HomeMy WebLinkAboutChapter 11 - Mineral ResourcesChapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
1
CHAPTER 11: MINERAL RESOURCES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
11.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................2
11.2 GENERAL GEOLOGIC SETTING OF BUTTE COUNTY...........................................................................2
11.3 MINERAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................................................3
REGIONAL OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................................................3
MINERAL RESOURCES: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ....................................................................................................3
MINING IN BUTTE COUNTY .......................................................................................................................................4
MINERAL RESOURCES: EXISTING POLICIES ...............................................................................................................7
MINERAL RESOURCES: PRESENT MINING ACTIVITIES ...............................................................................................9
MINERAL RESOURCES: POTENTIAL .........................................................................................................................10
Rock Resources..................................................................................................................................................10
Gold Resources..................................................................................................................................................11
Soil Resources....................................................................................................................................................12
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 11-1 ACTIVE MINES IN BUTTE COUNTY ...........................................................................................................10
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 11-1: MINING ACTIVITIES..................................................................................................................................6
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
2
11.1 INTRODUCTION
The topography of Butte County varies dramatically from the gentle flatlands of the Sacramento
River Valley in the western part of the county to the rugged foothills of the Sierra Nevada in the
eastern portion of the county. This diversity on the surface of the land expresses the complexity
of the geology underneath it. That complexity determines the location of mineral resources. It
also determines other factors, such as how various geologic hazards may threaten life and
property, groundwater supplies, climate, flooding hazards, and others that are described in other
chapters of this document.
11.2 GENERAL GEOLOGIC SETTING OF BUTTE COUNTY
The western portion of Butte County is part of the Great Valley geomorphic province. The Great
Valley province is the geologic term for the Central Valley of California, which is drained by the
Sacramento River in the North and the San Joaquin River in the south. The Central Valley
extends nearly 500 miles north and south, and averages about 40 miles in width between the
Coast Ranges on the west and the Sierra Nevada and Cascades on the east. Geologically, the
Great Valley province is characterized by great thicknesses of generally flat-lying sedimentary
rocks overlain by soils that were deposited by floods or runoff. These deposits are called
“alluvium.” In Butte County the soils range in thickness from a few inches near the foothills to
more than 200 feet near the Sacramento River. Also, the sedimentary rocks of the Great Valley
province are relatively flat and dip gently west to southwest with only minor faults and folds that
run parallel to the structural trend of the valley and the Sierra Nevada.
Much of the eastern portion of Butte County is part of the Sierra Nevada geomorphic province.
The Sierra foothills in Butte County are rather complex geologically, and contain a wide variety
of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks. The metamorphic base rocks of the Sierra
Nevada have been subjected to intense folding and faulting which has produced an area of
steeply eastwardly dipping, northwesterly striking bedrock series through the center of the Sierra.
These bedrock series are bounded on both the west and east sides by zones of active or
potentially active faults. In eastern Butte County, granites have been pushed into these
metamorphic rocks in a process called “intrusion.” The contacts between the intruded granites
and the older metamorphic rocks are usually marked by faults.
The northernmost part of Butte County, near Jonesville, is part of the Cascade Range
geomorphic province. This geomorphic province is characterized by major volcanoes, including
Mount Lassen. Lava flows and other volcanic deposits compose most of the surface materials in
this province.
Each of these areas has a distinct geologic history. The eastern half of Butte County lies in that
part of the Sierra Nevada that is comprised of strongly deformed and metamorphosed rocks of
Paleozoic age intruded by a granitic batholith of Mesozoic age. Large clumps of granite rock that
lay under the earth until they were exposed by erosion, called plutons, probably of Cretaceous or
earlier age, intrude the metamorphic rock with mineralization that often shows along the veins
and seams of gold-bearing quartz that intruded the fissures and joints of the granitic rock.
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
3
From the beginning of the Cretaceous period, the upthrust rocks of the eastern half of Butte
County were eroded, and the resulting rock and silt flowed down into the Sacramento Valley. In
the western half of the county the rocks of the Central Valley are primarily flat-lying Cretaceous,
Eocene, and younger formations, consisting of shale, sandstone, conglomerate, and volcanic rock
that overlap the older metamorphic series. Older alluvial deposits occur as nearly flat plain
deposits in the western portion of the county on the floor of the Sacramento Valley. The older
alluvium consists of moderately consolidated clay, silt, and sand. Alluvium covers much of the
valley floor and also occurs along many of the ancient, inactive streambeds and as the present
stream channels that drain into the valley from the mountains to the east. These deposits are
loose, unconsolidated, and consist of a mixture of boulders, gravel, sand, and lesser amounts of
silt, and can range from 10 to 50 feet in thickness. Intermixed with the rock debris are often
remnants of gold that was deposited in the mountains to the east and eroded away as the
mountains thrust upward.
11.3 MINERAL RESOURCES
The following section provides an overview of mineral and soil resources in Butte County that
are managed by County government.
Regional Overview
The majority of the area’s sand and gravel deposits occur in two regions, along the Sacramento
River and within a band running from north to south down the center of the county. Gravel in the
Sacramento River is no longer extensively mined, due to environmental constraints and the
difficulty of working in an area with a high water table. The county’s central “gravel belt”
comprises the transitional region where sediments washed down from the Sierra Nevadas into
the slower moving rivers of the flat valley. This is the region in Butte County where gravel
mining is most active. In the past, these residual gravel deposits were mined for their gold
content. However, today they are mined for their gravel and sand, to be used in combination with
portland cement or asphalt compounds in construction and road building. Sand and gravel
deposits are also mined for silica, used in the production of cleansers, abrasives, and toothpaste.
In California sand and gravel has an economic value many times larger than that of all other
minerals mined statewide, including gold. However, gold mining has played a larger role in the
history of the state, and it remains an important part of mining in Butte County. The gold found
in Butte County is often mined with sand and gravel operations. However, there are many
historic gold mines located in the eastern part of the county that are operating, and many more
that have yet to be discovered or are not economically feasible to operate.
Mineral Resources: Historical Perspective
From a historical perspective, gold and gravel have played an important role in the development
of Butte County. Although it is the gold that originally attracted people to the Sierra foothill
region of Butte County, the economic value and widespread use of sand and gravel today is more
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
4
important and of greater value than gold mining. Gold can be traced back to the old Tertiary river
beds and the quartz veins formed in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, the primary source of all gold
in the region. Therefore, where gravel deposits exist, there is a high probability of finding placer
gold.
Mining activities carried out during California’s Gold Rush days were conducted with little or no
regard for the environment. Mountains and streams were altered by hydraulic mining and manual
labor. Some of the most productive Tertiary channel deposits of gold in the state have been
found in Butte County, including the Magalia, Cherokee, and Bangor-Wyandotte districts. The
largest true nugget of native gold in California was the Willard, Dogtown, or Magalia nugget
found in Magalia in 1859, weighing 54 pounds troy. Famous gold mining regions of Butte
County include: Bangor, Bidwell Bar, Butte Creek, Cherokee, Clipper Mills, Concow,
Forbestown, Honcut, Inskip, Kimshew, Magalia, Morris Ravine, Oroville, Wyandotte, and
Yankee Hill. These communities originally sprang up around gold mining. Many of these
historic gold regions are now mining the residual sand and gravel resources, with the extraction
of gold as a secondary operation.
Mining in Butte County
Mining activities in Butte County focus on three industries: sand and gravel, stone, and gold.
Table 11-1 contains a list of active mines in the county. Figure 11-1 shows mining activities in
Butte County. Although other mineral resources have been or are extracted in Butte County, sand
and gravel, stone, and gold play the greatest role in the county’s economy.
Aggregate resources are used extensively in all types of construction: residential, commercial
and industrial, roads and highways, dams, and bridges. As of 2003 the California Geological
Survey has not conducted a study to determine the amount of demand for aggregate resources in
Butte County. However, a general rule is that the demand for aggregate resources will essentially
parallel a region’s growth rate. There are no specific studies of per-capita consumption of
aggregate resources in Butte County. California Geological Survey studies in the Central Valley
in the 1990s show that the rate of consumption varies between 5 and 10 tons per person,
averaging about 7.5 tons per person.
Butte County had an estimated population of 182,120 in 1990 and 203,171 in 2000, representing
a growth rate of 11.6 percent over the decade. Therefore, assuming a demand for aggregate that
roughly parallels a region’s growth rate, it is reasonable to predict a continuing high demand for
aggregate resources in Butte County. The mining of aggregate and rock resources provides a
regionally significant source of construction materials within a close proximity to a local need.
Because sand, rock, and gravel are expensive to transport, construction and development are
aided when substantial quantities of these materials exist close by.
The primary economic benefit to the county from aggregate resources comes from property and
sales taxes. Property taxes are set by Proposition 13 throughout the state at approximately 1
percent of a parcel’s appraised value. If the parcel contains mineral resources, the County
imposes minimal additional property taxes. These taxes are assessed according to the proven
reserves of minerals or in terms of the economic value of the resource in the market.
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
5
The county also benefits from mining activity through sales taxes. A sales tax is usually levied at
the general sales tax rate based on 6 percent of the total sales dollars. Of the 6 percent sales tax,
only 1.25 percent is returned to the County. The remainder is kept by the State. Of the 1.25
percent that goes to the County, 0.25 percent is allotted to public transit in Butte County, leaving
1 percent for discretionary use by the County. It should also be noted that a sales tax is incurred
only when a sale is made to the public, not when a raw material is sold to a producer who
processes a raw material into a salable product.
Butte County also benefits from jobs in mining. Although the commercial extraction of sand and
gravel, hard rock, and gold are not labor intensive, it contributes to the county’s economic
output. However, the number of jobs associated with mining is minimal. Based on California
Employment Development Department projections from 1999 to 2006, the number of people
employed in construction and mining in Butte County will rise from 2,700 to 3,600 (statistics on
construction and mining are included together.) Based on the most accurate information
available to date, there are 18 full-time operative mines in Butte County. Of these mines, the
actual number of employees per mine is quite low, ranging from 1 to 20 employees, with an
average of 7 employees per facility.
32
99
70
191
162
70
162
99
32
PARADISE
OROVILLE
BIGGS
GRIDLEY
CHICO
MINING ACTIVI TIES
Figure 11-1
Butte County
General Plan
Miles02468101
Source: Butte County Department of Development Services, 2003Legend
ACTIVE MINES
Base Rock and Ballast Material
Base Rock and Rip Rap
Gold
Gravel
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Sand and Gravel and Base Rock
Lakes
Date printed: June 6, 2003
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
7
Mineral Resources: Existing Policies
Mining is often a source of controversy in local land use planning, as it has the potential to cross
a wide spectrum of environmental issues. These issues range from the compatibility of mining
with adjacent land uses, to its direct environmental impacts to air, water, biology, noise, geology,
aesthetics, traffic, archaeology, and public safety.
Many laws and regulations govern mineral exploration and extraction to protect against potential
adverse environmental consequences. These laws and regulations include local controls imposed
on a county-wide level, as well as state and federal regulations.
The most important mineral resource policies are found in the California’s Surface Mining and
Reclamation Act (SMARA). SMARA establishes a statewide policy for conservation and
development of mineral lands in California. It also provides requirements for a permit and
reclamation plan approval before conducting a surface mining operation. Under the Act, there is
no distinction between exploration and actual mining. Activities below the threshold defined by
the Act are exempt from regulation; those exceeding the threshold are regulated. These
regulations require the mine operator to obtain mining permits from local county governments
prior to initiating work.
The Butte County Department of Development Services carries out SMARA, regulating mining
activity through issuing a Conditional Use Permit, which may set out specific time limits and
conditions for both exploration and mining activities. The State directs counties to apply
SMARA policies to surface mining operations. These directives include policies on the conduct
of surface mining operations as well as specific measures to be employed in grading, backfilling,
resoiling, revegetation, soil compaction, soil erosion control, water quality and watershed
control, waste disposal, and flood control. State policies do not include aspects of regulating
surface mining operations that are solely of local concern, and not of statewide or regional
concern, such as hours of operation, noise, dust, fencing, and aesthetics. These factors are
normally administered and regulated by the local lead agency. SMARA does require that every
lead agency establish, in accordance with state policy, mineral resources management policies to
be incorporated in the general plan, including:
1) Recognition of the mineral classifications and information prepared by the State
Geologist;
2) Management of land use that affects areas identified as being of statewide and regional
significance; and
3) Emphasis on conservation and development of identified mineral resources.
SMARA contains specific provisions for the classification of mineral lands by the State
Geologist. Land is designated as Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ), including MRZ-1, MRZ-2,
MRZ-3, or MRZ-4. The most significant designation is MRZ-2, which is a designation of
mineral resources that are of regional or statewide significance. These classified lands and
designated areas ultimately must be recognized by the county in its general plan in order to adopt
appropriate and compatible land use designations, and to establish policies and implementation
programs for the conservation and development of these resources. The county’s land use
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
8
decisions involving areas designated as being of regional or statewide significance must be in
accordance with mineral resource management policies. It must also, in balancing mineral values
against alternative land uses, consider the importance of these minerals to their market region as
a whole, and not just their importance to the county’s area of jurisdiction.
SMARA also requires that a Reclamation Plan be prepared and approved by the county before
the initiation of mining operations. The purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to ensure that mined
lands are reclaimed to a condition that is readily adaptable for alternative land uses. A major goal
in requiring such a plan is to optimize subsequent land use at a reasonable cost, and to avoid the
legal and environmental problems created by abandoned mines. This process involves two basic
steps: 1) environmental restoration of the land to a condition whereby it can be adapted to a
second use, and 2) establishment of a second use for mined land (Sierra Economic Development
District and Sierra Planning Organization Mining Task Force 1985). Depleted sand and gravel
pits in California have been used in many ways. These uses include solid waste disposal, open
space for parks, land and water recreation, spreading basins for groundwater recharge through
percolation, and urban development.
The State Geologist has yet to map the mineral resources in Butte County. Although aggregate
resources are recognized as being regionally significant minerals, a specific map designating
where these resources occur and the associated MRZ-2 zoning designation has not been
prepared. In addition, a Mineral Resource Management Plan has not yet been adopted. To
remedy this situation, public or private entities can petition the State Geology Board to classify
specific lands that contain significant mineral deposits and that are threatened by land use
incompatibilities. Alternatively, Butte County could formally request that the State Board of
Geology map the entire county.
Since 1996, there have been several new requests for sand and gravel operations in Butte
County. A 42-acre gravel mine known as the Daimler Rock Quarry was approved in the Butte
Valley area on August 10, 2000. As of 2003, the County is considering a much larger proposal
located on the M&T Chico Ranch proposed by Baldwin Contracting Company, a subsidiary of
KRC Holdings Inc. to mine approximately 193 acres located adjacent to Little Chico Creek, five
miles southwest of Chico. This project proposes the extraction of 5.5 million cubic yards of
aggregate over a twenty to thirty-year period.
On March 28, 1994, the County received a Petition for Mineral Classification (DMG Open-file
Report 94-01) from the State Mines and Geology Board (SMGB) for the Greenrock Quarry near
Oroville (now known as Martin Marietta Materials, Table Mountain Quarry). This Petition
involves approximately 320 acres of land and is considered an active mine (California Mine ID
#91-04-0011). The SMGB concluded that part of this mine is classified as MRZ-2a for railroad
ballast. The remainder of the property has been classified as either MRZ-2b or MRZ-1 for
railroad ballast.
In 2001, the California Geological Survey gave an MRZ-2a designation to a portion of the Ord
Ferry Quadrangle, also known as the M&T Chico Ranch site. The property is leased by KRC
Holdings and its subsidiary, Baldwin Contracting, Inc. The Survey concluded that the aggregate
resources on this property exceeded a threshold value of $13.1 million dollars. Therefore the
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
9
property could receive the MRZ-2a designation. Though the precise market value and volume of
aggregate was proprietary information, the Survey’s report called the resources “significant high
quality construction aggregate resources.”
In accordance with Section 2762 (a) of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA), the
SMGB has accepted the classification of the minerals described in both reports, and has
transmitted the reports to the Butte County Planning Division, which is designated as the
SMARA Lead Agency. In accordance with this section, the Lead Agency must, within a 12
month period of receiving the Mineral Classification Reports, establish Mineral Resource
Management Policies to be incorporated in the General Plan that will serve to protect the mineral
resources and mining operations from incompatible land uses that might curtail or otherwise
impact mineral resource production.
Mineral Resources: Present Mining Activities
The status of mining activities in Butte County can be identified through the information in
Table 11-1. It shows a strong pattern of sand and gravel, stone, and placer gold as the
predominant mining activities, with limited amounts of lode gold and chromite (previously
mined). Table 11-1 describes the location, company, and status of 18 operating mines.
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
10
TABLE 11-1
ACTIVE MINES IN BUTTE COUNTY
Operator
Name Mine Name Status
Use
Permit
Number State ID #Product
Baldwin
Contracting Co.
Inc.Pentz Pit Intermittent 78-99 91-04-0001 Sand and Gravel
Duke Sherwood
Contracting Inc.Lucky 7 Pit Producing 94-63 91-04-0014 Sand and Gravel
Meridian
Aggregates
Table Mountain
Quarry Producing 84-37 91-04-0011 Stone-Blast
Robinson
Construction Co.
Inc.
Vance Avenue Pit
#1 and #2 Producing
77-96
92-43
91-04-0007
91-04-0021 Sand and Gravel
Granite
Construction
Oroville Wildlife
Area Pit Producing 89-58 91-04-0004 Sand and Gravel
Dunstone Rock
Quarry
Dunstone Rock
Quarry Seasonal 84-33 91-04-0019 Stone-Base
Donald Zandstra Carr Mine Inactive 84-27 9104-0013 Gold - placer
J. Michael Smith Blue Lead Mine Producing 81-43 91-04-0020 Gold - placer
Wilder, James D.Ohio-Dix Mine Producing 83-33 91-04-0010 Gold - placer
Franklin
Construction Inc.
Franklin
Construction
Comp.Active 93-01 91-04-0012 Sand and Gravel
Cherokee Mines Mineral
Resources, LCC Producing 93-36 91-04-0015 Silica
Diamler Rock, Inc.Diamler Rock
(Gunn)Producing 98-02 91-04-0028
Mathew ReadyMix Statelands Producing 86-38 91-04-0008
Anderson Brothers
Corp.
Pine Creek
Mine/Anderson
Brothers Producing 65-50 91-04-0025
Reggie Smart Pentz Aggregates Producing 80-74 None issued
Butte County
Public Works
Almond Ave.
Mine Producing Vested 91-04-0018
Bangor Rock
Quarry - Site A
and B Roy E. Ladd, Inc.Producing
81-105, 88-35, 88-
35A
91-04-0006
91-04-0002 Sand and Gravel
Source: Butte County Department of Development Services, 2003
Mineral Resources: Potential
Rock Resources
There are three categories of rock resource operations in Butte County. These categories include
Inchannel Resources, comprised of the Quaternary gravel present in surfacial quantities in stream
channels; Offchannel Resources or Terraces, involving the removal of sands and gravels which
have been overlaid by soils located adjacent to or within an active or ancient floodplain; and
Hardrock Operations, consisting of the removal of consolidated rock materials from higher
elevation mountains.
Aggregates extracted from both in-channel and off-channel sources are used extensively in all
types of construction. Raw materials are processed (washed, screened, crushed, graded,
classified, etc.) and sold as road base or sub-base in loose form and in a binding mixture with
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
11
cement or asphalt. One of the main difficulties with aggregate resources is transporting of
materials to a processing facility and the transporting of the final product to its prospective
market. Due to the sheer mass and weight of aggregate, transportation is expensive, and
centralized processing plants are not desirable. Gravel is generally mined in proximity to its
potential market. For this reason, aggregate from Butte County continues to be used primarily
within the county.
Hardrock operations occur primarily in areas of high topographic relief. Mining operations
consist of the removal of soils and weathered overburden, followed by the extraction and
processing of the hard unweathered bedrock. The rock is then crushed and sorted. The processed
quarry rock is used primarily for various road materials or mixed with asphalt. Other uses
include fill, drain rock, riprap, and decorative materials. The predominant use of hard rock in
Butte County is for base (such as for roadways or structures) or ballast (rock used for the base
material of a railroad track). The hardrock mining facilities now operating in Butte County
include Bangor Rock Quarry, Table Mountain Quarry, and Dunstone Quarry.
Gold Resources
Gold mining in Butte County takes a variety of forms, ranging from simple one-person
operations of gold panning and suction dredging to large scale commercial extraction and
processing operations. The main form of gold mining in Butte County is placer mining,
involving so-called placer deposits. A placer deposit is a mass of gravel, sand, or other similar
material resulting from erosion of solid rock and containing particles of gold. Placer mining
involves removing the surface gold bearing gravels, and either washing or chemically extracting
the gold ore from the gravel.
Buried placer deposits are located throughout the county and are not easily identified. Two of the
county’s best known buried placer deposits include one under the city of Paradise and one under
Table Mountain. Table Mountain contains a placer deposit buried under an ancient lava flow
which forms the flat top of the mountain. The area of Cherokee on the northwest side of Table
Mountain is the historic site of an old gold mining camp which used hydraulic blasting to wash
away the mountain’s walls to get to the gold-laden gravels. With mining restrictions and a
heightened environmental sensitivity, hydraulic blasting is no longer allowed. Instead, buried
placer deposits are obtained through drift mining, which involves digging into the ground and
tunneling horizontally to extract the gravels. The economics associated with drift mining are
restrictive, as it costs 5 to 10 times more to drift mine than to use an open pit mine. A large
quantity of high-quality gold is necessary in order for drift mining to be economically feasible.
The second kind of gold mining is called lode mining, referring to the Mother Lode, the veins of
gold embedded within subsurface rock material. Lode gold often involves open pit mines and the
blasting of mountains to expose the deep veins of gold. Examples of lode gold mines in Butte
County include the Gold Bank Mine (proposed), Hornet Mine (exploring), and Blue Lead Mine.
The development and improvement of cyanide heap leaching methods has greatly improved gold
production in the past 10 years. Use of cyanide to separate precious metals from waste rock is an
old technique practiced for a century, but it has only been in the past 20 years that the method
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
12
has been improved for use on high tonnage, low-grade deposits. There are currently no mines
using heap leach processing in the county.
Soil Resources
Soil is not normally defined as a mineral or an aggregate. However, it is also an important earth
resource. While some topsoil for fill and landscaping is mined in Butte County, soil is not mined
on a large scale for this purpose. More important is soil’s ability to produce and sustain
profitable food and fiber crops. Pound for pound, the crops that soil can produce are far more
valuable than the actual commercial value of the soil itself. For example, Butte County’s 2001
Crop Report stated that the total value of Butte County’s agricultural production was
$282,503,000. This makes Butte County’s soil an important local resource.
Modern agricultural practices have shifted over the years to include the widespread use of
pesticides, fertilizers, herbicides, and other chemical products. These chemicals can accumulate
and cause detrimental affects to the quality of soils and groundwater. In addition, irrigation
techniques, if not managed properly, can adversely affect the soil by leaching it of important
nutrients and organic material. This leaching effect essentially “strips” the soil of its ability to
produce crops requiring certain nutrients without the aide of soil additives. Soil leaching also
occurs through repeated cultivation of the same crop. Cultivation of a crop requires the
extraction of a specific combination of nutrients from the soil, and when this cultivation is
repeated year after year, it has a cumulative affect on the properties of the soil.
Soil reclamation activities in Butte County associated with agricultural stabilization and
conservation are more oriented toward the future development of agricultural lands than existing
soils problems. Since Butte County has elected not to create a Resource Conservation District,
regulation and enforcement of soil-related problems or implementation of reclamation and
conservation practices are left primarily up to individual property owners.
Soil problems are handled by the County Agricultural Commissioner and/or the U.S. Soil
Conservation Service office in Glenn County, which provides technical assistance as requested
by Butte County. Also, the County’s Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Services
(ASCS) and the University of California Extension Services have established erosion-reduction
programs for obtaining trees for reforestation, grass seed for erosion stabilization, and the
development of small reservoirs to divert livestock away from natural riparian corridors.
However, these projects are not mandatory, so the responsibility to protect and restore soil
resources falls on the individual land owner.
A majority of the agricultural related reclamation work in Butte County involves water,
specifically the use of water for rice field irrigation. The County Agricultural Commissioner and
the U. S. Soil Conservation Service work with farmers to install tail-water return systems,
irrigation systems that prevent the water used on a rice field from leaving the site. This system
prevents water containing pesticides and herbicides from entering off-site waterways. The tail-
water return system also recycles the irrigation water, thereby conserving water resources.
Chapter 11: Geology
Final Draft August 8, 2005
Butte County General Plan Background Report
13
The County’s role in regulating agricultural soil reclamation and conservation primarily involves
implementing the 1985 California Farm Bill, commonly known as the Swap-buster/Sod buster
Act. According to this act, all agricultural programs with government involvement occurring
after December 31, 1985 must submit a 1026 form to the Butte County ASCS. This form asks an
applicant to answer questions regarding the impacts on wetlands or highly erodible soils from
future agricultural activities. The ASCS forwards the application to the Soil Conservation
Service for its technical review and appraisal of the project. If the project has the potential to
adversely impact wetlands or highly erodible soils (thus the name Swamp-buster/Sod buster), the
Soil Conservation Service will disallow the project or work with the applicant to find appropriate
mitigation measures to ensure compliance and reduce erosion rates. The drawback of this
program is that it only applies to new agricultural development. Further, it only applies to
projects with some form of government intervention, i.e., subsidization or financial support, and
does not apply to other agricultural operations which may be involved in similar, possibly more
extensive, degradation to the county’s wetlands and highly erodible soils.