HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.22.2024 Board Correspondence - FW_ 3.4.a indemnificationFrom:Clerk of the Board
To:BOS
Cc:Daneluk, Paula; Nevers, Dawn
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: 3.4.a indemnification
Date:Tuesday, October 22, 2024 8:32:13 AM
Please see public comment below.
-----Original Message-----
From: John S. <john@upperridge.info>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 7:23 AM
To: Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>
Subject: 3.4.a indemnification
.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
We have just witnessed meritless challenges to the discretionary land use process resulting in significant public
agency expense. But from an applicant standing to benefit, vainly trying to set aside a unanimous denial. Of course
the county should not have to use public dollars to defend an approval challenged by the citizenry. Nor should we
have to spend public dollars defending the discretionary denial of a conditional use permit. This amendment is a
half-step in the right direction that will significantly weight the scales towards approval of the nine-figure projects in
the pipeline until the wording is revisited.
John Stonebraker
Magalia, CA