8640 4 Confidential construction of two new soldier pile walls to widen road section, construction of a new subgrade, aggregate base, and pavement road section, storm drainage improvements, scaling of loose rocks and install rockfall drapery on cut slope above road. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Pacific Gas and Electric, Responsible Engineer 2013 to Present •Served as Responsible Engineer on large-scale, complex, multi-discipline capital and expense projects related to hydroelectric powerhouses, dams, gates, penstocks, tunnels, pipelines, fish ladders, weirs, bridges, roads, cofferdams, recreation facilities, and associated hydropower infrastructure. City of Chico Capital Project Services Department, Civil Engineer 2005 to 2013 •Project Engineer and Project Manager for numerous projects. Responsibilities included surveying, design, calculations, authoring specifications, environmental permitting, grant applications, public meetings and workshops, budget management, right of way acquisition, utility coordination, preparation of construction documents, and construction inspection for municipal projects in Chico, CA. Butte County Department of Public Works, Civil Engineer 2001 to 2005 •Project Engineer on various maintenance and capital improvement projects from conceptual phase through construction stages. Responsibilities included design, calculations, authoring specifications, environmental permitting, grant applications, public meetings, budget management, right of way acquisition, utility coordination, preparation of construction documents, and construction inspection for municipal projects throughout Butte County, CA. Haling and Associates, Staff Engineer 2001 •Designed and inspected the construction of new onsite wastewater treatment facilities. Responsibilities included surveying, design, calculations, authoring specifications, environmental permitting, budget management, utility coordination, preparation of construction documents, and construction inspection for environmental engineering projects. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 1 CERTIFICATIONS • ACI – Fundamentals of Concrete Construction • ACI – Fundamentals of Concrete Materials • AWS Certified Welding Inspector No. 08051021 • American Society of Nondestructive Testing ASNT-TC-1A Level 1 • International Code Council Fireproofing No. 5319021-86 • SPRAT Level 1 No.181268 • OSHA Safety Associate Level 1 • ACI Field Level 1 No.00049036 PROFESSIONAL SINCE: 1998 EDUCATION/SEMINARS: • American Concrete Institute (ACI) Low-Density Cellular Concrete and Advanced Engineered Foam Technology • American Society of Nondestructive Testing • American Welding Society (AWS) Welding Technology • American Public Works Association (APWA), Storm Water Management and Construction Inspection • California Geotechnical Engineering Association (CalGeo), Loss Prevention Seminar and Technician Training • California Asphalt Paving Association (CalAPA), Asphalt Industry Leadership Seminar • Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), Codes and Standards Annual Seminar • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Northern CA Annual Conference • Society of Professional Rope Access Technicians (SPRAT) TRAINING • Introduction to Dam • PG&E Dam Safety Program • Basic Dam Surveillance & Monitoring • Basic Dam Inspections • Basic Dam Maintenance • Inspection of Embankment Dams • Inspection of Concrete and Masonry Dams • Excavation Safety, Competent Person Training • Scaffolding Safety, Competent Person Training • Safety at Heights, Competent Person PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. McKee has 26 years of construction and inspection experience. • Supervised construction engineering inspection and construction specifications. • Implementation of geotechnical engineering recommendations and requirements. • Prioritized tasks and effectively managed inspection staff on large projects. • Responsible for supervising construction engineering inspection and materials testing for a variety of projects (e.g., hydroelectric electrical transmission, and substation facilities California Department of Water Resource (DWR) and U.S Army Corp or Engineers projects (e.g., flood management, levee buttress, cofferdams, impermeable liners, high-pressure grouting, soil-cement/soil-cement-bentonite projects). • Inspection supervision, including: - Contract document review - Submittal review - Project communication - Quality assurance/quality control/quality control inspection program development and implementation - Inspection/field testing of work for compliance • Monitored construction progress, overall quality control and site safety, schedule and coordination, as-built drawings, and final project closeout. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 2 CERTIFICATIONS continued • ACI Aggregate Testing Technician Level 1 No. 00049036 • ACI Adhesive Anchor Installation Inspector No.00049036 • ACI Concrete Strength Testing Technician No.00049036 • Radiation Safety and Nuclear Gauge/Troxler No. 090987 • Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) for Portable Nuclear Gauges • American Heart Association First Aid CPR/AED • VideoRay Remotely Operated Vehicle Certified Operator Training • APWA-Certified Construction Inspector • BIA Certified Storm Water Prevention Pollution Plan • California Safety Training Corporation/Confined Space Training • SCBA 8 Hour Tunnel Rescue Training • 40 Hour HAZWOPER 29 CFR 1910.120 and CCR 5192 PROJECTS • Inspection Supervisor Backfill 2017-2024 PG&E PERIODIC AND TEMPORARY SUPERVISOR COVERAGE Temporarily backfilled for inspection supervisor and Quality Control Manager role on numerous occasions between 2017 and 2024. Managed staff assignments and oversight of the inspection support team responsible for quality control on each project and permit adherence. • McCloud Dam Spillway Replacement DPP Geotechnical Investigation 2023 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of drilling 50 HQ and 2 sonic exploratory borings and test pits at various locations along the dam, spillway channel, LLO tunnel and FERC boundaries. Work included remote, high angle helicopter accessible drilling methods including mud rotary, sonic, rock coring methods, and geophysical surveying to characterize subsurface conditions for use in developing and evaluating spillway improvements. Responsibilities included: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Geotechnical investigation, drilling operations, geophysical surveying o Placement of reinforcing steel and epoxy anchors/dowels o Spillway anchor testing program o Structural concrete placement, consolidation, and curing Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 3 o Compressive strength test specimens o Stop work authority • Wise Forebay Dam – Stump and Root Removal 2023 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of improvements to the existing earth fill dam and mortared rock, masonry intake channel. Work included removal and backfill of trees, stumps, and roots from the intake channel banks and toe of dam. Responsibilities included: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Water management o Tree stump/root removal and backfill o Soils compaction testing using ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method o Stop work authority • Pit 3 Dam Bridge Repair 2022 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of concrete rehabilitation to the existing Pit 3 Dam bridge originally constructed in 1922. The Pit 3 Dam bridge consists of a multiple structural steel-encased concrete arches that support the 492-foot-long reinforced concrete bridge over the dam crest. Responsibilities included: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Aggregate Base and Soils compaction testing using ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method o Concrete demolition, subsurface preparation and patching methods o Reinforcing steel replacement o Epoxy dowels/anchors o Adhesion/tensile bond strength of concrete overlay o Epoxy injection of cracked concrete o Industrial painting and coatings Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 4 o Asphalt concrete pavement compaction testing using ASTM D2950 for density of asphalt mixtures in place by nuclear method o Field sampling and testing of plastic concrete for properties and compressive strength test specimens o Traffic Control and Public Safety o Stop work authority • Upper Peak Dam and Spillway Repair 2022 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of improving the existing earthfill, drystone masonry dam and mortared rock, masonry spillway channel. Work included armoring the banks of the existing spill channel with rock slope protection (RSP) to protect against designed probable maximum flood (PMF) and removing and backfilling of trees, stumps, and roots from the channel banks and dam toe. Responsibilities included: - Staffing and oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Water bypass pumping o Spillway channel excavation o RSP placement o Tree stump/root removal and backfill o Soils compaction testing using both ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method and ASTM D1556 for density and unit weight of soil in place by sand-cone methods o Stop work authority • Fordyce Dam Seepage Mitigation 2021–2022 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of improving the existing rockfill embankment, upstream, concrete-faced dam to reduce seepage. The dam is 145 feet high and 1,220 feet long. Appurtenant construction activities included: - Dredging related to the temporary 450-foot-long cofferdam - Roadway improvements (8.5 miles) - Hard rock blasting - Water bypass pumping - Water quality evaluation during construction activities - Geotechnical investigation Responsibilities included: Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 5 - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Water bypass pumping o Year 1 geotechnical investigation – excavation and backfill of test pits at upstream dam toe o Concrete coring on the dam face and patching o Soils compaction testing using standard test method for in-place density and water content by nuclear method o Sampling and testing of plastic concrete for properties and compressive strength test specimens o Stop work authority • Lake Valley Dam Low-Level Outlet Pipe Improvement 2020 PG&E LEAD SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of removing and replacing approximately 365 linear feet of the original 30-inch steel low-level outlet (LLO) pipe, removing and abandoning two 20-inch valves, and backfilling the original 5-foot-wide by 7-foot-tall by 350-feet- long tunnel with cellular concrete. Responsibilities included: - Staffing and oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Verification of existing concrete bulkhead/steel LLO pipe demolition and replacement o Epoxy grouting o Epoxy dowel installation for new bulkhead o Steel pipe field welding in accordance with AWWA C206 and AWS D1.1 o Interior and exterior pipe coating o Sampling and testing of plastic concrete and cellular concrete for properties o Compressive strength test specimens o Stop work authority Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 6 • Upper Blue Lake Seismic Retrofit 2019–2020 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of improving the existing Upper Blue Lake Dam. The dam is approximately 790 feet long and 31 feet high at the maximum section. Seismic improvements to the existing dam include constructing an upstream 50-foot-wide rockfill buttress for stability, extending the twin LLO pipes, and constructing a new reinforced concrete headworks and intake structure. Responsibilities included: - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Cofferdam construction o Soils excavations o Engineered fill placement o Construction of rockfill buttress o Placement of reinforcing steel and epoxy anchors/dowels o Low-level pipe fabrication o Field welding in accordance with AWWA C206 and AWS D1.1 o Structural concrete placement, consolidation, and curing o Appurtenant construction activities related to dewatering/pumping o Engineered fill placement using ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method o Stop work authority • Poe Tunnel Liner Improvement 2019–2020 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of repairing an approximately 170-linear-foot section of structural shotcrete on the original 19-foot-diameter Poe tunnel constructed in the 1950s. Responsibilities included: - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Verification of underground rock drilling o Low-pressure contact grouting o Subdrain installation o Reinforcing steel and anchorage for shotcrete liner construction o Adit door repairs, including door seals, gasket replacement, and bolting o Industrial coatings o Helicopter operations Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 7 o Underground/tunnel work/tunnel safety orders o Appurtenant construction activities o Stop work authority • Rock Creek Dam Improvement and Siphon Project 2018 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope of work consisted of construction of a 36” inch diameter pipeline intake for Nevada Irrigation District (NID) water delivery system within the Rock Creek Dam. Work included construction of a headwall, and outlet structure. Responsibilities included inspection verification that means and methods used and materials placed met the project design drawings, QCIP, and specifications for dam embankment vegetation/tree removal, engineered fill placement/trench backfill, using standard test method for in-place density and water content by nuclear method. • Helms Pump Storage PH Penstock Access Tunnel Plug Leakage 2017–2018 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of repairing an approximately 270-linear-foot section of structural shotcrete on the original 30-foot-diameter Helms Powerhouse bypass tunnel and penstock access tunnel, constructing a waterproof geomembrane (Carpi) liner, and other leakage mitigation. Responsibilities included: - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Drilling underground rock o Installing rock anchors and proof load testing o High-pressure grouting o Installing subdrain, piezometer, and concrete weir o Installation of reinforcement anchors and reinforcement steel o Installation of shotcrete and gunite o Constructing waterproof geomembrane (carpi) liner o Completing activities related to appurtenant tunneling construction o Stop work authority • South Yuba Canal Mile 8.5 Flume Landslide 2017 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of replacing approximately 350’ linear feet of existing flume on the Upper Drum Conveyance System, South Yuba Canal. Work included landslide mitigation, demolition/removal of the existing damaged flume, realignment for new canal section and construction of both reinforced concrete canal sections and box flume. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 8 Responsibilities included: - Inspection verification that means and methods used and materials placed met the project design drawings, QCIP, and specifications the following activities: o Landslide mitigation excavation, o earthwork grading, o up-stream, and down-stream canal tie-in, o subdrain and drain panel installation including weep holes, o reinforcing steel placement and anchorage, o epoxy dowels, o sampling and testing shotcrete for properties, and compressive strength test specimens. o Stop work authority • San Joaquin No.3 Ditch Repair 2016 - 2017 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of replacing approximately 75’ linear feet of existing deteriorated canal liner on the San Joaquin No.3 Conveyance System. Work included construction of up-stream and down-stream tie-ins, expansion joints, transverse cut-off walls, weep holes, and installation of subdrains. Responsibilities included inspection verification that means and methods used and materials placed met the project design drawings, QCIP, and specifications. for water bypass pumping, up-stream, and down-stream excavation for new liner tie-in, subdrain and drain panel installation including weep holes, reinforcing steel placement and anchorage, epoxy dowels, sampling and testing shotcrete for properties, and compressive strength test specimens. • 2016 Annual Canal Liner Improvement 2016 PG&E SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of replacing approximately 300’ linear feet of existing deteriorated canal liner on the Lower Drum Conveyance System, Ragsdale Draw B1 and B2. Work included construction of up-stream and down-stream tie-ins, expansion joints, transverse cut-off walls, weep holes, and installation of subdrains. Responsibilities included inspection verification that means and methods used and materials placed met the project design drawings, QCIP, and specifications. for water bypass pumping, up-stream, and down-stream excavation for new liner tie-in, subdrain and drain panel installation including weep holes, reinforcing steel placement and anchorage, epoxy dowels, sampling and testing shotcrete for properties, and compressive strength test specimens. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 9 • Natomas Levee Improvement, Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency 2008–2015 KLEINFELDER SUPERVISORY INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of improving the 42-mile-long Natomas Basin perimeter levee system north of Sacramento to meet the 200-year level of flood protection. The project included: - Construction of 75-foot-deep soil-cement-bentonite (SCB) and soil-bentonite (SB) slurry cutoff walls by deep soil mixing and conventional slurry trench methods - Levee strengthening, including earth embankment construction - Levee slope improvements - Vegetation, tree stump, and root removal - Associated planned levee improvements in accordance with Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) regulations. Responsibilities included inspection for compliance with project drawings, quality control inspection program, and contract specification for: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Levee embankment engineered fill placement - Slurry wall construction activities - Tree stump, root, and utility abandonment removal and backfill - Soils compaction testing using both ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method and ASTM D1556 for density and unit weight of soil in place by sand-cone methods • Feather River and Yuba River Evaluation and Repairs, Three Rivers Levee 2012–2014 Improvement Authority KLEINFELDER SUPERVISORY INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of flood protection for the 20-mile-long Feather River and Yuba River perimeter levee system. The project included: - Construction of deep soil-cement-bentonite (SCB) slurry cutoff walls by deep soil mixing and conventional slurry trench methods - Levee strengthening including earth embankment construction - Levee slope improvements - Vegetation, tree stump, and root removal - Associated planned levee improvements in accordance with Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority and USACE regulations Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 10 Responsibilities included inspection for compliance with project drawings, quality control inspection program, and contract specification for: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Levee embankment engineered fill placement - Slurry wall construction activities - Tree stump, root, and utility abandonment removal and backfill - Soils compaction testing using both ASTM D6938 for in-place density and water content by nuclear method and ASTM D1556 for density and unit weight of soil in place by sand-cone methods • Kleinfelder Inspection Group Manager/Service Line Director 2008–2016 Construction Materials Testing/Inspection Group Manager and Service Line Director responsible for inspection services, QC/QA, project field reports, construction materials test results, contractor progress schedules, manpower/staffing and equipment verification, DSA, AASHTO/CCRL, and Caltrans laboratory accreditation, Radiation Safety Officer (RSO), daily safety meetings, coordination of project execution, managing inspection of work for compliance to contract documents, project review, planning, As-Built, RFI/Submittal review, cost management, invoicing, and project closeout. Projects included: - 2013-2015 Lower Drum Water Conveyance Outage - PG&E/Barnard Alliance Team Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan (PSEP) - PG&E multiple substation projects - SMUD East Campus Operations Center - Non-Urban Levee Evaluation California Department of Water Resources - Folsom Dam Spillway Concrete Forensic Testing - California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation State Wide On-Call Inspection Program - California Administration Office of the Courts, Northern California New Superior Courts • Kleinfelder Inspection Project Manager 2005–2008 Construction Materials Testing/Inspection Project Manager responsible for inspection services, project field reports, construction materials test results, contractor progress schedules, manpower/staffing and equipment verification, DSA, AASHTO/CCRL, and Caltrans laboratory accreditation, daily safety meetings, coordination of project execution, managing inspection of work for compliance to contract documents, project review, QC/QA planning, As-Built, RFI/Submittal review, cost management, invoicing, and project closeout. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 LARRY MCKEE SUPERVISOR, POWER GENERATION INSPECTION Email: Larry.McKee@pge.com Power Generation │ 12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 530-537-7006 11 Projects included: - 2006-2009 City of Sacramento Street Overlay Program - Foresthill Bridge Seismic Retrofit - Vineyard Surface Water Treatment Plant - City of Elk Grove On-Call Materials Testing Contract - Veterinary Medicine 3B Facility University of California at Davis • Kleinfelder Senior Inspector 2000–2005 Senior Inspector responsible for inspection services, project field reports, contractor progress schedules, manpower/staffing and equipment verification, daily safety meetings, coordination of project execution, managing inspection of work for compliance to contract documents, project review, and QC/QA planning. Projects included: - City of Lincoln various commercial and residential developments - City of Roseville West Roseville Annex - Stoneridge Joint Use Water Storage Facility - City of Lincoln Waste Water Treatment and Reclamation Facility Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 SCOTT JOHNSON SENIOR INSPECTOR Email: js2js@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 559-999-6253 1 CERTIFICATIONS • OSHA Safety Associate Level A1 • OSHA 510 Standards for Construction • OSHA 2264 Permit-Required Confined Space Entry • OSHA 3015 Excavation, Trenching, & Soil Mechanics • OSHA 3115 Fall Protection • OSHA 5109 Cal/OSHA Standards for Construction • OSHA 7505 Introduction to Incident (Accident) Investigation • OSHA 7845 Recordkeeping Rule Seminar • First-Aid/CPR/AED and Wilderness First-Aid/CPR/AED Certified • 30 Hour OSHA • 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations PROFESSIONAL SINCE 2014 TRAINING • Introduction to Dams • PG&E Dam Safety Program • Basic Dam Surveillance & Monitoring • Basic Dam Inspections • Basic Dam Maintenance • Dam Surveillance and Monitoring • Inspection of Embankment Dams • Inspection of Concrete and Masonry Dams • Smith System Driving • 40-hour HAZMAT PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Mr. Johnson has 10 years of construction and inspection experience with various PG&E Substation and Hydro projects. His experience includes: • Performed construction engineering inspection and construction specifications. • Held responsibility for construction engineering inspection and materials testing for a variety of projects (e.g., hydroelectric facilities, natural gas storage facilities, gas transmission, electrical transmission, and substation facilities). • Inspected construction engineering, including: - Contract document review - Submittal review - Project communication - Quality assurance/quality control/quality control and inspection program implementation - Inspection/field testing of work for compliance • Monitored construction progress, overall site safety, schedule and Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 SCOTT JOHNSON SENIOR INSPECTOR Email: js2js@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 559-999-6253 2 PROJECTS • Lake Almanor Dam Low Level Tunnel Repair 2022–2023 CANUS SENIOR INSPECTOR The project scope consisted of removing and repairing approximately 65 feet in length, section of structural steel tunnel liner including excavate upstream keyway, installation of anchorage, replacement of repair mortar, and contact grouting behind new and existing steel liner at Lake Almanor Dam. Responsibilities included: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Verification of existing concrete steel liner demolition and replacement o Epoxy grouting o Epoxy dowel installation for new steel liner o Steel field welding in accordance with AWWA C206 and AWS D1.1, NDE testing and inspection of field welding o Interior pipe coating o Sampling and testing of plastic concrete and grout for properties and compressive strength test specimens o Stop-work authority • Canyon Dam Low Level Outlet Install Cutoff Wall 2022 CANUS SENIOR INSPECTOR Scope of work consisted of installing a cutoff wall at the Canyon Dam Low Level Outlet (LLO) to prevent undermining of the existing outlet structure including installation of a new reinforced concrete wing wall along the right-side base of the spillway channel. Responsibilities included: - Oversight of the inspection support team responsible for managing project quality control, worker safety, and permit adherence - Inspection and testing verification that construction means, methods, and materials conformed to the project drawings specifications and QCIP for the following activities: o Water bypass pumping o Flip bucket structure concrete demolition and excavation o Reinforcing steel placement o Post-installed anchors/rock-bolts and dowels o Stop-work authority Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 SCOTT JOHNSON SENIOR INSPECTOR Email: js2js@pge.com Power Generation │12840 Bill Clark Way│ Auburn, CA 95602 Phone: 559-999-6253 3 • KERN POWER SUBSTATION 2018 - 2019 CANUS SENIOR INSPECTOR The scope of this project included construction of a new wall that encompassed the new yard extension. Responsibilities included verifying the means and methods used and the materials placed met the project design drawings and specifications. tested all concrete and grout delivered to meet specifications. Confirming with the contractor on layout of all wall foundations, concrete placement and testing. Observing the contractors in setting the new wall panels with their crane to ensure their tasks were completed. Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program APPENDIX C REFERENCE LIST OF PROJECT- RELATED DOCUMENTS Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program PROJECT-RELATED DOCUMENTS Number Date Description 3114685 2/29/2024 TITLE SHEET 3114686 2/29/2024 SPECIFICATIONS 3114687 2/29/2024 DEMOLITION AND GRADING PLAN 3114688 2/29/2024 DETAILS 3114689 2/29/2024 CXT DETAILS Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program APPENDIX D INSPECTION AND HOLD POINT CHECKLIST Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program INSPECTION AND HOLD POINT CHECKLIST – Page 1 of 2 Job Order No.: 74054961 PM/RE: Drew Petersen / Gavin Rhoads Project Title: Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom EOR/Company: Robert Harp / PACE Engineering, Inc Project Component: General Constructor: PG&E GC #Inspection Point Hold Point (Yes/No). If yes, do not proceed until complete. Responsible Role Name, Sign & Date Criteria / References / Comments 1.0 Verify with PM, EOR, and RE all QCIP hold points and environmental QC points Yes Inspector 1.1 Review Contractor’s plan for work area, staging area, vehicle access, and haul routes.No Inspector Compliance with erosion control plan and effectiveness of erosion control measures. (Visual; Daily) 2.0 Hold MANDATORY onsite meeting with PM, EOR, RE, and Construction Lead Yes RE (Gavin Rhoads) Review project documents and verify demolition. requirements, project scope, and intent. 2.1 Verify that the contractor takes adequate measures to ensure the accurate location of proposed improvements. No Inspector Limits of work shall be construction staked by a California Licensed Land Surveyor. 3.0 Verify all materials have been removed and properly disposed of at an approved off-site location. Yes Inspector 3.1 Verify that the Contractor takes adequate measures to protect all existing utilities and improvements to remain from damage during construction. Yes Inspector 3.2 Observe ground preparation (subgrade) for parking areas and structures.Yes Inspector, EOR (Bob Harp) Design drawings, sheets 3114686 & 3114687 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program INSPECTION AND HOLD POINT CHECKLIST – Page 2 of 2 #Inspection Point Hold Point (Yes/No). If yes, do not proceed until complete. Responsible Role Name, Sign & Date Criteria / References / Comments 3.3 Verify aggregate base, concrete, and vault toilet comply with approved submittals.No Inspector Design drawings, sheets 3114686 & 3114687 4.0 Observe placement and compaction of aggregate base for parking area.No Inspector Design drawings, sheets 3114686 & 3114687 4.1 Observe and inspect type and placement of forms, rebar, and concrete.No Inspector Design drawings, sheets 3114686 & 3114687 4.2 Observe vault excavations prior to vault placement, see 3.2 above.Yes EOR (Bob Harp)Design drawings, sheets 3114686 & 3114687 4.3 Observe placement of Concrete Vault Toilet structure No Inspector 5.0 Periodic Observation during course of construction to verify general compliance with construction documents No EOR (Bob Harp) 5.1 Observe final construction for general compliance with construction documents No EOR (Bob Harp) Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program INSPECTION AND HOLD POINT CHECKLIST – [Page 3 of 3] #Inspection Point Hold Point (Yes/No). If yes, do not proceed until complete. Responsible Role Name, Sign & Date Criteria / References / Comments Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program APPENDIX E MATERIAL AND FIELD-TESTING REQUIREMENTS Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program MATERIAL AND FIELD-TESTING REQUIREMENTS – Page 1 of 1 Job Order No.: 74054961 PM/RE: Drew Petersen / Gavin Rhoads Project Title: Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom EOR/Company: Robert Harp / PACE Engineering, Inc Facility/Lab Testing Facility:Constructor: PG&E GC #Material Test Test Method and/or Standard Test Frequency and Acceptance Criteria 1.0 Aggregate Base and soil Compaction ASTM D1557 Lab ASTM D6938 Field Testing At each compacted layer of Aggregate Base. A minimum of one test for 100 Lineal feet of roadway and every 500 square feet of parking area. 95% relative compaction unless otherwise specified by EOR. 2.0 Concrete Temperature Air content Slump ASTM C172, metal dial type thermometers ASTM C231 ASTM C143 First batch produced each day and every 50 cubic yards 4% - 6% Air Entrainment 4” – 6” slump 2.1 Concrete Compressive Strength ASTM C31, C39 and C172 (7 and 28 days) and ACI 214 Three test cylinders from the first batch for each mix design. Three per day from each concrete pour day or every 50 cubic yards thereafter. 4,000 psi @ 28 days. 3.0 Concrete aggregate Gradation, Fineness modulus, abrasion, specific gravity, and absorption ASTM C33, C127, C131, C136, and C289 Prior to delivery of concrete by supplier during submittal process. Max size 1”. 4.0 Soil Moisture Content ASTM D1557 At time of placing 4.1 Soil Density ASTM D1557 Before use 4.2 Soil In-place Density ASTM D6938 A minimum of one test for every three lifts and three tests for every 200 cubic yards Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program MATERIAL AND FIELD-TESTING REQUIREMENTS – [Page 2 of 3] #Material Test Test Method and/or Standard Test Frequency and Acceptance Criteria Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program MATERIAL AND FIELD-TESTING REQUIREMENTS – [Page 3 of 3] #Material Test Test Method and/or Standard Test Frequency and Acceptance Criteria Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program APPENDIX F QCIP REPORTING TEMPLATES Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program SAMPLE DAILY INSPECTION REPORT Job # Click here to enter text. Report #: Click here to enter text. Date: Click here to enter text. Project Name: Click here to enter text. Supervisor: Click here to enter text. Weather: Click here to enter text.Job Location: Click here to enter text. Daily Tailboard/Safety Tailboard: Click here to enter text. Details of labor, equipment usage, and standby equipment time: Click here to enter text. Work Plan for Today: Click here to enter text. Today’s Progress: Click here to enter text. Problems/Discussions/Delays: Click here to enter text. Material/Equipment Deliveries/Equipment Departures: Click here to enter text. Instructions to constructor, inspections, acceptances, and rejections: Click here to enter text. Comments: Click here to enter text. Photos: (Attach) Field Workers Field Worker Trade Quantity SIGNATURE: Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) NONCONFORMANCE: 1. Date Identified: _________________________________________________________________________ 2. Identified by: __________________________________________________________________________ 3. Department: ___________________________________________________________________________ 4. Location: ___________________________________________________________________________ 5. Description of nonconformance: 6. Cause of problem: 7. Analysis of the problem: Prepared by: _____________________ Date: _____________ CORRECTIVE MEASURES: 1. Description of corrective measures: 2. Date corrective measures completed: ________________________________ 3. Inspected and Approved by: Field Inspector: _________________________ Date: ________________ Engineer of Record: _____________________ Date: ________________ Responsible Engineer: ____________________ Date: ________________ cc: Field Inspectors License Compliance Lead Constructor Dam Safety Engineer / SME Engineer of Record PM Responsible Engineer File Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Bucks Creek Project – Grizzly Forebay RA Replacement Restroom, FERC No. 619 Quality Control Inspection Program ENVIRONMENTAL DEFICIENCY REPORT (EDR) DEFICIENCY: 1. Date Identified: _________________________________________________________________________ 2. Identified by: __________________________________________________________________________ 3. Department: ___________________________________________________________________________ 4. Location: ___________________________________________________________________________ 5. Description of Deficiency: 6. Cause of problem: 7. Analysis of the problem: Prepared by: _____________________ Date: _____________ CORRECTIVE MEASURES: 1. Description of corrective measures: 2. Date corrective measures completed: ________________________________ 3. Inspected and Approved by: Field Inspector: ______________________ Date: ________________ Environmental Lead: __________________ Date: ________________ cc: Field Inspectors License Compliance Lead Constructor Environmental Lead Responsible Engineer PM Engineer of Record File Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 ENCLOSURE 3 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 From:Visinoni, Jamie To:Carlton, Christopher - FS Cc:Edlund, Leslie - FS; Alvarez, Dawn -FS; Sable, Kurt A -FS; Brenzovich, Erika -FS; Young, Megan; Petersen, Drew; McKay, Jim; Rhoads, Gavin Subject:Bucks Creek - FERC 619 - Authorization Request for Grizzly Forebay Recreation Improvements Date:Tuesday, June 25, 2024 5:22:00 PM Attachments:Grizzly_Restroom_and_Locker_Project_Description and 100% Drawings_6-25-24.pdf Dear Christopher Carlton, This email presents a request to construct recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay, which is part of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) Bucks Creek Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) No. 619. FERC issued a new license for the Bucks Creek Project on June 16, 2022. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) Condition 21 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service’s (“Forest Service”) section 4(e) Condition No. 55 require the licensees implement the Bucks Creek Recreation Management Plan (RMP). Table 3.1-1 of the RMP identifies the following recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay in license year 1 (2023): Facility Activity Grizzly Forebay Campground - Perform Trail Maintenance - Install Wildlife Resistant Food Lockers - Fuel Treatment Grizzly Forebay Gauging Station Trail - Perform Trail Maintenance Due to significant precipitation and unprecedented snowpack in 2022/2023, access to the Bucks Creek project was restricted until early June which delayed site condition assessments and planning. Due to these constraints, PG&E was only able to implement the following RMP year 1 activities: Grizzly Forebay Campground: Perform Trail Maintenance and Fuel Treatment Grizzly Forebay Gauging Station Trail: Perform Trail Maintenance PG&E sought approval from the Forest Service to complete the remainder of the year 1 work (Install Wildlife Resistant Food Lockers) by December 31, 2024 in an email dated May 19, 2023. The Forest Service provided a concurrence email on June 30, 2023. In addition to installation of the wildlife resistant food lockers, PG&E is taking advantage of the facility closure and accelerating the RMP implementation schedule to complete the following recreation improvements at Grizzly Forebay (originally required in license year 3 - 2025): Facility Activity - Replace restroom Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Grizzly Forebay Recreation Area - Install signage As described in the Bucks Creek RMP, the Forest Service must approve the site development plan and construction plan. The wildlife resistant food lockers and bathroom installation are prefabricated with a standard design, therefore PG&E did not have the typical 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design stages. Attached please find a Project Description, including 100% design drawings. Requesting Forest Service review and approval as soon as possible so we can file concurrence with FERC to support mobilization in late September. For general questions, please contact Jamie Visinoni, senior license coordinator for PG&E, at (530) 215-6676. Sincerely, Jamie Visinoni Hydro License Coordinator | Power Generation Pacific Gas and Electric Company d: (530) 894-4779 | m: (530) 215-6676 | e: jnvs@pge.com Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024 Document Content(s) PGE20240626_619_Grizzly_Forebay_Rec_Improvements.pdf......................1 Document Accession #: 20240626-5116 Filed Date: 06/26/2024