HomeMy WebLinkAboutANDERSON BROTHERS DRAFT EMAILChuck and Pete,
For your review before I send to Dave (Pete, see his last email with preference for mini storage)
Hi Dave,
We have a possible (the process is discretionary) path forward if you would still like to have a ministorage building. The process would involve approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to allow for your structure to be built as proposed. This is per the Development Agreement. In addition, this CUP would also cover the two nearby storage buildings that, while we will
continue to search for past approvals/building permits, if we cannot find them and unless you provide evidence of building permits for these two buildings, they would also be permitted
in conjunction with the CUP.
The CUP would have to undergo environmental review and the cost for such a CUP is: $6,163.69 and if there is any time beyond the allotted 16 hours for planning, there would be additional
billing. The CUP process takes 3-6 months.
If you proposed retail/warehouse we would need a new floor plan and Environmental Health clearance. The new floor plan must show the conditioned retail space and separate warehouse space.
Each unit must have its own retail space. A rough estimate of the projected County Wide Impact fees for a floor plan that shows 1000 square feet of retail (total) and 5000 square feet
of warehousing (total) is approximately $36,000.
Let me know how you want to move forward, if you have any questions let me know.
Thanks,
Tristan Weems, Assistant Planner
Department of Development Services
7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
T: 530.538.2953 (direct) or 530.538.7601 (main) | F: 530.538.7785
Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Join DDS Email List
-----Original Message-----
From: David Anderson [mailto:andersondj2@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 9:45 AM
To: Weems, Tristan <tweems@buttecounty.net>
Cc: Thistlethwaite, Charles <cthistlethwaite@buttecounty.net>; Calarco, Pete <PCalarco@buttecounty.net>
Subject: Re: 13631 anderson brothers drive new building uses
Thank you.
I personally still think that mini storage is the best use and fits in the best with the existing area and existing uses.
Thanks again
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Weems, Tristan <tweems@buttecounty.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> At this point we are determining if the suggested uses noted by your broker apply to the Development Agreement (attached). FYI, the G-C zone does not apply, it is the Development Agreement
that controls this lot.
>
> If we find that the uses are compatible, then there is the issue of County Wide Impact Fees, which have yet to be determined and can be expensive for retail space. We will run some
numbers for you.
>
> There may also be an option for a Use Permit to allow for the proposed structure (as storage). These are the two scenarios we are working with.
>
> I will keep you updated as things progress,
>
> Thanks for your patience,
>
> Tristan Weems, Assistant Planner
> Department of Development Services
> 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
> T: 530.538.2953 (direct) or 530.538.7601 (main) | F: 530.538.7785
> Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Join DDS Email List
>
> From: David Anderson [mailto:andersondj2@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:46 PM
> To: Weems, Tristan <tweems@buttecounty.net>
> Subject: 13631 anderson brothers drive new building uses
>
> Tristan, Please see the attached letter from our commercial real estate broker. These would be some of the uses we would be marketing towards which would include the uses I described
in my 2010 letter to Chris Thomas.
> We have ordered our new building several weeks ago based on the letter I sent Chris thomas and his response. This building is already designed and manufactured and ready for delivery.
> I really need to get this project moving forward and think that I can make it work with these kind of tenants .
> Please let me know if you need anything further.
> Thank you for your help,
>
> <Development Agreement, Anderson Brothers, APN# 047-270-027.pdf>