HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.30.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ COVID Vaccine Hearing Exposes Deliberate Blind Eye to Overwhelming Evidence of Harm.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: COVID Vaccine Hearing Exposes Deliberate Blind Eye to Overwhelming Evidence of Harm
Date:Thursday, April 30, 2026 4:44:27 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Please see Board Correspondence -
Lewis LeeAdministrative Technician - ConfidentialButte County Administration25 County Center Drive, Suite 200 • Oroville, CA 95965T: 530.552.3326www.buttecounty.ca.gov | lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2026 9:54 AM
To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com;
Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ronald Owens <ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Connelly, Bill
<BConnelly@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>; Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teri DuBose <Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>;
Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.ca.gov>
Subject: COVID Vaccine Hearing Exposes Deliberate Blind Eye to Overwhelming Evidence of Harm
Public Record
COVID Vaccine Hearing Exposes Deliberate Blind Eye to ‘Overwhelming Evidence of Harm’
By Vigilant Fox Apr. 29, 2026 8:40 pm395 Comments
Truth
Tweet Share Gettr Gab
Listen to the article now1.0x
Audio by Carbonatix
Audio By Carbonatix
Senator Ron Johnson speaks during a congressional hearing, addressing vaccine-related data displayed on a screen behind him, while Senator Richard Blumenthal sits nearby.
This article originally appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.
For four years, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.
“Now I know,” he says.
The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.
ADVERTISEMENT (HIDE THIS AD)
And now we have the receipts:
The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.
This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.
(HIDE THIS AD)
According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.
More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).
ADVERTISEMENT (HIDE THIS AD)
It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).
And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.
But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?
(HIDE THIS AD)
The U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it.
It turns out they knew the safety signal was there. But they didn’t see it as a warning sign. They saw it as a “pest.”
So much of a “pest” that they decided it was better to ignore the devastating safety signals and let people die than to deal with the data head-on because it could stoke “vaccine hesitancy.”
(HIDE THIS AD)
Around the Web
Nerve Damage Has Been Tied to This Popular Daily Beverage. Are You Drinking It?
NeuroSalt
Keep reading to see the timeline that proves it.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called
“masking.”
Trending: Justice Samuel Alito Humiliates Leftist Lawyer With One Brilliant Question After He Asserts That Trump Ended TPS For Migrants For Racial Reasons (AUDIO)
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
(HIDE THIS AD)
Around the Web
MD Feet Numbness or Burning (Neuropathy) After 50 Comes Down to 1 Thing
The Wellness Tribune
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
(HIDE THIS AD)
Americans Over 55 Are Replacing Hearing Aids for This New Device
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
ADVERTISEMENT (HIDE THIS AD)
Around the Web
Americans Over 55 Are Replacing Hearing Aids for This New Device
hear.com
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
Remember this face. This is Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s former top vaccine official.
In September 2021, Dr. Marks decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
(HIDE THIS AD)
Around the Web
Foot Neuropathy is Connected to One Everyday Drink. Do You Consume It?
The Wellness Tribune
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Peter Marks: Image via Wikipedia
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
Audiologists Rank 17 Hearing Aids. Top Pick Shocks All
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
So, health officials decided to let people die from devastating side effects and bury the data because it was too inconvenient to take head-on.
(HIDE THIS AD)
Around the Web
Audiologists Tested 17 Hearing Aids. Here’s The Best
hear.com
People should be going to jail for this.
Everything I just outlined comes directly from this hearing and the official Subcommittee investigation. If you want to see it for yourself, watch the full hearing or read the full report below.
hear.com