HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.27.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ I did a FOIA Request in Butte County a long time ago. Where is COVID_ Here COVID. Here Covid. Where are you_”.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: I did a FOIA Request in Butte County a long time ago. Where is COVID? Here
COVID. Here Covid. Where are you?” LIARS. COVID has NEVER been isolated or purified. PCR tests do NOT
diagnose.
Date:Friday, March 27, 2026 4:32:36 PM
Please see Board Correspondence -
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2026 12:40 PM
To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>;
Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov;
davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney
<District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter
<PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod
<TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill
<BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet
<julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami
<TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board
<clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>;
Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com;
Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.net>
Subject: I did a FOIA Request in Butte County a long time ago. Where is COVID? Here COVID. Here
Covid. Where are you?” LIARS. COVID has NEVER been isolated or purified. PCR tests do NOT
diagnose.
Public Record
Dear Administrators,
I hereby request the immediate removal of my name from the list of signatories to the Great
Barrington Declaration.
When I endorsed the Declaration, I did so under the impression—based on the information
publicly available at the time, as well as knowledge imparted during my original medical
school training—that a novel pathogen had been identified and that a specific protective
strategy was being proposed to mitigate its spread. I now know that those assumptions were
false.
After thorough independent study of the primary evidence, and through the detailed analyses
presented by researchers and clinicians such as Drs. Michael Yeadon, Thomas Cowan, Mark
and Sam Bailey, Andrew Kaufman, as well as Jamie Andrews, and many others, I have
reached the unequivocal conclusion that the entire Covid-19 pandemic narrative rests upon
fraudulent science, data manipulation, and false attribution of disease causation.
No verified, purified, or characterized viral entity meeting any valid standard of isolation has
ever been produced. SARS-CoV-2 is a computer-assembled consensus sequence, not a
biological discovery. The claim of a novel pathogen rests entirely on in silico construction and
circular validation through meaningless PCR testing.
As Drs. Bailey and Kaufman have documented, no specimen containing purified virus has
been demonstrated to cause illness in any host, human or animal. This means the central
premise of contagion driving global mortality was never substantiated; it was asserted through
media repetition and institutional amplification rather than demonstrable scientific evidence.
The events beginning in 2020 were largely a bureaucratically generated phenomenon. They
arose from the misuse of PCR testing at non-diagnostic thresholds, the reclassification of
common illnesses and deaths, suppression of appropriate medical care, and sustained
institutional messaging designed to enforce compliance through fear. These practices
produced the illusion of a viral pandemic while concealing the real harms—iatrogenic injury,
psychological trauma, economic collapse, and widespread violations of civil liberties.
The Great Barrington Declaration begins with and upholds the assumption that a novel viral
pathogen existed and required containment through “focused protection.” While opposition to
mass lockdown policies was justified—and certainly preferable to the policies adopted by
most governments—the Declaration’s framing nonetheless reinforced the underlying
virological premise upon which the broader pandemic narrative depended.
By legitimizing that premise, the Declaration inadvertently strengthens the pandemic
preparedness industry, which continues to profit from fear narratives such as the prospect of
“the next lab leak.” Unless society confronts and dismantles the foundational assumptions of
modern virology that enabled this crisis, humanity remains vulnerable to repeated cycles of
manufactured health emergencies.
Accordingly, I formally and permanently withdraw my name from the Great Barrington
Declaration. I request written confirmation within fourteen (14) days that my name,
credentials, and any reference to my prior endorsement have been removed from all records,
publications, and websites associated with the Declaration. I further request assurance that no
statement or document suggests my continued support for the Declaration or its premises.
For reasons of scientific integrity, medical ethics, and professional responsibility, I hereby
disavow and formally withdraw my support for the Great Barrington Declaration in its
entirety.
Sincerely,
M. Kirk Moore, MD