Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.01.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:Mutony, Heather Cc:Lee, Lewis Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust Date:Thursday, April 2, 2026 4:49:01 PM Attachments:https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideHeart%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2 https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideComments%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2 https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideShare2%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2 https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2Fnotes__NoteRestackIcon%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2%26strokeLinecap%3Dround%26strokeLinejoin%3Dround https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideArrowUpRight%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2 https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F22b8df2e-523b-4b55-852a-199c47d1cbcc_1536x1024.heic Please see Board Correspondence - From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 8:59 PM To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.net>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>; Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.net>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.net>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com Subject: Fwd: Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust Public Record “Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust DECISION JUNCTION APR 1 READ IN APP John’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid Medicine promised innovation. What it delivered—Catastrophic Genomic Harms! Over the past few years, mRNA technology has been pushed to the forefront of global healthcare at unprecedented speed. It was framed as a breakthrough. A solution. A turning point. But beneath that narrative, a deeper and far more uncomfortable conversation is emerging: The Fracture Between Science and Trust The issue is no longer just biological. It’s Institutional-It’s Global Collapse! Public health agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies asked for trust while operating in a landscape of: · Accelerated approvals · Limited long-term data · Suppressed or dismissed dissent This created something far more dangerous than a scientific debate: A collapse of trust in the system itself. Because when questions aren’t allowed, people start looking for answers elsewhere.“ diana dreiss Begin forwarded message: From: Decision Junction from John’s Substack <johncatanzaro@substack.com> Date: April 1, 2026 at 4:01:07 PM PDT To: lancedreiss@att.net Subject: Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust Reply-To: Decision Junction from John’s Substack <reply+36ugty&kcryl&&e7e6953348ca6926a26f3ca1f3f4eac0c1d8700af7301f8e619c546816f8360d@mg1.substack.com>  Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust Gene Disruption, Rising Cancer Fears, and the Collapse of Public and Institutional Trust DECISION JUNCTION APR 1 READ IN APP John’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid Medicine promised innovation. What it delivered—Catastrophic Genomic Harms! Over the past few years, mRNA technology has been pushed to the forefront of global healthcare at unprecedented speed. It was framed as a breakthrough. A solution. A turning point. But beneath that narrative, a deeper and far more uncomfortable conversation is emerging: The Fracture Between Science and Trust The issue is no longer just biological. It’s Institutional-It’s Global Collapse! Public health agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies asked for trust while operating in a landscape of: Accelerated approvals Limited long-term data Suppressed or dismissed dissent This created something far more dangerous than a scientific debate: A collapse of trust in the system itself. Because when questions aren’t allowed, people start looking for answers elsewhere. The Question of Genetic Disruption At the center of concern is a simple but profound issue: What is mRNA doing inside the human body beyond its intended purpose? Emerging research and continued peer-reviewed research have raised questions about: Prolonged spike protein expression Persistent immune activation Transcriptomic (gene expression) changes following exposure Some researchers have even suggested that, in certain biological environments, synthetic mRNA activity could contribute to: DNA damage Chronic inflammation Autoimmune activation Potential downstream cancer risk in susceptible individuals These are not settled conclusions. But they are not trivial questions either. The Cancer Conversation No One Wants to Have One of the most current alarming concerns circulating is that mRNA exposure is linked to rising cancer rates. There are emerging discussions in the scientific literature exploring: Alarming rise in post mRNA vaccine-initiated cancers Immune system modulation and T-cell exhaustion Inflammatory signaling pathways Case reports and peer-reviewed studies connecting immune dysregulation with cancer progression Even regulatory discussions have acknowledged gaps in knowledge, including: Potential genomic integration mechanisms (still unproven) Long-term biological effects The need for a deeper investigation into rare adverse outcomes The nuance is no longer subtle. What was once uncertainty has evolved into demonstrable proof. And in medicine, when the data speaks clearly, silence is no longer justified. The Myth of “Settled Science” Science is not static. It evolves. Yet during the mRNA rollout, the narrative became rigid: Safe Effective Settled But real science doesn’t work that way. Even today, research continues to explore: Why does myocarditis occur in some individuals How immune responses vary dramatically between patients Whether repeated exposure impacts long-term immune function When institutions present evolving science as absolute truth, they don’t strengthen confidence. They erode it. Medical Betrayal or Systemic Failure? “Betrayal” is a strong word. But for many, it reflects a feeling—not necessarily a proven intent. A feeling that: Risks were minimized Questions were dismissed Individual outcomes were ignored This doesn’t require a conspiracy. It requires only one thing: A system built for population-level decisions for accountable health policy to manage individual biology. And failing to bridge that gap. The Real Problem: One-Size-Fits-All Medicine Here’s what the mRNA debate truly exposes: Modern medicine still operates on averages. But no two patients are biologically identical. Which means: The same intervention can produce radically different outcomes “Safe for most” does not mean safe for all Rare events disappear in population-level data. The real question is no longer whether they are rare—but whether they are casualties of a harmful technology embedded within a broken system. This is where the system breaks. The Path Forward: Transparency and Precision The solution is not fear. And it’s not blind trust. It’s transparency. And more importantly: Measurement. Instead of asking: “Is this technology safe?” We should be asking: How is this individual responding? What is happening at the level of gene expression? What signals are being activated or suppressed? Because without measuring biology in real time, we are guessing. Where Medicine Must Go Next The future of medicine cannot look like the past. It must become: Personalized Adaptive Data-driven at the molecular level This is where precision medicine changes everything. By analyzing: Gene expression Immune signaling Metabolic function We move from assumption → to evidence From protocol → to personalization Because the future will not be built on blind trust… It will be built on transparent science, ethical responsibility, and individualized care. Learn more: Neo7Bioscience.com McCullough Foundation Further Reading: 1. mRNA reckoning: Medicine’s great genetic mistake - America Out Loud News 2. Gene Expression Alterations Induced by mRNA Vaccines 3. Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination 4. Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination 5. Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA VaccinationTurbo Cancer Onslaught: mRNA Vaccines – Genomic Saboteurs Igniting Malignancy DECISION JUNCTION, NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH, AND PETER A. MCCULLOUGH, MD, MPH ·JAN 23 Turbo Cancer Onslaught: mRNA Vaccines – Genomic Saboteurs Igniting Malignancy By John A. Catanzaro, CEO, Neo7Bioscience John’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Read full story The Profound Risks of Gene Transfer Technology on Chromosomal Stability DECISION JUNCTION ·DECEMBER 12, 2025 The Profound Risks of Gene Transfer Technology on Chromosomal Stability John’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Read full story Upgrade to paid You're currently a free subscriber to John’s Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid LIKE COMMENT RESTACK © 2026 John Catanzaro548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 Unsubscribe