HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.8.24 Board Correspondence – FW_ International Legal Dispute with WHO.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening
attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Blankenship, DeAnne
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence – FW: International Legal Dispute with WHO
Date:Tuesday, November 12, 2024 10:51:12 AM
Please see Board Correspondence –
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 4:48 AM
To: Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; District Attorney
<District_Attorney@buttecounty.net>; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com;
pcbs@countyofplumas.com; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.net>; tjohns@pcso.net;
Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.net>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.net>;
Connelly, Bill <BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Ring, Brian <bring@buttecounty.net>; JULIE THREET
<preyinghawkreport@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.net>; Ritter, Tami
<TRitter@buttecounty.net>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board
<clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net>; Congressman Doug LaMalfa
<CA01DL.Outreach@mail.house.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.net>
Subject: International Legal Dispute with WHO
Public Record
L E T T E R T O
World Health Organization
Interest of Justice v. WHO, Costa Rica, and United States
Nature of the Dispute:
This international legal dispute arises from the alleged widespread misuse of products authorized
under the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Emergency Use Listing (EUL) mechanism, which
allowed the procurement, distribution, and administration of investigational vaccines without
adequate informed consent regarding known risks to life and health. Interest of Justice alleges that
the WHO, along with the governments of Costa Rica, the United States, UK and many Member State
countries seriously breached their obligations under international and national laws by integrating
these unproven interventions into national vaccine schedules, leading to harm to individuals’ lives
and health.
Parties Involved:
1. Interest of Justice: The Claimant, a civil society international organization dedicated to
protecting human rights and holding international organizations with their Member States
accountable for unlawful conduct.
2. World Health Organization (WHO): The wrongdoer, accused of authorizing the procurement
and use of investigational vaccines under the Emergency Use Listing procedure without
ensuring adequate safety standards, informed consent, or transparency in disclosing known
risks.
3. Government of Costa Rica: The wrongdoer, accused of violating its own biomedical research
laws by signing procurement contracts for EUL-authorized vaccines without ensuring proper
informed consent and without complying with legal requirements for safety guarantees in
public health interventions.
4. Government of the United States: The wrongdoer, accused of participating in the global
distribution and administration of investigational vaccines without properly informing citizens
of the risks involved in receiving such vaccines under the EUL, leading to serious harm.
Statement of Facts:
1. WHO Authorization of Unproven Interventions: The WHO, through its Emergency Use
Listing (EUL) procedure, authorized the use of investigational vaccines during the global
pandemic. These vaccines, developed and distributed without full approval or comprehensive
safety trials, were integrated into national vaccine schedules by countries such as Costa Rica
and the United States.
2. Waiver of Good Manufacturing Inspections and Safety Standards: Under the EUL
mechanism, and "regulatory flexibility" WHO waived many of the good manufacturing
inspections and safety protocols that would typically apply to vaccines. This waiver led to the
distribution of vaccines that had not undergone sufficient testing to establish their long-term
safety or efficacy.
3. Lack of Informed Consent: Costa Rica, the United States and most WHO Member States
integrated the WHO-authorized vaccines into their national vaccine schedules without
ensuring that citizens were properly informed of the experimental nature of the vaccines and
the potential risks to life and health. Informed consent, a core requirement under international
human rights law and national biomedical laws, was disregarded.
4. Serious Breaches of National and International Law:
In Costa Rica, and many Member States procurement contracts for the investigational
vaccines were signed without compliance with national laws requiring insurance for
vaccine-related injuries and without proper risk disclosure.
In the United States, federal health authorities pushed for widespread use of EUL-
authorized vaccines without providing the public with sufficient warnings about known
risks, in breach of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and
the Nuremberg Code’s principles regarding human experimentation.
5. Adverse Health Consequences: Many thousands, if not millions, of individuals in Costa Rica,
the United States and globally suffered adverse health effects as a direct result of the
widespread and systematic administration of these unproven vaccines. Reports of severe side
effects, including life-threatening complications, have emerged, and many affected
individuals claim they were not adequately informed of the risks prior to receiving the
vaccines.
Legal Basis for the Claims:
1. Breach of International Law:
Violation of the Right to Life and Health: The International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), Siracusa Principles and the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights guarantee the right to life and the right to health. By authorizing and distributing
vaccines under the EUL without sufficient safety guarantees, the WHO, Costa Rica, the
United States and most Member States violated these fundamental rights.
Nuremberg Code Violations: The administration of investigational vaccines without
informed consent constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code, which explicitly
prohibits human experimentation without voluntary and informed consent. Costa Rica,
the United States and most Member States administered these unproven vaccines
without ensuring informed consent, thus breaching international legal standards.
2. Breach of National Laws:
Costa Rican Biomedical Research Laws: Costa Rica’s national biomedical research
regulations explicitly prohibit the procurement and use of investigational medical
products without prior insurance for injuries and proper informed consent. By signing
contracts and integrating EUL vaccines into its vaccine schedule, Costa Rica breached
these laws, causing harm to its citizens.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulations: The FDA’s regulatory
framework mandates that any investigational medical product used under emergency
conditions must be accompanied by full disclosure of the known risks. By failing to
inform the public of the risks of the EUL vaccines, U.S. authorities violated these
regulations and endangered public health.
3. Breach of WHO’s Own Standards:
Failure to Ensure Safety: WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR)and internal
guidelines require that all health interventions authorized for global use must comply
with strict safety and efficacy standards. By waiving manufacturing inspections and
distributing vaccines without adequate safety data, the WHO acted outside its mandate
and violated its own obligations.
Waiver of Immunity in Commercial Agreements: WHO has engaged in contractual
agreements with vaccine manufacturers, governments, and other stakeholders under the
EUL. These contracts of a commercial nature may require waivers of immunity,
allowing WHO to be held accountable for failure to ensure product safety or for harm
caused by their investigational interventions.
Relief Sought:
1. Damages: Interest of Justice seeks compensatory and punitive damages for serious delays in
justice, and for individuals harmed by the investigational vaccines in Costa Rica and the
United States, including compensation for medical expenses, loss of income, and pain and
suffering.
2. Injunction: Interest of Justice seeks an injunction to halt the continued use of EUL-authorized
vaccines in national vaccine schedules, and the WHO EUL Listing until they undergo full
regulatory approval and safety testing in accordance with international and national legal
standards.
3. Public Apology and Reparation: Interest of Justice demands a public apology owed erga
omnes from WHO, Costa Rica, the United States and all wrongdoer Member States for their
roles in exposing citizens to harmful investigational vaccines without adequate informed
consent. The parties must establish a compensation fund for those affected by vaccine-related
injuries and make provisions to compensate and cease censorship of medical and other
opinion involving public health.
4. Revocation of EUL Authorization: Interest of Justice seeks the immediate revocation and
GLOBAL DELISTING of WHO’s EUL for the mRNA vaccines & PCR in question, along
with a full investigation into the breaches of safety and consent protocols.
Conclusion:
Interest of Justice contends that the WHO, Costa Rica, the United States and most Member States violated
international human rights law, national biomedical laws, and the ethical standards governing public health
interventions by authorizing and distributing investigational vaccines without adequate informed consent.
These actions resulted in widespread harm and demand immediate legal redress. Interest of Justice urges
the National Authorities to hold the WHO and wrongdoer Member State Countries accountable for their
breaches and to ensure that no further harm to individuals or the public interest is caused by the continued
use of unproven pandemic medical products. Sent from my iPhone