Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.07.2024 Board Correspondence - FW_ AGENDA 2030 IS ABOUT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN BARCODING.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Jessee, Meegan Cc:Hancock, LeAnne Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: AGENDA 2030 IS ABOUT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN BARCODING Date:Wednesday, July 10, 2024 2:58:54 PM Please see Board correspondence - LeAnne Hancock Management Analyst I Butte County Administration T. 530.552.3314 From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2024 1:31 PM To: Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; pcbs@countyofplumas.com; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; sheriff@pcso.net; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Ring, Brian <bring@buttecounty.net>; JULIE THREET <preyinghawkreport@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa <CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net> Subject: Fwd: AGENDA 2030 IS ABOUT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN BARCODING Public Record diana dreiss From: "Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD from Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD" <anamihalceamdphd@substack.com> Date: July 7, 2024 at 6:07:05 AM PDT To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: AGENDA 2030 IS ABOUT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN BARCODING Reply-To: "Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD from Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD" <reply+2f4urz&kcryl&&a6a7ea1e7551f941d67d85f98d46a250fdb41611f491bc61d1f12922272b480f@mg1.substack.com>  Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD cross-posted a post from OUTRAGED’s Newsletter Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhDJul 7 · Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD I could not agree more. Next week on my show I will interview WHO and World Bank Insider Peter Koenig. He will tell you how they already succeeded in barcoding humanity. Please read this article, so you understand what already has happened - effectively implementing digital ID through the back door without your knowledge. UNFATHOMABLE EVIL based on nanotechnology. AGENDA 2030 IS ABOUT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN BARCODING OUTRAGED HUMAN JUL 7 READ IN APP Thanks for reading OUTRAGED’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Subscribed IS BASED ON NANOTECHNOLOGY IS BASED MAINLY ON TOXIC NANOTECHNOLOGY!!! https://addi.ehu.es/bitstream/handle/10810/43990/s41467-020-16297-3.pdf%3Bjsessionid%3DAEE6C9AC6FF000AC65799DCE95533874?sequence=1 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c10919 Nanotechnology for a Sustainable Future: Addressing Global Challenges with the International Network4Sustainable Nanotechnology | ACS Nano Publication Date: December 15, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c10919 Figure 7. Contributions of nanobio/materials/photonic technologies to emerging infectious diseases. PCR, polymerase chain reaction; POCT, point-of-care testing; UV, ultraviolet; LED, light-emitting diode. … CRYPTOGRAPHY = CBDC THAT'S WHAT THESE "INJECTIONS" AND "PANDEMICS"ARE ALL ABOUT: THEYARE AIMED AT INJECTING, INSTILLING, INHALING, INGESTING TOXICNANOMATERIALS. The risk evaluation for exposure to nanotechnology products is hindered by the law-protected secrecyof product formulations https://web.archive.org/web/20040926172352/http://www.nanoscience.gatech.edu:80/dfmoore/nanodangers.ppt When nanotubes, hailed as the harbinger of nanotech, were injected into rats, 15% of them diedquickly. “The highest death rate we had ever seen”. https://web.archive.org/web/20100619234814/http://www.che.tamu.edu/orgs/groups/Seminario/nanotechnology/PLong_G4_Nanotoxicology_Diego_Gomez.ppt Rats that were instilled with high doses of SWCNT’s died of respiratory blockagerather than pulmonary intoxication The picture shows that the respiratory airways are mechanically blocked by carbon nanotubes. This led to the asphyxiation of 15% of the test population Results Inflammation, no cytotoxicity (Toxicological Sciences (2004), Vol. 77, pp 117) Asphyxia causes generalized hypoxia, which affects all the tissues and organs, some more rapidly thanothers. CARBON NANOTUBES IN MASKS: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215038221001849 Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects - ScienceDirect https://testpubschina.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.1c01386 Relevant to nanoparticle-based medical treatments is the potential of fever thatwould induce organ damage!!! (THIS IS WHY THIS “VACCINE” IS IN YOUR SALAD…) Conclusions (https://web.archive.org/web/20100619234814/http://www.che.tamu.edu/orgs/groups/Seminario/nanotechnology/PLong_G4_Nanotoxicology_Diego_Gomez.ppt) https://web.archive.org/web/20090712082036/http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Nanotechnology/NanotechnologyTaskForce/ucm111399.ppt https://web.archive.org/web/20051031223004/http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/ILSI-HESI-ann-mtg-pres-1-17-05.ppt www.FDA.GOV/NANOTECHNOLOGY … Nanoassemblers The “Holy Grail of Nanotechnology” Self-copying nanobots “The perfect plague” http://wowjava.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/nanotech.ppt Nanoelectronics combine biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, and computer science, i.a. computer chips(nanochips), nanomotors, nanoelectronics to body’s nervous system Potential Danger Intentional misuse of the technology as an act of war or terrorism will be difficult to control. … https://environmentjournal.online/features/nanoparticles-pose-major-threat-to-our-environment-scientists-warn/ Scientists at the University of Minnesota, U.S, have suggested that nanoparticles may have a bigger impact on theenvironment than previously thought. The researchers found that a common, non-disease-causing bacteria found in the environment developed rapid resistance when it was exposed to nanoparticles. https://www.futureforall.org/nanotechnology/risks.htm Environmental Risks Nanoparticles are very small and can easily enter the environment, including air, water, and soil. Once released, they can potentially have harmful effects on the environment and living organisms. For example, nanoparticles may accumulate in the soil, affecting plant growth, and in aquatic environments, they can accumulate in the tissues of fish and other aquatic animals, potentially affecting their health. Additionally, nanoparticles may also affect the balance of ecosystems by disrupting natural processes. Health Risks The small size of nanoparticles allows them to penetrate biological barriers, such as cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier, potentially causing harm to living organisms. For example, some nanoparticles have been shown to cause inflammation and damage to the lungs when inhaled. There is also concern that nanoparticles may accumulate in the body and cause long-term health effects. https://web.archive.org/web/20060427164615/http://www.voyle.net/Nano%20Debate%202005/Nano%20Debate%202005-0040.htm Vanderbilt chemical engineers question safety of certain nanomaterials A new study published in December 2005 in Biophysical Journal raises a red flag regarding the safety of buckyballs when dissolved in water. It reports the results of a detailed computer simulation that finds buckyballs bind to the spirals in DNA molecules in an aqueous environment, causing the DNA to deform, potentially interfering with its biological functions and possibly causing long-term negative side effects in people and other living organisms. The research, conducted at Vanderbilt by chemical engineers Peter T. Cummings and Alberto Striolo (now a faculty member at the University of Oklahoma), along with Oak Ridge National Laboratory scientist Xiongce Zhao, employed molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the question of whether buckyballs would bind to DNA and, if so, might inflict any lasting damage. “Safe is a difficult word to define, since few substances that can be ingested into the human body are completely safe,” points out Cummings, who is the John R. Hall Professor of Chemical Engineering and director of the Nanomaterials Theory Institute at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Surprising findings Despite the caveat, Cummings suggests that his research reveals a potentially serious problem: “Buckyballs have a potentially adverse effect on the structure, stability and biological functions of DNA molecules.”Cummings' team found that, depending on the form the DNA takes, the 60-carbon-atom (C60) buckyball molecule canlodge in the end of a DNA molecule and break apart important hydrogen bonds within the double helix. They can also stick to the minor grooves on the outside of DNA, causing the DNA molecule to bend significantly to oneside. Damage to the DNA molecule is even more pronounced when the molecule is split into two helices, as it does when cellsare dividing or when the genes are being accessed to produce proteins needed by the cell. “The binding energy between DNA and buckyballs is quite strong,” Cummings says. “We found that the energies werecomparable to the binding energies of a drug to receptors in cells.” It turns out that buckyballs have a stronger affinity for DNA than they do for themselves. “This research shows that ifbuckyballs can get into the nucleus, they can bind to DNA,” Cummings says. “If the DNA is damaged, it can be inhibitedfrom self-repairing.” Computer simulationsThe computer simulations showed that buckyballs make first contact with the DNA molecule after one to twonanoseconds. Once the C60 molecules bind with the DNA, they remained stable for the duration of the simulation. Researchers tested the most common forms of DNA, the “A” and “B” forms. The “B” form is the most common form. In astronger saline solution, or when alcohol is added, the DNA structure can change to the “A” form. A third, rarer form,“Z,” occurs in high concentrations of alcohol or salt and was not tested. The researchers found that buckyballs docked on the minor groove of “A” DNA, bending the molecule and deformingthe stacking angles of the base pairs in contact with it. The simulations also showed that buckyballs can penetrate thefree end of “A” form DNA and permanently break the hydrogen bonds between the end base pair of nucleotides. As expected, the buckyballs bound most strongly to single helix DNA, causing the most deformation and damage. Whilebuckyballs did bind to “B” form double-strand DNA, the binding did not affect the overall shape of the DNA molecule. “Earlier studies have shown both that buckyballs can migrate into bodily tissues and can penetrate cell membranes,”Cummings says. “We don't know whether they can penetrate a cell nucleus and reach the DNA stored there. What thisstudy shows is that if the buckyballs can get into the nucleus they could cause real problems. What are needed now areexperimental and theoretical studies to demonstrate whether they can actually get there. Because the toxicity ofnanomaterials like buckyballs is not well known at this point, they are regarded in the laboratory as potentially veryhazardous, and treated accordingly.” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024074243 Nano Revolution: “Tiny tech, big impact: How nanotechnology is driving SDGs progress" - ScienceDirect Fig. 1. UN Sustainable Development Goals and Nanotechnology (no poverty; zero hunger; good health and well-being; quality education; gender equality; clean water and sanitation; affordable and clean energy; decent work and economic growth; industry, innovation and infrastructure; reduced inequalities; sustainable cities and communities; responsible consumption and production; climate action; life below water; life on land; peace, justice, and strong institutions; and partnerships for the goals). Paragraph 70 of the 2030 Agenda reads: “The Technology Facilitation Mechanism will be based on a multi-stakeholdercollaboration between Member States, civil society, private sector, the scientific community, United Nations entities, andother stakeholders and will be composed of a United Nations Interagency Task Team on Science, Technology, and an on-line platform.” PROTECTING THE PLANET!!!!!!! WHAT A JOKE!!! 2.1. Partnerships for the goals (Goal 17) A recent trial in the UAE [105], featuring innovative cloud seeding technology, has yielded encouraging outcomes. The assess the effectiveness of the new approach. Nanomaterials took center stage in this endeavor. Designed explicitly forcloud seeding, these nanomaterials prove superior to conventional agents like salt and dry ice. Their precision andefficacy make them a more advanced tool for inducing rainfall from existing clouds. Nanotechnology-based encryption methods can also improve data security and protect sensitive information,contributing to the establishment of robust institutional frameworks, especially in the era of quantum computing. THESE PEOPLE ARE DANGEROUS MADMEN AND CRIMINALS. THIS IS WAR, THEY KNOW VERY WELL THAT THEY ARE MURDERING MILLIONS,BILLIONS OF PEOPLE. MOREOVER, THEY ALSO SLAUGHTER ANIMALS, PLANTS, ALL LIFE ON THISPLANET AND THE PLANET ITSELF. THEY ARE INSANE!!! http://www.capitalideasonline.com/images/C%20M%20Sampat-Dec11%2C2002.ppt Thanks for reading OUTRAGED’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Subscribed LIKE COMMENT RESTACK Originally posted on O OUTRAGED’s NewsletterOUTRAGED HUMAN Subscribe BioNTech stands for biological applications of nanotechnology © 2024 Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 Unsubscribe