Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.19.2024 Board Correspondence FW_ Elizabeth Cash, Annabella Jones.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying.. From:Clerk of the Board To:BOS Subject:Board Correspondence FW: Elizabeth Cash, Annabella Jones Date:Wednesday, November 20, 2024 10:11:23 AM Attachments:social worker perjury Please see Board Correspondence. From: Shawn Cash <shawnp.cash@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 2:00 PM To: Mittag, Penny <PMittag@buttecounty.net>; Boston, Shelby <sboston@buttecounty.net>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.net> Subject: Elizabeth Cash, Annabella Jones Here is a breakdown of just some of the violations and trauma that the Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services has done to me and my family in the last two years. Third District Court of Appeal reversed jurisdictional findings as to Annabella, and vacated all subsequent orders stemming from those findings as of June 24, 2024. Instead of releasing detainment of Annabella the department decided to file a new petition on June 30, 2024, as of today's date parents have not been afforded a detainment hearing, a jurisdiction hearing, father has not recieved the new petition, jurisdiction report, nothing. And the violations continue. Everyday is a new claim for relief from the department. Please see attached document. Shawn P. Cash Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground. (Genesis 1:26-28) Social Worker Testimony And Illegal Activities ➢ On September 7, 2022 Elizabeth Cash was born. She was diagnosed as Asymptomatic. (Without Symptoms) She was ordered by her MD to be released home with parents, for mother to breastfeed 8 times every 24 hours, and to return in 3 days for checkup. She was born 6lb 11oz 21 inches long, beautiful, healthy, baby girl . That was before all the reports respectfully submitted by Shelby Boston. Even though her social workers refuted everything that was in the reports, they still illegally were able to kidnap both of my girls for 802 days now. There is so much evidence that social workers have not put in the CMS/CWS system it’s unbelievable, yet nobody will take the time to go over the record and see all the bias, predisposed Aporaphobia. Every time Mrs. Laboski-Ford has any interaction with the family or she testifies, everything that she says is “Mr. Cash needs to be out of the home” “Mr. Cash needs to not be in this family.” “Mr. Cash is not doing services that I require.” Well guess what? ➢ The petition is a general neglect against the Mother for one, Mr. Cash is a non offending father for two, and Mr. Cash is required to do no services until a judge finds at a Jurisdiction Hearing that the allegations are t rue, and then orders Mr. Cash to do services at disposition hearing . Which the department decided to bypass me for services. ➢ So how many I ask does a social worker detain a baby that is NOT effected by drug abuse or alcohol abuse. By calling law enforcement for detainment without a warrant when Penal Code 11165.13 strictly states DO NOT MAKE A REPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. Then have father removed from his home for not doing services, then perjure yourself to obtain a warrant for his other daughter because he is not doing services that are not even required of him yet . Why? Because you can report: ➢ “Elizabeth is reported by foster mother to be a typical meth baby who has arm and leg tremors, and difficulty sleeping, and eating for the first month of her life.” The only thing I can say is look at your own records. ➢ On Elizabeth’s 1 month and 3rd day of life, the same foster mother Mrs. Laboski-Ford declared stated those words, was present at a recorded Zoom family team meeting in which foster parent Carolyn declares the following: “Elizabeth is doing really well, she’s sweet, eats, and sleeps well. She’s getting regular checkups and the Dr doesn’t have any concerns. She loves to be swaddled, held, and rocked.” (Clerks Transcript @ page 335.) ➢ On September 9, 2022 @ around 8:30 am Social Workers Natasha Chronister, and Natasha Laboski-Ford did a walk through of Mr. Cash’s home, and informed Mr. Cash that his newborn Elizabeth could not be released from the hospital, and come home unless he waived his 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and went to probation before the end of the day, and submitted to a toxicology screen of his urine for evidentiary purposes. This action was done using coercion, threatening Mr. Cas h into submitting to a drug screen or losing his child. Father agreed, and was told to submit anytime Between 9:00, and 12:00, or between 1:00 and 4:00pm. This action was testified to by Mrs. Laboski-Ford under oath on November 15, 2022 Jurisdiction Hearing (Reporters Transcript page 52.) ➢ On September 9, 2022 @approximately 12:30pm Social Workers Natasha Chronister, and Natasha Laboski-Ford visited the home of Mr. Cash once again, and informed Mr. Cash that his newborn daughter could not be released from the hospital to come home unless he signed a “voluntary case plan” This action was done using coercion threatening Mr. Cash against his will with the removal of his newborn child. (Reporters Transcript page 131-132) ➢ On September 13, 2022.,Social Worker Natasha Chronister drafted a petition for the Court for the detainment of Mr. Cash’s newborn alleging that Social workers provided pre-deprivation services, by asking Mr. Cash to drug test multiple times, and he failed to comply by refusing to test. Then swore under penalty of perjury that she informed Mr. Cash to test between 1:00 and 4:00 pm, yet detained Mr. Cash’s newborn at 2:20pm after they “determined that if Mr. Cash could not follow through with a simple drug test that he would not be able to participate with voluntary services.” (Reporters Transcript page 52) Penal Code 11165.13 states that: “For purposes of this article, a positive toxicology screen at the time of the delivery of an infant is not in and of itself a sufficient basis for reporting child abuse or neglect. However, any indication of maternal substance abuse shall lead to an assessment of the needs of the mother and child pursuant to Section 123605 of the Health and Safety Code. If other factors are present that indicate risk to a child, then a report shall be made. However, a report based on risk to a child which relates solely to the inability of the parent to provide the child with regular care due to the parent’s substance abuse shall be made only to a county welfare or probation department, and not to a law enforcement agency.” (Penal Code 11165.13) This law specifically states not to make a report to Law Enforcement pursuant to the United States Supreme Court ruling in Ferguson v. City of Charleston 532 U.S.67. Which found, and has held that hospitals cannot test pregnant women without their express permission, and knowledge. A positive toxicology test at the time of birth of Elizabeth is all the county has in either one of these cases. ➢ September 14, 2022, Mrs. Laboski-Ford informed the court that father had not submitted to a drug test. And requested that the Judge order father to submit to drug testing. Judge ordered father to go to probation department and test right after court. No probable cause. ➢ September 14, 2022 Mrs. Laboski-Ford told the courts that mother tested on September 13, 2022, test was positive for methamphetamine, and amphetamine. (Reporters Transcript page 53) Mother’s drug screening was returned by Redwood Toxicology negative for all illegal substances, presumptive positive for alcohol. (Clerks Report page 399) ➢ September 15, 2022 Detainment hearing @8:30 am Mr. Kennedy informs the judge “Your honor, the mother did not drug test for us yesterday because she had tested the day before. It was positive for methamphetamine, amphetamine. The father did test for us yesterday, it was also positive”. Mrs. Solano: “For?” Mr. Kennedy: “Same.”(Reporters Transcript page 18). If you look at the drug test results from Mrs. Strang’s September 13 collection in the record it will show the lab did not even have the sample yet, (received 9/15/2022@4:35 Pm.) Results were not available until September 16, 2022 @ 2:39 am. Just as Charlene’s test results were “presumptive positive” for alcohol, my test results were “presumptive positive” for methamphetamines. As the disclaimer states “Unconfirmed Positive Screen Test Results (PRESUMPTIVE POSITIVE) provide only a preliminary analytical result”. Although the judge never gets to see those results, or the disclaimer after DESS puts their results on a DESS Entry form and gives that form to the judge instead of the real results. (Clerks Transcripts page 399) ➢ September 13, 2022 Natasha Chronister filed a petition with the courts, where she declares that “The child’s mother acknowledged using methamphetamine approximately 2 days prior to giving birth, and using methamphetamine multiple other times during the pregnancy.” (Clerks Transcript page 10.) Although the 6 month review report states: “Elizabeth Cash came to the attention of Children’s Services after being born with methamphetamine, and amphetamine in her system. Mrs. Strang reported that she had only used one time while pregnant. (Clerks Transcripts page 533) Mrs. Natasha Laboski-Ford filled out a referral to behavioral health for Mrs. Strang on 9/19/2022. In that referral Mrs. Laboski-Ford writes “Charlene’s newborn baby was positive for meth. Charlene denying habitual meth use. She states I have only used 3x in my life.( Reporters Transcript page 397.) ➢ In the petition dated September 13, 2022 Social Worker Natasha Chronister states that “The child’s father was aware that the child’s mother was using methamphetamine while she was pregnant, and did not dissuade her from further use. (Clerks Transcript page 11.) However when asked upon the stand under oath Mrs. Laboski-Ford was asked: “During your follow up with Mrs. Strang did she inform you that she had used methamphetamine the day before she went into labor?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” When asked “ Did she inform you that I found out about it during labor when she told the doctor that she used?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” (Clerks Transcript page 182.) Furthermore as indicated in the 6 month, and 12 month review reports “mother admitted to using methamphetamines only one time while pregnant” and as testified father found out at labor. (Clerks Transcript page 182.) ➢ In the petition dated September 13, 2022 Natasha Chronister stated that “The Father failed to participate in a safety plan designed to prevent the necessity of detaining the child.” (Clerks Transcript page 11.) However when asked under Oath on the stand “And so he was instructed to go drug test between 1:00 and 4:00, and yet at 2:30 you picked up, or 2:20 you picked up Elizabeth?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford “He would have been given a drug testing forms which has probations hours for drug testing on there.” Mrs. Price: “Al right evidently there’s a safety plan that you’ve said “dad go test;” is that correct? Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” Mrs. Price: “And in the middle of that safety plan , during the time period he was supposed to go test on that day, CSD went and detained Elizabeth. Is that your testimony?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” Mrs. Price: “Why wouldn’t you wait to see if he tested that day?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “We gave him many hours to go submit to drug testing.” Mrs. Price: “Well, okay. Probation’s open, what, until what time to drug test?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “They are open in the morning, and they’re also open in the afternoon. Mrs. Price: “And how long in the afternoon are they open?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Until 4:00.” Mrs. Price: “All right. And yet at 2:20 you decided to detain the baby is that right?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” Mrs. Price: “And you saw—you found that he was in violation of his safety plan; is that correct?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “Yes.” (Clerks Transcript page 61- 62) ➢ On October 12, 2022 Social workers Natasha Laboski- Ford, and Alicia Escobar made a visit to the Cash home. Mr. Cash was in the bedroom in a conference call with investors of his homeless tiny home villages. Mrs. Strang walked with Social Workers to the park where social workers informed her that there is no such thing as a false positive drug screen, and that Mrs. Strang needs to normalize the statement “I smoked meth and got my child taken away, so that she does not relapse. They also informed her that as long as Mr. Cash was living in the home then they would come, and detain Annabella for Mr. Cash was not doing any services. When Mrs. Strang informed Social Worker Escobar that she informed Mr. Cash of their requirement of moving out that he got upset and broke his phone. Social workers then placed in all subsequent reports that Mr. Cash and Mrs. Strang had a domestic violence incident in front of the child. Every piece of information that Mr. Cash has received states that the process is petition, jurisdiction to find the evidence true, then disposition to order parents into services. How do Social Workers have the unchecked power to demand Mr. Cash out of his home for not doing non required services, then detaining the 18 month old daughter for failure to do services pre-jurisdiction is 100% illegal. Supporting evidence: On Nov 4, 2022 directly following Annabella’s detainment Mrs. Strang sent Mrs. Laboski-Ford a text informing her that Mrs. Strang has done everything she has asked, “Mrs. Strang does not even let Mr. Cash in the home to get his stuff, but she is not going to throw all his stuff in the street .” To which Mrs. Laboski-Ford replied “Not letting Shawn back in the home is a good thing, that’s what we asked you before.” (Clerks Transcript @ page 457). Furthermore on November 15 Jurisdiction Hearing Mrs. Price asked “As you sit here today, is there anything that you can report, or tell the Court what it would take to be able to get Annabella home from your standpoint?” Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “The concerns that I stated in the report that you just reviewed.” Mrs.Price: “Okay, So you want the tests to be different even though they’re negative labs. You want Me.Cash basically out of the house? Mrs. Laboski-Ford: “If Annabella is in the home. Correct. (Reporters Transcript page69). This is but the beginning of what Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services Director Shelby Boston has respectfully submitted to the Courts in her responsibilities to help families in Butte County. The department has kidnapped my children for 802 days, illegally. Annabella has had 7 deep purple human bite marks across her body over a 4 month period of time while in their care, both of my children received pink eye in their care, Annabella was placed in a Spanish speaking home, and then places in speech therapy because she could not put her words together correctly, so the department could get more grant money for placing her in regional services. My children have been tortured for over 2 years three times a week, getting to play with mom for 2 hours in a locked little room, before being ripped from moms arms again kicking and screaming because they want their mother. The department had to change procedure, and make mom stay in the room while social worker took the children out to foster parent to relieve Annabella’s discomfort being separated from her mother. Parents both lost their businesses, their landlord had their vehicle towed after they applied for Bringing Families Home program ran by Social Services because they signed a release of information which allowed social worker Alicia Escobar to contact the landlord. We were unaware she was going to report to the landlord that here was substance abuse and domestic violence in the home. Resulting in the towing of our car. We signed up for the Bringing Families Home program which is a 24 month program with 6 months of aftercare which is rental assistance while parents are going through dependency. They helped with 3 months rent and then dropped us like a brick unknowingly until we got evicted. We are now in a hotel room with the department telling us 21 days then it’s off to a homeless shelter, that’s all the help we are going to received after everything the department has done to us. Federal Court says they cannot take jurisdiction until after state proceedings are done. At which time it will not be hard to convince a jury since we were already granted our leave to proceed which gives my case merit, and overcomes any qualified immunity. Everything is in black and white, documented. I am asking for social workers to wear body cameras so they cannot lie about conversations. I am asking for drug testing forms to have a disclaimer stating that a parent waives his 4 th and 5th amendment right when submitting to a drug test. I am asking for all drug tests to be confirmed by a lab approved by the FDA for confirmatory testing using gas Chromotagraphy/Mass Spectrometry before being presented to a court. I am asking for jury trials to bypass judge biasness after working with Social Services where the judge just believes everything a social worker says. I am asking for compensatory, and punitive damages in upwards of 5 million dollars for illegal trama done to my family I am asking for federal charges be brought against Natasha Chronister, Natasha Laboski-Ford, and Alicia Escobar for their known flat out lies to deprive me of my constitutional rights including kidnapping . Equal to life sentences I am asking for the courts to make an example of this department for all of CPS so that this kind of “help” or “services” for the departments acquisition of federal block grants cease to exist all across America. I am reputing my citizenship to the corporate United States, and becoming a state sovereign and trademarking my children’s corporate names and placing those names on commerce for sale across seas. So that no court can ever use those NAMES again without my express permission and all documents with those NAMES must be destroyed. (As law can regulate commerce, but cannot interfere with it. I will then walk in, take jurisdiction of the land, air, sea, and law as my God told me to do in Genesis 1:26-28, and demand my rightful property be returned to me after I am no longer under the statutes, bylaws, and codes of the corporation.